Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Employees’ Reactions to Peers’ Unfair Treatment by Supervisors: The Role of Ethical Leadership

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little is known about employee reactions in the form of un/ethical behavior to perceived acts of unfairness toward their peers perpetrated by the supervisor. Based on prior work suggesting that third parties also make fairness judgments and respond to the way employees are treated, this study first suggests that perceptions of interactional justice for peers (IJP) lead employees to two different responses to injustice at work: deviant workplace behaviors (DWBs) and organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs). Second, based on prior literature pointing to supervisors as among the most important sources of moral guidance at work, a mediating role is proposed for ethical leadership. The article suggests that supervisors who inflict acts of injustice on staff will be perceived as unethical leaders, and that these perceptions would explain why employees react to IJP in the form of deviance (DWBs) and citizenship (OCBs). Data were collected from 204 hotel employees. Results of structural equation modeling demonstrate that DWBs and OCBs are substantive reactions to IJP, whereas ethical leadership significantly mediates reactions in the form of DWBs and OCBs. Behavioral ethics and managerial implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alicke, M. D. (1992). Culpable causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 368–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, M. L., Seabright, M. A., & Schminke, M. (2002). Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 947–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step-approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J. (1999). Full leadership development: Building the vital forces in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1998). Revenge in organizations: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In R. W. Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelly, & J. M. Collins (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations: Non-violent dysfunctional behavior (pp. 49–67). Stamford, CN: Jai Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., Tripp, T. M., & Kramer, R. M. (1997). At the breaking point: Cognitive and social dynamics of revenge in organizations. In R. A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations (pp. 18–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., & Dukerich, J. M. (2001). Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 471–499). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J. (1990). Scope of justice in the workplace: How survivors react to co-worker layoffs. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Teviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2005), 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsmith, K. M. (2006). The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 437–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, A. L., & Darley, J. M. (1973). Victim or perpetrator? Defensive attribution of responsibility and the need for order and justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 268–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloward, R. A. (1959). Illegitimate means anomie, and deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 24, 164–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffin, B. (2003). Breaking the silence on white collar crime. Risk Management, 50, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. K. (1965). The sociology of the deviant act: Anomie theory and beyond. American Sociological Review, 30, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. (1995). Ethics and crime in business firms: Organizational culture and the impact of anomie. In F. Adler & W. Laufer (Eds.), The legacy of anomie theory (pp. 183–206). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J., & Greenberg, J. (2003). Organizational justice: A fair assessment of the state of the literature. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (2nd ed., pp. 165–210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlon, D. E., Meyer, C. J., & Nowakowski, J. M. (2005). How does organizational justice affect performance, withdrawal, and counterproductive behaviour? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 301–327). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. (2002). Just punishments: Research on retributional justice. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 314–333). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. [1893 (1984)]. The division of labor in society, (W.D. Halls, Trans.). New York: Free Press.

  • Durkheim, E. [1897 (1951)]. Suicide: A study in sociology, (J. A. Spaulding, & G. Simpson, Trans.). New York: Free Press.

  • Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From Ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 659–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In S. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Research in social issues in management, pp. 3–31. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

  • Folger, R., Cropanzano, R., & Goldman, B. (2005). What is the relationship between justice and morality. In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt. Handbook of organizational justice, pp. 215–246. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Folger, R., & Skarlicki, D. P. (1998). A popcorn metaphor for workplace violence. In R. W. Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelly, & J. Collins (Ed.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations: Violent and deviant behavior, Vol. 23, pp. 43–81.

  • Gaudine, A., & Thorne, L. (2001). Emotion and ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(2), 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, A. (1998). Moral leadership and business ethics. In J. B. Ciulla (Ed.), Ethics, the heart of leadership (pp. 27–45). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1952). On cooling the mark out: Some aspects of adaptation to failure. Psychiatry, 15, 451–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informal classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (2002). Who stole the money and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 985–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gromet, D. M., Okimoto, T. G., Wenzel, M., & Darley, J. M. (2012). A Victim-centered approach to justice? Victim satisfaction effects on third-party punishments. Law and Human Behavior, 36(5), 375–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. E. (1990). Methodological problems and policy implications in sexual harassment research. Population Research and Policy Review, 9, 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, R. (1999). Organizational anomie and worker consent. Work and Occupations, 26(August), 292–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R. C., & Clark, J. P. (1982). Deterrence in the workplace: Perceived certainty, perceived severity, and employee theft. Social Forces, 62, 398–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R. C., & Clark, J. P. (1983). Theft by employees. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, T. (1999). Images of the familiar: Individual differences and implicit leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 589–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelloway, K., Loughlin, C., Barling, J., & Nault, A. (1999). Counterproductive and organizational citizenship behaviours: separate but related constructs. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., Kray, L., & Thompson, L. (1998). The social construction of injustice: Fairness judgments in response to own and other’s unfair treatment by authorities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linke, L. H. (2012). Social closeness and decision making: Moral, attributive and emotional reactions to third party transgressions. Current Psychology, 31(3), 291–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J., Harvey, J. L., & Hall, R. J. (2001). Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multilevel consequences for leadership perceptions. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 311–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, S. S., Lewis-McClear, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 67, 738–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H. (1991). The relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R., & Byrne, Z. S. (2005). What is the role of justice in promoting organizational citizenship behavior? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice: Fundamental questions about fairness in the workplace (pp. 355–382). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. R. (1993). Honesty in the workplace. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okimoto, T. G., & Wenzel, M. (2011). Third-party punishment and symbolic intragroup status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(4), 709–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact or organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestions for future research. Human Performance, 10, 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Morrman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on follower’s trust in leader satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D. & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1997). Workplace deviance: Its definition, its manifestations, and its causes. In R. J. Lewicki & R. J. Bies (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations, Vol. 6 (pp. 3–27). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Greenberg, J. (1998). Employees behaving badly: Dimensions, determinants, and dilemmas in the study of workplace deviance. In C. L. Cooper & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior, Vol. 5 (pp. 1–30). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. E., & Cropanzano, R. (2002). The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 925–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schminke, M., Wells, D., Peyrefitte, J., & Sebora, T. C. (2002). Leadership and ethics in work groups. Group & Organization Management, 27, 272–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B. H., Lewicki, R. J., & Minton, J. W. (1992). Organizational justice: The search for fairness in the workplace. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., Ellard, J. H., & Kelln, B. R. C. (1998). Third-party perceptions of a layoff: Procedural, derogation, and retributive aspects of justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 434–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R., & Tesluk, P. (1999). Personality as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and retaliation. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 100–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., & Kulik, C. (2005). Third party reactions to employee mistreatment: A justice perspective. In B. Staw & R. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 26, 183–230.

  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., & Brown, M. E. (2005). The role of leaders in influencing unethical behavior in the workplace. In R. E. Kidwell & C. L. Martin (Eds.), Managing organizational deviance (pp. 69–96). London: Sage Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 55, 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Hartman, L. P., & Brown, M. (2000). Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42, 128–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32, 951–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turillo, C. J., Folger, R., Lavelle, J. J., Umphress, E. E., & Gee, J. O. (2002). Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 839–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. T., & Smith, H. J. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 595–629). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos, K. (2005). What is responsible for the fair process effect? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 273–300). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L., & Parks, J. M. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters). Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 215–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Prooijen, J. W. (2010). Retributive versus compensatory justice: Observers’ preferences for punishment in response for criminal offenses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 72–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G. N., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E. (2002). The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader–member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 590–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., & Treviño, L. K. (1999). Compliance and values oriented ethics programs: Influences on employees’ attitudes and behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9, 315–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes, and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoghbi, P. (2008). Anomic employees and deviant workplace behaviour: An organisational study. Estudios de Psicología, 29(2), 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P. (2010). Do unfair procedures predict employees’ ethical behavior by deactivating formal regulations? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P., Aguiar-Quintana, T., & Suárez-Acosta, M. A. (2013). A justice framework for understanding how guests react to hotel employee (mis)treatment. Tourism Management, 36, 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics and Management, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, c/ Saulo Torón, 4, Campus Tafira Baja, 35017, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, The Canary Islands, Spain

    Pablo Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara

  2. Institute of Tourism and Sustainable Development (TIDES), University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, The Canary Islands, Spain

    Miguel A. Suárez-Acosta

Authors
  1. Pablo Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miguel A. Suárez-Acosta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 Exploratory factor analysis of all the variables in this study
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P., Suárez-Acosta, M.A. Employees’ Reactions to Peers’ Unfair Treatment by Supervisors: The Role of Ethical Leadership. J Bus Ethics 122, 537–549 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1778-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1778-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation