Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Globally, peatlands are estimated to store about 600 Pg of carbon (C), or about 30% of global soil C stocks, although estimates vary widely (Minasny et al. 2019, 2023; Leifeld and Menichetti 2018). This makes peatland C stocks about twice as high as the C in the above- and belowground biomass of living forests (Pan et al. 2013). Since the industrial revolution, northern peatlands in the temperate and boreal zones of the Northern Hemisphere have been extensively drained for agricultural production, a trend that only stopped about half a century ago, with peatland areas used as cropland declining since the 1990s due to abandonment (Qiu et al. 2021). In contrast, large-scale drainage and conversion of tropical peatlands began half a century ago, driven by increasing land use pressures, first in Southeast Asia, but increasingly also in Africa and South America (Fluet- Chouinard et al. 2023, Leifeld et al. 2019; Miettinen et al. 2017; Frolking et al. 2011). Drainage of peat soils accelerates microbial carbon and nitrogen mineralization due to the change from anoxic to oxic conditions (Ma et al. 2022; Frolking et al. 2011), so that with drainage peatlands become strong sources of the greenhouse gases (GHG) CO2 and N2O, while CH4 emissions mostly disappear (Frolking et al. 2011). The importance of drained peatlands as regional and global GHG sources is huge, especially in Northern Europe, North America and South-East Asia, although the accounting is somewhat hampered due to uncertainties in peatland mapping and definitions, and the extent and intensity of anthropogenic activities affect the GHG balance of peatlands (Minasny et al. 2023; Harris et al. 2022). For example, GHG emissions associated with peatland drainage are estimated to contribute about 50% of total GHG emissions from land use, land use change, and forestry (LULUCF) sector in Indonesia (Austin et al. 2018) and still 6.6% of total anthropogenic GHG emissions in a highly industrialized country such as Germany (Tiemeyer et al. 2020).
Peatland restoration has become a key measure to reduce GHG emissions from the LULUCF sector, which is due to the importance of drained peatlands as GHG sources and of intact peatlands as sinks for atmospheric CO2 resulting from the hindered decomposition of plant litter inputs under anaerobic conditions (Frolking et al. 2011),. The European Union, as well as many of its Member States, Canada, the USA, but also countries in the tropics such as Indonesia, are currently assessing strategies and support schemes for the rewetting of drained peatlands used for agriculture or forestry, although a regulatory framework is not yet in place (Chen et al. 2023; Wicaksono and Zainal 2022). Such strategies include the use of rewetted peatlands for sustainable biomass production, such as for paludiculture (Freeman et al. 2022).
In November 2022, the Department of Agroecology and its Pioneer Center on Sustainable Agricultural Futures, Land-CRAFT, Aarhus University, Denmark, organized a workshop to bring together leading experts in peatland ecology and management to discuss what can be done to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and restore carbon stocks in drained organic soils (Fig. 1). The workshop discussed the latest research on regulating GHG emissions from managed peatlands and organic soils, as well as possible ways to restore the original functions of peatlands as important landscape elements for carbon storage, water and nutrient buffering, and biodiversity. Policy developments at both national and international levels were addressed, as well as ways to incentivize peatland restoration. This last point remains critical because, given the large uncertainties associated with quantifying the extent of managed peatlands and their GHG balance, and the lack of knowledge on the longer-term mitigation effects of rewetting, the inclusion of GHG emission reductions from rewetting in national GHG inventories reported to the UNFCCC remains problematic and hampers the targeting and identification of appropriate mitigation actions and thus policy making (Fig. 2).
The special issue on “Peatlands for climate change mitigation in agriculture” provides a comprehensive overview of different aspects of peatland research, covering aspects of organic matter decomposition, management of peatlands used for agriculture, peatland degradation in the tropics, assessment of rewetting strategies and, finally, observational shortcomings regarding peatland mapping.
Two papers in this collection assess the dynamics of organic matter mineralization in different peatland types. The work by Glatzel et al. (2023) assesses mineralization dynamics and dissolved organic matter fluxes in two common peatland types, blanket bogs and raised bogs. They found that blanket bogs have higher hydrological C losses compared to raised bogs due to greater hydrological conductivity to the adjacent landscape. Insights into the decomposition of organic matter and possible pathways of CH4 production are provided by an in-situ decomposition study in a rewetted peatland with Phragmites litter by Reuter et al. (2023). This study shows that the highest rates of carbohydrate decomposition were observed in the still aerobic surface water layers of the rewetted peat, while in the deeper, mostly anaerobic but still rooted peat layers, lignin was decomposed more efficiently. The authors speculate that the significant CH4 production may be directly related to the demethoxylation of phenols. For assessing emission risks associated with rewetting it would be helpful to identify by chemical makers the degree of peat degradation. Turunen et al. (2024) used a C:N:H stochiometric approach for classifying the status of peat degradation and changes in peat substrate quality following water table changes. They showed that elemental ratios of H:C, O:C and C:N and degree of unsaturation are valuable proxies for peat degradation and for explaining site differences in annual CO2 and CH4 emissions.
The study by Honkanen et al. (2023) confirms that drained peatlands used for agriculture in Finland are major sources of GHG, with C loss rates of about 5.4–8.8 t C ha−1 yr−1, N2O emissions in the range of 4.5–11.8 kg N ha−1 yr−1. CH4 fluxes were marginal, with soils acting as weak sinks. The introduction of no-tillage reduced GHG emissions by about 10%, although this remains uncertain as inter-annual variability was significant and longer-term monitoring beyond the three-year observation period is needed to confirm observations. A somewhat different view of GHG emissions from agricultural peatlands is provided by the study of Tyler and Silver (2023), who compared three different management systems in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta of California. While the perennial alfalfa and grazed pasture sites were overall net sinks for GHGs, the peatland used for corn production was a strong sink for both CO2 (about 60% of total GHG emissions) and N2O (about 40%). Most interestingly, hotspots of CO2, CH4 and N2O did not persist over the observation period, and the explanatory power of spatiotemporal variations in soil moisture, soil oxygen and temperature for explaining patterns of GHG fluxes remained limited.
The effect of different restoration pathways on the GHG budgets of peatlands is the focus of four papers in this special issue. Temmink et al. (2023) investigated nutrient dynamics, organic matter formation, and carbon and nutrient accumulation in a 16 ha Sphagnum paludiculture site in NW Germany 10 years after topsoil removal and Sphagnum inoculation. They conclude that Sphagnum paludiculture sequestered an average of 2.6 t C ha−1 yr−1 and thus represents a promising management strategy for peatland restoration on agricultural peatlands. The practice of topsoil removal as part of peatland restoration and for priming paludiculture remains a matter of ongoing discussion (Zak an McInnes, 2022). Käärmelahti et al. (2023) show that the establishment of Sphagnum paludiculture was comparable at topsoil removal depths of 5 or 30 cm, but that P concentrations remained elevated when no or only 5 cm of topsoil was removed. While the establishment of paludiculture appears to be an effective strategy for converting former agricultural peatlands from strong GHG sources to GHG sinks, the long-term benefits under the constraints of climate change remain uncertain. Bockermann et al. (2024) used an in-situ experimental approach with warming (+ 0.8–1.3 °C increase in mean annual temperature) and rewetting of soils to a water table position of 0.13 m below the soil surface to study the effects of climate change on intensively and extensively managed grasslands. They found that at the elevated water table position, high rates of net C sequestration could be observed even under warming conditions, and that even with huge N2O emissions of up to 27 kg N2O ha−1 yr−1, the study site turned from a strong GHG source (+ 48–67 t CO2−eq ha−1 yr−1) to a net GHG sink (− 11 to − 13 t CO2−eq ha−1 yr−1).
By reviewing the current literature and developing a conceptual model, the paper by Mander et al. (2023) provides insights into the GHG emissions and C sequestration potential of different restoration options, such as paludiculture, shallow lakes, or restored peatlands in boreal, temperate, and tropical climates. Based on their assessment, Sphagnum paludiculture showed the highest C sequestration potential, followed by shallow lakes and reed/grass paludiculture. However, the study also confirms that long-term GHG balance datasets and analyses are too scarce, and that lateral losses of dissolved and particulate organic matter and associated GHG fluxes from streams are often overlooked, to derive a comprehensive picture of drainage- and restoration-induced changes in peatland GHG fluxes (Fig. 1). An additional review synthesizes the research highlighting the pivotal role of soil microbial communities in regulating carbon and nutrient cycling within rewetted peatlands (Gios et al. 2023). This encompasses an examination of molecular biology techniques designed to better understand the biogeochemical processes linked to GHG fluxes. Notably, it demonstrates how rapidly evolving molecular biology approaches, like high-throughput sequencing, serve as potent tools in unraveling the dynamics of crucial biogeochemical processes when combined with isotope tracing and GHG measurement techniques.
The lack of observations on the effects of drainage on peatlands is particularly relevant for tropical peatlands and swamps. In a study in Sumatra, Indonesia, Swails et al. (2023) analyzed how CH4 and N2O emissions changed as a result of a land-use transition from primary peat swamp forests to oil palm plantations. This transition was associated with a large increase in soil N2O emissions, while CH4 emissions decreased significantly. Although the decrease in CH4 emissions compensated for the increase in N2O emissions using a 20-year global warming potential (GWP) approach, this was not the case when changes in GHG emissions were calculated over a 100-year period.
In addition to active drainage of tropical swamp forests and subsequent land use change, peatland degradation due to unsustainable harvesting of e.g., Mauritia flexuosa palms for fruit, affects site hydrology and GHG fluxes. A site study for a peat swamp forest in Peru (Hergoualc’h et al. 2023) and a review of published field measurements by Swails et al. (2024) for sites in Southeast Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean provide initial insights into the magnitude of GHG flux changes due to degradation. Swails et al. (2024) conclude that “the large observed increases in net CO2 emissions in undrained degraded forests compared to undegraded conditions calls for their inclusion as a new class in the IPCC guidelines” and that either protection or a new approach to sustainable management of swamp peatlands is needed to limit the impact of tropical peatland degradation on GHG emissions and the climate.
Given the importance of peatlands to the Earth’s climate system, and the extent to which human activities have changed these systems from net sinks to net sources of GHGs, it remains remarkable that key observational evidence remains inadequate. The paper by Zhao et al. (2023) provides an important analysis of current observational gaps and specifically calls for additional GHG observations in Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, as overall assessments of the GHG balance of natural and managed peatland systems are scarce. However, targeting future measurements and restoration activities requires detailed mapping of peatlands, peatland types and conditions, and anthropogenic management activities around the world, which remains a challenge. The review by Minasny et al. (2023) summarizes various approaches to monitoring peatland conditions and functions, including remote sensing techniques with passive and active sensors that can be used at regional to national scales to support monitoring of subsidence rates, water levels, peat moisture, and GHG emissions. Improved monitoring of peatlands using comparable approaches is a prerequisite for national and international prioritization of peatland protection and restoration measures. Protecting natural peatlands and restoring those peatlands currently used for agriculture is a key priority for reducing the GHG footprint of global agriculture.
While this appears to be a win-win situation in terms of reducing national GHG emissions from the LULUCF sector, as well as being beneficial for landscape hydrology and biodiversity, the reality is still different, especially for peatlands in the tropics, where increasing agricultural land use is still a major driver of peatland drainage and conversion to agricultural land. Moreover, little is known so far about how climate change may directly or indirectly affect peatland restoration and the GHG balance, e.g., available water resources at the regional scale may not be sufficient to ensure sustained high-water table positions of rewetted peatlands across seasons and years, which may jeopardize the restoration goal of turning drained peatlands into permanent GHG sinks. Thus, the question of what role global peatlands may play in regional and global climate and hydrological systems in the coming decades remains unanswered.
Data availability
Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.
References
Austin KG, Harris NL, Wijaya A, Murdiyarso D, Harvey T, Stolle F, Kasibhatla PS (2018) A review of land-based greenhouse gas flux estimates in Indonesia. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab531
Bockermann C, Eickenscheidt T, Drösler M (2024) Adaptation of Fen peatlands to climate change: rewetting and management shift can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and offset climate warming effects. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01113-z
Chen C, Loft L, Matzdorf B (2023) Lost in action: climate friendly use of European peatlands needs coherence and incentive-based policies. Environ Sci Policy 145:104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.04.010
Fluet-Chouinard E, Stocker BD, Zhang Z, Malhotra A, Melton JR, Poulter B, Kaplan JO, Goldewijk KK, Siebert S, Minayeva T, Hugelius G, Joosten H, Barthelmes A, Prigent C, Aires F, Hoyt AM, Davidson N, Finlayson CM, Lehner B, Jackson RB, McIntyre PB (2023) Extensive global wetland loss over the past three centuries. Nature 614(7947):281–286. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05572-6
Freeman BWJ, Evans CD, Musarika S, Morrison R, Newman TR, Page SE, Wiggs GFS, Bell NGA, Styles D, Wen Y, Chadwick DR, Jones DL (2022) Responsible agriculture must adapt to the wetland character of mid-latitude peatlands. Global Change Biol 28(12):3795–3811. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16152
Frolking S, Talbot J, Jones MC, Treat CC, Kauffman JB, Tuittila ES, Roulet N (2011) Peatlands in the Earth’s 21st century climate system. Environ Rev 19(1):371–396. https://doi.org/10.1139/a11-014
Gios E, Verbruggen E, Audet J, Burns R, Butterbach-Bahl K, Espenberg M, Fritz C, Glatzel S, Jurasinski G, Larmola T, Mander Ü, Nielsen C, Rodriguez AF, Zak D, Silvennoinen HM (2023) Unraveling microbial processes involved in C/N cycling and greenhouse gas emissions in rewetted peatlands by molecular biology. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-024-01122-6
Glatzel S, Worall F, Boothroyd IM, Heckmann KA (2023) Comparison of the transformation of organic matter flux through a raised bog and a blanket bog. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01093-0
Harris LI, Richardson K, Bona KA, Davidson SJ, Finkelstein SA, Garneau M, McLaughlin J, Nwaishi F, Olefeldt D, Packalen M, Roulet NT, Southee FM, Strack M, Webster KL, Wilkinson SL, Ray JC (2022) The essential carbon service provided by northern peatlands. Front Ecol Environ 20(4):222–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2437
Hergoualc K, van Lent J, Dezzeo N, Verchot LV, Groeningen JW, Lopez M, Grandez-Rios J (2023) Major carbon losses from degradation of Mauritia flexuosa peat swamp forests in western Amazonia. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01057-4
Honkanen H, Kekkonen H, Heikkinen J, Kaseva J, Lång K (2023) Minor effects of no-till treatment on GHG emissions of boreal cultivated peat soil. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01097-w
Käärmelahti S, Fritz C, Quadra G, Gardoki ME, Gaudig G, Krebs M, Temmink R (2023) Topsoil removal for sphagnum establishment on rewetted agricultural bogs. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01096-x
Leifeld J, Menichetti L (2018) The underappreciated potential of peatlands in global climate change mitigation strategies. Nat Commun 9:1071
Leifeld J, Wüst-Galley C, Page S (2019) Intact and managed peatland soils as a source and sink of GHGs from 1850 to 2100. Nat Clim Change 9(12):945–947. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0615-5
Ma L, Zhu G, Chen B, Zhang K, Niu S, Wang J, Ciais P, Zuo H (2022) A globally robust relationship between water table decline, subsidence rate, and carbon release from peatlands. Commun Earth Environ 3(1):254
Mander Ü, Espenberg M, Melling L, Kull A (2023) Peatland restoration pathways to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and retain peat carbon. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01103-1
Miettinen J, Hooijer A, Vernimmen R, Liew SC, Page SE (2017) From carbon sink to carbon source: extensive peat oxidation in insular Southeast Asia since 1990. Environm Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5b6f
Minasny B, Berglund Ö, Connolly J, Hedley C, de Vries F, Gimona A, Kempen B, Kidd D, Lilja H, Malone B, McBratney A, Roudier P, O’Rourke S, Rudiyanto R, Padarian J, Poggio L, ten Caten A, Thompson D, Tuve C, Widyatmanti W (2019) Digital mapping of peatlands—a critical review. Earth Sci Rev 196:102874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019
Minasny B, Adetsu DV, Aitkenhead M, Artz RRE, Baggaley N, Barthelmes A, Beucher A, Caron J, Conchedda G, Connolly J, Deragon R, Evans C, Fadnes K, Fiantis D, Gagkas Z, Gilet L, Gimona A, Glatzel S, Greve MH, Habib W, Hergoualch K, Hermansen C, Kidd DB, Koganti T, Kopansky D, Large DJ, Larmola T, Lilly A, Liu H, Marcus M, Middleton M, Morrison K, Petersen RJ, Quaife T, Rochefort L, Rudiyanto Toca L, Tubiello FN, Lystbæk Weber P, Weldon S, Widyatmanti W, Williamson J, Zak D (2023) Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01084-1
Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Phillips OL, Jackson RB (2013) The structure, distribution, and biomass of the world’s forests. Annual Rev Ecol Evol Syst 44:593–622. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135914
Qiu C, Ciais P, Zhu D, Guenet B, Peng S, Petrescu AMR, Lauerwald R, Makowski D, Gallego-Sala AV, Charman DJ, Brewer SC (2021) Large historical carbon emissions from cultivated northern peatlands. Sci Adv 7(23):eabf1332. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf1332
Reuter J, Reuter H, Zak D (2023) Decomposition of lignin and carbohydrates in a rewetted peatland: a comparative analysis of surface water and anaerobic soil layers. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01102-2
Swails E, Drewer J, Hartill J, Comeau LP, Verchot L, Hergoualc’h K (2023) Soil nitrous oxide and methane fluxes from a land-use change transition of primary forest to oil palm in an Indonesian peatland. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01070-7
Swails E, Frolking S, Deng J, Hergoualc’h K (2024) Degradation increases peat greenhouse gas emissions in undrained tropical peat swamp forests. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01110-2
Temmink RJM, Vroom R, van Dijk G, Käärmelahti SA, Koks AHW, Joosten H, Krebs M, Gaudig G, Brust K, Lamers LPM, Smolders AJP, Fritz C (2023) Restoring organic matter, carbon and nutrient accumulation in degraded peatlands: 10 years sphagnum paludiculture. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01065-4
Tiemeyer B, Freibauer A, Borraz EA, Augustin J, Bechtold M, Beetz S, Beyer C, Ebli M, Eickenscheidt T, Fiedler S, Förster C, Gensior A, Giebels M, Glatzel S, Heinichen J, Hoffmann M, Höper H, Jurasinski G, Laggner A, Leiber-Sauheitl K, Peichl-Brak M, Drösler M (2020) A new methodology for organic soils in national greenhouse gas inventories: data synthesis, derivation and application. Ecol Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105838
Turunen J, Anttila J, Laine-Petäjäkangas A, Ovaskainen J, Laatikainen M, Alm J, Larmola T (2024) Impacts of forestry drainage on surface peat stoichiometry and physical properties in boreal peatlands in Finland. Forests. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01115-x
Tyler L, Silver WL (2023) Hot spots and hot moments of greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural peatlands. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01095-y
Wicaksono A, Zainal (2022) Peatlands restoration policies in Indonesia: success or failure? Earth Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/995/1/012068
Zak D, McInnes RJ (2022) A call for refining the peatland restoration strategy in Europe. J Appl Ecol 59(11):2698–2704. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14261
Zak D, Maagaard AL, Liu H (2022) Restoring Riparian Peatlands for Inland waters: a European perspective. Encyclopedia of Inland waters, Second Edition, pp 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819166-8.00127-4
Zhao J, Weldon S, Barthelmes A, Swails E, Hergoualc’h K, Mander Ü, Qiu C, Connolly J, Silver W, Campbell D (2023) Global observation gaps of peatland greenhouse gas balances–needs and obstacles. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01091-2
Funding
This special issue evolved from a workshop titled “Peatlands for climate change mitigation in agriculture” that took place in Aarhus, Denmark, on 3–5 October 2022 supported by the OECD Co-operative Research Programme: Biological Resource Management for Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Additional funding for the workshop was provided by the Danish Pioneer Center for Research in Sustainable Agricultural Futures (Land-CRAFT), DNRF grant number P2. The opinions expressed and arguments employed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the OECD or of the governments of its member countries.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Butterbach-Bahl, K., Zak, D. & Olesen, J.E. Editorial: Peatlands for climate change mitigation in agriculture. Biogeochemistry 167, 321–326 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-024-01123-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-024-01123-5