Skip to main content
Log in

Three-body problem in modified dynamics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

General properties of the three-body problem in a model of modified dynamics are investigated. It is shown that the three-body problem in this model shares some characters with the similar problem in Newtonian dynamics. Moreover, the planar restricted three-body problem is solved analytically for this type of extended gravity and it is proved that under certain conditions, which generally happen at galactic and extragalactic scales, the orbits around \(L_{4}\) and \(L_{5}\) Lagrange points are stable. Furthermore, a code is provided to compare the behavior of orbits in the restricted three-body problem under Newtonian and modified dynamics. Orbit integrations based on this code show contrasting orbital behavior under the two dynamics and specially exhibit in a qualitative way that the rate of ejections is smaller in the modified dynamics compared to Newtonian gravity. These results could help us to search for observational signatures of extended gravities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://github.com/Shenavar/ThreeBodyinMOD.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Ramezan Ebrahimi for checking the equations in Sec. 3. Also, I appreciate fruitful discussions with members of the astronomy and astrophysics group, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. I appreciate helpful discussions with Elham Nazari on the nature of the problem of the binary systems. In addition, I benefited from comments and suggestions by the reviewers for which I am very grateful. (One comment helped me to find an error in Fig. 1 of the earlier version of this manuscript.) This research has made use of NASA’s Astrophysics Data System. The MATHEMATICA codes related to orbit integration are provided in my GitHub repository (https://github.com/Shenavar/ThreeBodyinMOD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Shenavar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Supplementary figures

Appendix A: Supplementary figures

See Figs. 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27.

Fig. 13
figure 13

The evolution of a test particle around two massive objects of \(m_{1}=10~ \mathcal {M}\) and \(m_{2}=7~ \mathcal {M}\) with the distance of \(d=20~ \mathcal {D}\). The evolution time is \(3000~\mathcal {T}\), the initial position of \(m_{3}\) is chosen randomly to be within \((x_{0}\pm 0.1x_{0},~y_{0} \pm 0.1y_{0})\) and this particle rotates initially in the opposite direction of \(m_{1} \) and \(m_{2}\)

Fig. 14
figure 14

The evolution of a test particle around two massive objects of \(m_{1}=10~ \mathcal {M}\) and \(m_{2}=7~ \mathcal {M}\) with the distance of \(d=20~ \mathcal {D}\). The evolution time is \(3000~\mathcal {T}\), the initial position of \(m_{3}\) is chosen randomly to be within \((x_{0}\pm 0.5x_{0},~y_{0} \pm 0.5y_{0})\) and this particle rotates initially in the opposite direction of \(m_{1} \) and \(m_{2}\)

Fig. 15
figure 15

The evolution of a test particle around two massive objects of \(m_{1}=10~ \mathcal {M}\) and \(m_{2}=7~ \mathcal {M}\) with the distance of \(d=20~ \mathcal {D}\). The evolution time is \(3000~\mathcal {T}\), the initial position of \(m_{3}\) is chosen randomly to be within \((x_{0}\pm x_{0},~y_{0} \pm y_{0})\) and this particle rotates initially in the opposite direction of \(m_{1} \) and \(m_{2}\)

Fig. 16
figure 16

The evolution of a test particle around two massive objects of \(m_{1}=10~ \mathcal {M}\) and \(m_{2}=3~ \mathcal {M}\) with the distance of \(d=20~ \mathcal {D}\). The evolution time is \(3000~\mathcal {T}\), the initial position of \(m_{3}\) is chosen randomly to be within \((x_{0}\pm 0.1x_{0},~y_{0} \pm 0.1y_{0})\) and this particle rotates initially in the same direction of \(m_{1} \) and \(m_{2}\)

Fig. 17
figure 17

The evolution of a test particle around two massive objects of \(m_{1}=10~ \mathcal {M}\) and \(m_{2}=3~ \mathcal {M}\) with the distance of \(d=20~ \mathcal {D}\). The evolution time is \(3000~\mathcal {T}\), the initial position of \(m_{3}\) is chosen randomly to be within \((x_{0}\pm 0.5x_{0},~y_{0} \pm 0.5y_{0})\) and this particle rotates initially in the same direction of \(m_{1} \) and \(m_{2}\)

Fig. 18
figure 18

The evolution of a test particle around two massive objects of \(m_{1}=10~ \mathcal {M}\) and \(m_{2}=3~ \mathcal {M}\) with the distance of \(d=20~ \mathcal {D}\). The evolution time is \(3000~\mathcal {T}\), the initial position of \(m_{3}\) is chosen randomly to be within \((x_{0}\pm x_{0},~y_{0} \pm y_{0})\) and this particle rotates initially in the same direction of \(m_{1} \) and \(m_{2}\)

Fig. 19
figure 19

The evolution of a test particle around two massive objects of \(m_{1}=10~ \mathcal {M}\) and \(m_{2}=3~ \mathcal {M}\) with the distance of \(d=20~ \mathcal {D}\). The evolution time is \(3000~\mathcal {T}\), the initial position of \(m_{3}\) is chosen randomly to be within \((x_{0}\pm 0.1x_{0},~y_{0} \pm 0.1y_{0})\) and this particle rotates initially in the opposite direction of \(m_{1} \) and \(m_{2}\)

Fig. 20
figure 20

The evolution of a test particle around two massive objects of \(m_{1}=10~ \mathcal {M}\) and \(m_{2}=3~ \mathcal {M}\) with the distance of \(d=20~ \mathcal {D}\). The evolution time is \(3000~\mathcal {T}\), the initial position of \(m_{3}\) is chosen randomly to be within \((x_{0}\pm 0.5x_{0},~y_{0} \pm 0.5y_{0})\) and this particle rotates initially in the opposite direction of \(m_{1} \) and \(m_{2}\)

Fig. 21
figure 21

The evolution of a test particle around two massive objects of \(m_{1}=10~ \mathcal {M}\) and \(m_{2}=3~ \mathcal {M}\) with the distance of \(d=20~ \mathcal {D}\). The evolution time is \(3000~\mathcal {T}\), the initial position of \(m_{3}\) is chosen randomly to be within \((x_{0}\pm x_{0},~y_{0} \pm y_{0})\) and this particle rotates initially in the opposite direction of \(m_{1} \) and \(m_{2}\)

Fig. 22
figure 22

The evolution of a test particle around two massive objects of \(m_{1}=10~ \mathcal {M}\) and \(m_{2}=1~ \mathcal {M}\) with the distance of \(d=20~ \mathcal {D}\). The evolution time is \(3000~\mathcal {T}\), the initial position of \(m_{3}\) is chosen randomly to be within \((x_{0}\pm 0.1x_{0},~y_{0} \pm 0.1y_{0})\) and this particle rotates initially in the same direction of \(m_{1} \) and \(m_{2}\)

Fig. 23
figure 23

The evolution of a test particle around two massive objects of \(m_{1}=10~ \mathcal {M}\) and \(m_{2}=1~ \mathcal {M}\) with the distance of \(d=20~ \mathcal {D}\). The evolution time is \(3000~\mathcal {T}\), the initial position of \(m_{3}\) is chosen randomly to be within \((x_{0}\pm 0.5x_{0},~y_{0} \pm 0.5y_{0})\) and this particle rotates initially in the same direction of \(m_{1} \) and \(m_{2}\)

Fig. 24
figure 24

The evolution of a test particle around two massive objects of \(m_{1}=10~ \mathcal {M}\) and \(m_{2}=1~ \mathcal {M}\) with the distance of \(d=20~ \mathcal {D}\). The evolution time is \(3000~\mathcal {T}\), the initial position of \(m_{3}\) is chosen randomly to be within \((x_{0}\pm x_{0},~y_{0} \pm y_{0})\) and this particle rotates initially in the same direction of \(m_{1} \) and \(m_{2}\)

Fig. 25
figure 25

The evolution of a test particle around two massive objects of \(m_{1}=10~ \mathcal {M}\) and \(m_{2}=1~ \mathcal {M}\) with the distance of \(d=20~ \mathcal {D}\). The evolution time is \(3000~\mathcal {T}\), the initial position of \(m_{3}\) is chosen randomly to be within \((x_{0}\pm 0.1x_{0},~y_{0} \pm 0.1y_{0})\) and this particle rotates initially in the opposite direction of \(m_{1} \) and \(m_{2}\)

Fig. 26
figure 26

The evolution of a test particle around two massive objects of \(m_{1}=10~ \mathcal {M}\) and \(m_{2}=1~ \mathcal {M}\) with the distance of \(d=20~ \mathcal {D}\). The evolution time is \(3000~\mathcal {T}\), the initial position of \(m_{3}\) is chosen randomly to be within \((x_{0}\pm 0.5x_{0},~y_{0} \pm 0.5y_{0})\) and this particle rotates initially in the opposite direction of \(m_{1} \) and \(m_{2}\)

Fig. 27
figure 27

The evolution of a test particle around two massive objects of \(m_{1}=10~ \mathcal {M}\) and \(m_{2}=1~ \mathcal {M}\) with the distance of \(d=20~ \mathcal {D}\). The evolution time is \(3000~\mathcal {T}\), the initial position of \(m_{3}\) is chosen randomly to be within \((x_{0}\pm x_{0},~y_{0} \pm y_{0})\) and this particle rotates initially in the opposite direction of \(m_{1} \) and \(m_{2}\)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shenavar, H. Three-body problem in modified dynamics. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 135, 19 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-023-10137-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-023-10137-4

Keywords

Navigation