Skip to main content
Log in

Product Diversification and International Expansion of Business Groups

Evidence from India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Management International Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

  • Does product diversification constrain or boost international expansion of business groups from emerging markets? What is the role of international orientation and group resources in moderating this relationship? Given the dominance of business groups as an organizational form in emerging markets and their recent international expansion, these research questions are pertinent and timely.

  • We use GLS fixed-effects models to test our arguments using longitudinal data on foreign direct investment of 482 business groups, incorporating 4,038 firms from India over a period of 8 years from 2001–2008.

  • We find that a high product diversification has an adverse effect on the international expansion of emerging market business groups, and that international orientation and group resources positively moderate this relationship.

  • Our findings suggest the inherent trade-off that exists between strategies of product diversification and international expansion for emerging market business groups. Those business groups that can effectively employ their learning from prior international exposure and their technical competences are better placed to simultaneously pursue a strategy of product diversification and international expansion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allred, B. B., & Park, W. G. (2007). The influence of patent protection on firm innovation investment in manufacturing industries.Journal of International Management, 13(2), 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H. G., Bell, J. H. J., & Pennings, J. M. (1996). Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning.Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., Mehta, P., & Mullainathan, S. (2002). Ferreting out tunneling: An application to Indian business groups.Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 121–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. (2007). The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment.Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chacar, A., & Vissa, B. (2005). Are emerging economies less efficient? Performance persistence and business group affiliation.Strategic Management Journal,26(10), 933–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. J. (2003). Ownership structure, expropriation, and performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea.Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 238–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. J., & Choi, U. (1988). Strategy, structure and performance of Korean business groups: a transactions cost approach.Journal of Industrial Economics, 37(2), 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. J., & Hong, J. (2002). How much does the business group matter in Korea?Strategic Management Journal, 23(3), 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (1999). Geographic scope, product diversification, and the performance of Japanese firms.Strategic Management Journal, 20(8), 711–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A., Gaur, A. S., & Kamal, S. (2009). International acquisitions and the globalization of firms from India. In J. Chaisse & P. Gugler (Eds.),Expansion of trade and FDI in Asia: Strategic and policy challenges (pp. 58–76). New York: Routledge.

  • Douma, S., George, R., & Kabir, R. (2006). Foreign and domestic ownership, business groups, and firm performance: evidence from a large emerging market.Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 637–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elango, B., & Pattnaik, C. (2007). Building capabilities for international operations through networks: a study of Indian firms.Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 556–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Encarnation, D. (1989).Dislodging multinationals: India’s comparative perspective. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaur, A. S. (2007).Essays on strategic adaptation and firm performance during institutional transition. Doctoral dissertation, National University of Singapore.

  • Gaur, A. S., & Delios, A. (2006). Business group affiliation and firm performance during institutional transition.AOM Best Paper Proceedings 2006. Atlanta: USA.

  • Gaur, A. S., & Kumar, V. (2009). International diversification, business group affiliation and firm performance: Empirical evidence from India.British Journal of Management, 20(2), 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaur, A. S., & Kumar, V. (2010). Internationalization of emerging market firms: a case for theoretical extension. In T. M. Devinney, T. Pedersen, & L. Tihanyi (Eds.),Advances in international management: The past, present and future of international business and management (Vol. 23, pp. 603–627). New York: Emerald.

  • Gaur, A. S., Kumar, V., & Sarathy, R. (2011). Liability of foreignness and internationalization of emerging market firms. In C. Asmussen, T. M. Devinney, T. Pedersen, & L. Tihanyi (Eds.),Advances in International Management—Dynamics of globalization: Location-specific advantages or liabilities of foreignness? (Vol. 24, pp. 211–233). New York: Emerald.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P., & Khanna, T. (1998). The nature of diversified groups: a research design and two case studies.Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(1), 35–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillen, M. F. (2000). Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view.Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 362–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1994). Business groups. In J. N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.),The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 453–475). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M., Jammine, A. P., & Thomas, H. (1988). Diversification and profitability among British manufacturing companies.Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 771–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Carroll, G. R. (1992).Dynamics of organizational populations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change.American Sociological Review, 49(4), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects of innovation on firm performance in product-diversified firms.Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies.Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., & Khanna, T. (2006). Bringing history (back) into international business.Journal of International Business Studies, 37(4), 453–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. R., & Hill, C. W. L. (1988). Transaction cost analysis of strategy—structure choice.Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, D., & Ramamurti, R. (2001). India’s emerging competitive advantage in services.Academy of Management Executive, 15(2), 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keister, L. A. (1998). Engineering growth: Business group structure and firm performance in China’s transition economy.American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 404–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets.Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000a). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups.Journal of Finance, 55(2), 867–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000b). The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile.Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 268–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. W. (2001). Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets.Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 45–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Yafeh, Y. (2007). Business groups in emerging markets: Paragons or parasites?Journal of Economic Literature, 45(2), 331–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. C., Hwang, P., & Burgers, W. P. (1989). Global diversification strategy and corporate profit performance.Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S. S., & Aulakh, P. S. (2002). Multinationality and firm performance: The moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities.Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPorta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world.Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leff, N. (1978). Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: The economic groups.Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26(4), 661–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). The internationalization and performance of SMEs.Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 565–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Tung, R. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective.Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. A. (2006). Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century of globalization.Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E. (2006). Global focusing: From domestic conglomerates to global specialists.Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 1109–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhe, A. (1991). Interfirm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances.Journal of International Business Studies, 22(4), 579–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Delios, A. (2006). What determines the scope of the firm over time and around the world? An Asia Pacific perspective.Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4), 385–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. (2009). What have we learned about emerging market MNEs? In R. Ramamurti & J. Singh (Eds.),Emerging multinationals from emerging markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R., & Singh, J. (2009). Indian multinationals: Generic internationalization strategies. In R. Ramamurti & J. Singh (Eds.),Emerging multinationals from emerging markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sambharya, R. B. (1995). The combined effect of international diversification and product diversification strategies on the performance of US-based multinational corporations.Management International Review, 35(3), 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., Gaur, A. S., & Schmid, F. P. (2010). Corporate diversification, TMT experience, and performance evidence from German SMEs.Management International Review, 50(1), 35–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy.Research Policy, 15(6), 785–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. G. (2001). Learning through acquisitions.Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 457–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, W. P., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2005). Home country environments, corporate diversification strategies and firm performance.Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. (2005). Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom.Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, S., Huang, C. H., & McDermott, M. (1996). Internationalization and competitive catch-up processes: Case study evidence on Chinese multinational enterprises.Management International Review, 36(4), 295–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiu, D. W., Lu, Y., Bruton, G. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2007). Business groups: An integrated model to focus future research.Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), 1551–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zattoni, A., Pedersen, T., & Kumar, V (2009). The performance of business group firms during institutional transition: A longitudinal study of Indian firms.Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 510–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported with the Rutgers University Research Council Grant (2010). The article benefited greatly from comments and advice provided by the two anonymous reviewers. We also thank the participants at the 2010 Asia Academy of Management conference for their comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajai S. Gaur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, V., Gaur, A.S. & Pattnaik, C. Product Diversification and International Expansion of Business Groups. Manag Int Rev 52, 175–192 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-012-0133-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-012-0133-4

Keywords

Navigation