Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The biogeochemical redox paradox: how can we make a foundational concept more predictive of biogeochemical state changes?

  • Synthesis and Emerging Ideas
  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oxidation–reduction (redox) ladders are a fundamental biogeochemical concept that explain basic and applied phenomena including microbial metabolic evolution and chemical pollution remediation. However, it is difficult to measure and predict which redox couples dominate an environment. This discrepancy manifests a redox paradox: while redox ladders are a fundamental biogeochemical concept, it is difficult to use existing measurements to predict which redox couples dominate in an environment or use redox to predict biogeochemical state changes. Additionally, there is often confusion around the concept due to the differential emphasis in biological vs. geochemical sub-disciplines in explanations of the: (1) roles of actual vs. standard free energy calculations, (2) thermodynamics vs. enzymatic kinetics in reactions, (3) ubiquity of alternative electron donors as opposed to assuming processes are solely driven by organic carbon, and (4) difference between redox intensity and redox buffering capacity. Redox buffering capacity is a particularly underdeveloped concept within biogeochemical studies, which have largely used redox potential, a measurement with myriad analytical concerns. We review the small number of studies that have quantified redox buffering capacity. We highlight four challenges to overcome before redox buffering capacity can be a useful concept. Measuring redox buffering capacity may be key to understanding the ability of the ecosystems to resist change in redox conditions. Biogeochemists are often most interested in predicting these state changes to understand hot spot/hot moment phenomena such as greenhouse gas fluxes; thus, incorporating redox buffering capacity into our predictive frameworks and methodological toolbox may be key to unlocking the redox paradox. We postulate that the well-known ecological resilience and resistance framework constitutes the needed theoretical foundation on which measurements of redox buffering capacity can be incorporated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

References are the data available for this synthesis paper.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The ideas in this paper were improved with helpful discussions with colleagues Sharon Billings, Steve Hamilton, Matthew Kirk, and Ben Sikes. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for their time and efforts in clarifying these ideas. This work was funded by National Science Foundation grant (NSF-DEB-1613325) and the US Department of Agriculture-NIFA grant (Awards 2011-03007 and 2011-000829). The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AJB and TDL developed this synthesis and outlined the article, drafted text, and designed the figures. The first draft of the manuscript was prepared by AJB and TDL contributed revisions. All authors read and approved of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. Burgin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Sharon A. Billings.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burgin, A.J., Loecke, T.D. The biogeochemical redox paradox: how can we make a foundational concept more predictive of biogeochemical state changes?. Biogeochemistry 164, 349–370 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01036-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01036-9

Keywords

Navigation