Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Water retention value predicts biomass recalcitrance for pretreated biomass: biomass water interactions vary based on pretreatment chemistry and reflect composition

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Cellulose Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Processing of lignocellulosic biomass is complex due to the heterogeneity of the substrate, but also due to lengthy unit operations, which complicates process control including for enzymatic saccharification. Methods for predicting enzymatic saccharification yield based on the properties of the pretreated biomass would be advantageous to process optimization and control. Biomass-water interaction measurements provide a method for quickly predicting biomass recalcitrance. Correlating water retention value (WRV) and enzymatic saccharification yield (ESY) on pretreated biomass has shown promise, especially when assessing only single biomass types pretreated with one specific chemistry. However, with comparisons between different types of biomasses, predictive powers have been low. We investigate the effect of pretreatment chemistry on the predictive power of WRV, when keeping the biomass static. Wheat straw was pretreated with dilute acid, hydrothermal, or alkaline chemistries at five different temperatures. Furthermore, low field nuclear magnetic resonance was used to measure water constraint in the pretreated materials, to better understand how biomass-water interactions change with pretreatment severity and chemistry. We show that the correlation of WRV and ESY is highly pretreatment dependent, while WRV strongly predicts ESY within each pretreatment chemistry. While ESY and WRV correlated under all chemistries, the direction of the correlations were divergent, suggesting a more complex interplay between recalcitrance and biomass-water interactions. Using T2 relaxation profiles, reductions in hemicellulose composition was related to the decrease in size of the most constrained water population present in the pretreated biomasses for all chemistries, suggesting a new identification of this population of constrained water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DA:

Dilute acid pretreatment

WRV:

Water retention value

AL:

Alkaline pretreatment

HT:

Hydrothermal pretreatment

ESY:

Enzymatic saccharification yield

T2 :

Spin–spin relaxation time

LF-NMR:

Low field nuclear magnetic resonance

ANN:

Artificial neural network

PCA:

Principal component analysis

NIR:

Near infrared spectroscopy

FTIR:

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

AFEX:

Ammonia fiber explosion pretreatment

ASE:

Accelerated solvent extractor

DM:

Dry matter

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

Britta Skov is thanked for reliable laboratory assistance, and Alan Lunde is acknowledged for collecting and sharing the wheat straw.

Funding

The work was financially supported by the EUDP project “Demonstration of 2G ethanol production in full scale, MEC” (Jr. no. 64015‐0642) funded by the Danish Energy Agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sune Tjalfe Thomsen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declares no conflicts of interest

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomsen, S.T., Weiss, N.D., Zhang, H. et al. Water retention value predicts biomass recalcitrance for pretreated biomass: biomass water interactions vary based on pretreatment chemistry and reflect composition. Cellulose 28, 317–330 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03507-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03507-w

Keywords

Navigation