Skip to main content
Log in

Neighborhood Effects Examined Through the Lens of Residential Mobility Programs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Although researchers have consistently found that neighborhoods matter, relatively little is known about the processes through which neighborhood-level characteristics influence individual outcomes, and whether interventions targeting improving neighborhood characteristics will be beneficial for children. I examine whether relocating from high- to low-poverty neighborhoods affected low-income Black children’s exposure to promotive developmental experiences. Participating families voluntarily relocated from high-poverty, minority segregated, inner-city Chicago neighborhoods to mostly White, low-poverty, suburban and Chicago neighborhoods. Data come from retrospective qualitative interviews with 22 Gautreaux One families an average of 15 years after initial relocation, and from interviews with 43 Gautreaux Two families as they relocated into their new communities. I find that children primarily benefited from the institutional versus the social interaction resources in their new neighborhoods. Furthermore, suburban placement was key in facilitating children’s access to higher quality resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The effects of residential mobility on children’s exposure to inhibiting developmental factors that would increase participation in crime are presented in a separate paper (Keels 2008).

  2. Gautreaux participants were similar to the Chicago AFDC sample in their time on public assistance (more than seven years) and their marital status (about 45% never married and 10% currently married). However, Gautreaux participants were less likely to be high school dropouts (39% vs. 50%), tended to be older (median age 34 vs. 31), and had fewer children (mean 2.5 vs. 3.0). On the other hand, they were also more likely to be second-generation AFDC recipients (44% vs. 32%).

  3. Current CHA residents are in many ways a very disadvantaged population (Popkin and Cunningham 2001). The majority are poor (annual income of less than $10,000) long-term public housing residents; 62% have been living in public housing for more than ten years. Current CHA residents also have low human capital resources (63% do not have a high school diploma, 32% report being employed, and only 13% have a driver’s license).

  4. Likely movers were selected from the Leadership Council’s Transmittal List, which consists of families who have already located units and begun the inspection/moving process.

  5. A handful of mothers were interviewed in a restaurant because either they did not want to conduct the interview in their home or we offered to meet at a restaurant as an additional incentive after they scheduled and canceled several prior appointments.

  6. See Boyd et al. (2007) for a detailed discussion of why many Gautreaux Two families did not maintain residence in their initial relocation neighborhoods.

References

  • Aaronson, D. (1998). Using sibling data to estimate the impact of neighborhoods on children’s educational outcomes. Journal of Human Resources, 33(4), 915–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R. D., & Logan, J. R. (1993). Minority proximity to whites in suburbs: An individual-level analysis of segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, M., Edin, K., Duncan, G. J., & Clampet-Lundquist, S. (2007). The durability of the Gautreaux Two residential mobility program: A qualitative analysis of who stays and who moves from low-poverty neighborhoods. Working Paper.

  • Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., & Aber, J. L. (1997). Neighborhood poverty. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., Klebanov, P. K., & Sealand, N. (1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development? American Journal of Sociology, 99(2), 353–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, P. C., & Smith, R. N. (1997). Mixed-income housing: Factors for success. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 3(2), 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, I., & Lewis, D. A. (2003). Beyond community: Reactions to crime and disorder among inner-city residents. Criminology, 41(3), 779–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clampet-Lundquist, S. (2007). No more bois ball: The effect of relocation from public housing on adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(3), 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl), S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, J. (1991). The epidemic theory of ghettos and neighborhood effects on dropping out and teenage childbearing. American Journal of Sociology, 96(5), 1226–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Souza Briggs, X. (1997). Moving up versus moving out: Neighborhood effects in housing mobility programs. Housing Policy Debate, 8(1), 195–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Souza Briggs, X. (2003). Bridging networks, social capital, and racial segregation in America. Working Paper, John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University.

  • Dion, K. L. (1986). Responses to perceived discrimination and relative deprivation. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J. (1994). Families and neighbors as sources of disadvantage in the schooling decisions of white and black adolescents. American Journal of Education, 103(1), 20–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, I. G., & Turner, M. A. (1997). Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), 833–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg, F. F., Cook, T. D., Eccles, J., & Elder, G. H. (2000). Managing to make it: Urban families and adolescent success. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, D. (2003). Counterfactual models of neighborhood effects: The effect of neighborhood poverty on high school dropout and teenage pregnancy. American Journal of Sociology, 109(3), 676–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jargowsky, P. (2003). Stunning progress, hidden problems: The dramatic decline of concentrated poverty in the 1990s. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jargowsky, P. A., Crutchfield, R., & Desmond, S. (2004). Is suburban sprawl a juvenile justice issue? In D. Hawkins & K. Kempf-Leonard (Eds.), Our children, their children: confronting race and ethnic differences in American criminal justice (pp. 167–201). Chicago: The John D and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, R. L. (1995). Growing up poor: The family experiences of socially mobile youth in low-income african american neighborhoods. Journal of Adolescent Research, 10(1), 111–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. E. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In L. E. Lynn Jr. & M. G. McGeary (Eds.), Inner city poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, M. L., Chaskin, R. J., & Webber, H. S. (2007). The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review, 42(3), 369–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keels, M. (2008). Second-generation effects of Chicago’s Gautreaux residential mobility program on children’s participation in crime. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18(2), 305–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keels, M., Duncan, G. J., Deluca, S., Mendenhall, R., & Rosenbaum, J. (2005). Fifteen years later: Can residential mobility programs provide a long-term escape from neighborhood segregation, crime, and poverty? Demography, 42(1), 51–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kling, J. R., Liebman, J. B., & Katz, L. F. (2001). Bullets don’t got no name: Consequences of fear in the ghetto. Joint Center for Poverty Research Working Paper # 225.

  • Kowaleski-Jones, L. (2000). Staying out of trouble: Community resources and problem behavior among high-risk adolescents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(2), 449–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. A., Campbell, K. E., & Miller, O. (1991). Racial differences in urban neighboring. Sociological Forum, 6(3), 525–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., & Stults, B. J. (1999). Racial differences in exposure to crime: The city and suburbs of cleveland in 1990. Criminology, 37, 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., & Hirschfield, P. (1999). Urban poverty and juvenile crime: Evidence from a randomized housing mobility experiment. Working Paper, Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research.

  • Ludwig, J., Ladd, H., & Duncan, G. J. (2001). Urban poverty and educational outcomes. In W.Gale & J. Rothenberg Pack (Eds.), Brookings-Warthon papers on urban affairs Vol. 2. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Mumford Center. (2001). Ethnic diversity grows, neighborhood integration lags behind. Lewis Mumford Center for Comparative Urban and Regional Research. http://www.mumford.albany.edu/census/WholePop/WPreport/MumfordReport.pdf.

  • Pashup, J., Edin, K., Duncan, G. J., & Burke, K. (2006). Participation in a residential mobility program from the client’s perspective: Findings from Gautreaux Two. Housing Policy Debate, 16, 361–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pebley, A. R. & Sastry, N. (2003). Concentrated poverty vs. concentrated affluence: Effects on neighborhood social environments and children’s outcomes. LAFANS Working Paper.

  • Plybon, L. E., & Kliewer, W. (2001). Neighborhood types and externalizing behavior in urban school-age children: Tests of direct, mediated, and moderated effects. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10(4), 419–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polikoff, A. (2006). Waiting for Gautreaux: A story of segregation, housing, and the Black ghetto. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

  • Popkin, S. J., & Cunningham, M. K. (2001). CHA relocation counseling assessment interim report. The Urban Institute.

  • Popkin, S. J., Harris, H., & Cunningham, M. K. (2002). Families in transition: A qualitative analysis of the MTO experience, final report. Report prepared by the Urban Institute for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

  • Reardon, S. F., & Yun, J. T. (2001). Suburban racial change and suburban school segregation, 1987–95. Sociology of Education, 74, 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roosa, M. W., Jones, S., Tein, J., & Cree, W. (2003). Prevention science and neighborhood influences on low-income children’s development: Theoretical and methodological issues. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1–2), 55–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, J. E. (1994). Housing mobility strategies for changing the geography of opportunity. Institute for Policy Research Working Paper, Northwestern University.

  • Rosenbaum, J. E., DeLuca, S., & Miller, S. R. (1999). The long term effects of residential mobility on AFDC receipt: Studying the Gautreaux program with administrative data. Paper Presented at the JCPR Conference on Neighborhood Effects on Low-Income Families.

  • Rosenbaum, J. E., Popkin, S. J., Kaufman, J. E., & Rusin, J. (1991). Social integration of low-income black adults in middle-class white suburbs. Social Problems, 38(4), 448–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinowitz, L. S., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2000). Crossing the class and color lines: From public housing to white suburbia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusin-White, J. (1993). Self-efficacy, residential integration and attainment in Gautreaux families: A longitudinal study. Doctoral Dissertation, Northwestern University.

  • Sampson, R. J. (1992). Family management and child development: Insights into social disorganization theory. In J. McCord (Ed.), Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 3, pp. 63–93). New Brunswich: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2001). How do communities undergird or undermine human development? Relevant contexts and social mechanisms. In A. Booth & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Does it take a village? Community effects on children, adolescents, and families (pp. 3–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing neighborhood effects: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanbonmatsu, L., Kling, J. R., Duncan, G. J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2006). Neighborhoods and academic achievement: Results from the moving to opportunity experiment. Journal of Human Resources, 41(4), 649–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. L., & McDermott, M. (2006). The presence of organizational resources in poor urban neighborhoods: An analysis of average and contextual effects. Social Forces, 84(3), 1697–1724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spilsbury, J. C. (2002). ‘If I don’t know them, I’ll get killed probably’: How children’s concerns about safety shape help-seeking behavior. Childhood, 9(1), 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J. M., & Wheeler, L. (2000). Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turley, R. N. L. (2002). Is relative deprivation beneficial? The effects of richer and poorer neighbors on children’s outcomes. Journal of community psychology, 30(6), 671–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1991). Another look at ‘the truly disadvantaged’. Political Science Quarterly, 106(4), 639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Greg J. Duncan, Kathryn Edin, and Ruby Mendenhall for their assistance with this manuscript. I also thank Gautreaux interviewees for trusting us with their stories. To ensure confidentially all names and places used in this manuscript are pseudonyms. Finally, I am grateful for financial support from the MacArthur Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Foundation for Child Development, and the Family and Child Well-being Research Network of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Micere Keels.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keels, M. Neighborhood Effects Examined Through the Lens of Residential Mobility Programs. Am J Community Psychol 42, 235–250 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9204-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9204-x

Keywords

Navigation