Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of political ties on firms’ innovation capability: Evidence from China

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Though the benefits of political ties in emerging markets are well-documented, their potential negative impact on firms' innovation capabilities (i.e., the efficiency of transforming resource inputs into innovative outputs) has not been thoroughly explored. Building on the upper echelons theory, we propose that political ties hinder innovation capabilities by diverting executives’ focus away from innovation transformation. We also suggest that the detrimental effect of political ties is weakened for firms with executives having R&D backgrounds or overseas experience. Our findings based on publicly listed private manufacturing firms in China from 2008 to 2017 confirm our predictions, after correcting for endogeneity. These findings offer a new theoretical lens to explain political ties’ dark side and a nuanced understanding on how to leverage political ties effectively in emerging markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data is available upon request.

Notes

  1. We consider a firm as having either archived or ascribed political ties if it had such ties in any year within the time window (i.e., 2008-2016). A firm is considered to have both types of political ties if it had both archived and ascribed ties in the same year. However, a firm may have only one type of political ties in different years within the time window. Therefore, the number of firms with archived ties plus the number of firms with ascribed ties minus the number of firms with both ties is greater than the actual number of firms with both ties (i.e., 270 + 323—99 = 494 > 445).

  2. The estimated mean value of the dependent variable (i.e., innovation capability) is 33.832 for firms without political ties based on the regression results reported in Model 5 (see Table 3), and it is 32.665 for firms with political ties. Therefore, the marginal effect equals − 3.45% (i.e., [32.665 − 33.832]/33.832). The same below.

References

  • Barker, V. L., III., & Mueller, G. C. (2002). CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Science, 48(6), 782–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A., & Rowley, T. J. (2002). Companion to organizations: An introduction. In J. A. Baum (Ed.), The blackwell companion to organizations (pp. 1–34). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Bu, M., Wu, S., & Liang, X. (2015). How does tmt attention to innovation of Chinese firms influence firm innovation activities? A study on the moderating role of corporate governance. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1127–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, V. Z., Li, J., Shapiro, D. M., & Zhang, X. (2014). Ownership structure and innovation: An emerging market perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Han, C., Wang, L., Ieromonachou, P., & Lu, X. (2021). Recognition of entrepreneur’s social ties and firm innovation in emerging markets: Explanation from the industrial institutional environment and survival pressure. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(2), 491–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Z., Wang, F., Keung, C., & Bai, Y. (2017). Will corporate political connection influence the environmental information disclosure level? Based on the panel data of A-Shares from listed companies in Shanghai Stock Market. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, T. S., & Hambrick, D. C. (2006). Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17(4), 453–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossland, C., Zyung, J., Hiller, N. J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2014). CEO career variety: Effects on firm-level strategic and social novelty. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 652–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, W., & Liao, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial attention to deregulations and reinvestments by private firms: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(4), 1221–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z., Hofman, P. S., & Newman, A. (2013). Ownership concentration and product innovation in Chinese private SMEs. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3), 717–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieleman, M., & Widjaja, H. (2019). How powerful political ties appropriate resources and how weaker organizations protect themselves: A case study from Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(1), 61–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., & Rajiv, S. (2005). Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: Methodology and empirical application. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, H., Morgan, N. A., & Rego, L. L. (2015). Marketing department power and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 79(5), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, H., Morgan, N. A., & Rego, L. L. (2017). Firm capabilities and growth: The moderating role of market conditions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(1), 76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Y., Yang, H., & Hafsi, T. (2019). Corporate giving and corporate financial performance: The S-curve relationship. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(3), 687–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadani, M., Dahan, N. M., & Doh, J. P. (2015). The CEO as chief political officer: Managerial discretion and corporate political activity. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2330–2337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2005). Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 472–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, H. A., Jia, N., Shi, J., & Wang, Y. (2017). The dynamics of political embeddedness in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1), 67–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 764–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, N. (2016). Political strategy and market capabilities: Evidence from the Chinese private sector. Management and Organization Review, 12(1), 75–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, N., Huang, K. G., & Zhang, C. M. (2019). Public governance, corporate governance, and firm innovation: An examination of state-owned enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1), 220–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju, M., & Zhao, H. (2009). Behind organizational slack and firm performance in China: The moderating roles of ownership and competitive intensity. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(4), 701–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, U., Kongsted, H. C., Laursen, K., & Ejsing, A.-K. (2018). Experience matters: The role of academic scientist mobility for industrial innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 39(7), 1935–1958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kor, Y. Y. (2006). Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1081–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M., Jiang, C. X., & Murray, J. Y. (2017). Examining the complementary effect of political networking capability with absorptive capacity on the innovative performance of emerging-market firms. Journal of Management, 43(4), 1131–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasnikov, A., & Jayachandran, S. (2008). The relative impact of marketing, research-and-development, and operations capabilities on firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Tang, Y. (2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Xia, J., & Zajac, E. J. (2018). On the duality of political and economic stakeholder influence on firm innovation performance: Theory and evidence from Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1), 193–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. J., Poppo, L., & Zhou, K. Z. (2008). Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 383–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, D., Lu, J., Liu, X., & Zhang, X. (2016). International knowledge brokerage and returnees’ entrepreneurial decisions. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3), 295–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W.-T., & Wang, L. C. (2021). Family firms, R&D, and internationalization: The stewardship and socio-emotional wealth perspectives. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(1), 91–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukas, B. A., & Ferrell, O. C. (2000). The effect of market orientation on product innovation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 239–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J., Xiang, Y., & Zhu, R. (2017). Military top executives and corporate philanthropy: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(3), 725–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddux, W. W., Adam, H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). When in rome … Learn why the Romans do what they do: How multicultural learning experiences facilitate creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(6), 731–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, I. P., Zhu, H., & Zajac, E. J. (2011). Where can capabilities come from? Network ties and capability acquisition in business groups. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 820–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science, 25(1), 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 175–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, S., & Modi, S. B. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder wealth: The role of marketing capability. Journal of Marketing, 80(1), 26–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musacchio, A., Lazzarini, S. G., & Aguilera, R. V. (2015). New varieties of state capitalism: Strategic and governance implications. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. (2001). Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 455–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., Li, Y., Xie, E., & Su, Z. (2010). CEO duality, organizational slack, and firm performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(4), 611–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 486–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puck, J., Hödl, M. K., Filatotchev, I., Wolff, H.-G., & Bader, B. (2016). Ownership mode, cultural distance, and the extent of parent firms’ strategic control over subsidiaries in the PRC. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(4), 1075–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, P., Siegel, D. S., Hillman, A., & Eden, L. (2006). Three lenses on the multinational enterprise: Politics, corruption, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 733–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, T. P. (1997). Modern regression methods. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambharya, R. B. (1996). Foreign experience of top management teams and international diversification strategies of US multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 17(9), 739–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarto, F., Saggese, S., Viganò, R., & Mauro, M. (2019). Human capital and innovation: Mixing apples and oranges on the board of high-tech firms. Management Decision, 58(5), 897–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauerwald, S., Lin, Z., & Peng, M. W. (2016). Board social capital and excess CEO returns. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3), 498–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2011). The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., Li, J. J., & Guo, Z. (2018). Institutions and opportunism in buyer–supplier exchanges: The moderated mediating effects of contractual and relational governance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(6), 1014–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. S. (2009). Green management matters only if it yieds more green: An economic/strategic perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. (2007). Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(4), 621–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, Y.-S., Tsang, E. W., & Peng, M. W. (2009). How do internal capabilities and external partnerships affect innovativeness? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(2), 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P. (2019). Corporate political ties in emerging markets. In R. Grosse & K. Meyer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of management in emerging markets (pp. 291–310). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P., Deng, Z., & Wright, M. (2021a). Partnering with Leviathan: The politics of innovation in foreign-host-state joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 52, 592–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P., Doh, J. P., Rajwani, T., & Siegel, D. (2021b). Navigating cross-border institutional complexity: A review and assessment of multinational nonmarket strategy research. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(9), 1818–1853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P., Hu, H. W., & Hillman, A. J. (2016). The dark side of board political capital: Enabling blockholder rent appropriation. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1801–1822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P., Mellahi, K., & Thun, E. (2010). The dynamic value of MNE political embeddedness: The case of the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7), 1161–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P., Mellahi, K., & Wright, M. (2012). The contingent value of corporate political ties. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3), 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P., Mellahi, K., Wright, M., & Xu, H. (2015). Political tie heterogeneity and the impact of adverse shocks on firm value. Journal of Management Studies, 52(8), 1036–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, S. L., Peng, M. W., & Tan, W. (2017). Institutional relatedness behind product diversification and international diversification. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(2), 339–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, T., Devine, R. A., Lamont, B. T., Holmes, J., & Michael, R. (2021). Resource dependence, uncertainty, and the allocation of corporate political activity across multiple jurisdictions. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1), 38–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabesh, P., Vera, D., & Keller, R. T. (2019). Unabsorbed slack resource deployment and exploratory and exploitative innovation: How much does CEO expertise matter? Journal of Business Research, 94, 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, D., Li, C., & Tanna, S. (2022). Foreign ownership and productivity in Chinese newly listed firms: The moderating roles of founder’s human capital and social ties. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39(3), 1125–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Du, F., & Marquis, C. (2019). Defending Mao’s dream: How politicians’ ideological imprinting affects firms’ political appointment in China. Academy of Management Journal, 62(4), 1111–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R., Li, Y.-N., & Wei, J. (2022). Growing in the changing global landscape: The intangible resources and performance of high-tech corporates. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39(3), 999–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R., & Wu, C. (2020). Politician as venture capitalist: Politically-connected VCs and IPO activity in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., Zhang, T., & Shou, Z. (2021). The double-edged sword effect of political ties on performance in emerging markets: The mediation of innovation capability and legitimacy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38, 1003–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, T., & Liu, X. (2022). The innovation paradox of tmt political capital in transition economy firms. Journal of Business Research, 142, 775–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, G., & Bharadwaj, S. (2013). Asymmetric roles of advertising and marketing capability in financial returns to news: Turning bad into good and good into great. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(6), 706–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., Zhou, K. Z., & Chen, S. (2023). The impact of communist ideology on the patenting activity of Chinese firms. Academy of Management Journal, 66(1), 102–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., Zhou, K. Z., & Du, F. (2019). Deviant versus aspirational risk taking: The effects of performance feedback on bribery expenditure and R&D intensity. Academy of Management Journal, 62(4), 1226–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, Y., Srinivasan, S., Pauwels, K., & Joshi, A. (2020). How CEO/CMO characteristics affect innovation and stock returns: Findings and future directions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(6), 1229–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Marquis, C., & Qiao, K. (2016). Do political connections buffer firms from or bind firms to the government? A study of corporate charitable donations of Chinese firms. Organization Science, 27(5), 1307–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Sun, P., & Qiao, K. (2020). Wining and dining government officials: What drives political networking in Chinese private ventures? Management and Organization Review, 16(5), 1084–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, W., Singh, K., & Mitchell, W. (2015). Buffering and enabling: The impact of interlocking political ties on firm survival and sales growth. Strategic Management Journal, 36(11), 1615–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, X., Ren, L., & Song, T. (2022). To cheat when continuously missing aspirations: Does CEO experience matter? Asia Pacific Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09805-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., Wu, R., & Li, J. (2019). More ties the merrier? Different social ties and firm innovation performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(2), 445–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K. Z., Gao, G. Y., & Zhao, H. (2017). State ownership and firm innovation in China: An integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2), 375–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K. Z., Li, J. J., Sheng, S., & Shao, A. T. (2014). The evolving role of managerial ties and firm capabilities in an emerging economy: Evidence from China. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(6), 581–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank editor Pei Sun and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and encouragement. We would also like to thank Kevin Zheng Zhou for his help and suggestions. The authors acknowledge the funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71602173, 72032007, 71972159) and Chongqing Social Science Planning Project under Grant 2022PY42.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiyuan Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

All authors contribute equally.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6

Table 6 Variable measurement

Table 7

Table 7 Parameter estimates for the input variables

Table 8

Table 8 Matching results and quality assessment (logistic estimation results, pre- and post-match differences, and percentage bias reduction)

Figure 3

Fig. 3
figure 3

Treatment and control group density functions, before and after

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, K., Zhang, Q., Wang, D. et al. The impact of political ties on firms’ innovation capability: Evidence from China. Asia Pac J Manag (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09885-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09885-6

Keywords

Navigation