Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Synthesis and evaluation of naphthalene derivatives as potent STAT3 inhibitors and agents against triple-negative breast cancer growth and metastasis

  • Preclinical study
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents the worst prognostic subtype of breast cancer and lacks targeted therapeutic drugs. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is overexpressed and constitutively activated in TNBCs and associated with poor patient outcomes. However, no agents targeting STAT3 have been successfully developed and marketed. Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs) have been reported as potential inhibitors of the IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway. Naphthalene compounds have good pharmacological activity and significant anti-cancer activity. In this study, we synthesized a new series of naphthalene derivatives with the general structure of SERM and evaluated their effects on TNBC and STAT3 signals.

Methods

A new series of compounds based on the scaffold of SERMs and an amino group were designed and screened based on the structure–activity relationship by MTT assay. The binding activity of SMY002 to STAT3 was predicted and validated by docking and SPR. The STAT3 signaling target and anti-cancer effects of SMY002 were evaluated with three TNBC cell lines and the mice transplanted tumor model.

Results

Among the compounds, SMY002 displayed the most potent activity, which could directly interact with STAT3 SH2-domain, and strongly inhibit the phosphorylation, dimerization, nuclear distribution, transcriptional activity, and target genes expression of STAT3. Furthermore, SMY002 markedly suppressed migration, invasion, survival, growth, and metastasis of TNBC cells in vitro and in vivo via down-regulating the expression of Cyclin D1 and MMP9.

Conclusions

SMY002 can significantly inhibit the growth and metastasis of TNBC cells by targeting the STAT3 signal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.

Abbreviations

STAT3:

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

TNBC:

Triple-negative breast cancer

SERM:

Selective estrogen receptor modulator

ER:

Estrogen receptor

PR:

Progesterone receptor

HER2:

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

GP130:

Glycoprotein 130 KD

JAKs:

Janus kinases

SH2:

Src homology domain 2

MMPs:

Matrix-metalloproteases

Tyr705:

Tyrosine 705

IC50:

Half-maximal inhibitory concentration

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

SPR:

Surface plasmon resonance

MTT:

3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

DAPI:

4,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar P, Aggarwal R (2016) An overview of triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293(2):247–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3859-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jhan JR, Andrechek ER (2017) Triple-negative breast cancer and the potential for targeted therapy[J]. Pharmacogenomics 18(17):1595–1609. https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs-2017-0117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu H, Pardoll D, Jove R (2009) STATs in cancer inflammation and immunity: a leading role for STAT3[J]. Nat Rev Cancer 9(11):798–809. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Darnell JJ, Kerr IM, Stark GR (1994) Jak-STAT pathways and transcriptional activation in response to IFNs and other extracellular signaling proteins[J]. Science 264(5164):1415–1421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8197455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Katz M, Amit I, Yarden Y (2007) Regulation of MAPKs by growth factors and receptor tyrosine kinases[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta 1773(8):1161–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2007.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Klemm JD, Schreiber SL, Crabtree GR (1998) Dimerization as a regulatory mechanism in signal transduction[J]. Annu Rev Immunol 16:569–592. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leslie K, Lang C, Devgan G et al (2006) Cyclin D1 is transcriptionally regulated by and required for transformation by activated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3[J]. Cancer Res 66(5):2544–2552. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grad JM, Zeng XR, Boise LH (2000) Regulation of Bcl-xL: a little bit of this and a little bit of STAT[J]. Curr Opinion Oncol 12(6):543–549. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001622-200011000-00006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li W, Lee MR, Kim T et al (2018) Activated STAT3 may participate in tumor progression through increasing CD133/survivin expression in early stage of colon cancer[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 497(1):354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.02.084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jia ZH, Jia Y, Guo FJ et al (2017) Phosphorylation of STAT3 at Tyr705 regulates MMP-9 production in epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. PLoS ONE 12(8):e183622. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang D, Zheng X, Fu B et al (2019) Hepatectomy promotes recurrence of liver cancer by enhancing IL-11-STAT3 signaling[J]. EBioMedicine 46:119–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.07.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heichler C, Scheibe K, Schmied A et al (2020) STAT3 activation through IL-6/IL-11 in cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes colorectal tumour development and correlates with poor prognosis[J]. Gut 69(7):1269–1282. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Qin JJ, Yan L, Zhang J et al (2019) STAT3 as a potential therapeutic target in triple negative breast cancer: a systematic review[J]. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 38(1):195. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-019-1206-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ren B, Kwah M, Liu C et al (2021) Resveratrol for cancer therapy: Challenges and future perspectives[J]. Cancer Lett 515:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2021.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garg M, Shanmugam M, Bhardwaj V et al (2020) The pleiotropic role of transcription factor STAT3 in oncogenesis and its targeting through natural products for cancer prevention and therapy[J]. Med Res Rev 41:1291–1336. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li M, Yu H (2021) Identification of WP1066, an inhibitor of JAK2 and STAT3, as a KV 1.3 potassium channel blocker[J]. Br J Pharmacol 178(13):2617–2631. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.15441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li CH, Xu LL, Jian LL et al (2018) Stattic inhibits RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis by suppressing activation of STAT3 and NF-kappaB pathways[J]. Int Immunopharmacol 58:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2018.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang L, Lin S, Xu L et al (2019) Novel activators and small-molecule inhibitors of STAT3 in cancer[J]. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 49:10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2019.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li H, Xiao H, Lin L et al (2014) Drug design targeting protein-protein interactions (PPIs) using multiple ligand simultaneous docking (MLSD) and drug repositioning: discovery of raloxifene and bazedoxifene as novel inhibitors of IL-6/GP130 interface[J]. J Med Chem 57(3):632–641. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm401144z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tian J, Chen X, Fu S et al (2019) Bazedoxifene is a novel IL-6/GP130 inhibitor for treating triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat 175(3):553–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05183-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Allen SL, Lundberg AS (2011) Amonafide: a potential role in treating acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 20(7):995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1517/13543784.2011.585756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Casado A, Rosell R, Garcia-Gomez R et al (1996) Phase II study of mitonafide in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)[J]. Invest New Drugs 14(4):415–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00180820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang JR, Shen GN, Luo YH et al (2018) The compound 2-(naphthalene-2-thio)-5,8-dimethoxy-1,4-naphthoquinone induces apoptosis via reactive oxygen species-regulated mitogen-activated protein kinase, protein kinase B, and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling in human gastric cancer cells[J]. Drug Dev Res 79(6):295–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu X, Kasembeli MM, Jiang X et al (2009) Chemical probes that competitively and selectively inhibit Stat3 activation[J]. PLoS ONE 4(3):e4783. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shao H, Xu X, Mastrangelo MA et al (2004) Structural requirements for signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 binding to phosphotyrosine ligands containing the YXXQ motif[J]. J Biol Chem 279(18):18967–18973. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M314037200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S et al (2010) A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu[J]. J Chem Phys 132(15):154104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3382344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Trott O, Olson AJ (2010) AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading[J]. J Comput Chem 31(2):455–461

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang W, Dong Z, Zhang J et al (2019) Acute and subacute toxicity assessment of oxyclozanide in wistar rats[J]. Front Vet Sci 6:294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sau S, Mondal SK, Kashaw SK et al (2017) Combination of cationic dexamethasone derivative and STAT3 inhibitor (WP1066) for aggressive melanoma: a strategy for repurposing a phase I clinical trial drug[J]. Mol Cell Biochem 436(1–2):119–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-017-3084-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hong D, Kurzrock R, Kim Y et al (2015) AZD9150, a next-generation antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of STAT3 with early evidence of clinical activity in lymphoma and lung cancer[J]. Sci Transl Med 7(314):185r–314r. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aac5272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bharadwaj U, Eckols TK, Xu X et al (2016) Small-molecule inhibition of STAT3 in radioresistant head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Oncotarget 7(18):26307–26330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hayakawa F, Sugimoto K, Harada Y et al (2013) A novel STAT inhibitor, OPB-31121, has a significant anti-tumor effect on leukemia with STAT-addictive oncokinases[J]. Blood Cancer J 3:e166. https://doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2013.63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ogura M, Uchida T, Terui Y et al (2015) Phase I study of OPB-51602, an oral inhibitor of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, in patients with relapsed/refractory hematological malignancies[J]. Cancer Sci 106(7):896–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Doheny D, Sirkisoon S, Carpenter RL et al (2020) Combined inhibition of JAK2-STAT3 and SMO-GLI1/tGLI1 pathways suppresses breast cancer stem cells, tumor growth, and metastasis[J]. Oncogene 39(42):6589–6605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-020-01454-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gote V, Sharma AD, Pal D (2021) Hyaluronic acid-targeted stimuli-sensitive nanomicelles co-encapsulating paclitaxel and ritonavir to overcome multi-drug resistance in metastatic breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer cells[J]. Int J Mol Sci 22(3):1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhu J, Li Z, Zhang G et al (2011) Icaritin shows potent anti-leukemia activity on chronic myeloid leukemia in vitro and in vivo by regulating MAPK/ERK/JNK and JAK2/STAT3 /AKT signalings[J]. PLoS ONE 6(8):e23720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Han D, Yu T, Dong N et al (2019) Napabucasin, a novel STAT3 inhibitor suppresses proliferation, invasion and stemness of glioblastoma cells[J]. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 38(1):289. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-019-1289-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China for funding the project (Nos. 81803575, 31902287) and the Henan Science and Technology Department of China for financing the project (No. G20190126005). We also thank the Department of Science and Technology, Government of Kaifeng, China, for funding the project (No. 21SSF003)), the Key R&D and promotion projects of Kaifeng (No. 2203008).

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the High-End Foreign Experts Introduction Plan of Henan Science and Technology Department (No. G20190126005), Kaifeng Science and Technology Development Plan Project (No. 21SSF003), Youth Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81803575).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Zhengyan Yang contributed to conceptualization and writing-original draft. Hongyun Xu contributed to investigation and validation. Yupo Yang and Chaoqun Duan contributed to the synthesis and analysis of the compounds. Pai Zhang contributed to the data curation. Yang Wang contributed to resource collection. Kai Fu contributed to methodology and formal analysis. Yonghong Shen contributed to the writing-reviewing, and editing of the manuscript. Marvin Xuejun Xu contributed to funding acquisition and project administration. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yonghong Shen or Marvin Xuejun Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 15510 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Z., Xu, H., Yang, Y. et al. Synthesis and evaluation of naphthalene derivatives as potent STAT3 inhibitors and agents against triple-negative breast cancer growth and metastasis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 197, 255–267 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06790-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06790-2

Keywords

Navigation