Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 10, pp 5643–5658 | Cite as

Comparison between solid and liquid acids for production of low molecular weight chitosan using systematic DOE-based approach

  • Saurabh Patil
  • R. Akhil Krishnan
  • Shashank Bhangde
  • Prajakta Dandekar
  • Ratnesh Jain
Original Paper
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

Chitosan is an abundantly available biodegradable polymer with diverse applications in various chemical and biomedical industries. However, it has remained underutilized due to its bulky and intractable nature, limiting its application in various fields. The major drawback, however, is poor aqueous solubility and thus preparation of low molecular weight derivatives of chitosan (LMWC) is an ideal solution to overcome the drawbacks associated with the parent polymer. The present study reports a sustainable method to produce LMWC, using H-β Zeolite as a green catalyst in comparison to the traditional depolymerization methods, based on nitrous acid. Successful decrease in molecular weight from 1157 to 175 kDa was achieved as studied by gel permeation chromatography. Furthermore, spray drying assisted in achieving uniform sized particles of LMWC of size less than 100 µm. Integration of response surface methodology for process optimization led to the negligible formation of by-products like 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. Comparative investigations confirmed the consistency of the developed method, simultaneously presenting additional advantages such as catalyst reusability, process reproducibility and process safety. Our findings demonstrate a greener approach for preparation of consistent quality LMWC, by implementing systemic stratagem of design of experiments.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Chitosan H-β Zeolite Solid acid catalysis Response surface methodology Low molecular weight chitosan 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to University Grants Commission for the UGC-SAP fellowship [F.25-1/2014-15 (BSR)/No. F.8-10/2007(BSR)] and [F.4-1/2006 (BSR)/8-10/2007(BSR)] for financial support. The authors would like to acknowledge DST-Nanomission (Sanction No. SR/NM/NS-1145/2012) for the zetasizer instrument and DST-FIST (Sanction No. SR/FST/ETII-058/2013 (C)) for Gel Permeation Chromatography. The authors are also very thankful to Nano-xpert technologies for technical support and providing gift sample of solid acid. Special thanks to Tejal Pant and Manish Gore for assistance in drafting the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10570_2018_1986_MOESM1_ESM.doc (922 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 922 kb)

References

  1. Allan GG, Peyron M (1995) Molecular weight manipulation of chitosan II: prediction and control of extent of depolymerization by nitrous acid. Carbohydr Res 277:273–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bezerra MA, Santelli RE, Oliveira EP, Villar LS, Escaleira LA (2008) Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta 76:965–977CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Camblor M, Corma A, Valencia S (1998) Characterization of nanocrystalline zeolite Beta. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 25:59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chopra S, Patil GV, Motwani SK (2007) Release modulating hydrophilic matrix systems of losartan potassium: optimization of formulation using statistical experimental design. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 66:73–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dimitrijevic R, Lutz W, Ritzmann A (2006) Hydrothermal stability of zeolites: determination of extra-framework species of HY faujasite-type steamed zeolite. J Phys Chem Solids 67:1741–1748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ding L, Zheng Y, Hong Y, Ring Z (2007) Effect of particle size on the hydrothermal stability of zeolite beta. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 101:432–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Domard A, Rinaudo M (1983) Preparation and characterization of fully deacetylated chitosan. Int J Biol Macromol 5:49–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Focher B, Naggi A, Torri G, Cosani A, Terbojevich M (1992) Chitosans from Euphausia superba. 2: characterization of solid state structure. Carbohydr Polym 18:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frey DD, Engelhardt F, Greitzer EM (2003) A role for “one-factor-at-a-time” experimentation in parameter design. Res Eng Des 14:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guinesi LS, Cavalheiro ETG (2006) The use of DSC curves to determine the acetylation degree of chitin/chitosan samples. Thermochim Acta 444:128–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guisnet M, Magnoux P (1997) Deactivation by coking of zeolite catalysts. Prevention of deactivation. Optimal conditions for regeneration. Catal Today 36:477–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. He P, Davis SS, Illum L (1999) Chitosan microspheres prepared by spray drying. Int J Pharm 187:53–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang Y-B, Fu Y (2013) Hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose by solid acid catalysts. Green Chem 15:1095–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kas HS (1997) Chitosan: properties, preparations and application to microparticulate systems. J Microencapsul 14:689–711CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim S-K (2010) Chitin, chitosan, oligosaccharides and their derivatives: biological activities and applications. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim S-K, Rajapakse N (2005) Enzymatic production and biological activities of chitosan oligosaccharides (COS): a review. Carbohydr Polym 62:357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kittur F, Prashanth KH, Sankar KU, Tharanathan R (2002) Characterization of chitin, chitosan and their carboxymethyl derivatives by differential scanning calorimetry. Carbohydr Polym 49:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krishnan RA et al (2016) Proton play in the formation of low molecular weight chitosan (LWCS) by hydrolyzing chitosan with a carbon based solid acid. Carbohydr Polym 151:417–425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar MNR (2000) A review of chitin and chitosan applications. React Funct Polym 46:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar MR, Muzzarelli RA, Muzzarelli C, Sashiwa H, Domb A (2004) Chitosan chemistry and pharmaceutical perspectives. Chem Rev 104:6017–6084CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumar ABV, Varadaraj MC, Gowda LR, Tharanathan RN (2007) Low molecular weight chitosans—preparation with the aid of pronase, characterization and their bactericidal activity towards Bacillus cereus and Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Gen Subj 1770:495–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumirska J, Czerwicka M, Kaczyński Z, Bychowska A, Brzozowski K, Thöming J, Stepnowski P (2010) Application of spectroscopic methods for structural analysis of chitin and chitosan. Mar Drugs 8:1567–1636CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee S-B, Jeong G-T (2015) Catalytic conversion of chitosan to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural under low temperature hydrothermal process. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 176:1151–1161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Li J, Du Y, Yang J, Feng T, Li A, Chen P (2005) Preparation and characterisation of low molecular weight chitosan and chito-oligomers by a commercial enzyme. Polym Degrad Stab 87:441–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu S-b, Wu J-F, Ma L-J, Tsai T-C, Wang I (1991) On the thermal stability of zeolite beta. J Catal 132:432–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu L, Wang X, Zou H, Yu M, Xie W (2017) Optimizing synthesis parameters of short carbon fiber reinforced polysulfonamide composites by using response surface methodology. Polym Test 59:355–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mao S, Shuai X, Unger F, Simon M, Bi D, Kissel T (2004) The depolymerization of chitosan: effects on physicochemical and biological properties. Int J Pharm 281:45–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Motwani SK, Chopra S, Talegaonkar S, Kohli K, Ahmad FJ, Khar RK (2008) Chitosan–sodium alginate nanoparticles as submicroscopic reservoirs for ocular delivery: formulation, optimisation and in vitro characterisation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 68:513–525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Moura FA, Macagnan FT, Silva LP (2015) Oligosaccharide production by hydrolysis of polysaccharides: a review. Int J Food Sci Technol 50:275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nikolla E, Román-Leshkov Y, Moliner M, Davis ME (2011) “One-pot” synthesis of 5-(hydroxymethyl) furfural from carbohydrates using tin-beta zeolite. Acs Catal 1:408–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nobandegani MS, Birjandi MRS, Darbandi T, Khalilipour MM, Shahraki F, Mohebbi-Kalhori D (2016) An industrial Steam Methane Reformer optimization using response surface methodology. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 36:540–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Onda A, Ochi T, Yanagisawa K (2008) Selective hydrolysis of cellulose into glucose over solid acid catalysts. Green Chem 10:1033–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paudel A, Worku ZA, Meeus J, Guns S, Van den Mooter G (2013) Manufacturing of solid dispersions of poorly water soluble drugs by spray drying: formulation and process considerations. Int J Pharm 453:253–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Paulo F, Santos L (2017) Design of experiments for microencapsulation applications: a review. Mater Sci Eng C 77:1327–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prashanth KH, Tharanathan R (2005) Depolymerized products of chitosan as potent inhibitors of tumor-induced angiogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Gen Subj 1722:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rabea EI, Badawy ME-T, Stevens CV, Smagghe G, Steurbaut W (2003) Chitosan as antimicrobial agent: applications and mode of action. Biomacromolecules 4:1457–1465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rinaldi R, Palkovits R, Schüth F (2008) Depolymerization of cellulose using solid catalysts in ionic liquids. Angew Chem Int Ed 47:8047–8050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosatella AA, Simeonov SP, Frade RF, Afonso CA (2011) 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) as a building block platform: biological properties, synthesis and synthetic applications. Green Chem 13:754–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sabnis S, Block LH (1997) Improved infrared spectroscopic method for the analysis of degree of N-deacetylation of chitosan. Polym Bull 39:67–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tsai G-J, Tsai M-T, Lee J-M, Zhong M-Z (2006) Effects of chitosan and a low-molecular-weight chitosan on Bacillus cereus and application in the preservation of cooked rice. J Food Prot 69:2168–2175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. van Strien RT, Gent JF, Belanger K, Triche E, Bracken MB, Leaderer BP (2004) Exposure to NO2 and nitrous acid and respiratory symptoms in the first year of life. Epidemiology 15:471–478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Vasilieva T et al (2017) Formation of low molecular weight oligomers from chitin and chitosan stimulated by plasma-assisted processes. Carbohydr Polym 163:54–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang J, Xu W, Ren J, Liu X, Lu G, Wang Y (2011) Efficient catalytic conversion of fructose into hydroxymethylfurfural by a novel carbon-based solid acid. Green Chem 13:2678–2681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ward JW (1970) The nature of active sites on zeolites. J Catal 17:355–358.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(70)90111-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weitkamp J (2000) Zeolites and catalysis. Solid State Ion 131:175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Xu B, Sievers C, Hong SB, Prins R, van Bokhoven JA (2006) Catalytic activity of Brønsted acid sites in zeolites: intrinsic activity, rate-limiting step, and influence of the local structure of the acid sites. J Catal 244:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zheng B, Wen Z-S, Huang Y-J, Xia M-S, Xiang X-W, Qu Y-L (2016) Molecular weight-dependent immunostimulative activity of low molecular weight chitosan via regulating NF-κB and AP-1 signaling pathways in RAW264. 7 macrophages. Mar Drugs 14:169CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhou L, Liu Z, Bai Y, Lu T, Yang X, Xu J (2016) Hydrolysis of cellobiose catalyzed by zeolites—the role of acidity and micropore structure. J Energy Chem 25:141–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringInstitute of Chemical TechnologyMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and TechnologyInstitute of Chemical TechnologyMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations