Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 127, Issue 1, pp 65–85 | Cite as

Scandinavian Cooperative Advantage: The Theory and Practice of Stakeholder Engagement in Scandinavia

Article

Abstract

In this article, we first provide evidence that Scandinavian contributions to stakeholder theory over the past 50 years play a much larger role in its development than is presently acknowledged. These contributions include the first publication and description of the term “stakeholder”, the first stakeholder map, and the development of three fundamental tenets of stakeholder theory: jointness of interests, cooperative strategic posture, and rejection of a narrowly economic view of the firm. We then explore the current practices of Scandinavian companies through which we identify the evidence of relationships to these historical contributions. Thus, we propose that Scandinavia offers a particularly promising context from which to draw inspiration regarding effective company-stakeholder cooperation and where ample of examples of what is more recently referred to as “creating shared value” can be found. We conclude by endorsing the expression “Scandinavian cooperative advantage” in an effort to draw attention to the Scandinavian context and encourage the field of strategic management to shift its focus from achieving a competitive advantage toward achieving a cooperative advantage.

Keywords

Cooperative advantage Scandinavia Stakeholder theory Strategic management Sustainability Creating shared value 

References

  1. Ahlstedt, L., & Jahnukainen, I. (1971). Yritysorganisaatio yhteistoiminnan ohjausjärjestelmän. Helsinki: Weilin & Göös.Google Scholar
  2. Alkhafaji, A. F. (1989). A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Governance: Managing in a Dynamic Environment. New York: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  3. Alvesson, M. (2003). Critical organization studies. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), The Northern LightsOrganization Theory in Scandinavia (pp. 151–174). Malmo: Liber.Google Scholar
  4. Andersen, H. C. (2009). Works of Hans Christian Andersen: Mobile Reference, Available at http://books.google.dk/books?id=xuSy6icx2joC, retrieved 1 November 2012.
  5. Andersen, H. C. (2012), “I am a Scandinavian”, Available at http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/hans-christian-anderson?before=1340262393, retrieved 1 November 2012.
  6. Andersen, H.C. & Music (2012). I am a Scandinavian. Available at http://www2.kb.dk/elib/noder/hcamusik//skandinav/index_en.htm. Retrieved 1 November 2012.
  7. Andersen, J. G., & Hoff, J. (2001). Democracy and Citizenship in Scandinavia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  9. Archer, C., & Joenniemi, P. (2003). The Nordic Peace. Cornwall: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  10. Atkinson, A. A., Waterhouse, J. H., & Wells, R. B. (1997). A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 25–37.Google Scholar
  11. Audebrand, L. K. (2010). Sustainability in strategic management education: The quest for new root metaphors. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(3), 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ax, C., & Bjørnenak, T. (2005). Bundling and diffusion of management accounting innovations: The case of the balanced scorecard in Sweden. Management Accounting Research, 16(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Axelrod, R. (2006). The Evolution of Cooperation. Revised Edition. Cambridge: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Barnett, M. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 794–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Beauchamp, T. L., Bowie, N. E., & Arnold, D. G. (2009). Ethical Theory and Business (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Birchall, J. (2003). Rediscovering the cooperative advantage. Poverty reduction through self-help. Geneva: International Labour Office, Cooperative Branch.Google Scholar
  18. Bjerke, B. (1999). Business Leadership and Culture. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bondeson, U. (2003). Nordic moral Climates: Value Continuities and Discontinuities in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Bosse, D., Phillips, R., & Harrison, J. (2009). Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bowie, N. E. (1999). Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Boyden, J., Ling, B., & Myers, W. (1998). What Works for Working Children. Stockholm: Save the Children/UNICEF.Google Scholar
  23. Bruzelius, L. H., & Skärvad, P. H. (1974). Integrerad företagadminstration. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  24. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, 32(3), 946–967.Google Scholar
  25. Cardon, M. S., Zietsma, C., Saparito, P., Matherne, B., & Davis, C. (2005). A tale of passion: New insights into entrepreneurship from a parenthood metaphor. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Carlsson, R. H. (2002). Ownership and Value Creation: Strategic Corporate Governance in the New Economy. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  27. Carlsson, R. H. (2007). Swedish corporate governance and value creation: Owners still in the driver’s seat. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 1038–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Carroll, A. B. (1989). Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. Cincinnati: South-Western.Google Scholar
  29. Carroll, A. B., & Näsi, J. (1997). Understanding stakeholder thinking: Themes from a Finnish conference. Business Ethics: A European Review, 6(1), 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.Google Scholar
  31. Cooke, P. (2002). Knowledge economies: Clusters, learning and cooperative advantage. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Dagnino, G. B., & Padula, G. (2002). Coopetition strategy: a new kind of interfirm dynamics for value creation. In Innovative Research in Management, European Academy of Management (EURAM), vol 9, Second Annual Conference, Stockholm, May 9–11.Google Scholar
  35. Dahan, N. M., Doh, J. P., Oetzel, J., & Yaziji, M. (2010). Corporate-NGO collaboration: Co-creating new business models for developing markets. Long Range Planning, 43, 326–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.Google Scholar
  37. Derry, T. K. (1979). A History of Scandinavia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  38. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  39. Dorfman, P. W., Hanges, P. J., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2004). Leadership and cultural variation: The identification of culturally endorsed leadership profiles. In R. House, P. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (pp. 669–721). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Dyer, J., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategies and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.Google Scholar
  41. Engwall, L. Furusten, S., & Wallerstedt, E. (2002). The changing relationship between management consulting and academia: Evidence from Sweden. In M. Kipping, & L. Engwall (Eds.) Management Consulting: Emergence and Dynamics of a Knowledge Industry. (pp. 36–51) Oxford: Oxford.Google Scholar
  42. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Financial Times (2004, 14 September). IKEA’s grown-up plan to tackle child labour.Google Scholar
  44. Financial Times (2013, 20 March). Scandinavia: Model management. Available at www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e0f4bc0e-81c2-11e2-ae78-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2Pxxj2aFK. Retrieved 21 March 2013.
  45. Forbes (2012, 24 January). Ranking the world’s most sustainable companies. Available at http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacquelynsmith/2012/01/24/ranking-the-worlds-most-sustainable-companies. Retrieved 1 June 2012.
  46. Freeman, R. E. (1984/2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  47. Freeman, R. E. (2009a). Managing for stakeholders. In T. L. Beauchamp, N. E. Bowie, & D. G. Arnold (Eds.), Ethical Theory and Business (8th ed., pp. 56–68). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  48. Freeman, R. E. (2009b). Stakeholder theory: 25 years later. Philosophy of Management, 8(3), 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Freeman, R. E. (2010a). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. 25th anniversary reprint. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Freeman, R. E. (2010b). Managing for stakeholders: Trade-offs or value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 7–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J., & Wicks, A. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J., Wicks, A., Parmar, B., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Freeman, R. E., & Heed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 93–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Friedman, M. (1962/2002). Capitalism and Freedom. 40 th Anniversary Copy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  56. Friedman, M. (1970, 13 September). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.Google Scholar
  57. Friedman, M. (1986). Economists and economic policy. Economic Inquiry, 24(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Gjølberg, M. (2009). Measuring the immeasurable? Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Gjølberg, M. (2010). Varieties of corporate social responsibility (CSR): CSR meets the “Nordic Model”. Regulation and Governance, 4, 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Global Sustainable Competitiveness Index (2013). Compiled by SolAbility. Ilsan. Available at http://www.solability.com/pdfs/Sustainable_Competitiveness_Index_2013.pdf. Retrieved 19 April 2013.
  63. Grennes, T. (2003). Scandinavian managers on Scandinavian management. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 16, 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. H&M. (2012a) Stakeholder engagement overview: Engaging with our stakeholders. Available at http://about.hm.com/content/dam/hm/about/documents/en/CSR/Others/Stakeholder%20engagement%20overview_en.pdf. Retrieved 1 May 2012.
  65. Harris, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2008). The impossibility of the separation thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Herlin, H. & Pedersen, J. T. forthcoming. Corporate foundations: Catalysts of NGO-business partnerships? Journal of Corporate Citizenship.Google Scholar
  68. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Hydro (2002). Hydro and Amnesty International Norway sign cooperation agreement. Available at http://www.statoil.com/en/NewsAndMedia/News/2002/Pages/HydroAndAmnestyInternationalNorwaySignCooperationAgreement.aspx. Retrieved 16 July 2013.
  70. IKEA. (2012). Preventing child labor. Available at http://www.ikea.com/ms/en_US/about_ikea/our_responsibility/working_conditions/preventing_child_labour.html. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
  71. Jensen, M. (2002). Value maximizations, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2, 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of ManagementReview, 24, 206–221.Google Scholar
  73. Kakabadse, N. K., Rozuel, C., & Lee-Davies, L. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder approach: A conceptual review. Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(4), 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ketelhöhn, W. (1993). What do we mean by cooperative advantage? European Management Journal, 11(1), 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kjær, V (2012). A Nordic CSR policy framework. Keynote address. Global Compact Nordic Meeting. 1–2 October 2012. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  76. Lei, D., Slocum, J. W., & Pitts, R. A. (1997). Building cooperative advantage: Managing strategic alliances to promote organizational learning. Journal of World Business, 32(3), 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lind, J., & Rhenman, E. (1989). The SIAR school of strategic management. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 5(3), 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lorange, P., Løwendahl, B. R., & Revang, Ø. (2003). Scandinavian approaches to strategy—Combining competition and co-operation in practice. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), The Northern Lights: Organization Theory in Scandinavia (pp. 131–149). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  79. Maccoby, M. (Ed.). (1991). Sweden at the Edge: Lessons for American and Swedish Managers. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  80. Magretta, J. (2012). Understanding Michael Porter. The Essential Guide to Competition and Strategy. Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  81. Mason, R., & Mitroff, I. (1982). Challenge Strategic Planning Assumptions. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  82. McCallin, J. & Webb, T. (2004, January). Corporate Responsibility Progress in Scandinavia. Ethical Corporation.Google Scholar
  83. Michelsen, J. (1994). The rationales of cooperative organizations: Some suggestions from Scandinavia. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 65(1), 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Midttun, A., Gautesen, K., & Gjølberg, M. (2006). The political economy of CSR in Western Europe. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 6(4), 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Miles, S. (2012). Stakeholder: Essentially contested or just confused? Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Mintzberg, H. (2001). Foreword. In Richard Normann’s Reframing Business: When the Map Changes the Landscape. (pp. ix–xi) West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  87. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2009). Strategy Safari: The Complete Guide Through the Wilds of Strategic Management. London: Financial Times/Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  88. Mirvis, P., & Googines, B. (2006). Stages of corporate citizenship. California Management Review, 48(2), 104–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  90. Morsing, M., Midttun, A., & Palmås, K. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in Scandinavia—a turn towards the business case? In S. May, G. Cheney, & J. Roper (Eds.), The Debate Over Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 98–127). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Morsing, M., & Oswald, D. (2009). Sustainable leadership: Management control systems and organizational culture in Novo Nordisk A/S. Corporate Governance, 9(1), 83–99.Google Scholar
  92. Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Näsi, J. (1995a). A Scandinavian approach to stakeholder thinking: An analysis of its theoretical and practical uses, 1964–1980. In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding Stakeholder Thinking (pp. 97–115). Helsinki: LSR-Julkaisut Oy.Google Scholar
  94. Näsi, J. (1995b). What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of the social theory of the firm. In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding Stakeholder Thinking (pp. 19–32). Helsinki: LSR-Julkaisut Oy.Google Scholar
  95. Nordstrom, B. (2000). Scandinavia Since 1500. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  96. Norsk Hydro. (2012). Norsk Hydro Main Shareholders. Available at http://www.norskhydro.com/en/Investor-relations/The-Hydro-share/Shareholders/Shareholder-overview/. Retrieved 1 November 2012.
  97. Novo Nordisk. (2011, 16 June). The Triple Bottom Line—our way of doing business. Presentation by Susanne Stormer, Vice President, Global Triple Bottom Line Management, Novo Nordisk. Bagsværd, Denmark.Google Scholar
  98. Novo Nordisk. (2012). Stakeholder engagement. Available at: http://www.novonordisk.com/sustainability/stakeholder_engagement/stakeholder_engagement.asp. Retrieved 10 May 2012.
  99. Novo Nordisk Foundation. (2012). Ownership and Subsidiaries. Available at http://www.novonordiskfonden.dk/en/content/ownership-and-subsidiaries. Retrieved 1 November 2012.
  100. Novozymes. (2012). Stakeholder engagement. Available at: http://www.novozymes.com/en/sustainability/stakeholder-engagement/Pages/default.aspx. Retrieved 10 May 2012.
  101. Nowak, M., & Highfield, R. (2011). SuperCooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  102. Oliver, R. W. (1999). Real time strategy: Strategy as Sports! War!… Food? Journal of Business Strategies, 20(5), 8–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Pfeffer, J. (2005). Why do bad management theories persist? A comment on Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Philips, R. (2003). Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics. San Francisco: Berret Kohler Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  105. Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.Google Scholar
  106. Porter, M. (1979, March/April) How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  107. Porter, M. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  108. Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  109. Porter, M. & Kramer, M. (2011, January–February). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review. pp. 62–77.Google Scholar
  110. Post, J., Preston, L., & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Randøy, T., Thomsen, S., & Oxelheim, L. (2006). A Nordic perspective on corporate board diversity. Age, 390, 0-5428.Google Scholar
  112. Rhenman, E. (1963, July). Research Planning—A Complex Problem. Conference paper presentation at the 3rd International Conference on Operational Research. Oslo: Swedish Institute for Administrative Research publication SIAR-4. UDC 65.012.2.Google Scholar
  113. Rhenman, E. (1964). Företagsdemokrati och företagsorganisation. Stockholm: Thule.Google Scholar
  114. Rhenman, E. (1968). Industrial Democracy and Industrial Management. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  115. Rhenman, E. (1973). Organization Theory for Long-Range Planning. London: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  116. Rhenman, E., Strömberg, L., & Westerlund, G. (1970). Conflict and Cooperation in Business Organizations. London: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  117. Rhenman, E., & Stymne, B. (1965). Företagsledning i en föränderlig värld [Corporate Management in a Changing World]. Stockholm: Aldus/Bonniers.Google Scholar
  118. Rholin, L. (1972). Företagsekonomi—En första introduktion. Lund: Liber Laromdel.Google Scholar
  119. Rocha, H. O., & Ghoshal, S. (2006). Beyond self-interest revisited. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 585–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Rosenau, P. V. (2003). The Competition Paradigm, America’s Romance with Conflict, Contest, and Commerce. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  121. Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  122. Sinani, E., Stafsudd, A., Thomsen, S., Edling, C., & Randøy, T. (2008). Corporate governance in Scandinavia: Comparing networks and formal institutions. European Management Review, 5(1), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Sjöstrand, S. E. (1974). Organisationsteori. Lund: Hermods-Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  124. Skrabec, Q. R, Jr. (1999). Cooperative advantage—A new measure of performance. National Productivity Review, 18(2), 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Social Progress Index. (2013). Available at http://www.socialprogressimperative.org. Retrieved 25 April 2013.
  126. Stanford Faculty Profile. (2012). James E. Howell. Available at http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/facultyprofiles/biomain.asp?id=76653299. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
  127. Stanford Research Institute (SRI). (1963). Internal memorandum as cited in Freeman and Reed (1983) and Freeman (1984).Google Scholar
  128. Statoil. (2011). Statoil 2011 Annual Report: Major Shareholders. Available at http://www.statoil.com/annualreport2011/en/shareholderinformation/pages/majorshareholders.aspx. Retrieved 1 November 2012.
  129. Statoil. (2012). Statoil 2011 Annual report on Form 20F. Available at http://www.statoil.com. Retrieved 10 May 2012.
  130. Stormer, S. (2013, 7 April). Inaugural Lecture by Susanne Stormer, Vice President, Corporate Sustainability, Novo Nordisk and Adjunct Professor, Copenhagen Business School. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
  131. Strand, R. (2009). Corporate responsibility in Scandinavian supply chains. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Strand, R. (2011). Toward sustainable sustainability learning: Lessons from a US MBA study abroad program in Scandinavia. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 7(2), 41–63.Google Scholar
  133. Strand, R. (2013). The chief officer of corporate social responsibility: A study of its presence in top management teams. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(4), 721–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Strand, R. forthcoming. Scandinavian cooperative advantage: The case of IKEA. In Shiban Khan (Ed.), World Humanism: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Ethical Practices in Organizations. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  135. Stucke, M. E. (2008). Better competition advocacy. St. John’s Law Review, 82(3), 951–1036.Google Scholar
  136. Stymne, B. (2004). Traveling in the borderline of academy and industry. In N. Adler, A. B. Shani, & A. Styhre (Eds.), Collaborative Research in Organizations: Foundation for Learning, Change, and Theoretical Development (pp. 37–53). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. The Economist (2013, 2 February). Special Report: The Nordic Countries—The Northern Lights.Google Scholar
  138. Thomsen, S., & Conyon, M. (2012). Corporate Governance: Mechanisms and Systems. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  139. Thomsen, S., & Hansmann, H. (2009). The Governance of Industrial Foundations. Working paper. Available at http://webs2002.uab.es/dep-economia-empresa/recerca/DocsSem/S_Thomsen_22_4_10.pdf. Retrieved 1 November 2012.
  140. Vallentin, S. & Murillo, D. (2010). Government, Governance and Collaborative Social Responsibility. In: Tencati, A & Zsolnai, L. (Eds.) The Collaborative Enterprise (pp. 209–227). Peter Lang Publishers: Oxford, UK). Google Scholar
  141. Vandekerckhove, W. (2009). What managers do: Comparing Rhenman and Freeman. Philosophy of Management, 8(3), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. von Ghyczy, T. (2003, September). The Fruitful Flaws of Strategy Metaphors. Harvard Business Review. pp. 86–94.Google Scholar
  143. Walsh, J. P. (2005). Book review essay: Taking stock of stakeholder management. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 426–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Wang, L., Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2011). Economics education and greed. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(4), 643–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Werhane, P. H. (2000). Business ethics and the origins of contemporary capitalism: Economics and ethics in the work of Adam Smith and Herbert Spencer. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(3), 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Westenholz, A. (2006). Employee participation in the management of working life: An historical analysis focusing on Danish and Scandinavian conditions. International Review of Sociology—Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 16(1), 79–99.Google Scholar
  147. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.Google Scholar
  148. World Economic Forum (2013). Sustainability-Adjusted Global Competitiveness Index. Available at http://www.weforum.org/content/pages/sustainable-competitiveness. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
  149. Yaziji, M. (2004). Turning gadflies into allies. Harvard Business Review, 82(2), 110–115.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Copenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark
  2. 2.University of Virginia Darden School of BusinessCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations