Skip to main content
Log in

Parametric Study of Urban-Like Topographic Statistical Moments Relevant to a Priori Modelling of Bulk Aerodynamic Parameters

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For a horizontally homogeneous, neutrally stratified atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), aerodynamic roughness length, \(z_0\), is the effective elevation at which the streamwise component of mean velocity is zero. A priori prediction of \(z_0\) based on topographic attributes remains an open line of inquiry in planetary boundary-layer research. Urban topographies – the topic of this study – exhibit spatial heterogeneities associated with variability of building height, width, and proximity with adjacent buildings; such variability renders a priori, prognostic \(z_0\) models appealing. Here, large-eddy simulation (LES) has been used in an extensive parametric study to characterize the ABL response (and \(z_0\)) to a range of synthetic, urban-like topographies wherein statistical moments of the topography have been systematically varied. Using LES results, we determined the hierarchical influence of topographic moments relevant to setting \(z_0\). We demonstrate that standard deviation and skewness are important, while kurtosis is negligible. This finding is reconciled with a model recently proposed by Flack and Schultz (J Fluids Eng 132:041203-1–041203-10, 2010), who demonstrate that \(z_0\) can be modelled with standard deviation and skewness, and two empirical coefficients (one for each moment). We find that the empirical coefficient related to skewness is not constant, but exhibits a dependence on standard deviation over certain ranges. For idealized, quasi-uniform cubic topographies and for complex, fully random urban-like topographies, we demonstrate strong performance of the generalized Flack and Schultz model against contemporary roughness correlations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The function representing a given topography, h(xy), contains zeros at spatial positions, \(\{x,y\}\), where there are no obstacles. The variable \(\langle h_o \rangle = \varphi \langle h(x,y) \rangle \), where \(\varphi = N_x N_y / \sum _{i}^{N_x} \sum _{j}^{N_y} I (x_i,y_j)\), \(N_x\) and \(N_y\) are the number of computational points in the x- and y-directions, respectively, and \(I(x,y) = \mathcal {H}\left[ h(x,y) - \delta _z/2 \right] \) is an indicator function, where \(\mathcal {H}\left[ x\right] \) is the Heaviside step function and \(\delta _z/2\) is the height of the first node in the staggered grid computational mesh.

References

  • Albertson J, Parlange M (1999) Surface length scales and shear stress: implications for land–atmosphere interaction over complex terrain. Water Resour Res 35:2121–2132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen J, Shockling M, Kunkel G, Smits A (2007) Turbulent flow in smooth and rough pipes. Philos Trans R Soc A 365(1852):699–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson W (2012) An immersed boundary method wall model for high-Reynolds number channel flow over complex topography. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 71:1588–1608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson W (2016) Amplitude modulation of streamwise velocity fluctuations in the roughness sublayer: evidence from large-eddy simulations. J Fluid Mech 789:567–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson W, Meneveau C (2010) A large-eddy simulation model for boundary-layer flow over surfaces with horizontally resolved but vertically unresolved roughness elements. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 137:397–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson W, Meneveau C (2011) A dynamic large-eddy simulation model for boundary layer flow over multiscale, fractal-like surfaces. J Fluid Mech 679:288–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson W, Barros J, Christensen K, Awasthi A (2015a) Numerical and experimental study of mechanisms responsible for turbulent secondary flows in boundary layer flows over spanwise heterogeneous roughness. J Fluid Mech 768:316–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson W, Li Q, Bou-Zeid E (2015b) Numerical simulation of flow over urban-like topographies and evaluation of turbulence temporal attributes. J Turbul 16(9):809–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenio V, Geurts B, Fröhlich J (2010) Direct and large-eddy simulation VII: Proceedings of the seventh international ERCOFTAC workshop on direct and large-eddy simulation, held at the University of Trieste, 8–10 Sept 2008, vol 13. Springer

  • Belcher S, Harman I, Finnigan J (2012) The wind in the willows: flows in forest canopies in complex terrain. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 44:479–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm M, Finnigan JJ, Raupach MR, Hughs D (2013) Turbulence structure within and above a canopy of bluff elements. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 146:393–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bou-Zeid E, Meneveau C, Parlange M (2005) A scale-dependent lagrangian dynamic model for large eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows. Phys Fluids 17(2):025,105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bou-Zeid E, Parlange M, Meneveau C (2007) On the parameterization of surface roughness at regional scales. J Atmos Sci 64:216–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro I (2007) Rough-wall boundary layers: mean flow universality. J Fluid Mech 585:469–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan L, MacDonald M, Chung D, Hutchins N, Ooi A (2015) A systematic investigation of roughness height and wavelength in turbulent pipe flow in the transitionally rough regime. J Fluid Mech 771:743–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Castro I (2002) Near wall flow over urban-like roughness. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 104:229–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Hayden P, Robins A, Castro I (2007) Flow over cube arrays of different packing densities. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 95(8):715–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng WC, Porté-Agel F (2015) Adjustment of turbulent boundary-layer flow to idealized urban surfaces: a large-eddy simulation study. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 155(2):249–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung J, Hagishima A, Ikegaya N, Tanimoto J (2015) Wind-tunnel study of scalar transfer phenomena for surfaces of block arrays and smooth walls with dry patches. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 157(2):219–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coceal O, Thomas T, Castro I, Belcher S (2006) Mean flow and turbulence statistics over groups of urban-like cubical obstacles. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121(3):491–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coceal O, Dobre A, Thomas TG, Belcher SE (2007) Structure of turbulent flow over regular arrays of cubical roughness. J Fluid Mech 589:375–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Counehan J (1971) Wind tunnel determination of the roughness length as a function of the fetch and the roughness density of three-dimensional roughness elements. Atmos Environ 5(8):637–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marchis M, Napoli E (2012) Effects of irregular two-dimensional and three-dimensional surface roughness in turbulent channel flows. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 36:7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang C, Sill B (1992) Aerodynamic roughness length: correlation with roughness elements. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 41(1):449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flack K, Schultz M (2010) Review of hydraulic roughness scales in the fully rough regime. J Fluids Eng 132(4):041,203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner A (2004) A full-scale investigation of roughness lengths in inhomogeneous terrain and a comparison of wind prediction models for transitional flow regimes. PhD Thesis, Texas Tech University

  • Garratt JR (1994) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 316 pp

  • Germano M (1992) Turbulence: the filtering approach. J Fluid Mech 238:325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germano M, Piomelli U, Moin P, Cabot W (1991) A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys Fluids A 3:1760–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghisalberti M (2009) Obstructed shear flows: similarities across systems and scales. J Fluid Mech 641:51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giometto M, Christen A, Meneveau C, Fang J, Krafczyk M, Parlange M (2016) Spatial characteristics of roughness sublayer mean flow and turbulence over a realistic urban surface. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. doi:10.1007/s10546-016-0157-6

  • Grimmond C, Oke T (1999) Aerodynamic properties of urban areas derived from analysis of surface form. J Appl Meteorol 38(9):1262–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagishima A, Tanimoto J, Nagayama K, Meno S (2009) Aerodynamic parameters of regular arrays of rectangular blocks with various geometries. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 132(2):315–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hama F (1954) Boundary-layer characteristics for smooth and rough surfaces. Trans Soc Naval Arch Mar Eng 62:333–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen F (1992) Surface roughness lengths. US Army Research Laboratory, ARL-TR-61

  • Harmon I, Finnigan JJ (2007) A simple unified theory for flow in the canopy and roughness sublayer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123:339–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong J, Katz J, Schultz M (2011) Near-wall turbulence statistics and flow structures over three-dimensional roughness in a turbulent channel flow. J Fluid Mech 667:1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong J, Katz J, Meneveau C, Schultz M (2012) Coherent structures and associated subgrid-scale energy transfer in a rough-wall channel flow. J Fluid Mech 712:92–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito T, Matsumoto A, Ito T, Motozawa M, Iwamoto K, Kawashima H, Ando H, Senda T, Kawaguchi Y (2011) Experimental investigation on effects of surface roughness geometry affecting to flow resistance. In: ASME-JSME-KSME 2011 joint fluids engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 3945–3954

  • Jackson P (1981) On the displacement height in the logarithmic profile. J Fluid Mech 111:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez J (2004) Turbulent flow over rough wall. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 36:173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanda M (2006) Large-eddy simulations on the effects of surface geometry of building arrays on turbulent organized structures. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 118(1):151–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanda M, Moriizumi T (2009) Momentum and heat transfer over urban-like surfaces. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 131(3):385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanda M, Moriwaki R, Kasamatsu F (2004) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent organized structures within and above explicitly resolved cube arrays. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 112(2):343–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanda M, Inagaki A, Miyamoto T, Gryschka M, Raasch S (2013) A new aerodynamic parametrization for real urban surfaces. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 148(2):357–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo H, Inagaki A, Kanda M (2015) A new parametrization of mixing length in an urban canopy derived from a large-eddy simulation database for tokyo. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 156(1):131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krayenhoff E, Santiago JL, Martilli A, Christen A, Oke T (2015) Parametrization of drag and turbulence for urban neighbourhoods with trees. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 156(2):157–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutzbach J (1961) Investigations of the modification of wind profiles by artificially controlled surface roughness. Studies of the three dimensional structure of the planetary boundary layer. Annual Report. Department of Meteorology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, pp 71–113

  • Lee HM, Wu Y (2015) A Tomo-PIV study of the effects of freestream turbulence on stall delay of the blade of a horizontal-axis wind turbine. Wind Energy 18(7):1185–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi S, Castro I (2010) Channel flow over large cube roughness: a direct numerical simulation study. J Fluid Mech 651:519–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi S, Orlandi P, Smalley R, Djenidi L, Antonia R (2003) Direct numerical simulations of turbulent channel flow with transverse square bars on one wall. J Fluid Mech 491:229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lettau H (1969) Note on aerodynamic roughness-parameter estimation on the basis of roughness-element description. J Appl Meteorol 8(5):828–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald R, Griffiths R, Hall D (1998) An improved method for the estimation of surface roughness of obstacle arrays. Atmos Environ 32(11):1857–1864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mara TA, Tarantola S (2012) Variance-based sensitivity indices for models with dependent inputs. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 107:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mejia-Alvarez R, Christensen K (2010) Low-order representations of irregular surface roughness and their impact on a turbulent boundary layer. Phys Fluids 22:015,106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meneveau C, Katz J (2000) Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32(1):1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millward-Hopkins J, Tomlin A, Ma L, Ingham D, Pourkashanian M (2011) Estimating aerodynamic parameters of urban-like surfaces with heterogeneous building heights. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 141(3):443–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millward-Hopkins J, Tomlin A, Ma L, Ingham D, Pourkashanian M (2013) Aerodynamic parameters of a uk city derived from morphological data. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 146(3):447–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody LF (1944) Friction factors for pipe flow. Trans ASME 66(8):671–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser RD, Kim J, Mansour NN (1999) Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Re = 590. Phys Fluids 11(4):943–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napoli E, Armenio V, Marchis MD (2008) The effect of the slope of irregularly distributed roughness elements on turbulent wall-bounded flows. J Fluid Mech 613:385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikuradse J (1950) Laws of flow in rough pipes. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Tech Memo # 1292

  • Perry A, Schofield W, Joubert P (1969) Rough wall turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 37:383–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Placidi M, Ganapathisubramani B (2015) Effects of frontal and plan solidities on aerodynamic parameters and the roughness sublayer in turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 782:541–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 771 pp

  • Porté-Agel F, Meneveau C, Parlange M (2000) A scale-dependent dynamic model for large-eddy simulation: application to a neutral atmospheric boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 415:261–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratti C, Sabatino SD, Britter R, Brown M, Caton F, Burian S (2002) Analysis of 3-D urban databases with respect to pollution dispersion for a number of European and American cities. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 2(5–6):459–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratto M, Tarantola S, Saltelli A (2001) Sensitivity analysis in model calibration: GSA-GLUE approach. Comput Phys Commun 136(3):212–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach M, Antonia R, Rajagopalan S (1991) Rough-wall turbulent boundary layers. Appl Mech Rev 44:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach M, Finnigan J, Brunet Y (1996) Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:351–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rij JV, Belnap B, Ligrani P (2002) Analysis and experiments on three-dimensional, irregular surface roughness. J Fluids Eng 124(3):671–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotach M (1999) On the influence of the urban roughness sublayer on turbulence and dispersion. Atmos Environ 33:4001–4008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth M (2000) Review of atmospheric turbulence over cities. Q J R Meteorol Soc 126(564):941–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli A (2002) Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment. Risk Anal 22(3):579–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott EM (2000) Sensitivity analysis. Wiley, Oxford, UK, 504 pp

  • Saltelli A, Annoni P, Azzini I, Campolongo F, Ratto M, Tarantola S (2010) Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index. Comput Phys Commun 181(2):259–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz M, Flack K (2009) Turbulent boundary layers on a systematically varied rough wall. Phys Fluids 21(1):015,104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shockling M, Allen J, Smits A (2006) Roughness effects in turbulent pipe flow. J Fluid Mech 564:267–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigal A, Danberg J (1990) New correlation of roughness density effect on the turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J 28(3):554–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su HB, Schmid H, Vogel C, Curtis P (2008) Effects of canopy morphology and thermal stability on mean flow and turbulence statistics observed inside a mixed hardwood forest. Agric For Meteorol 148(6):862–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennekes H, Lumley J (1972) A first course in turbulence. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 320 pp

  • Theurer W (1993) Dispersion of ground-level emissions in complex built-up areas. PhD Thesis, University of Karlsruhe, Germany

  • Thom A (1971) Momentum absorption by vegetation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 97:414–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend A (1976) The structure of turbulent shear flow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 429 pp

  • Wilczek M, Stevens R, Meneveau C (2015) Spatio-temporal spectra in the logarithmic layer of wall turbulence: large-eddy simulations and simple models. J Fluid Mech 769:R1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooding R, Bradley E, Marshall J (1973) Drag due to regular arrays of roughness elements of varying geometry. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 5:285–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Christensen KT (2007) Outer-layer similarity in the presence of a practical rough-wall topology. Phys Fluids 19:085,108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Christensen KT (2010) Spatial structure of a turbulent boundary layer with irregular surface roughness. J Fluid Mech 655:380–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyngaard J (2010) Turbulence in the atmosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 393 pp

  • Xie ZT, Coceal O, Castro I (2008) Large-eddy simulation of flows over random urban-like obstacles. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 129(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X (2016) On the mean flow behaviour in the presence of regional-scale surface roughness heterogeneity. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. doi:10.1007/s10546-016-0157-6

  • Yang XI, Sadique J, Mittal R, Meneveau C (2016) Exponential roughness layer and analytical model for turbulent boundary layer flow over rectangular-prism roughness elements. J Fluid Mech 789:127–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan J, Piomelli U (2014a) Estimation and prediction of the roughness function on realistic surfaces. J Turbul 15(6):350–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan J, Piomelli U (2014b) Roughness effects on the reynolds stress budgets in near-wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech 760:R1 (12 pp)

  • Yuan J, Piomelli U (2015) Numerical simulation of a spatially developing accelerating boundary layer over roughness. J Fluid Mech 780:192–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zagarola M, Smits A (1998) Mean-flow scaling of turbulent pipe flow. J Fluid Mech 373:33–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaki SA, Hagishima A, Tanimoto J, Ikegaya N (2011) Aerodynamic parameters of urban building arrays with random geometries. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 138(1):99–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank anonymous reviewers for providing comprehensive, insightful comments that led to a much-improved final manuscript. WA and XZ acknowledge support from the Army Research Office, Environmental Sciences Directorate (Grant # W911NF-15-1-0231; PM: Dr. J. Parker). Computational resources were provided by the Texas Advanced Computing Center at the University of Texas at Austin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Anderson.

Appendix: Topography Construction

Appendix: Topography Construction

The topographies summarized in Tables 3 and 4 were built in MatLab\(^{\mathrm {TM}}\). Construction of the topographies involved designation of two topographic “stencils”, where block heights are either fixed to zero or are allowed to vary at pre-defined locations. For cases 1–10, a topographic stencil with 256 uniform-height, square-based blocks was distributed across the \(N_x = N_y = 128\) computational grid (i.e., each block had side length, \(L_x/16\); see also Fig. 1a). The height of the blocks was varied as \(0.02 \le h_o/H \le 0.25\), and thus the standard deviation, \(\sigma _h/H\), was changed systematically while the skewness and kurtosis were set to fixed values (recall the description of topographic moments in Table 2). This approach is appealing for the present purposes since it allows higher-order moments to remain fixed. For cases 11–26, a topographic stencil with 64 uniform height, square-based blocks were distributed across the \(N_x = N_y = 128\) computational grid (i.e., each block had side length, \(L_x/8\); see also Fig. 1b, c). The block heights of groups of blocks were fixed to one of four equivalent values (\(h_{o1}, h_{o2}, h_{o3}, h_{o4}\)), and these values were systematically varied. These block heights were varied randomly to attain the desired realistic variability of \(s_k\) (cases 11–18) and \(k_u\) (cases 19–26). For cases 27–46, the cases 1–10 topographic stencil was reused, but the heights of the blocks were varied in pair to manipulate the statistical moments. For example, for cases 39–42, the case 9 topography was used as the base, and then the height of half the blocks was increased while the height of the remaining half was decreased. By introducing this heterogeneity, the skewness was varied systematically. For case 47 to 56, all block heights (within the topographic stencil) were selected with MatLab\(\mathrm {TM}\)’s random number generator (see Fig. 1d).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, X., Iungo, G.V., Leonardi, S. et al. Parametric Study of Urban-Like Topographic Statistical Moments Relevant to a Priori Modelling of Bulk Aerodynamic Parameters. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 162, 231–253 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0198-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0198-x

Keywords

Navigation