Skip to main content
Log in

Students’ Perceptions of School Climate During the Middle School Years: Associations with Trajectories of Psychological and Behavioral Adjustment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

A cross-domain latent growth curve model was used to examine the trajectories of change in student perceptions of four critical dimensions of school climate (i.e., teacher support, peer support, student autonomy in the classroom, and clarity and consistency in school rules and regulations) among 1,451 early adolescents from the beginning of sixth through the end of eighth grade; and the effects of such trajectories on the rate of change in psychological and behavioral adjustment. Findings indicated that all of the dimensions of perceived school climate declined over the 3 years of middle school. Furthermore, declines in each of the dimensions of perceived school climate were associated with declines over time in psychological and behavioral adjustment. Moreover, the direction of effects between each dimension of perceived school climate and psychological or behavioral adjustment were often unidirectional rather than bi-directional, underscoring the role of perceived school climate in the psychological and behavioral health of early adolescents. Gender and socioeconomic class differences in these patterns are noted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Connell and Wellborn (1991) refer to a psychological need for sense of relatedness, autonomy, and competency among students rather than relatedness, autonomy, and consistency. However, they note that a sense of competency will often emerge in an environment that is fair and consistent.

  2. We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the researchers at the Illinois Center for Prevention Research and of Robert D. Felner, who served as Principal Investigator of the Alliance of Illinois Middle Schools network evaluation. The evaluation was funded by a Carnegie Foundation grant to the University of Illinois.

  3. A two tiered consent procedure developed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at the participating university allowed the investigators to use passive consent procedures. The first step required each school to create a Parent Advisory Team (PAT) that was reflective of the children and families attending that school. The PAT was asked to review the surveys and consent form that would subsequently be sent home to parents for their approval. The PAT was to consider community norms and values when reviewing the topics covered in the surveys, and they were to determine if the consent form accurately represent the goals and purposes of the study. Parents serving on PAT team were also asked to serve as resources to other parents who might have questions supporting the surveys, and copies were kept in the school from office for parental review. Once the PAT signed the advisory form, schools were required to send home letters to parents and were asked to return the form if they did not want their child to participate.

  4. In none of the unconditional models were the errors allowed to correlate over time, which may have resulted in better fitting models.

  5. Results from the multiple imputations more strongly indicate that the pathways of influence do emerge from the dimensions of school climate to student adjustment implying the need to further study these processes in a larger sample.

  6. Preliminary models that included school size were examined. Inclusion of grade size did not change the pattern of results observed in the current study.

References

  • Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. (1987). Manual for the youth and self-report and profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvidrez, J., & Weinstein, R. (1999). Early teacher perceptions and later student academic achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 91, 731–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association of University Women (1992). How schools shortchange girls. New York: Marlowe & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anyon, J., & Wilson, W. J. (1997). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban reform. New York: Teachers College Press.

  • Bachman, J. G., & O’Malley, P. M. (1986). Self-concepts, self-esteem, and educational experiences: The frog pond revisited (again). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, J., & Robins, R. W. (1993). A longitudinal study of consistency and change in self-esteem from early adolescence to early adulthood. Child Development, 64, 909–923.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, D., Simmons, R. G., & Carlton-Ford, S. (1983). The adjustment of early adolescents to school transitions. Journal of Early Adolescence, 3, 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, S. Felner, R. D., DuBois, D. L., Mulhall, P. M., & Flowers, N. (1994). School climate in middle schools; Development and prelimiary validation of the PSCS. Unpublished Manuscript.

  • Brand, S., Felner, R., Shim, M., Seitsinger, A., & Dumas, T. (2003). Middle school improvement and reform: Development and validation of a school-level assessment of climate, cultural pluralism, and school safety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 570–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. M., & Gilligan, C. (1992). Meeting at the Crossroads. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Bryk, A. S., & Driscoll, M. E. (1988). The high school as community: Contextual influences and consequences for students and teachers. Madison: National Center on Effective Secondary Schools, University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. L. (1998). The development of depression in children and adolescents. American Psychologist, 53, 221–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conchas, G., & Noguera, P. (2004). Explaining the academic success of African American males. In N. Way & J. Chu (Eds.), Adolescent development in context (pp. 134–176). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1984). A developmental theory of motivation in the classroom. Teacher Education Quarterly, 11, 64–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development. The Minnesota symposium on child psychology. (pp. 43–77). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

  • Crick, N., & Rose, A. (2000). Toward a gender-balanced approach to the study of social-emotional development: A look at relational aggression. In P. Miller & E. Kofsky Scholnick (Eds.), Toward a feminist developmental psychology (pp. 153–168). Florence, KY: Routledge Press.

  • DuBois, D. L., & Felner, R. D. (1991). Reliability and validity data for the self-esteem questionnaire. Unpublished raw data.

  • DuBois, D. L., Felner, R. D., Brand, S., Phillips, R. S. C., & Lease, A. M. (1996). Early adolescent self-esteem: A developmental-ecological framework and assessment strategy. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 543–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., Barber, B., Jozefowicz, D., Malenchuk, O., Vida, M. (1999). Self-evaluations of competence, task values, and self-esteem. In N. Johnson & M. Roberts (Eds.), Beyond appearance: A new look at adolescent girl (pp. 53–83). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In R. E. Amers & C. Amers (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (pp. 139–186). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Buchanan, C. M., Wigfield, A., Reuman, D., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage/environment fit. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., & Roeser, R. (1999). School and community influences on human development. In M. Bornstein & M. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (4th ed., pp. 503–554). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein J., & Karweit N. (Eds.). (1983). Friends in school. New York: Academic Press.

  • Felner, R., Jackson, A., Kasak, D., Mulhall, P, Brand, S., & Flowers, N. (1997). The impact of school reform for the middle grades: A longitudinal study of a network engaged in Turning Points-based comprehensive school transformation. In R. Takanishi & D. Hamburg (Eds.), Preparing adolescents for the twenty-first century: Challenges facing Europe and the United States (pp. 38–69). New York: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school. New York: SUNY Press.

  • Griffith, J. (1995). An empirical examination of a model of social climate in elementary schools. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, N., & Emmons, C. (1994). The role of school climate in students’ psycho-social development. New Haven, Ct: Lecture given at invited talk at Yale University.

  • Hoge, D. R., Smit, E. K., & Hanson, S. L. (1990). School experiences predicting changes in self-esteem of sixth- and seventh-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8.30 [Computer Software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.

  • Kasen, S., Johnson, J., & Cohen, P. (1990). The impact of school emotional climate on student psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 165–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Methodology in the social sciences. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, M. (1980/1981). Affective disorders in children and adolescents. American Psychologist, 44, 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozol, J. (1992). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York: Harper Perennial Press.

  • Kuperminc, G., Leadbeater, B. J., Emmons, C., & Blatt, S. J. (1997). Perceived school climate and problem behaviors in middle-school students: The protective function of a positive educational environment. Journal of Applied Developmental Science, 1, 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Girgus, J. S. (1994). The emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 424–443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orenstein, P. (1994). Schoolgirls: young women, self esteem, and the confidence gap. Wilmington, NC: Anchor Publishers.

  • Reid, K. (1983). Retrospection and persistent school absenteeism. Educational Research, 25, 110–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, R. W., & Eccles, J. S. (1998). Adolescents’ perceptions of middle school: Relation to longitudinal changes in academic and psychological adjustment. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8, 123–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, R., Eccles, J., & Sameroff, A. (1998). Academic and emotional functioning in early adolescence: Longitudinal relations, patterns, and prediction by experience in middle school. Developmental and Psychopathology, 10, 321–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, R., Eccles, J., & Sameroff, A. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents’ academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. Elementary School Journal, 100, 443–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1992). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., Ouston, J., & Smith, A. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Second schools and their effects on children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rys G., & Bear, G. (1997). Relational aggression and peer relations: Gender and developmental issues. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America’s schools cheat girls. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. G., & Willett, J. B. (1998). A cross-domain model for growth in adolescent alcohol expectancies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 509–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L. (2000). NORM: Multiple imputation of incomplete multivariate data under a normal model, version 2.03 [Computer Software]. Available: http://www.stat.psu.edu/∼jls/misoftwa.html.

  • Seidman, E., Allen, L., Aber, L., & Mitchell, C. (1994). The impact of school transitions in early adolescence on the self-esteem and perceived social context of poor urban youth. Child Development, 65, 507–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., Wellborn., J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., & Wellborn, J. G. (1997). Children’s coping in the academic domain. In S. A. Wolchik & I. N. Sandler (Eds.), Handbook of children’s coping: Linking theory and intervention. Issues in clinical child psychology (pp. 387–422). New York: Plenum Press.

  • Sommer, B. (1985). What’s different about truants? A comparision study of eight graders. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 14, 411–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez-Orozco, C., & Qin-Hilliard, D. (2004). Immigrant Boys’ Experiences in U.S. Schools. In N. Way & J. Chu (Eds.), Adolescent boys: Exploring diverse cultures of boyhood (pp. 295–316). New York: New York University Press.

  • Trickett, E., & Moos, R. H. (1973). The social environment of junior high and high school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way, N. (1998). Everyday courage: The lives and stories of urban teenagers. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Way, N. & Robinson, M. G. (2003). Effects of perceived family, friends, and school experiences on change in self-esteem among urban, low-SES adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 324–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willett, J. B., & Keiley, M. K. (2000). Using covariance structure analysis to model change over time. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling: A comprehensive guide for applied researchers in the biological sciences, social sciences, and humanities. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willet, J. B., & Sayer, A. G. (1996). Cross-domain analyses of change over time: Combining growth modeling, covariance structure analysis. In G. A. Marcoulides, & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling (pp. 125–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We gratefully acknowledge the support of Peter Mulhall at the Illinois Center for Prevention Research. In addition, we are grateful for the support of the Spencer Foundation who provided the first and third author with a grant to analyze the data presented in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niobe Way.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Instructions: How often are the following things true about THIS SCHOOL? Mark the best answer for each statement.

Never

Hardly ever

Sometimes

Most of the time

Always

(1)

   

(5)

Teacher Support

  1. 1.

    Teachers take a personal interest in students.

  2. 2.

    Teachers go out of their way to help students.

  3. 3.

    If students want to talk about something, teachers will find time to do it.

  4. 4.

    Students really enjoy their classes.

  5. 5.

    Teachers help students to organize their work.

  6. 6.

    Teachers help students catch up when they return from an absence.

Peer Support

Negative peer interactions

  1. 1.

    Students in this school are mean to each other.

  2. 2.

    There are kids in this school who pick on other kids.

  3. 3.

    Students in this school have trouble getting along with each other.

  4. 4.

    In classes, students find it hard to get along with each other.

  5. 5.

    Students in this school fell students are mean to them.

Affiliation

  1. 1.

    Students in this school get to know each other really well.

  2. 2.

    Students in this school are very interested in getting to know other students.

  3. 3.

    Students enjoy working together on projects.

  4. 4.

    Students get to know each other well in classes.

  5. 5.

    Students enjoy doing things with each other in school activities.

Student Autonomy Climate

  1. 1.

    Students in this school have a say in how things work.

  2. 2.

    Students help decide how class time is spent.

  3. 3.

    In our school, students are given the chance to help make decisions.

  4. 4.

    Students get to help decide some of the rules in this school.

  5. 5.

    Teachers ask students what they want to learn about.

Clarity and Consistency in School Rules

School Structure

  1. 1.

    Teachers make a point to sticking to the rules in classes.

  2. 2.

    When teachers make a rule, they mean it.

  3. 3.

    Students are given clear instructions about how to do their work in classes.

  4. 4.

    Students understand what will happen to them if they break a rule.

  5. 5.

    If some students are acting up in class, the teachers will do something about it.

School Harshness

  1. 1.

    Teachers are very strict here.

  2. 2.

    Students get in trouble for breaking small rules.

  3. 3.

    Students get in trouble for talking.

  4. 4.

    It is easy for a student to get kicked out of class in this school.

  5. 5.

    The rules in this school are too strict.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Way, N., Reddy, R. & Rhodes, J. Students’ Perceptions of School Climate During the Middle School Years: Associations with Trajectories of Psychological and Behavioral Adjustment. Am J Community Psychol 40, 194–213 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9143-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9143-y

Keywords

Navigation