Abstract
For a horizontally homogeneous, neutrally stratified atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), aerodynamic roughness length, \(z_0\), is the effective elevation at which the streamwise component of mean velocity is zero. A priori prediction of \(z_0\) based on topographic attributes remains an open line of inquiry in planetary boundary-layer research. Urban topographies – the topic of this study – exhibit spatial heterogeneities associated with variability of building height, width, and proximity with adjacent buildings; such variability renders a priori, prognostic \(z_0\) models appealing. Here, large-eddy simulation (LES) has been used in an extensive parametric study to characterize the ABL response (and \(z_0\)) to a range of synthetic, urban-like topographies wherein statistical moments of the topography have been systematically varied. Using LES results, we determined the hierarchical influence of topographic moments relevant to setting \(z_0\). We demonstrate that standard deviation and skewness are important, while kurtosis is negligible. This finding is reconciled with a model recently proposed by Flack and Schultz (J Fluids Eng 132:041203-1–041203-10, 2010), who demonstrate that \(z_0\) can be modelled with standard deviation and skewness, and two empirical coefficients (one for each moment). We find that the empirical coefficient related to skewness is not constant, but exhibits a dependence on standard deviation over certain ranges. For idealized, quasi-uniform cubic topographies and for complex, fully random urban-like topographies, we demonstrate strong performance of the generalized Flack and Schultz model against contemporary roughness correlations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The function representing a given topography, h(x, y), contains zeros at spatial positions, \(\{x,y\}\), where there are no obstacles. The variable \(\langle h_o \rangle = \varphi \langle h(x,y) \rangle \), where \(\varphi = N_x N_y / \sum _{i}^{N_x} \sum _{j}^{N_y} I (x_i,y_j)\), \(N_x\) and \(N_y\) are the number of computational points in the x- and y-directions, respectively, and \(I(x,y) = \mathcal {H}\left[ h(x,y) - \delta _z/2 \right] \) is an indicator function, where \(\mathcal {H}\left[ x\right] \) is the Heaviside step function and \(\delta _z/2\) is the height of the first node in the staggered grid computational mesh.
References
Albertson J, Parlange M (1999) Surface length scales and shear stress: implications for land–atmosphere interaction over complex terrain. Water Resour Res 35:2121–2132
Allen J, Shockling M, Kunkel G, Smits A (2007) Turbulent flow in smooth and rough pipes. Philos Trans R Soc A 365(1852):699–714
Anderson W (2012) An immersed boundary method wall model for high-Reynolds number channel flow over complex topography. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 71:1588–1608
Anderson W (2016) Amplitude modulation of streamwise velocity fluctuations in the roughness sublayer: evidence from large-eddy simulations. J Fluid Mech 789:567–588
Anderson W, Meneveau C (2010) A large-eddy simulation model for boundary-layer flow over surfaces with horizontally resolved but vertically unresolved roughness elements. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 137:397–415
Anderson W, Meneveau C (2011) A dynamic large-eddy simulation model for boundary layer flow over multiscale, fractal-like surfaces. J Fluid Mech 679:288–314
Anderson W, Barros J, Christensen K, Awasthi A (2015a) Numerical and experimental study of mechanisms responsible for turbulent secondary flows in boundary layer flows over spanwise heterogeneous roughness. J Fluid Mech 768:316–347
Anderson W, Li Q, Bou-Zeid E (2015b) Numerical simulation of flow over urban-like topographies and evaluation of turbulence temporal attributes. J Turbul 16(9):809–831
Armenio V, Geurts B, Fröhlich J (2010) Direct and large-eddy simulation VII: Proceedings of the seventh international ERCOFTAC workshop on direct and large-eddy simulation, held at the University of Trieste, 8–10 Sept 2008, vol 13. Springer
Belcher S, Harman I, Finnigan J (2012) The wind in the willows: flows in forest canopies in complex terrain. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 44:479–504
Böhm M, Finnigan JJ, Raupach MR, Hughs D (2013) Turbulence structure within and above a canopy of bluff elements. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 146:393–419
Bou-Zeid E, Meneveau C, Parlange M (2005) A scale-dependent lagrangian dynamic model for large eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows. Phys Fluids 17(2):025,105
Bou-Zeid E, Parlange M, Meneveau C (2007) On the parameterization of surface roughness at regional scales. J Atmos Sci 64:216–227
Castro I (2007) Rough-wall boundary layers: mean flow universality. J Fluid Mech 585:469–485
Chan L, MacDonald M, Chung D, Hutchins N, Ooi A (2015) A systematic investigation of roughness height and wavelength in turbulent pipe flow in the transitionally rough regime. J Fluid Mech 771:743–777
Cheng H, Castro I (2002) Near wall flow over urban-like roughness. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 104:229–259
Cheng H, Hayden P, Robins A, Castro I (2007) Flow over cube arrays of different packing densities. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 95(8):715–740
Cheng WC, Porté-Agel F (2015) Adjustment of turbulent boundary-layer flow to idealized urban surfaces: a large-eddy simulation study. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 155(2):249–270
Chung J, Hagishima A, Ikegaya N, Tanimoto J (2015) Wind-tunnel study of scalar transfer phenomena for surfaces of block arrays and smooth walls with dry patches. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 157(2):219–236
Coceal O, Thomas T, Castro I, Belcher S (2006) Mean flow and turbulence statistics over groups of urban-like cubical obstacles. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121(3):491–519
Coceal O, Dobre A, Thomas TG, Belcher SE (2007) Structure of turbulent flow over regular arrays of cubical roughness. J Fluid Mech 589:375–409
Counehan J (1971) Wind tunnel determination of the roughness length as a function of the fetch and the roughness density of three-dimensional roughness elements. Atmos Environ 5(8):637–642
De Marchis M, Napoli E (2012) Effects of irregular two-dimensional and three-dimensional surface roughness in turbulent channel flows. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 36:7–17
Fang C, Sill B (1992) Aerodynamic roughness length: correlation with roughness elements. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 41(1):449–460
Flack K, Schultz M (2010) Review of hydraulic roughness scales in the fully rough regime. J Fluids Eng 132(4):041,203
Gardner A (2004) A full-scale investigation of roughness lengths in inhomogeneous terrain and a comparison of wind prediction models for transitional flow regimes. PhD Thesis, Texas Tech University
Garratt JR (1994) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 316 pp
Germano M (1992) Turbulence: the filtering approach. J Fluid Mech 238:325–336
Germano M, Piomelli U, Moin P, Cabot W (1991) A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys Fluids A 3:1760–1765
Ghisalberti M (2009) Obstructed shear flows: similarities across systems and scales. J Fluid Mech 641:51
Giometto M, Christen A, Meneveau C, Fang J, Krafczyk M, Parlange M (2016) Spatial characteristics of roughness sublayer mean flow and turbulence over a realistic urban surface. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. doi:10.1007/s10546-016-0157-6
Grimmond C, Oke T (1999) Aerodynamic properties of urban areas derived from analysis of surface form. J Appl Meteorol 38(9):1262–1292
Hagishima A, Tanimoto J, Nagayama K, Meno S (2009) Aerodynamic parameters of regular arrays of rectangular blocks with various geometries. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 132(2):315–337
Hama F (1954) Boundary-layer characteristics for smooth and rough surfaces. Trans Soc Naval Arch Mar Eng 62:333–358
Hansen F (1992) Surface roughness lengths. US Army Research Laboratory, ARL-TR-61
Harmon I, Finnigan JJ (2007) A simple unified theory for flow in the canopy and roughness sublayer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123:339–364
Hong J, Katz J, Schultz M (2011) Near-wall turbulence statistics and flow structures over three-dimensional roughness in a turbulent channel flow. J Fluid Mech 667:1–37
Hong J, Katz J, Meneveau C, Schultz M (2012) Coherent structures and associated subgrid-scale energy transfer in a rough-wall channel flow. J Fluid Mech 712:92–128
Ito T, Matsumoto A, Ito T, Motozawa M, Iwamoto K, Kawashima H, Ando H, Senda T, Kawaguchi Y (2011) Experimental investigation on effects of surface roughness geometry affecting to flow resistance. In: ASME-JSME-KSME 2011 joint fluids engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 3945–3954
Jackson P (1981) On the displacement height in the logarithmic profile. J Fluid Mech 111:15–25
Jimenez J (2004) Turbulent flow over rough wall. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 36:173
Kanda M (2006) Large-eddy simulations on the effects of surface geometry of building arrays on turbulent organized structures. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 118(1):151–168
Kanda M, Moriizumi T (2009) Momentum and heat transfer over urban-like surfaces. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 131(3):385–401
Kanda M, Moriwaki R, Kasamatsu F (2004) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent organized structures within and above explicitly resolved cube arrays. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 112(2):343–368
Kanda M, Inagaki A, Miyamoto T, Gryschka M, Raasch S (2013) A new aerodynamic parametrization for real urban surfaces. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 148(2):357–377
Kondo H, Inagaki A, Kanda M (2015) A new parametrization of mixing length in an urban canopy derived from a large-eddy simulation database for tokyo. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 156(1):131–144
Krayenhoff E, Santiago JL, Martilli A, Christen A, Oke T (2015) Parametrization of drag and turbulence for urban neighbourhoods with trees. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 156(2):157–189
Kutzbach J (1961) Investigations of the modification of wind profiles by artificially controlled surface roughness. Studies of the three dimensional structure of the planetary boundary layer. Annual Report. Department of Meteorology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, pp 71–113
Lee HM, Wu Y (2015) A Tomo-PIV study of the effects of freestream turbulence on stall delay of the blade of a horizontal-axis wind turbine. Wind Energy 18(7):1185–1205
Leonardi S, Castro I (2010) Channel flow over large cube roughness: a direct numerical simulation study. J Fluid Mech 651:519–539
Leonardi S, Orlandi P, Smalley R, Djenidi L, Antonia R (2003) Direct numerical simulations of turbulent channel flow with transverse square bars on one wall. J Fluid Mech 491:229–238
Lettau H (1969) Note on aerodynamic roughness-parameter estimation on the basis of roughness-element description. J Appl Meteorol 8(5):828–832
Macdonald R, Griffiths R, Hall D (1998) An improved method for the estimation of surface roughness of obstacle arrays. Atmos Environ 32(11):1857–1864
Mara TA, Tarantola S (2012) Variance-based sensitivity indices for models with dependent inputs. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 107:115–121
Mejia-Alvarez R, Christensen K (2010) Low-order representations of irregular surface roughness and their impact on a turbulent boundary layer. Phys Fluids 22:015,106
Meneveau C, Katz J (2000) Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32(1):1–32
Millward-Hopkins J, Tomlin A, Ma L, Ingham D, Pourkashanian M (2011) Estimating aerodynamic parameters of urban-like surfaces with heterogeneous building heights. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 141(3):443–465
Millward-Hopkins J, Tomlin A, Ma L, Ingham D, Pourkashanian M (2013) Aerodynamic parameters of a uk city derived from morphological data. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 146(3):447–468
Moody LF (1944) Friction factors for pipe flow. Trans ASME 66(8):671–684
Moser RD, Kim J, Mansour NN (1999) Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Re = 590. Phys Fluids 11(4):943–945
Napoli E, Armenio V, Marchis MD (2008) The effect of the slope of irregularly distributed roughness elements on turbulent wall-bounded flows. J Fluid Mech 613:385–394
Nikuradse J (1950) Laws of flow in rough pipes. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Tech Memo # 1292
Perry A, Schofield W, Joubert P (1969) Rough wall turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 37:383–413
Placidi M, Ganapathisubramani B (2015) Effects of frontal and plan solidities on aerodynamic parameters and the roughness sublayer in turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 782:541–566
Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 771 pp
Porté-Agel F, Meneveau C, Parlange M (2000) A scale-dependent dynamic model for large-eddy simulation: application to a neutral atmospheric boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 415:261–284
Ratti C, Sabatino SD, Britter R, Brown M, Caton F, Burian S (2002) Analysis of 3-D urban databases with respect to pollution dispersion for a number of European and American cities. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 2(5–6):459–469
Ratto M, Tarantola S, Saltelli A (2001) Sensitivity analysis in model calibration: GSA-GLUE approach. Comput Phys Commun 136(3):212–224
Raupach M, Antonia R, Rajagopalan S (1991) Rough-wall turbulent boundary layers. Appl Mech Rev 44:1–25
Raupach M, Finnigan J, Brunet Y (1996) Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:351–382
Rij JV, Belnap B, Ligrani P (2002) Analysis and experiments on three-dimensional, irregular surface roughness. J Fluids Eng 124(3):671–677
Rotach M (1999) On the influence of the urban roughness sublayer on turbulence and dispersion. Atmos Environ 33:4001–4008
Roth M (2000) Review of atmospheric turbulence over cities. Q J R Meteorol Soc 126(564):941–990
Saltelli A (2002) Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment. Risk Anal 22(3):579–590
Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott EM (2000) Sensitivity analysis. Wiley, Oxford, UK, 504 pp
Saltelli A, Annoni P, Azzini I, Campolongo F, Ratto M, Tarantola S (2010) Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index. Comput Phys Commun 181(2):259–270
Schultz M, Flack K (2009) Turbulent boundary layers on a systematically varied rough wall. Phys Fluids 21(1):015,104
Shockling M, Allen J, Smits A (2006) Roughness effects in turbulent pipe flow. J Fluid Mech 564:267–285
Sigal A, Danberg J (1990) New correlation of roughness density effect on the turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J 28(3):554–556
Su HB, Schmid H, Vogel C, Curtis P (2008) Effects of canopy morphology and thermal stability on mean flow and turbulence statistics observed inside a mixed hardwood forest. Agric For Meteorol 148(6):862–882
Tennekes H, Lumley J (1972) A first course in turbulence. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 320 pp
Theurer W (1993) Dispersion of ground-level emissions in complex built-up areas. PhD Thesis, University of Karlsruhe, Germany
Thom A (1971) Momentum absorption by vegetation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 97:414–428
Townsend A (1976) The structure of turbulent shear flow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 429 pp
Wilczek M, Stevens R, Meneveau C (2015) Spatio-temporal spectra in the logarithmic layer of wall turbulence: large-eddy simulations and simple models. J Fluid Mech 769:R1
Wooding R, Bradley E, Marshall J (1973) Drag due to regular arrays of roughness elements of varying geometry. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 5:285–308
Wu Y, Christensen KT (2007) Outer-layer similarity in the presence of a practical rough-wall topology. Phys Fluids 19:085,108
Wu Y, Christensen KT (2010) Spatial structure of a turbulent boundary layer with irregular surface roughness. J Fluid Mech 655:380–418
Wyngaard J (2010) Turbulence in the atmosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 393 pp
Xie ZT, Coceal O, Castro I (2008) Large-eddy simulation of flows over random urban-like obstacles. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 129(1):1–23
Yang X (2016) On the mean flow behaviour in the presence of regional-scale surface roughness heterogeneity. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. doi:10.1007/s10546-016-0157-6
Yang XI, Sadique J, Mittal R, Meneveau C (2016) Exponential roughness layer and analytical model for turbulent boundary layer flow over rectangular-prism roughness elements. J Fluid Mech 789:127–165
Yuan J, Piomelli U (2014a) Estimation and prediction of the roughness function on realistic surfaces. J Turbul 15(6):350–365
Yuan J, Piomelli U (2014b) Roughness effects on the reynolds stress budgets in near-wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech 760:R1 (12 pp)
Yuan J, Piomelli U (2015) Numerical simulation of a spatially developing accelerating boundary layer over roughness. J Fluid Mech 780:192–214
Zagarola M, Smits A (1998) Mean-flow scaling of turbulent pipe flow. J Fluid Mech 373:33–79
Zaki SA, Hagishima A, Tanimoto J, Ikegaya N (2011) Aerodynamic parameters of urban building arrays with random geometries. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 138(1):99–120
Acknowledgments
We thank anonymous reviewers for providing comprehensive, insightful comments that led to a much-improved final manuscript. WA and XZ acknowledge support from the Army Research Office, Environmental Sciences Directorate (Grant # W911NF-15-1-0231; PM: Dr. J. Parker). Computational resources were provided by the Texas Advanced Computing Center at the University of Texas at Austin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Topography Construction
Appendix: Topography Construction
The topographies summarized in Tables 3 and 4 were built in MatLab\(^{\mathrm {TM}}\). Construction of the topographies involved designation of two topographic “stencils”, where block heights are either fixed to zero or are allowed to vary at pre-defined locations. For cases 1–10, a topographic stencil with 256 uniform-height, square-based blocks was distributed across the \(N_x = N_y = 128\) computational grid (i.e., each block had side length, \(L_x/16\); see also Fig. 1a). The height of the blocks was varied as \(0.02 \le h_o/H \le 0.25\), and thus the standard deviation, \(\sigma _h/H\), was changed systematically while the skewness and kurtosis were set to fixed values (recall the description of topographic moments in Table 2). This approach is appealing for the present purposes since it allows higher-order moments to remain fixed. For cases 11–26, a topographic stencil with 64 uniform height, square-based blocks were distributed across the \(N_x = N_y = 128\) computational grid (i.e., each block had side length, \(L_x/8\); see also Fig. 1b, c). The block heights of groups of blocks were fixed to one of four equivalent values (\(h_{o1}, h_{o2}, h_{o3}, h_{o4}\)), and these values were systematically varied. These block heights were varied randomly to attain the desired realistic variability of \(s_k\) (cases 11–18) and \(k_u\) (cases 19–26). For cases 27–46, the cases 1–10 topographic stencil was reused, but the heights of the blocks were varied in pair to manipulate the statistical moments. For example, for cases 39–42, the case 9 topography was used as the base, and then the height of half the blocks was increased while the height of the remaining half was decreased. By introducing this heterogeneity, the skewness was varied systematically. For case 47 to 56, all block heights (within the topographic stencil) were selected with MatLab\(\mathrm {TM}\)’s random number generator (see Fig. 1d).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, X., Iungo, G.V., Leonardi, S. et al. Parametric Study of Urban-Like Topographic Statistical Moments Relevant to a Priori Modelling of Bulk Aerodynamic Parameters. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 162, 231–253 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0198-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0198-x