Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Left ventricular output indices in hospitalized heart failure: when “simpler” may not mean “better”

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of left ventricular (LV) output in hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF) is important to determine prognosis. Although echocardiographic LV ejection fraction (EF) is generally used to this purpose, its prognostic value is limited. In this investigation LV-EF was compared with other echocardiographic per-beat measures of LV output, including non-indexed stroke volume (SV), SV index (SVI), stroke distance (SD), ejection time (ET), and flow rate (FR), to determine the best predictor of all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with HF. A final cohort of 350 consecutive patients hospitalized with HF who underwent echocardiography during hospitalization was studied. At a median follow-up of 2.7 years, 163 patients died. Non-survivors at follow-up had lower SD, SVI and SV, but not ET, FR and LV-EF than survivors. At multivariate analysis, only age, systolic blood pressure, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and SVI remained significantly associated with outcome [HR for SVI 1.13 (1.04–1.22), P = 0.003]. In particular, for each 5 ml/m2 decrease in SVI, a 13% increase in risk of mortality for any cause was observed. SVI is a powerful prognosticator in HF patients, better than other per-beat measures, which may be simpler but partial or incomplete descriptors of LV output. SVI, therefore, should be considered for the routine echocardiographic evaluation of patients hospitalized with HF to predict prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ambrosy AP, Fonarow GC, Butler J et al (2014) The global health and economic burden of hospitalizations for heart failure. Lessons learned from hospitalized heart failure registries. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:1123–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cameli M, Mondillo S, Solari M et al (2016) Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular systolic function: from ejection fraction to torsion. Heart Fail Rev 21:77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Park JJ, Park J-B, Park J-H, Cho G-Y (2018) Global longitudinal strain to predict mortality in patients with acute heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 71:1947–1957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mele D, Pestelli G, Dal Molin D et al (2020) Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular output in heart failure patients: a per-beat or per-minute approach? J Am Soc Echocardiogr 33:135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldman JH, Schiller NB, Lim DC, Redberg RF, Foster E (2001) Usefulness of stroke distance by echocardiography as a surrogate marker of cardiac output that is independent of gender and size in a normal population. Am J Cardiol 87:499–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shigematsu Y, Hamada M, Kokubu T (1988) Significance of systolic time intervals in predicting prognosis of primary pulmonary hypertension. J Cardiol 18:1109–1114

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sztrymf B, Günther S, Artaud-Macari E et al (2013) Left ventricular ejection time in acute heart failure complicating precapillary pulmonary hypertension. Chest 144:1512–1520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Biering-Sørensen T, Mogelvang R, Søgaard P et al (2013) Prognostic value of cardiac time intervals by tissue Doppler imaging M-mode in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6:457–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Migrino RQ, Mareedu R, Eastwood D, Bowers M, Harmann L, Hari P (2009) Left ventricular ejection time on echocardiography predicts long-term mortality in light chain amyloidosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:1396–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Biering-Sørensen T, Roca GQ, Hegde SM et al (2018) Left ventricular ejection time is an independent predictor of incident heart failure in a community-based cohort. Eur J Heart Fail 20:1106–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saeed S, Senior R, Chahal NS et al (2017) Lower transaortic flow rate is associated with increased mortality in aortic valve stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:912–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vamvakidou A, Jin W, Danylenko O, Chahal N, Khattar R, Senior R (2019) Low transvalvular flow rate predicts mortality in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis following aortic valve intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12:1715–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD et al (2016) 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 37:2129–2200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ et al (2017) 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 38:2739–2791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:233–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP et al (2016) Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17:1321–1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mele D, Andrade A, Bettencourt P, Moura B, Pestelli G, Ferrari R (2020) From left ventricular ejection fraction to cardiac hemodynamics: role of echocardiography in evaluating patients with heart failure. Heart Fail Rev 25:217–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shah KS, Xu H, Matsouaka RA et al (2017) Heart failure with preserved, borderline, and reduced ejection fraction: 5-year outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 70:2476–2486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leye M, Brochet E, Lepage L et al (2009) Size-adjusted left ventricular outflow tract diameter reference values: a safeguard for the evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:445–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis JF, Kuo LC, Nelson JG, Limacher MC, Quinones MA (1984) Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window. Circulation 70:425–431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tan C, Rubenson D, Srivastava A et al (2017) Left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral outperforms ejection fraction and Doppler-derived cardiac output for predicting outcomes in a select advanced heart failure cohort. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 15:18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhong Y, Almodares Q, Yang J, Wang F, Fu M, Johansson MC (2018) Reduced stroke distance of the left ventricular outflow tract is independently associated with long-term mortality, in patients hospitalized due to heart failure. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 38:881–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Omote K, Nagai T, Iwano H et al (2020) Left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral in hospitalized heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. ESC Heart Fail 7:167–175

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Tei C, Dujardin KS, Hodge DO, Kyle RA, Tajik AJ, Seward JB (1996) Doppler index combining systolic and diastolic myocardial performance: clinical value in cardiac amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:658–664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Reant P, Dijos M, Donal E et al (2010) Systolic time intervals as simple echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular systolic performance: correlation with ejection fraction and longitudinal two-dimensional strain. Eur J Echocardiogr 11:834–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Weissler AM, Harris WS, Schoenfeld CD (1968) Systolic time intervals in heart failure in man. Circulation 37:149–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Weissler AM, Peeler RG, Roehll WH Jr (1961) Relationships between left ventricular ejection time, stroke volume, and heart rate in normal individuals and patients with cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J 62:367–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chahal NS, Drakopoulou M, Gonzalez-Gonzalez AM, Manivarmane R, Khattar R, Senior R (2015) Resting aortic valve area at normal transaortic flow rate reflects true valve area in suspected low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 8:1133–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Harrison MR, Clifton GD, Sublett KL, DeMaria AN (1989) Effect of heart rate on Doppler indexes of systolic function in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 14:929–935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ristow B, Na B, Ali S, Whooley MA, Schiller NB (2011) Left ventricular outflow tract and pulmonary artery stroke distances independently predict heart failure hospitalization and mortality: the Heart and Soul Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:565–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. De Marco M, Gerdts E, Mancusi C et al (2017) Influence of left ventricular stroke volume on incident heart failure in a population with preserved ejection fraction (from the Strong Heart Study). Am J Cardiol 119:1047–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Boudoulas H (1990) Systolic time intervals. Eur Heart J 11(supplI):93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sengeløv M, Jørgensen PG, Jensen JS et al (2015) Global longitudinal strain is a superior predictor of all-cause mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 8:1351–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hsiao SH, Lin SK, Chiou YR, Cheng CC, Hwang HR, Chiou KR (2018) Utility of left atrial expansion index and stroke volume in management of chronic systolic heart failure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 31:650–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mele D, Pestelli G, Dini FL et al (2020) Novel echocardiographic approach to hemodynamic phenotypes predicts outcome of patients hospitalized with heart failure. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 13:e009939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Daniels SR et al (1997) Stroke volume and cardiac output in normotensive children and adults. Assessment of relations with body size and impact of overweight. Circulation 95:1837–1843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Adler AC, Nathanson BH, Raghunathan K, McGee WT (2012) Misleading indexed hemodynamic parameters: the clinical importance of discordant BMI and BSA at extremes of weight. Crit Care 16:471

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donato Mele.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 211 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mele, D., Pestelli, G., Smarrazzo, V. et al. Left ventricular output indices in hospitalized heart failure: when “simpler” may not mean “better”. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 37, 59–68 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01946-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01946-x

Keywords

Navigation