Abstract
In this article, we describe a mixed-methods study used to examine the effectiveness of a widely-used peer support program designed to facilitate the transition to adolescence and high school by enhancing self-concept and other desirable outcomes. For the quantitative component, a longitudinal design was employed (930 Grade 7 students, 3 schools, 2 years), with control group and baseline (i.e., pre-program) data against which to compare the effects. Using a multilevel approach, the results provide evidence to suggest that the program was largely successful in achieving its aims of enhancing students’ school self-concept, school citizenship, sense of self and possibility, connectedness, and resourcefulness. A sub-sample of students from the experimental group participated in the qualitative component, which included open-ended survey results (n = 408 Grade 7 students, n = 75 peer support leaders) and focus groups (n = 119 Grade 7 students, n = 44 peer support leaders) to identify students’ personal perspectives of the program. The qualitative results confirmed the quantitative findings that the program has important benefits for Grade 7 students and provided rich and valuable insights into students’ views of the intervention. The findings of this research have important implications and suggest that the provision of peer support has the potential to a make significant contribution to schools’ efforts to orchestrate positive outcomes for adolescents.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, London: Sage.
Alspaugh, J. W. (1998). Achievement loss associated with the transition to middle school and high school. Journal of Educational Research, 92(1), 20–25.
Amirkhan, J. H. (1990). A factor analytically derived measure of coping: The coping strategy indicator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1066–1075.
Anderman, E. M., Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1999). Declining motivation after the transition to middle school: Schools can make a difference. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 131–147.
Arnett, J. J. (1999). Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered. American Psychologist, 54(5), 317–326.
Berry, J. D. (2002). Success … one child at a time. Tampa, FL: Plan for School Excellence.
Bryk, A., & Raudenbush, S. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Charlton, T. (1998). Enhancing school effectiveness through using peer support strategies with pupils and teachers. Support for Learning, 13(2), 50–53.
Chung, H., Elias, M., & Schneider, K. (1998). Patterns of individual adjustment changes during the middle school transition. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 83–101.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power for the behavioural sciences (Rev. ed. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 237–248.
Cook, S. B., Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. C. (1985). Handicapped students as tutors. Journal of Special Education, 19, 483–492.
Cowie, H., & Hutson, N. (2005). Peer support: A strategy to help bystanders challenge school bullying. Pastoral Care in Education, 23, 40–44.
Cowie, H., Naylor, P., Talamelli, L., Chauhan, L. T., & Smith, P. K. (2002). Knowledge, use of and attitudes towards peer support: A 2-year follow-up to the Prince’s Trust survey. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 453–467.
Cowie, H., & Wallace, P. (2000). Peer support in action. London: Sage.
Craven, R. G., Marsh, H. W., & Burnett, P. (2003). Cracking the self-concept enhancement conundrum: A call and blueprint for the next generation of self-concept enhancement research. In H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, & D. McInerney (Eds.), International advances in self research (Vol. 1, pp. 91–126). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Crockett, L. J., Petersen, A. C., Graber, J. A., Schulenberg, J. E., & Ebata, A. (1989). School transitions and adjustment during early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 9(3), 181–210.
Davies, P. (2000). Contributions from qualitative research. In H. T. Davies, M. N. Sandra, & P. Smith (Eds.), What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services (pp. 291–316). Bristol: Policy Press.
Dillon, J., & Swinbourne, A. (2007). Helping Friends: a peer support program for senior secondary schools. Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health, 6(1). www.auseinet.com/journal/vol6iss1/dillon.pdf
Durlak, J. A., & Wells, A. M. (1997). Primary prevention mental health programs for children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25(2), 115–152.
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), W. Damon (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol 4. Personality and social development. New York: Wiley.
Ellis, L. A. (2004). Peers helping peers: The effectiveness of a peer support program in enhancing self-concept and other desirable outcomes. Doctoral thesis submitted to the University of Western Sydney, Australia.
Felner, R. D., Primavera, J., & Cauce, A. M. (1981). The impact of school transitions: A focus for preventative efforts. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 449–459.
Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. London: Arnold.
Harter, S., Whitesell, N., & Kowalski, P. (1992). Individual differences in the effects of educational transitions on young adolescents’ perceptions of competence and motivational orientation. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 777–807.
Heaven, P. C. (2001). The social psychology of adolescence. Melbourne: MacMillan.
Hirsch, B. J., & DuBois, D. L. (1991). Self-esteem in early adolescence: The identification and prediction of contrasting longitudinal trajectories. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 20(1), 53–71.
Hox, J. (1995). Applied multilevel analysis. Amsterdam: TT Publikaties.
Hox, J. (1998). Multilevel modelling: When and why? In I. Balderjahn, R. Mathar, & M. Schader (Eds.), Classification, data analysis, and data highways (pp. 147–154). New York: Springer.
Kaye, P. G., & Webb, A. (1996). ‘A little help from my friends’: A secondary school peer support programme. Pastoral Care, June, 21–25.
Kotloff, L., Roaf, P., & Ma, P. (1993). Comparative case studies of five peer support group programs. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.
Kreft, I., & De Leeuw, J. D. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1201.
Marsh, H. W. (1990). Self-Description Questionnaire–II manual. Sydney, Australia: SELF Centre, University of Western Sydney.
Marsh, H. W., Ellis, L. A., Parada, R. H., Richards, G., & Heubeck, B. G. (2005a). Addressing the “sins” of short form development with new applications of confirmatory factor analyses: Evaluating the Self Description Questionnaire II Short Form. Psychological Assessment, 17, 81–102.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Kong, C.-K. (2002). Multilevel modelling of longitudinal growth and change: Substantive effects or regression toward the mean artefacts? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 245–282.
Marsh, H., Martin, A., & Hau, K. (2005b). A multimethod perspective on self-concept research in educational psychology: A construct validity approach. In M. Eid & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement (pp. 441–456). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Marsh, H. W., Parada, R. H., Craven, R. G., & Finger, L. (2004). In the looking glass: A reciprocal effects model elucidating the complex nature of bullying, psychological determinants and the central role of self-concept. In C. S. Sanders & G. D. Phye (Eds.), Bullying: Implications for the classroom (pp. 63–106). Orlando, FL: Elsevier Academic Press.
Marsh, H. W., Richards, G. E., & Barnes, J. (1986). Multidimensional self-concepts: A long term follow-up of the effect of participation in an Outward Bound program. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 475–492.
Marsh, H. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1996). The negative effects of school-average ability on academic self-concept—an application of multilevel modeling. Australian Journal of Education, 40(1), 65–87.
Midgley, C., Middleton, M. J., Gheen, M. H., & Kumar, R. (2002). Stage-environment fit revisited: A goal theory approach to examining school transitions. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 109–142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Naylor, P., & Cowie, H. (1999). The effectiveness of peer support systems in challenging school bullying: The perspectives and experiences of teachers and pupils. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 467–479.
O’Mara, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Debus, R. (2006). Do Self-concept interventions make a difference? A synergistic blend of construct validation and meta-analysis. Educational Pshychologist, 41(3), 181–206.
Parada, R. (2000). Adolescent Peer Relations Instrument: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of participant roles in bullying and victimisation of adolescence: An interim test manual and a research monograph: A test manual. Sydney: SELF Research Centre, University of Western Sydney.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, California: Sage.
Peer Support Foundation. (2001). The peer support program: High schools manual. Sydney: Peer Support Foundation.
Rasbash, J., Browne, W., Goldstein, H., Yang, M., Plewis, I., Healy, M., et al. (2002). A user’s guide to MLwiN. London: University of London, Institute of Education.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Chan, W. S. (1993). Application of a hierarchical linear model to the study of adolescent deviance in an overlapping cohort design. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(6), 941–951.
Reyes, O., Gillock, K., Kobus, K., & Sanchez, B. (2000). A longitudinal study of the school completion patterns of a group of adolescents from urban minority backgrounds. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(4), 519–544.
Reyes, O., Gillock, K., & Kobus, K. (1994). A longitudinal study of school adjustment in urban, minority adolescents: Effects of a high school transition program. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22(3), 341–369.
Richards, G. E., Ellis, L. A., & Neill, J. T. (2002, August). The ROPELOC: Review of personal effectiveness and locus of control. A comprehensive instrument for reviewing life effectiveness. Paper presented at the self-concept research conference: Driving international agendas, Sydney.
Richards, G. E., & Neill, J. T. (2000). Review of personal effectiveness scale. Canberra, Australia: National Outdoor Education and Leadership Services.
Robson, L. S., Shannon, H. S., Goldenhar, L. M., & Hale, A. R. (2001). Guide to evaluating the effectiveness of strategies for preventing work injuries: How to show whether a safety intervention really works (No. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2001-119): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
Roderick, M. (1995). School transitions and school dropout. In K. Wong (Ed.), Advances in educational policy. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer assisted learning Interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240–257.
Rudolph, K. D., Lambert, S. F., Clark, A. G., & Kurlakowsky, K. D. (2001). Negotiating the transition to middle school: The role of self-regulatory processes. Child Development, 72(3), 929–946.
Ryan, J., Reid, R., & Epstein, M. (2004). Peer-mediated intervention studies on academic achievement for students with EBD. Remedial & Special Education, 25(6), 330–341.
Simmons, R. G., & Blyth, D. A. (1987). Moving into adolescence: The impact of pubertal change and school context. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
Steckler, A., McLeroy, K. R., Goodman, R. M., Bird, S. T., & McCormick, L. (1992). Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: An introduction. Health Education Quarterly, 19(1), 1–8.
Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. London: Sage.
Walker, K. (1991). Chance to succeed: An after school tutorial program. New York: Plan for Social Excellence Inc.
Wassef, A., Ingham, D., Lassiter-Collins, M., & Mason, G. (1995). In search of effective programs to address students’ emotional distress and behavioral problems. Part 1: Defining the problems. Adolescence, 30(52), 3–538.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1994). Children’s competence beliefs, achievement values, and general, self-esteem: Change across elementary and middle school. Journal of Adolescence, 14(2), 107–138.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Students’ motivation during the middle school years. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 159–184). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Wigfield, A., Lutz, S., & Wagner, A. (2005). Early adolescents’ development across the middle school years: Implications for school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 9(2), 112–119.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by an Australian Research Council linkage grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
See Table 7.
Appendix 2
Student Evaluation of the Peer Support Program
Three open-ended questions were included at the end of the quantitative questionnaire so that students could convey their perceptions of the peer support program in their own words. The qualitative student evaluation for Grade 7 students comprised the following questions:
-
1.
How has the peer support program been helpful to you?
-
2.
Any other comments you would like to make about the peer support program?
-
3.
Any other comments you would like to make about your peer support leaders?
These questions gave all Grade 7 students the opportunity to express their views about the benefits of the program and their perceptions of the program in general, and express their perceptions about the peer support leaders. Participating leaders were also invited to identify the ways in which the program was of benefit to the Grade 7 students as well as to themselves. The qualitative student evaluation for the peer support leaders comprised the following questions:
-
1.
How has the peer support program been helpful to Grade 7 students?
-
2.
What skills did you develop by being involved in the peer support program?
-
3.
Any other comments you would like to make about the peer support program?
Appendix 3
Semi-Structured Interview Guide
The following questions were used as a guide to interview participants. The interview process was semi-structured to allow the interviewer to pursue relevant topics in more detail and probe as necessary to enrich descriptions of particular events and experiences shared by participants. Texts in parentheses are alternative phrases to encourage discussion.
-
Q1: What was good about the peer support program? (What did you like about the program?)
-
Q2: What was not good about the peer support program? (What didn’t you like about the program?) (How could the program be improved in the future?)
-
Q3: What value did you get out of it personally? (How was the program helpful to you?) (In what ways was the program of benefit to you?)
Examples of probing questions:
-
“What did you mean when you said ….”
-
“You said … Tell me more about that.”
Appendix 4
See Table 8.
Appendix 5
See Table 9.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ellis, L.A., Marsh, H.W. & Craven, R.G. Addressing the Challenges Faced by Early Adolescents: A Mixed-Method Evaluation of the Benefits of Peer Support. Am J Community Psychol 44, 54–75 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-009-9251-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-009-9251-y