Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methodological problems and policy implications in sexual harassment research

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that the ability of social research to influence legal arguments and policy decisions on sexual harassment in the workplace has been stymied by several methodological problems which are shared by most major studies on the topic. Determination of the incidence of harassment and its major sub-types is difficult because of problems with sampling (e.g., response rate, sample size) and instrument construction (e.g., number or variety of harassment categories). Additionally, severity of harassment is rarely treated as a variable.

Several resolutions to these problems are presented. First, estimates of the proportion of women who have experienced harassment, as well as the proportion having experienced the major sub-types of harassment, are derived. Second, a mutually exclusive and exhaustive set of sexual harassment categories, which includes harassment types that have evolved recently from legal decisions and policy developments, is discussed. Finally, an outline of factors which might be used to assess harassment severity is presented. Resolving these issues will provide social scientists and non-scientists alike with clearer answers to the ‘How much?’, ‘Which types?’ and ‘How serious?’ questions about harassment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benson, D. and G. Thomson (1982). ‘Sexual harassment on a university campus: the confluence of authority relations, sexual interest, and gender stratification,’ Social Problems 29: 236–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N. (1988). ‘Meritor Savings Bank vs. Vinson: clarifying the standards of hostile working environment sexual harassment,’ Houston Law Review 25: 441–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cammaert, L. (1985). ‘How Widespread is Sexual Harassment on Campus?’ International Journal of Women's Studies 8: 388–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) (1983). ‘Unwanted Sexual Attention and Sexual Harassment,’ Montreal: Minister of Supply and Services of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. and B. Gutek (1985). ‘Dimensions of perceptions of socio-sexual behavior in a work setting,’ Sex Roles 13: 317–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, E. and T. Blodgett (1981). ‘Sexual harassment: some see it, some won't,’ Harvard Business Review 59: 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolecheck, C. and M. Dolecheck (1983). ‘Sexual harassment: a Problem for Small Business,’ American Journal of Small Business 7(3): 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1980). ‘Guidelines on Discrimination because of Sex,’ 29CFR Part 1604. Federal Register 45(210): November 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • EEOC Policy Guidance (1988). ‘EEOC Gives Guidance on Current Issues of Sexual Harassment,’ Employment Practices, 6472-89.

  • Faley, R. (1983). ‘Sexual harassment: critical review of legal cases with general principles and preventive measures,’ Personnel Psychology 35: 583–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D. and A. Leffler (1987). ‘The politics of research methodology in claims-making activities: social science and sexual harassment,’ Social Problems 34: 490–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin-Shelley, E. (1985). ‘Sexual harassment: one organization's response,’ Journal of Counseling and Development 64: 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. and L. Bjorn (1982). ‘Blue collar blues: the sexual harassment of women autoworkers,’ Work and Occupations 9: 271–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. and L. Bjorn (1986). ‘Women's responses to sexual harassment: an analysis of sociocultural, organizational, and personal resources models,’ Social Science Quarterly 67: 814–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. and L. Bjorn (1987). ‘Perspectives on sexual harassment,’ Paper presented at the annual meetings of the North Central Sociological Association. Cincinnati, Ohio (May).

  • Gutek, B. (1985). Sex and the Workplace. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. and C. Nakamura (1982). ‘Gender roles and sexuality in the world of work,’ in E. Allgeier and N. McCormick (eds.), Changing Boundaries, Palo Alto, California: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. and C. Nakamura (1982). ‘Sex ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work,’ Journal of Social Issues 38: 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B., B. Morasch, and A. Cohen (1983). ‘Interpreting socio-sexual behavior in a work setting,’ Journal of Vocational Behavior 22: 30–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayler, B. (1979). ‘Report of Illinois Task Force on Sexual Harassment,’ Testimony before the State of Illinois Judiciary Committee: March 4.

  • Jensen, I. and B. Gutek (1982). ‘Attributions and assignment of responsibility for sexual harassment,’ Journal of Social Issues 38: 121–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1969). The Nature of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, E. and L. Tredeau (1986). ‘The Frequency, Sources, and Correlates of Sexual Harassment Among Women in Traditional Male Occupations,’ Sex Roles 15: 433–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, K. (1977). ‘Sexual harassment on the job,’ Ms. (November): 46-8.

  • Lloyd, R. (1987). ‘Research Problems in the Study of Sexual Harassment,’ Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association. Chicago (August).

  • Loy, P. and L. Stewart (1984). “The Extent and Effects of the Sexual Harassment of Working Women,’ Sociological Focus 17: 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, D. (1982). ‘Sexual Harassment in Government: The Situation in Florida and the Nation.’ Tallahassee: Florida State University dissertation.

  • MacKinnon, C. (1979). Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (1980). Breaking and Entering: Policewomen on Patrol. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maypole, D. (1986). ‘Sexual Harassment of Social Workers at Work.’ Social Work 31: 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maypole, D. and R. Skaine (1982). ‘Sexual Harassment of Blue Collar Workers,’ Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 9: 682–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, P.J. (1988). ‘Employer: Beware of ‘Hostile Environment’ Sexual Harassment,’ Duquesne Law Review 26: 461–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabidue vs. Osceola Refining Co, 584 F. Supp. 419, 432-3 (E.D. Mich. 1984).

  • Reilly, T., S. Carpenter, V. Dull, and K. Bartlett (1982). ‘A Factorial Survey Technique: An Approach to Defining Sexual Harassment on Campus,’ Journal of Social Issues 38: 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. and E. Weber-Burdin (1983). ‘Sexual Harassment on the Campus,’ Social Science Research 12: 131–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. (1981). ‘Dealing with Sexual Harassment,’ Harvard Business Review 59: 42–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safran, C. (1976). ‘What Men do to Women on the Job: A Shocking Look at Sexual Harassment,’ Redbook (November): 149, 217–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1985). ‘Approaches, Assaults, Attractions, Affairs: Policy Implications of the Sexualization of the Workplace.’ Population Research and Policy Review 4: 93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1982). ‘Consciousness about Sexual Harassment Among Heterosexual and Lesbian Women Workers,’ Journal of Social Issues 38: 75–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellitz, C., L. Wrightsman, and S. Cook (1976). Research Methods in Social Relations. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1976). ‘Sexual Harassment: Working Women's Dilemma,’ Quest: A Feminist Quarterly 3(3): 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer-Moore, D. (1982). Sexual Harassment in the Seattle City Workforce. Seattle: Office for Women's Rights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangri, S., M. Burt, and L. Johnson (1982). ‘Sexual Harassment at Work: Three Explanatory Models,’ Journal of Social Issues 38: 33–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, D. and D. Baker (1987). ‘A Hierarchy of Sexual Harassment.’ Journal of Psychology 121: 599–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB) (1981). Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., J. DiNunzio, and C. Spaulding (1983). ‘Unwanted Attention: Report on the Faculty Council, Harvard University.

  • Vhay, M. (1988). The harm of asking: toward a comprehensive treatment of sexual harassment,’ University of Chicago Law Review 55: 328–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogelmann-Sine, S., E. Ervin, R. Christensen, C. Warmsun, and L. Ullmann (1979). ‘Sex differences in feelings attributed to women in situations involving coercion and sexual advances,’ Journal of Personality 47: 420–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walshok, M. (1981). Blue-Collar Women: Pioneers on the Male Frontier. Garden City, N.J.: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webking, E. (1979). A Study of Sexual Harassment in Lethbridge. Lethbridge: Citizen's Human Rights Council.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, 48128-1491, Dearborn, Michigan, USA

    James E. Gruber

Authors
  1. James E. Gruber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gruber, J.E. Methodological problems and policy implications in sexual harassment research. Popul Res Policy Rev 9, 235–254 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162837

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162837

Keywords

Search

Navigation