Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 140, Issue 3, pp 439–453 | Cite as

Green or Greed? An Alternative Look at CEO Compensation and Corporate Environmental Commitment

  • Claude Francoeur
  • Andrea Melis
  • Silvia Gaia
  • Simone Aresu
Article

Abstract

This study relies on environmental stewardship, a stakeholder-enlarged view of stewardship theory, and institutional theory to analyze the relationship between CEO compensation and firms’ environmental commitment in a worldwide sample of 520 large listed firms. Our findings show that environment friendly firms pay their CEOs less total compensation and rely less on incentive-based compensation than environment careless firms. This negative relationship is stronger in institutional contexts where national environmental regulations are weaker. Our findings have important theoretical meaning and practical implications. Results show that CEOs do not necessarily act opportunistically; rather some of them may be willing to act as stewards of the natural environment and accept a lower, less incentive-based compensation from environment friendly firms. This study also provides evidence of the important influence of the institutional context in setting-up CEO compensation as the relationship is stronger when national environmental regulations are weaker. Our findings question the universal validity of agency theory in explaining CEO compensation. Compensation based on pecuniary incentives might be less indicated to motivate CEOs who feel rewarded by playing a stewardship role for environment friendly firms. When designing compensation for CEOs, compensation committees and external compensation advisors should consider psychological and institutional factors that might affect CEO motivation.

Keywords

CEO compensation Corporate social performance Corporate social responsibility Environmental commitment Environmental regulations Stewardship theory 

References

  1. Aggarwal, R. K., & Samwick, A. A. (1999). Executive compensation, strategic competition, and relative performance evaluation: Theory and evidence. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), 1999–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447–465.Google Scholar
  3. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. (2003). Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Review of Economic Studies, 70(3), 489–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ben-Ner, A., Ren, T., & Paulson, D. F. (2010). A sectoral comparison of wage levels and wage inequality in human services industries. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20(10), 1–26.Google Scholar
  10. Benz, M. (2005). Not for the profit, but for the satisfaction?—Evidence on worker well-being in non-profit firms. Kyklos, 58(2), 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009a). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009b). The pros and cons of rewarding social responsibility at the top. Human Resource Management, 48(6), 959–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blome, C., & Paulraj, A. (2013). Ethical climate and purchasing social responsibility: A benevolence focus. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(3), 567–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brekke, K. A., & Nyborg, K. (2008). Attracting responsible employees: Green production as labor market screening. Resource and Energy Economics, 30(4), 509–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan, C. (2011). Vice or virtue? The impact of corporate social responsibility on executive compensation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(2), 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Callan, S. J., & Thomas, J. M. (2011). Executive compensation, corporate social responsibility, and corporate financial performance: a multi-equation framework. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(6), 332–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheng, E., & Courtenay, S. M. (2006). Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure. The International Journal of Accounting, 41(3), 262–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.Google Scholar
  20. Coombs, J. E., & Gilley, M. K. (2005). Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 827–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cordeiro, J. J., & Sarkis, J. (2008). Does explicit contracting effectively link CEO compensation to environmental performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(5), 304–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cuevas-Rodríguez, G., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Wiseman, R. M. (2012). Has agency theory run its course? Making the theory more flexible to inform the management of reward systems. Corporate Governance, 20(6), 526–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davis, J., Schoorman, F., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.Google Scholar
  24. Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Deckop, J. R., Merriman, K. K., & Gupta, S. (2006). The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 32(3), 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Deutsch, Y., & Valente, M. (2013). Compensating outside directors with stock: The impact on non-primary stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Agency theory or stewardship theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Driscoll, C., & Starik, M. (2004). The primordial stakeholder: Advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eesley, C., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8), 765–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eisenhardt, K. (1988). Agency- and institutional-theory explanations: The case of retail sales compensation. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 488–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Endrikat, J., Guenther, E., & Hoppe, H. (2014). Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: A meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. European Management Journal, 32, 735–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Esty, D., & Porter, M. (2005). National environmental performance: An empirical analysis of policy results and determinants. Environment and Development Economics, 10(4), 391–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Etzioni, A. (1986). The case for a multiple-utility conception. Economics and Philosophy, 2(02), 159–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fehr, E., & Falk, A. (2002). Psychological foundations of incentives. European Economic Review, 46(4–5), 687–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fernandes, N., Ferreira, M., Matos, P., & Murphy, K. (2013). Are U.S. CEOs paid more? New international evidence. Review of Financial Studies, 26(2), 323–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Filatotchev, I., & Allcock, D. (2010). Corporate governance and executive remuneration: A contingency framework. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(1), 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fiorino, D. J. (2006). The new environmental regulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Frank, R. H. (2003). What price the moral high ground? Ethical dilemmas in competitive environments. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Oxford: Pitman Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  42. Frey, B. S., & Jegen, R. (2001). Motivation crowding theory. Journal of economic surveys, 15(5), 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Frye, M. B., Nelling, E., & Webb, E. (2006). Executive compensation in socially responsible firms. Corporate Governance, 14(5), 446–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Godos-Díez, J. L., Fernández-Gago, R., & Martínez-Campillo, A. (2011). How important are CEOs to CSR practices? An analysis of the mediating effect of the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 531–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Grolleau, G., Mzoughi, N., & Pekovic, S. (2012). Green not (only) for profit: An empirical examination of the effect of environmental-related standards on employees’ recruitment. Resource and Energy Economics, 34(1), 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hall, B. J., & Liebman, J. B. (1998). Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 653–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hernandez, M. (2008). Promoting stewardship behavior in organizations: A leadership model. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hill, C., & Jones, T. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Holländer, H. (1990). A social exchange approach to voluntary cooperation. The American Economic Review, 80(5), 1157–1167.Google Scholar
  50. Ims, K. J., Pedersen, L. J. T., & Zsolnai, L. (2014). How economic incentives may destroy social, ecological and existential values: The case of executive compensation. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(2), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 371–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jensen, M., & Murphy, K. J. (1990). Performance pay and top management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jensen, M. C., Murphy, K. J., & Wruck, E. G. (2004). Remuneration: Where we’ve been, how we got to here, what are the problems, and how to fix them, Harvard Business School, Research Paper 04–28.Google Scholar
  55. Jobome, G. O. (2006). Management pay, governance and performance: The case of large UK nonprofits. Financial Accountability & Management, 22(4), 331–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jones, M. T. (1999). The institutional determinants of social responsibility the institutional determinants of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(2), 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jones, M. J. (2014). Accounting for biodiversity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Jones, T., & Wicks, A. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 208–221.Google Scholar
  60. Kock, C. J., Santaló, J., & Diestre, L. (2012). Corporate governance and the environment: What type of governance creates greener companies? Journal of Management Studies, 49(3), 492–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kopel, M. & Brand, B. (2013). Why Do Socially Concerned Firms Provide Low-powered Incentives to Their Managers? Working Paper.Google Scholar
  62. Lyon, T. and Maxwell, W. (1999). “Voluntary” approaches to environmental regulation: A survey. Social Science Research Network Electronic Library.Google Scholar
  63. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for A comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McGuire, J., Dow, S., & Argheyd, K. (2003). CEO incentives and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
  66. Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Miles, P., & Miles, G. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and executive compensation: Exploring the link. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(1), 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Miller, J. S., Wiseman, R. M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2002). The fit between CEO compensation design and firm risk. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 745–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Moriarty, J. (2009). How much compensation can CEOs permissibly accept? Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(2), 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Murphy, K. J. (1999). Executive compensation. Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, pp. 2485–2563). Princeton: North Holland.Google Scholar
  71. Nyborg, K., & Zhang, T. (2013). Is corporate social responsibility associated with lower wages? Environmental & Resource Economics, 55(1), 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (1992). Executive compensation, organizational effectiveness, social performance and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 19(1), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rosen, S. (1982). Authority, control, and the distribution of earnings. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P., & Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sen, A. (1987). On ethics and economics. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  77. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (2001). CEO compensation: Does it pay to be green? Business Strategy and the Environment, 10(3), 176–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (2003). CEO and ethical reputation: visionary or mercenary? Journal of Management Decision, 41(10), 1050–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397–415.Google Scholar
  81. Tirole, J. (2002). Rational irrationality: Some economics of self-management. European Economic Review, 46, 633–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tosi, H., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (1994). CEO Compensation monitoring and firm performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1002–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tosi, H. L., Werner, S., Katz, J. P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2000). How much does performance matter? A meta-analysis of CEO pay studies. Journal of Management, 26(2), 301–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). Quality of management and quality of stakeholder relations are they synonymous? Business and Society, 36(3), 250–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wasserman, N. (2006). Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 960–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wiseman, R. M., Cuevas Rodríguez, G., & Gomez Mejia, L. R. (2012). Towards a social theory of agency. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 202–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3), 229–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claude Francoeur
    • 1
  • Andrea Melis
    • 2
  • Silvia Gaia
    • 3
  • Simone Aresu
    • 2
  1. 1.HEC MontréalMontrealCanada
  2. 2.University of CagliariCagliariItaly
  3. 3.Essex Business SchoolUniversity of EssexColchesterUK

Personalised recommendations