Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Predicting insect distributions from climate and habitat data

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Knowing the effects of climate and habitat on the distributions of insect pests and their natural enemy would help target the search for natural enemies, increase establishment of intentional introductions, improve risk assessment for accidental introductions and the effects of climate change. Most existing methods used to predict geographical distributions of insects either involve subjective comparisons of climate or require data concerning insect responses to climate. Here we have used geographical distributions of insects to develop statistical models for the effects of climate and habitat on these distributions. We tested this approach using six insect pests found in the United States: Ostrinia nubilalis (European corn borer), Diuraphis noxia (Russian wheat aphid), Helicoverpa zea (Corn earworm), Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Colorado potato beetle), Solenopsis invicta (Red imported fire ant), and Conotrachelus nenuphar (Plum curculio). By randomly separating the data into model-building and test sets, we were able to estimate prediction accuracy. For each species, a unique combination of predictor variables was identified. The models correctly predicted presence for more than 92% of the data on each insect species. The models correctly predicted absence for 59% to 77% of the data on five of six species. Absence predictions were poor for H. zea (21% correct), because distribution data were limited and inaccurate. Predictions of insect absence were more difficult because absence data were less abundant and perhaps less reliable. This approach offers potential for the analysis of existing data to produce predictions about insect establishment. However, accurate prediction depends heavily on data quality, and in particular, more data are needed from locations where insects are sampled but not found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson PR, Gómez-Laverde M, Peterson AT (2002) Geographical distributions of spiny pocket mice in South America: insights from predictive models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 11:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspinall R, Matthews K (1994) Climate change impact on distribution and abundance of wildlife species: an analytical approach using GIS. Environ Pollut 86:217–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Austin MP (1980) Searching for a model for use in vegetation analysis. Vegetatio 42:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin MP (2002) Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modeling. Ecol Model 157:101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker RHA, Sansford CE, Jarvis CH, Cannon RJC, MacLeod A, Walters KFA (2000) The role of climatic mapping in predicting the potential geographical distribution of non-indigenous pests under current and future climates. Agric Ecosyst Environ 82:57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beerling DJ, Huntley B, Bailey JP (1995) Climate and the distribution of Fallopia japonica: use of an introduced species to test the predictive capacity of response surfaces. J Veg Sci 6:269–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks L, Hein G, Johnson G, Legg D, Massey B, Morrisson P, Weiss M, Peairs F (1994) Economic impact of the Russian wheat aphid in the western United States 1991–1992. Great Plains Agric Council Publ 147:250–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Callcott AA, Collins HL (1996) Invasion and rage expansion of imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Northern America from 1918–1995. Florida Entomol 79:240–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cammell ME, Knight JD (1992) Effects of climate change on the population dynamics of crop pests. Adv Ecol Res 22:117–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capinera JL (2001) Handbook of vegetable pests. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 729

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen CP (Ed) (1978) Introduced parasites and predators of arthropod pests and weeds: a world review. Washington, DC Agricultural research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Handbook No. 480

  • Culpepper GH (1953) The distribution of the imported fire ant in the Southern States. Proceedings of the Association of Agricultural Workers 50,102 pp

  • Daly C, Neilson RP, Philipps DL (1994) A statistical-topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. J Appl Meteorol 33:140–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBach P (1964) Biological control of insect pests and weeds. Chapmann and Hall Ltd, London, pp 884

    Google Scholar 

  • Dentener PR, Whiting DC, Connolly PG (2002) Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae): could it survive in New Zealand? N Z Plant Prot 55:18–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Burgmann M (2002) Predictions and their validation: rare plants in the central highlands, Victoria, Australia. In: Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Morrison ML, Haufler JB, Raphael MG, Wall WA, Samson FB (eds) Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 303–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding AH (2002) What are the appropriate characteristics of an accuracy measure? In: Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Morrison ML, Haufler JB, Raphael MG, Wall WA, Samson FB (eds) Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 271–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin MJ, Keitt TH, Maurer BA, Taper ML, Kaufmann DM, Blackburn TM (2005) Species’ geographic ranges and distributional limits: pattern analysis and statistical issues. Oikos 108:7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (2003) The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. Oxford University Press

  • Gevrey M, Worner SP (2006) Prediction of global distribution of insect pest species in relation to climate by using an ecological informatics method. J Econ Entomol 99:979–986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goolsby JA, DeBarro PJ, Kirk AA, Sutherst RW, Canas L, Ciomperlik MA, Ellsworth PC, Gould JR, Hartley DM, Hoelmer KA, Naranjo SE, Rose M, Roltsch WJ, Ruiz RA, Pickett CH, Vacek DC (2005) Post-release evaluation of biological control of Bemisia tabaci biotype “B” in the USA and the development of predictive tools to guide introductions for other countries. Biol Control 32:70–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Hofer U (2003) Predicting reptile distributions at the mesoscale: relation to climate and topography. J Biogeogr 30:1233–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Theurillat JP (2000) Equilibrium modeling of alpine plant distribution and climate change: how far can we go? Phytocoenologia 30:353–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo QF, Qian H, Ricklefs RE, Xi WM (2006) Distributions of exotic plants in eastern Asia and North America. Ecol Lett 9:827–834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall RW, Ehler LE (1979) Rate of establishment of natural enemies in classical biological control. Bull Entomol Soc Am 25:280–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Hance T, van Baaren J, Vernon P, Boivin G (2007) Impact of extreme temperatures on parasitoids in a climate change perspective. Annu Rev Entomol 52:107–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley S, Harris R, Lester PJ (2006) Quantifying uncertainty in the potential distribution of an invasive species: climate and the Argentine ant. Ecol Lett 9:1068–1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hengeveld R (1990) Dynamic and biogeography. Cambridge Univ. Press

  • Hoelmer KA, Kirk AA (2005) Selecting arthropod biological control agents against arthropod pests: can the science be improved to decrease the risk of releasing ineffective agents? Biol Control 34:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD, Keitt TH (2000) Alternative causes for range limits: a metapopulation perspective. Ecol Lett 2:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper KR (1996) Making biological control introductions more effective. Biological control introductions opportunities for improved crop production. Proceedings of an international symposium Brighton, UK 18 November, British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, UK, pp 59–76

  • Hopper KR (1998) Assessing and improving the safety of introductions for biological control. Phytoprotection 79:84–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton DL, Ellis HC (1989) Plum curculio. S.C. Myers Peach production handbook. Cooperative Extension Service, University of Georgia Athens, GA, pp 169–170

  • Kiritani K (2006) Predicting impacts of global warming on population dynamics and distribution of arthropods in Japan. Popul Ecol 48:5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriticos DJ, Randall PR (2001) A comparison of systems to analyze potential weed distributions. In: Groves RH, Panetta FD, Virtue JG (eds) Weed risk assessment. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 61–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH (2000) Concluding remarks: a review of some open questions. In: Hutchings M, John E, Steward AJA (eds) Ecological consequences of heterogeneity. Cambridge University Press, pp 401–424

  • Leathwick JR (1998) Are New-Zealand’s Nothofagus species in equilibrium with their environment. J Veg Sci 9:719–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim BK, Peterson AT, Engstrom MD (2002) Robustness of ecological niche modeling algorithms for mammals in Guyana. Biodivers Conserv 11:1237–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loiselle BA, Howell CA, Graham CH, Goerck JM, Brooks T, Smith KG, Williams PH (2003) Avoiding pitfalls of using species distribution models in conservation planning. Conserv Biol 17:1591–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay WP, Fagerlund R (1997) Range expansion of the red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), into New Mexico and extreme western Texas. Proc Entomol Soc Wash 99:757–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier CT (1990) Native and exotic rosaceous hosts of apple, plum, and quince curculio larvae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the northeastern United States. J Econ Entomol 83:1326–1332

    Google Scholar 

  • Manel S, Williams HC, Ormerod SJ (2001) Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. J Appl Ecol 38:921–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Austin MP (1994) Biological models for monitoring species decline: the construction and use of data bases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 344:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason CE, Rice ME, Calvin DD, Van Duyn JW, Showers WB, Hutchison WD, Witkowski JF, Higgins RA, Onstad DW, Dively GP (1996) European corn borer ecology and management. North Central Regional Extension Publication No. 327, Iowa State University

  • Maurer BA (1994) Geographical population analysis: tools for the analysis of biodiversity. Blackwell

  • Messenger PS, van den Bosch R (1971) The adaptability of introduced biological control agents. In: Huffaker CB, Messenger PS (eds) Theory and practice of biological control. Academic Press, New York, pp 68–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf RL, Metcalf RA (1993) Destructive and useful insects: their habits and control, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, pp 9.26–9.27

  • Mourell C, Ezcurra E (1996) Species richness of Argentine cacti: a test of biogeographic hypotheses. J Veg Sci 7:667–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock L, Worner S (2006) Using analogous climates and global insect distribution data to identify potential sources of new invasive insect pests in New Zealand. N Z J Zool 33:141–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce J, Ferrier S (2000) Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regressions. Ecol Model 133:225–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson RG, Dawson TP, Berry PM, Harrison PA (2002) SPECIES: a Spatial Evaluation of Climate Impact on the Envelope of Species. Ecol Model 154:289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polavarapu S, Barry JD, Kyryczenko-Roth V (2004) Phenology and infestation patterns of plum curculio (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on four highbush blueberry cultivars. J Econ Entomol 97:1899–1905

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rafoss T, Saethre MG (2003) Spatial and temporal distribution of bioclimatic potential for the codling moth and the Colorado potato beetle in Norway: model predictions versus climate and field data from the 1990s. Agric Forest Entomol 5:75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport EH (1982) Areography: geographical strategies of species. Pergamon Press. 269 pp

  • Samways MJ, Osborn R, Hastings H, Hattingh V (1999) Global climate change and accuracy of prediction of species’ geographical ranges: establishment success of introduced ladybirds (Coccinellidae, Chilocorus spp.) worldwide. J Biogeogr 26:795–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1989) SAS/STAT User´s Guide, Version 6, Cary, NC 4 (2) 846 pp

  • Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Morrison ML, Haufler JP, Raphael MG, Wall WA, Samson FB (eds) (2002) Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 868

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens AEA, Kriticos DJ, Leriche A (2007) The current and future potential geographical distribution of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Bull Entomol Res 97:369–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson NL (1998) Actual evapotranspiration and deficit: biologically meaningfully correlates of vegetation distribution across spatial scales. J Biogeogr 25:855–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiling P (1990) Calculation the establishment rates of parasitoids in classical biological control. Am Entomol 36:225–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiling P (1993) Why do natural enemies fail in classical biological control programs? Am Entomol 39:31–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockman AK, Beamer DA, Bond JE (2006) An evaluation of a GARP model as an approach to predicting the spatial distribution of non-vagile invertebrate species. Divers Distrib 12:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell DRB, Peters DP (1999) The GARP modeling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 13:143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker RL, Ferris DK, Grant WE, Folse LJ (1994) Simulating colonization by exotic species: a model of the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) in North America. Ecol Model 73:281–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherst RW (2003) Prediction of species geographical ranges. J Biogeogr 30:805–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherst RW, Maywald GF (2005) A climate-model of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): implications for invasion of new regions, particularly Oceania. Environ Entomol 34:317–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherst RW, Maywald GF, Yonow T, Stevens PM (2005) Climex-predicting the effects of climate on plants and animals. User guide. CSIRO publishing, Victoria, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson WR, Parker HL (1928) The European corn borer and its controlling factors in Europe. US Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 59, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuda M, Matsumoto T, Itioka T, Ishida N, Takanashi M, Ashihara W, Kohyama M, Takagi M (2006) Climatic and intertrophic effects detected in 10-year population dynamics of biological control of the arrowhead scale by two parasitoids in southwestern Japan. Popul Ecol 48:59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward FI, Beerling DJ (1997) The dynamics of vegetation change: health warnings for equilibrium and ‘dodo’ models. Global Ecol Biodivers Lett 6:413–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young AM, Blackshaw B, Maywald GF, Sutherst RW (1999) CLIMEX for Windows 1.1. Tutorials. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 1–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalucki MP, Furlong MJ (2005) Forecasting Helicoverpa populations in Australia: a comparison of regression based models and a bio-climatic based modeling approach. Insect Sci 12:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Jim Pheasant of the National Agricultural Pest Information System (NAPIS) unit for giving us access to the extended US pest data-base.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Christian Ulrichs

    Present address: Institute for Horticultural Science, Section Urban Horticulture, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Lentzeallee 55/57, 14195, Berlin, Germany

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beneficial Insect Introduction Research, USDA-ARS, Newark, DE, USA

    Christian Ulrichs & Keith R. Hopper

Authors
  1. Christian Ulrichs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keith R. Hopper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Ulrichs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ulrichs, C., Hopper, K.R. Predicting insect distributions from climate and habitat data. BioControl 53, 881–894 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-007-9143-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-007-9143-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation