Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Due to an oversight that was only noticed after the online publication of Meyer (2009), a mistake has been published in the formula reported Footnote 1 of “Editorial: Motivating, testing, and publishing curvilinear effects in management research” (DOI: 10.1007/s10490-008-9122-3). The correct wording of the footnote should be as follows:
“This application of algebra on the regression coefficients goes as follows: If the estimation yields a coefficient β 1 on a linear effect and β 2 on the corresponding quadratic effect, this corresponds to a function of the form β 1 x + β 2 x 2 . Taking the first derivative and setting it to zero yields β 1 + 2β 2 x = 0, and thus the turning point at x = (-β 1 /2β 2 ).”
We apologize for any inconvenience caused.
References
Meyer, K. E. 2009. Motivating, testing, and publishing curvilinear effects in management research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26 (DOI: 10.1007/s10490-008-9122-3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9122-3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meyer, K.E. Erratum: Motivating, testing, and publishing curvilinear effects in management research. Asia Pac J Manag 26, 195 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9131-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9131-2