Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 1–17 | Cite as

The home country of the MNE: The case of emerging economy firms

  • Bersant Hobdari
  • Peter Gammeltoft
  • Jing Li
  • Klaus Meyer
Editorial

Abstract

Research on multinational enterprises that originate from emerging economies has highlighted the importance of the home country for firms’ strategies of internationalization. In this paper, we outline a simple analytical framework linking institutions and resource munificence in the home country to the domestic business eco-system in an emerging economy, and thereby to strategies of outward investments. Specifically, we argue that businesses interact with each other in their home economy, and these patterns of interactions influence strategies of internationalization as companies not only compete with each other, but share resources, coordinate actions and serve as each other’s role model. Strategies of outward investment thus reflect the competition and collaboration in their home country business eco-system.

Keywords

Emerging market multinationals Institutions Resource munificence Business groups Business networks Peer businesses 

References

  1. Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K., Bednar, M. K., & Lee, J. H. 2015. Connecting the dots: Bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1): 483–573.Google Scholar
  2. Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. 2003. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28: 447–465.Google Scholar
  3. Aulakh, P. S. 2007. Emerging multinationals from developing economies: Motivations, paths and performance. Journal of International Management, 13: 235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Awate, S., Larsen, M. M., & Mudambi, R. 2012. EMNE catch-up strategies in the wind turbine industry. Global Strategy Journal, 2(3): 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banalieva, E. 2014. Embracing the second best? Synchronization of reform speed, excess high discretion risk, and performance of transition economy firm. Global Strategy Journal, 4(2): 104–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barreto, I., & Baden-Fuller, C. 2006. To conform or to perform? Mimetic behaviour, legitimacy-based groups and performance consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7): 1559–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bhaumik, S. K., Driffield, N., & Pal, S. 2010. Does ownership structure of emerging market firms affect their outward FDI? The case of the Indian automotive and pharmaceutical sectors. Journal of International Business Studies, 41: 437–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bird, A., & Mendenhall, M. E. 2016. From cross-cultural management to global leadership: Evolution and adaptation. Journal of World Business, 51(1): 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruton, G. D., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Stan, C., & Xu, K. 2015. State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1): 92–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan, C. M., & Makino, S. 2007. Legitimacy and multi-level institutional environments: Implications for foreign subsidiary ownership structure. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 621–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang, S. J., & Hong, J. 2000. Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 429–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chari, M., & Acikgoz, S. 2015. What drives emerging economy firm acquisitions in tax havens?. Journal of Business Research, 69(2): 664–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, V., Li, J., & Shapiro, D. 2015. Subnational institutions and outward FDI by Chinese firms: The mediating role of firm-specific advantages. Multinational Business Review, 23(4): 254–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chittoor, R., Kale, P., & Puranam, P. 2015. Business groups in developing capital markets: Towards a complementarity perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 1277–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chittoor, R., Sarkar, M. B., Ray, S., & Aulakh, P. S. 2009. Third-world copycats to emerging multinationals: Institutional changes and organizational transformation in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Organization Science, 20: 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Colpan, A. K., Hikino, T., & Lincoln, J. R. (Eds.). 2010. The Oxford handbook of business groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2011. Global strategy and global business environment: The direct and indirect influences of the home country on a firm’s global strategy. Global Strategy Journal, 1: 382–386.Google Scholar
  19. Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Ramamurti, R. (Eds.). 2014. Understanding multinationals from emerging markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Cui, L., Meyer, K. E., & Hu, H. 2014. What drives firms’ intent to seek strategic assets by foreign direct investment? A study of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(4): 488–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. 1999. Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 915–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Delios, A., Zhou, N., & Wu, Z. J. 2006. New perspective on ownership identities in China’s listed companies. Management and Organization Review, 23(3): 319–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deng, P. 2009. Why do Chinese firms tend to acquire strategic assets in international expansion?. Journal of World Business, 44(1): 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organization fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Elango, B., & Pattnaik, C. 2011. Learning before making the big leap: Acquisition strategies of emerging market firms. Management International Review, 51(4): 461–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Elango, B., & Sethi, S. P. 2007. An exploration of the relationship between country of origin (COE) and the internationalization-performance paradigm. Management International Review, 47: 369–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Estrin, S., Meyer K. E., Nielsen, B., & Nielsen, S. 2016. Home country institutions and the internationalization of state owned enterprises: A cross-country analysis. Journal of World Business, 51(2): 294–307.Google Scholar
  29. Estrin, S., Poukliakova, S., & Shapiro, D. 2009. The performance effects of business groups in Russia. Journal of Management Studies, 46: 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Estrin, S., & Prevezer, M. 2011. The role of informal institutions in corporate governance: Brazil, Russia, India, and China compared. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(1): 41–67.Google Scholar
  31. Globerman, S., & Shapiro, D. 2009. Economic and strategic considerations surrounding Chinese FDI in the United States. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(1): 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guillén, M. 2002. Structural inertia, imitation, and foreign expansion: South Korean firms and business groups in China, 1987–95. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3): 509–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Henisz, W. J. 2003. The power of the Buckley and Casson thesis: The ability to manage institutional idiosyncracies. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2): 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Henisz, W. J., & Delios, A. 2001. Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990–1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3): 443–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hertenstein, P., Sutherland, D., & Anderson, J. 2015. Internationalization within networks: Exploring the relationship between inward and outward FDI in China’s auto components industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.1007/s10490-015-9422-3.
  36. Inoue, C. F. K. V., Lazzarini, S. G., & Musacchio, A. 2013. Leviathan as a minority shareholder: Firm-level implications of state equity purchases. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6): 1775–1801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L. G. 1988. Internationalization in industrial systems—A network approach. In N. Hood & J. E. Vahlne (Eds.). Strategies in global competition: 303–321. New York: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  38. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. 2006. Commitment and opportunity development in the internationalization process: A note on the Uppsala internationalization process model. Management International Review, 46(2): 1–14.Google Scholar
  39. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. 2009. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited—From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1411–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4): 41–50.Google Scholar
  41. Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. 2001. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Khanna, T., & Yafeh, Y. 2005. Business groups and risk sharing around theworld. Journal of Business, 78(1): 301–340.Google Scholar
  43. Khanna, T., & Yafeh, Y. 2007. Business groups in emerging markets: Paragon or parasites?. Journal of Economic Literature, 65: 331–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kim, H., Hoskisson, R. E., & Lee, S. H. 2015. Why strategic factor markets matter: “New” multinationals’ geographic diversification and firm profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 518–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kraatz, M. S. 1998. Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6): 621–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kumar, V., Gaur, A. S., & Pattnaik, C. 2012. Product diversification and international expansion of business groups. Management International Review, 52: 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lamin, A. 2013. Business groups as information resource: An investigation of business group affiliation in the Indian software services industry. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 1487–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Li, M. H., Cui, L., & Lu, J. 2014. Varieties in state capitalism: Outward FDI strategies of central and local state-owned enterprises from emerging economy countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(8): 980–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Li, M. H., Cui, L. & Lu, J. (2017). Marketized state ownership and foreign expansion of emerging market multinationals: Leveraging institutional comparative advantages. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, this issue.Google Scholar
  51. Li, J., Xia, J., & Lin, Z. 2016. Cross-border acquisitions by state-owned firms: How do legitimacy concerns affect the completion and duration of their acquisitions? Strategic Management Journal. doi:10.1002/smj.2609.Google Scholar
  52. Lieberman, M. B., & Asaba, S. 2006. Why do firms imitate each other?. Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 366–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Liu, Y. P., & Woywode, M. 2013. Light-touch integration of Chinese cross-border M&A: The influences of culture and absorptive capacity. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55: 469–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lu, J., & Xu, D. 2006. Growth and survival of international joint ventures: An external-internal legitimacy perspective. Journal of Management, 32(3): 426–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Luo, X., & Chung, C. N. 2005. Keeping it all in the family: The role of particularistic relationships in business group performance during institutional transition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 404–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. 2007. International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Luo, Y. D., & Wang, S. L. 2012. Foreign direct investment strategies by developing country multinationals: A diagnostic model for home country effects. Global Strategy Journal, 2(3): 244–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lyles, M. A., Li, D., & Yan, H. F. 2014. Chinese outward direct investment performance: The role of learning. Management and Organization Review, 10(3): 411–437.Google Scholar
  59. Makino, S., Lau, C. M., & Yeh, R. S. 2002. Asset-exploitation versus asset-seeking: Implications for location choice of foreign direct investment from newly industrialized economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3): 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Martin, X. 2014. Commentary on institutional advantage. Global Strategy Journal, 4: 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mathews, J. A. 2006. Dragon multinationals: New players in twenty-first century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Meyer, K. E. 2015. What is strategic asset seeking FDI?. Multinational Business Review, 23(1): 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Meyer, K. E., Ding, Y., Li, J., & Zhang, H. 2014. Overcoming distrust: How state-owned enterprises adapt their foreign entries to institutional pressures. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(8): 1005–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. 2016. Theoretical foundations of emerging economy research. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Meyer, K. E., & Skak, A. T. 2002. Networks, serendipity and SME entry into Eastern Europe. European Management Journal, 20(2): 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Meyer, K. E., & Thaijongrak, O. 2013. The dynamics of emerging economy MNEs: How the internationalization process model can guide future research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4): 1125–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Meyer, K. E. & Xin, K. R. 2017. Managing talent in emerging economy multinationals: Integrating strategic management and human resource management. International Journal of Human Resource Management, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  68. Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Zhao, M. 2008. Perspectives on China’s outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3): 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Musacchio, A., Lazzarini, S. G., & Aguilera, R. V. 2015. New varieties of state capitalism: Strategic and governance implications. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1): 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Musteen, M., Francis, J., & Datta, D. K. 2010. The influence of international networks on internationalization speed and performance: A study of Czech SMEs. Journal of World Business, 45(3): 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Narayanan, V. K., & Fahey, L. 2005. The relevance of the institutional underpinnings of Porter’s five forces framework to emerging economies: An epistemological analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 207–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Noorderhaven, N. G., & Harzing, A. W. 2003. The “country-of-origin effect” in multinational corporations: Sources, mechanisms and moderating conditions. Management International Review, 43: 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 275–296.Google Scholar
  75. Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5): 920–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Porter, M. E. 1979. The structure within industries and companies’ performance. Review of Economics and Statistics, 61: 214–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Prashantham, S., & Birkinshaw, J. M. 2008. Dancing with gorillas: How small companies can partner effectively with multinational corporations. California Management Review, 51(1): 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Prashantham, S., & Dhanaraj, C. 2010. The dynamic influence of social capital on the international growth of new ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6): 967–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rui, H., & Yip, G. S. 2008. Foreign acquisitions by Chinese firms: A strategic intent perspective. Journal of World Business, 43(2): 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schotter, A., & Teagarden, M. 2014. Protecting intellectual property in China. Sloan Management Review, 55(4): 41–48.Google Scholar
  81. Scott, W. R. 2003. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Tan, D., & Meyer, K. E. 2011. Country-of-origin and industry agglomeration of foreign investors in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(4): 502–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tung, R. 2007. The human resource challenge to outward foreign direct investment aspirations from emerging economies: The case of China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(5): 868–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wang, C., Hong, J., Kafouros, M., & Wright, M. 2012. Exploring the role of government involvement in outward FDI from emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(7): 655–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Westphal, J., Gulati, R., & Shortell, S. 1997. Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 366–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Williamson, O. E. 2000. The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3): 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Xie, Z. Z., & Li, J. T. 2017. Selective imitation of compatriot firms: Entry mode decisions of emerging market multinationals in cross-border acquisitions, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, this issue.Google Scholar
  89. Xu, D., & Meyer, K. E. 2013. Linking theory and context: “Strategy research in emerging economies” after Wright et al. (2005). Journal of Management Studies, 50(7): 1322–1346.Google Scholar
  90. Yaprak, A., & Karademir, B. 2010. The internationalization of emerging market business groups: An integrated literature review. International Marketing Review, 27(2): 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Yip, G., & McKern, B. 2016. China’s next strategic advantage: From imitation to innovation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  92. Yiu, D. W., & Makino, S. 2002. The choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary: An institutional perspective. Organization Science, 13(6): 667–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. 2005. Benefiting from network positions: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Manage. Journal, 26: 809–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zattoni, A., Pedersen, T., & Kumar, V. 2009. The performance of group-affiliated firms during institutional transition: A longitudinal study of Indian firms. Corporate Governance: An international Review, 17: 510–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International Economics and ManagementCopenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark
  2. 2.Canada Research Chair in Global Investment StrategyBeedie School of Business, Simon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  3. 3.Department of Strategy and EntrepreneurshipChina Europe International Business SchoolShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations