Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Flying over the reality gap: From simulated to real indoor airships

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because of their ability to naturally float in the air, indoor airships (often called blimps) constitute an appealing platform for research in aerial robotics. However, when confronted to long lasting experiments such as those involving learning or evolutionary techniques, blimps present the disadvantage that they cannot be linked to external power sources and tend to have little mechanical resistance due to their low weight budget. One solution to this problem is to use a realistic flight simulator, which can also significantly reduce experimental duration by running faster than real time. This requires an efficient physical dynamic modelling and parameter identification procedure, which are complicated to develop and usually rely on costly facilities such as wind tunnels. In this paper, we present a simple and efficient physics-based dynamic modelling of indoor airships including a pragmatic methodology for parameter identification without the need for complex or costly test facilities. Our approach is tested with an existing blimp in a vision-based navigation task. Neuronal controllers are evolved in simulation to map visual input into motor commands in order to steer the flying robot forward as fast as possible while avoiding collisions. After evolution, the best individuals are successfully transferred to the physical blimp, which experimentally demonstrates the efficiency of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bermúdez i Badia, S., Pyk, P., and Verschure, P. 2005. A biologically based flight control system for a blimp-based uav. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

  • Cliff, D. and Miller, G.F. 1996. Co-evolution of pursuit and evasion ii: Simulation methods and results. In P. Maes, M. Mataric, J.A. Meyer, J. Pollack, H. Roitblat, and S. Wilson (eds), From Animals to Animats IV: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. MIT Press-Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA.

  • da Silva Metelo, F.M. and Garcia Campos, L.R. 2003. Vision based control of an autonomous blimp. Technical report.

  • Fossen, T.I. 1995. Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles. Wiley, New York.

  • Iida, F. 2003. Biologically inspired visual odometer for navigation of a flying robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 44:201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobi, N., Husbands, P., and Harvey, I. 1995. Noise and the reality gap: The use of simulation in evolutionary robotics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 929:704–720.

  • Khoury, G.A. and Gillet, J.D. 1999. Airship Technology. Cambridge University Press, London.

  • Lamb, H. 1932. Hydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press, London.

  • Melhuish, C. and Welsby, J. 2002. Gradient ascent with a group of minimalist real robots: Implementing secondary swarming. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

  • Michel, O. 2004. Webots: Professional mobile robot simulation. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 1(1):39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munk, M.M. 1934. Fluid mechanics, second part. In W.F. Durand (ed.), Aerodynamic Theory I. Julius Springer, pp. 224–304.

  • Munk, M.M. 1936. Aerodynamics of airships. In W.F. Durand (ed.), Aerodynamic Theory VI. Julius Springer, pp. 32–48.

  • Nicoud, J.D. and Zufferey, J.-C. 2002. Toward indoor flying robots. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 787–792.

  • Nolfi, S. and Floreano, D. 2000. Evolutionary Robotics. The Biology, Intelligence, and Technology of Self-organizing Machines. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

  • Planta, C., Conradt, J., Jencik, A., and Verschure, P. 2002. A neural model of the fly visual system applied to navigational tasks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN).

  • Sagatun, S.I. and Fossen, T. 1991. Lagrangian formulation of underwater vehicles’ dynamics. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp 1029–1034.

  • Schlichting, H. and Truckenbrodt, E. 2001. Aerodynamik des Flugzeuges. Springer, Berlin.

  • Urzelai, J. and Floreano, D. 2001. Evolution of adaptive synapses: robots with fast adaptive behavior in new environments. Evolutionary Computation, 9:495–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Zwaan, S., Bernardino, A., and Santos-Victor, J. 2002. Visual station keeping for floating robots in unstructured environments. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 39:145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. and Ostrowski, J. 1998. Visual servoing with dynamics: Control of an unmanned blimp. Technical report.

  • Zufferey, J.-C. 2005. Bio-inspired Vision-based Flying Robots. PhD thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL).

  • Zufferey, J.-C. and Floreano, D. 2006. Fly-inspired visual steering of an ultralight indoor aircraft. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 22(1):137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zufferey, J.-C., Floreano, D., van Leeuwen, M., and Merenda, T. 2002. Evolving vision-based flying robots. In Blthoff, Lee, Poggio, and Wallraven (eds.), Biologically Motivated Computer Vision: Second International Workshop, BMCV 2002, Tbingen, Germany. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2525. Springer-Verlag, pp. 592–600.

  • Zufferey, J.-C., Beyeler, A., and Floreano, D. 2003. Vision-based navigation from wheels to wings. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 3, pp. 2968–2973.

  • Zufferey, J.-C., Klaptocz, A., Beyeler, A., Nicoud, J.D., and Floreano, D. 2006. A 10-gram microflyer for vision-based indoor navigation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Christophe Zufferey.

Additional information

Jean-Christophe Zufferey and Alexis Guanella contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zufferey, JC., Guanella, A., Beyeler, A. et al. Flying over the reality gap: From simulated to real indoor airships. Auton Robot 21, 243–254 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-006-9718-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-006-9718-8

Keywords

Navigation