Ackermann, M., S. Vicente, and S. Monsalve. 2021. The Latin American and Caribbean counter-mobilization against the UN Food Systems Summit: Magdalena Ackermann in conversation with Saúl Vicente and Sofía Monsalve. Development. October 27. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-021-00324-x.
Aga, A. 2021. Farm protests in India are writing the green revolution’s obituary. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/farm-protests-in-india-are-writing-the-green-revolutions-obituary/. Accessed 7 June 2021.
AGRA (Alliance for the Green Revolution in Africa). 2021. Our strategy—AGRA. https://agra.org/our-strategy/. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Agroecology Europe. 2021. AEEU Webinar on “Technological innovations for the agroecological transition.” Agroecology Europe, May 27.
Ajl, M. 2021. A people’s green new deal. London: Pluto Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Alger, J. 2008. A guide to global nuclear governance: Safety, security, and non-proliferation. The Centre for International Governance Innovation. https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/a_guide_to_nuclear_power.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2021.
Altieri, M.A. 1995. Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture, 2nd ed. London: Westview Press.
Google Scholar
Altieri, M.A., and L. Merrick. 1987. In situ conservation of crop genetic resources through maintenance of traditional farming systems. Economic Botany 41 (1): 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859354.
Article
Google Scholar
Altieri, M.A., C. Nicholls, and R. Montalba. 2017. Technological approaches to sustainable agriculture at a crossroads: An agroecological perspective. Sustainability 9 (3): 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030349.
Article
Google Scholar
Altieri, M.A., and V.M. Toledo. 2011. The agroecological revolution in Latin America: Rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (3): 587–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.582947.
Article
Google Scholar
Anderson, C.R., and M. Pimbert. 2018. The battle for the future of farming: what you need to know. The Conversation, November 21. http://theconversation.com/the-battle-for-the-future-of-farming-what-you-need-to-know-106805. Accessed 6 June 2021.
Andreotti, V. 2020. Gesturing Towards Decolonial Futures: lecture: “The house of modernity.” September 1. https://bit.ly/3k3IgUv. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Argumedo, A., and B. Yun Loong Wong. 2010. The ayllu system of the Potato Park (Peru). In Sustainable use of biological diversity in socio-ecological production landscapes. Background to the ‘Satoyama Initiative for the benefit of biodiversity and human well-being.,’ ed. C. Bélair, K. Ichikawa, B. Y. L. Wong, and K. J. Mulongoy, 184 pages. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Technical Series No. 522. Montreal.
Badgley, C., J. Moghtader, E. Quintero, E. Zakem, M.J. Chappell, K. Avilés-Vázquez, A. Samulon, and I. Perfecto. 2007. Organic agriculture and the global food supply. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 22 (2): 86–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170507001640.
Article
Google Scholar
Belay, M., and B. Mugambe. 2021. Bill Gates Should Stop Telling Africans What Kind of Agriculture Africans Need. Scientific American, July 6. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/bill-gates-should-stop-telling-africans-what-kind-of-agriculture-africans-need1/. Accessed 5 September 2021.
Benjamin, R. 2019. Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Medford, MA: Polity.
Google Scholar
Bennett, A.B., C. Chi-Ham, G. Barrows, S. Sexton, and D. Zilberman. 2013. Agricultural biotechnology: Economics, environment, ethics, and the future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 38 (1): 249–279. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-050912-124612.
Article
Google Scholar
Bernard, B., and A. Lux. 2017. How to feed the world sustainably: An overview of the discourse on agroecology and sustainable intensification. Regional Environmental Change 17 (5): 1279–1290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1027-y.
Article
Google Scholar
Bezner Kerr, R. 2013. Seed struggles and food sovereignty in northern Malawi. Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (5): 867–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2013.848428.
Article
Google Scholar
Boadi, R.Y., and M. Bokanga. 2007. The African Agricultural Technology Foundation approach to IP management. In Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation: A handbook of best practices, ed. A. Krattinger, R. T. Mahoney, L. Nelson, and et al. Oxford, UK: MIHR and PIPRA: Davis.
Bollier, D., and S. Helfrich. 2019. Free, fair, and alive: The insurgent power of the commons. Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society Publishers.
Google Scholar
Broad. 2017. DuPont Pioneer and Broad Institute join forces to enable democratic CRISPR licensing in agriculture. Broad Institute. October 18. https://www.broadinstitute.org/news/dupont-pioneer-and-broad-institute-join-forces-enable-democratic-crispr-licensing-agriculture. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Buttel, F.H. 2005. Ever since Hightower: The politics of agricultural research activism in the molecular age. Agriculture and Human Values 22 (3): 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-005-6043-3.
Article
Google Scholar
Canfield, M., M.D. Anderson, and P. McMichael. 2021. UN Food Systems Summit 2021: Dismantling democracy and resetting corporate control of food systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5 (April): 661552. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.661552.
Article
Google Scholar
Carlisle, L., M. Montenegro de Wit, M.S. DeLonge, A. Iles, A. Calo, C. Getz, J. Ory, et al. 2019. Transitioning to sustainable agriculture requires growing and sustaining an ecologically skilled workforce. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 3 (November): 96. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00096.
Article
Google Scholar
Carney, J.A. 2001. Black rice: The African origins of rice cultivation in the Americas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Carolan, M. 2020. Automated agrifood futures: Robotics, labor and the distributive politics of digital agriculture. The Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (1): 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1584189.
Article
Google Scholar
Chappell, M.J. 2018. Beginning to end hunger: Food and the environment in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, and beyond. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Chappell, M.J., and L.A. LaValle. 2011. Food security and biodiversity: Can we have both? An agroecological analysis. Agriculture and Human Values 28 (1): 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-009-9251-4.
Article
Google Scholar
Clapp, J., M.D. Anderson, M. Rahmanian, and S. Monsalve Suárez. 2021. An “IPCC for food?” How the UN Food Systems Summit is being used to advance a problematic new science-policy agenda. IPES-Food briefing note on the governance of food systems, July. http://www.ipes-food.org/_img/upload/files/GovBrief.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Clément, C., and F. Ajena. 2021. Paths of least resilience: Advancing a methodology to assess the sustainability of food system innovations—the case of CRISPR. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 45 (5): 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2021.1890307.
Article
Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 2019. China’s CRISPR revolution. Science 365 (6452): 420–421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.365.6452.420.
Article
Google Scholar
Collins, E. D., and K. Chandrasekaran. A wolf in sheep’s clothing? An analysis of the ‘sustainable intensification’ of agriculture. Amsterdam, NL: Friends of the Earth International. https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Wolf-in-Sheeps-Clothing-for-web.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2021.
Contreras, J.L., and J.S. Sherkow. 2017. CRISPR, surrogate licensing, and scientific discovery. Science 355 (6326): 698–700. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4222.
Article
Google Scholar
CRISPRcon. 2021. CRISPRcon—Conversations on science, society and the future of gene editing. CRISPRcon. https://crisprcon.org/. Accessed 7 June 2021.
Cullather, N. 2010. The hungry world: America’s Cold War battle against poverty in Asia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Curtis, T.Y., S.J. Powers, R. Wang, and N.G. Halford. 2018. Effects of variety, year of cultivation and sulphur supply on the accumulation of free asparagine in the grain of commercial wheat varieties. Food Chemistry 239 (January): 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.113.
Article
Google Scholar
Curtis, T.Y., S. Raffan, Y. Wan, R. King, A. Gonzalez-Uriarte, and N.G. Halford. 2019. Contrasting gene expression patterns in grain of high and low asparagine wheat genotypes in response to sulphur supply. BMC Genomics 20 (1): 628. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5991-8.
Article
Google Scholar
Da Silva, D.F. 2014. Toward a Black feminist poethics: The quest(ion) of Blackness toward the end of the world. The Black Scholar 44 (2): 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00064246.2014.11413690.
Article
Google Scholar
Davis, A. 2006. Angela Davis Lecture Moe Lectureship in Women’s Studies, Gustavus Adolphus College, St. Peter, Minnesota. April 12.
David, S., and L. Sperling. 1999. Improving technology delivery mechanisms: Lessons from bean seed systems research in eastern and central Africa. Agriculture and Human Values 16 (4): 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007603902380.
Article
Google Scholar
de la Cadena, M. 2015. Earth beings: Ecologies of practice across Andean worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
de Sousa Santos, B. 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
Google Scholar
Disparity to Parity. 2021. Disparity to Parity: A call to mandate fair pricing and update supply management to build a racially just, economically empowered, and climate resilient food system. https://disparitytoparity.org/. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Doudna, J.A., and E. Charpentier. 2014. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346 (6213): 12580960–12580969. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258096.
Article
Google Scholar
Dunbar-Ortiz, R. 2014. An indigenous peoples’ history of the United States. New York: Beacon Press.
Google Scholar
Eddens, A. 2019. White science and indigenous maize: The racial logics of the green revolution. The Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (3): 653–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1395857.
Article
Google Scholar
Egelie, K.J., G.D. Graff, S.P. Strand, and B. Johansen. 2016. The emerging patent landscape of CRISPR–Cas gene editing technology. Nature Biotechnology 34 (10): 1025–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3692.
Article
Google Scholar
Eubanks, V. 2017. Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Google Scholar
Fanon, F. 1952. Black skin, white masks. New York: Grove Press.
Google Scholar
Fanon, F. 1963 [2004]. The wretched of the earth. New York: Grove Press.
FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, and WHO. 2020. The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2020. Transforming food systems for affordable healthy diets. Rome: FAO: FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9692en.
Figueroa-Helland, L., C. Thomas, and A. Pérez Aguilera. 2018. Decolonizing food systems: Food sovereignty, indigenous revitalization, and agroecology as counter-hegemonic movements. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology 17 (1–2): 173–201. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691497-12341473.
Article
Google Scholar
Fischer, J., B. Brosi, G.C. Daily, P.R. Ehrlich, R. Goldman, J. Goldstein, D.B. Lindenmayer, et al. 2008. Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6 (7): 380–385. https://doi.org/10.1890/070019.
Article
Google Scholar
Fister, A.S., L. Landherr, S.N. Maximova, and M.J. Guiltinan. 2018. Transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 machinery targeting TcNPR3 enhances defense response in Theobroma cacao. Frontiers in Plant Science 9 (March): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00268.
Article
Google Scholar
Fleming, A., E. Jakku, L. Lim-Camacho, B. Taylor, and P. Thorburn. 2018. Is big data for big farming or for everyone? Perceptions in the Australian grains industry. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 38 (3): 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0501-y.
Article
Google Scholar
Foote, N. 2019. MEPs slam gene-editing court ruling as damaging for SMEs. Euractive. https://www.euractiv.com/section/agriculture-food/news/meps-slam-gene-editing-court-ruling-as-damaging-for-smes/. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Francis, C., G. Lieblein, S. Gliessman, T.A. Breland, N. Creamer, R. Harwood, L. Salomonsson, et al. 2003. Agroecology: The ecology of food systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 22 (3): 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v22n03_10.
Article
Google Scholar
Garnett, T., M.C. Appleby, A. Balmford, I.J. Bateman, T.G. Benton, P. Bloomer, B. Burlingame, et al. 2013. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Premises and policies. Science 341 (July): 33–34. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234485.
Article
Google Scholar
Gates, B. 2015. Can GMOs end world hunger by 2030? The Verge. February 18. https://www.theverge.com/2015/2/18/8061437/bill-gates-can-gmos-end-world-hunger-by-2030. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Giraldo, O.F. 2018. Ecología política de la agricultura: agroecología y posdesarrollo. Primera edición. San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas: ECOSUR.
Google Scholar
Glasner, J. 2018. Home run exits happen stealthily for biotech. TechCrunch. July 28. https://social.techcrunch.com/2018/07/28/home-run-exits-happen-stealthily-for-biotech/. Accessed 6 Sept 2021.
Glenna, L.L., W.B. Lacy, R. Welsh, and D. Biscotti. 2007. University administrators, agricultural biotechnology, and academic capitalism: Defining the public good to promote university–industry relationships. The Sociological Quarterly 48 (1): 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00074.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Gliessman, S.R. 2013. Agroecology: Growing the roots of resistance. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37 (1): 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2012.736927.
Article
Google Scholar
Gliessman, S.R. 2020. Transforming food and agriculture systems with agroecology. Agriculture and Human Values 37 (3): 547–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10058-0.
Article
Google Scholar
Gomez, M.A., Z.D. Lin, T. Moll, R.D. Chauhan, L. Hayden, K. Renninger, G. Beyene, et al. 2019. Simultaneous CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of cassava eIF4E isoforms nCBP-1 and nCBP-2 reduces cassava brown streak disease symptom severity and incidence. Plant Biotechnology Journal 17 (2): 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12987.
Article
Google Scholar
González de Molina, M., P. Petersen, F.G. Peña, and F.R. Caporal. 2020. Political agroecology: Advancing the transition to sustainable food systems. Advances in Agroecology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
GRAIN. 2021. Infographic | Digital fences: Technology and its use in land grabbing. https://grain.org/en/article/6653-infographic-digital-fences-technology-and-its-use-in-land-grabbing. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
GRAIN and AFSA (African Food Sovereignty Alliance). 2019. The real seeds producers: Small-scale farmers save, use, share and enhance the seed diversity of the crops that feed Africa. October 29. https://grain.org/en/article/6035-the-real-seeds-producers-small-scale-farmers-save-use-share-and-enhance-the-seed-diversity-of-the-crops-that-feed-africa. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Greenberg, A. 2018. DIY guns: A landmark ruling opens the door for homemade firearms. Wired. July 10. https://www.wired.com/story/a-landmark-legal-shift-opens-pandoras-box-for-diy-guns/. Accessed 6 Sept 2021.
Harding, S. 2007. Feminist standpoints. Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis: 45–69.
Harvey, D. 2007. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Hecht, S. 2010. The new rurality: Globalization, peasants and the paradoxes of landscapes. Land Use Policy 27 (2): 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.010.
Article
Google Scholar
Heinemann, J.A., D.J. Paull, S. Walker, and B. Kurenbach. 2021. Differentiated impacts of human interventions on nature. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 9 (1): 00086. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00086.
Article
Google Scholar
Hernández Xolocotzi, E. 1985. Xolocotzia: Obras de Efraím Hernández Xolocotzi. Tomo 1. Revista de Geografía Agrícola. In In Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo, Texcoco: México. México.
HLPE (High Level Panel of Experts). 2019. Agroecological approaches and other innovations for sustainable agriculture and food systems that enhance food security and nutrition. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/ca5602en/ca5602en.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Hodson, E., U. Niggli, K. Kitajima, L. Rattan, and C. Sadoff. 2021. Boost nature positive production: a paper on action track 3. A paper from the Scientific Group of the UN Food Systems Summit. https://sc-fss2021.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Action_Track_3_paper_Boost_Nature_Positive_Production.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Holt-Giménez, E., and M.A. Altieri. 2013. Agroecology, food sovereignty and the new green revolution. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 37 (1): 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2012.716388.
Article
Google Scholar
Holt Giménez, E., and A. Shattuck. 2011. Food crises, food regimes and food movements: Rumblings of reform or tides of transformation? Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (1): 109–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2010.538578.
Article
Google Scholar
IGI (Innovative Genomics Institute). 2021. Genome editing of the staple crop cassava to eliminate toxic cyanogen production. Innovative Genomics Institute (IGI). https://innovativegenomics.org/projects/genome-editing-staple-crop-cassava-eliminate-toxic-cyanogen-production/. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Iles, A. 2021. Can Australia transition to an agroecological future? Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 45 (1): 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2020.1780537.
Article
Google Scholar
Illich, I. 1973. Tools for conviviality. New York: Harper & Row.
Google Scholar
Innovature. 2019. Gene editing a sweet solution for weakened cacao trees. May 2. https://innovature.com/article/gene-editing-sweet-solution-weakened-cacao-trees. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
IPES-Food (International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems). 2016. From uniformity to diversity: A paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversified agroecological systems. http://www.ipes-food.org/_img/upload/files/UniformityToDiversity_FULL.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
IPES-Food (International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems). 2017. Too big to feed: Exploring the impacts of mega-mergers, consolidation, and concentration of power in the agri-food sector. http://www.ipes-food.org/images/Reports/Concentration_FullReport.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications). 2019. ISAAA brief 55–2019: biotech crops drive socio-economic development and sustainable environment in the new frontier. https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/55/executivesummary/default.asp. Accessed 4 Sept 2021.
Jasanoff, S., ed. 2004. States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. International Library of Sociology. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Johnson, N. 2015. It’s practically impossible to define “GMOs.” Vox. December 26. https://www.vox.com/2015/12/26/10653372/gmos-definition. Accessed 5 September 2021.
Jonas, T. 2021. Peoples’ solutions to food systems transformation in Asia and the Pacific. Development. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-021-00306-z.
Article
Google Scholar
Khumsupan, P., S. Donovan, and A.J. McCormick. 2019. CRISPR/Cas in Arabidopsis: Overcoming challenges to accelerate improvements in crop photosynthetic efficiencies. Physiologia Plantarum 166 (1): 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12937.
Article
Google Scholar
Kloppenburg, J.R. 2004. First the seed: the political economy of plant biotechnology, 1492–2000. 2nd ed. Science and Technology in Society. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Kremen, C. 2015. Reframing the land-sparing/land-sharing debate for biodiversity conservation: Reframing the land-sparing/land-sharing debate. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1355 (1): 52–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12845.
Article
Google Scholar
Kremen, C., and A.M. Merenlender. 2018. Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people. Science 362 (6412): eaau6020. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6020.
Article
Google Scholar
Kremen, C., and A. Miles. 2012. Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus conventional farming Systems: Benefits, externalities, and trade-Offs. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05035-170440.
Article
Google Scholar
Kuzma, J., and K. Grieger. 2020. Community-led governance for gene-edited crops. Science 370: 916–918. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd1512.
Article
Google Scholar
LaManna, C.M., and R. Barrangou. 2018. Enabling the rise of a CRISPR world. The CRISPR Journal 1 (3): 205–208. https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2018.0022.
Article
Google Scholar
Lemmon, Z.H., N.T. Reem, J. Dalrymple, S. Soyk, K.E. Swartwood, D. Rodriguez-Leal, J. Van Eck, and Z.B. Lippman. 2018. Rapid improvement of domestication traits in an orphan crop by genome editing. Nature Plants 4 (10): 766–770. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0259-x.
Article
Google Scholar
Levidow, L., M. Pimbert, and G. Vanloqueren. 2014. Agroecological research: Conforming—Or transforming the dominant agro-food regime? Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 38 (10): 1127–1155. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2014.951459.
Article
Google Scholar
Liboiron, M. 2021. Pollution is colonialism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Liu, G., J. Li, and I.D. Godwin. 2019. Genome editing by CRISPR/Cas9 in sorghum through biolistic bombardment. In Sorghum, ed. Zuo-Yu Zhao and Jeff Dahlberg. 1931, 169–183. Methods in molecular biology. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9039-9_12
Lotz, L.A., C.C. van de Wiel, and M.J. Smulders. 2020. Genetic engineering at the heart of agroecology. Outlook on Agriculture 49 (1): 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727020907619.
Article
Google Scholar
Lucheta, A.R., and M. Rodrigues Lambais. 2012. Sulfur in agriculture. Revista Brasileira De Ciência Do Solo 36 (5): 1369–1379. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832012000500001.
Article
Google Scholar
Mackelprang, R. 2018. Organic farming with gene editing: An oxymoron or a tool for sustainable agriculture? The Conversation, October 10. https://theconversation.com/organic-farming-with-gene-editing-an-oxymoron-or-a-tool-for-sustainable-agriculture-101585. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Macnaghten, P., and M.G. Habets. 2020. Breaking the impasse: Towards a forward-looking governance framework for gene editing with plants. Plants, People, Planet 2 (4): 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10107.
Article
Google Scholar
Marya, R., and R. Patel. 2021. Inflamed: Deep medicine and the anatomy of injustice. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Google Scholar
McKittrick, K. 2021. Dear science and other stories. Errantries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Méndez, E.V., C.M. Bacon, and R. Cohen. 2013. Agroecology as a transdisciplinary, participatory, and action-oriented approach. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37 (1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2012.736926.
Article
Google Scholar
Mignolo, W.D., and A. Escobar, eds. 2013. Globalization and the decolonial option. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Miladinovic, D., D. Antunes, K. Yildirim, A. Bakhsh, S. Cvejić, A. Kondić-Špika, A.M. Jeromela, H. Opsahl-Sorteberg, A. Zambounis, and Z. Hilioti. 2021. Targeted plant improvement through genome editing: From laboratory to field. Plant Cell Reports 40 (6): 935–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-020-02655-4.
Article
Google Scholar
Montenegro de Wit, M. 2020. Democratizing CRISPR? Stories, practices, and politics of science and governance on the agricultural gene editing frontier. Elementa Science of the Anthropocene 8 (1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.405.
Article
Google Scholar
Montenegro de Wit, M. and A. Iles. 2021. Woke science and the 4th Industrial Revolution: inside the making of UNFSS knowledge. Development. October 19. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-021-00314-z
Morales, H. 2021. Agroecological feminism. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 45 (7): 955–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2021.1927544.
Article
Google Scholar
Murdock, A. 2020. Using CRISPR genome editing to make cyanide-free cassava. Innovative Genomics Institute (IGI), July 14. https://innovativegenomics.org/news/crispr-cyanide-free-cassava/. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Nelson, A. 2016. The social life of DNA: Race, reparations, and reconciliation after the genome. Boston: Beacon Press.
Google Scholar
Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H., J. Kangmennaang, R. Bezner Kerr, I. Luginaah, L. Dakishoni, E. Lupafya, L. Shumba, and M. Katundu. 2017. Agroecology and healthy food systems in semi-humid tropical Africa: Participatory research with vulnerable farming households in Malawi. Acta Tropica 175 (November): 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.10.022.
Article
Google Scholar
Nyéléni. 2015. Declaration of the International Forum for Agroecology, Nyéléni, Mali. Development 58 (2–3): 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-016-0014-4.
Article
Google Scholar
Nyéléni Newsletter. 2019. Nyéléni Newsletter, no. 36. https://nyeleni.org/DOWNLOADS/newsletters/Nyeleni_Newsletter_Num_36_EN.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Odum, E.P. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164 (3877): 262–270.
Article
Google Scholar
Oliva, R., C. Ji, G. Atienza-Grande, J.C. Huguet-Tapia, A. Perez-Quintero, T. Li, J.S. Eom, et al. 2019. Broad-spectrum resistance to bacterial blight in rice using genome editing. Nature Biotechnology 37 (11): 1344–1350. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0267-z.
Article
Google Scholar
Otherwise School. 2021. Tools and techniques of counter-fascism, June 14–July 23, 2021 | a summer curriculum. https://sites.uw.edu/otherwise/. Accessed 7 June 2021.
Patel, R. 2009. Food sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (3): 663–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150903143079.
Article
Google Scholar
Patel, R. 2013. The long green revolution. The Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (1): 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.719224.
Article
Google Scholar
Pechlaner, G., and G. Otero. 2008. The third food regime: Neoliberal globalism and agricultural biotechnology in North America. Sociologia Ruralis 48 (4): 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00469.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Perfecto, I., and J. Vandermeer. 2010. The agroecological matrix as alternative to the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (13): 5786–5791. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905455107.
Article
Google Scholar
Perkins, J.H. 1990. The Rockefeller Foundation and the green revolution, 1941–1956. Agriculture and Human Values 7 (3–4): 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01557305.
Article
Google Scholar
Phelps, M. 2019. Gene editing delivers major sorghum protein lift. Queensland Country Life. November 19. http://www.queenslandcountrylife.com.au/story/6500841/gene-editing-delivers-major-sorghum-protein-lift/. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Phillips MacDougall. 2011. The cost and time involved in the discovery, development and authorisation of a new plant biotechnology derived trait. United Kingdom. https://croplife.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Getting-a-Biotech-Crop-to-Market-Phillips-McDougall-Study.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Pimbert, M.P., and B. Barry. 2021. Let the people decide: Citizen deliberation on the role of GMOs in Mali’s agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10221-1.
Article
Google Scholar
Pimbert, M. P., N. I. Moeller, J. Singh, and C. R. Anderson. 2021. Agroecology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology. August 31. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.298.
Prahladachar, M. 1983. Income distribution effects of the green revolution in India: A review of empirical evidence. World Development 11 (11): 927–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(83)90055-4.
Article
Google Scholar
Quijano, A. 2007. Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353.
Article
Google Scholar
Raffan, S., J. Oddy, and N.G. Halford. 2020. The sulphur response in wheat grain and its implications for acrylamide formation and food safety. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21 (11): 3876. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113876.
Article
Google Scholar
Raffan, S., C. Sparks, A. Huttly, L. Hyde, D. Martignago, A. Mead, S.J. Hanley, et al. 2021. Wheat with greatly reduced accumulation of free asparagine in the grain, produced by CRISPR/Cas9 editing of asparagine synthetase gene TaASN2. Plant Biotechnology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13573.
Article
Google Scholar
Ravetz, J.R. 2006. No-nonsense guide to science. The No-Nonsense Guides. Oxford: New Internationalist.
Google Scholar
Regalado, A. 2015. Everything You Need to Know About CRISPR Gene Editing’s Monster Year. MIT Technology Review, December 1. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/543941/everything-you-need-to-know-about-crispr-gene-editings-monster-year/. Accessed 6 Sept 2021.
Robinson, C. 2019. Why regulation of gene editing will not hurt small and medium size companies. GM Watch. November 28. https://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/archive/2019/19239-why-regulation-of-gene-editing-will-not-hurt-small-and-medium-size-companies. Accessed 2 Sept 2021.
Rock, J. 2019. “We are not starving:” Challenging genetically modified seeds and development in Ghana. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment 41 (1): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/cuag.12147.
Article
Google Scholar
Rodney, W. 1972 [2018]. How Europe underdeveloped Africa. New York: Verso.
Ronald, P. 2015. TED Talks: The case for engineering our food. https://www.ted.com/talks/pamela_ronald_the_case_for_engineering_our_food. Accessed 2 Sept 2021.
Ronald, P., and R.W. Adamchak. 2008. Tomorrow’s table: Organic farming, genetics, and the future of food. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Rosset, P., and M.A. Altieri. 2017. Agroecology: science and politics. Agrarian Change & Peasant Studies. United Kingdom: Practical Action Publishing.
Rothamsted. 2021. GE field trial application submitted to Defra. Rothamsted Research. May 6. https://www.rothamsted.ac.uk/news/ge-field-trial-application-submitted-defra. Accessed 7 June 2021.
Rotz, S., E. Duncan, M. Small, J. Botschner, R. Dara, I. Mosby, M. Reed, and E.D.G. Fraser. 2019. The politics of digital agricultural technologies: A preliminary review. Sociologia Ruralis 59 (2): 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12233.
Article
Google Scholar
Saini, A. 2019. Superior: The return of race science. Boston: Beacon Press.
Google Scholar
Schultink, A., T. Qi, A. Lee, A.D. Steinbrenner, and B. Staskawicz. 2017. Roq1 mediates recognition of the Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas effector proteins XopQ and HopQ1. The Plant Journal 92 (5): 787–795. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13715.
Article
Google Scholar
Shapin, S. 1994. A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Sharma, H.R. 1994. Distribution of landholdings in rural India, 1953–54 to 1981–82: Implications for land reforms. Economic and Political Weekly 29 (13): A12–A25.
Google Scholar
Sherkow, J. 2015. The CRISPR patent interference showdown is on: how did we get here and what comes next? Stanford Law School. December 29. https://law.stanford.edu/2015/12/29/the-crispr-patent-interference-showdown-is-on-how-did-we-get-here-and-what-comes-next/. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Shotwell, A. 2016. Against purity: Living ethically in compromised times. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar
Sievers-Glotzbach, S., and A. Christinck. 2021. Introduction to the symposium: Seed as a commons—exploring innovative concepts and practices of governing seed and varieties. Agriculture and Human Values 38 (2): 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10166-x.
Article
Google Scholar
Stein, S. 2019. Beyond higher education as we know it: Gesturing towards decolonial horizons of possibility. Studies in Philosophy and Education 38 (2): 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-018-9622-7.
Article
Google Scholar
Stein, S., D. Hunt, R. Suša, and V. de Oliveira Andreotti. 2017. The educational challenge of unraveling the fantasies of ontological security. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education 11 (2): 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/15595692.2017.1291501.
Article
Google Scholar
Stone, G.D. 2017. Dreading CRISPR: GMOs, honest brokers, and Mertonian transgressions. Geographical Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/gere.12260.
Article
Google Scholar
Stone, G.D., and D. Glover. 2017. Disembedding grain: Golden rice, the green revolution, and heirloom seeds in the Philippines. Agriculture and Human Values 34 (1): 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9696-1.
Article
Google Scholar
Suárez-Torres, J., J. Ricardo Suárez-López, D. López-Paredes, H. Morocho, L. Enrique Cachiguango-Cachiguango, and W. Dellai. 2017. Agroecology and health: Lessons from indigenous populations. Current Environmental Health Reports 4 (2): 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-017-0146-z.
Article
Google Scholar
Subramian, K. 2015. Revisiting the green revolution: irrigation and food production in twentieth-century India. United Kingdom: King’s College, London. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/revisiting-the-green-revolution(c7fedff0-862a-4fdb-aef8-0526f78772b5).html. Accessed 6 Sept 2021.
TallBear, K. 2013. Native American DNA: Tribal belonging and the false promise of genetic science. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Tavella, E. 2016. How to make participatory technology assessment in agriculture more “participatory”: The case of genetically modified plants. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 103 (February): 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.015.
Article
Google Scholar
Taylor, A.P. 2019. Companies use CRISPR to improve crops. The Scientist Magazine. February 1. https://www.the-scientist.com/bio-business/companies-use-crispr-to-improve-crops-65362. Accessed 6 Sept 2021.
TestBiotech. 2019. Patent cartel for the large companies. TestBiotech. June 24. https://www.testbiotech.org/en/printpdf/2378. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
The Red Nation. 2021. The Red Deal: Indigenous action to save our earth. Brooklyn, NY: Common Notions.
Google Scholar
The Royal Society. 2009. Reaping the benefits: Science and the sustainable intensification of global agriculture. London, UK: The Royal Society.
Google Scholar
Tischler, W. 1965. Agrarökologie. Jena: Fischer.
Google Scholar
Tittonell, P. 2014. Ecological intensification of agriculture—sustainable by nature. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 8 (October): 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.08.006.
Article
Google Scholar
Tomlinson, I. 2013. Doubling food production to feed the 9 billion: A critical perspective on a key discourse of food security in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies 29 (January): 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.09.001.
Article
Google Scholar
Tsing, A.L., J. Deger, A. Keleman Saxena, and F. Zhou. 2020. Feral atlas: The more-than-human Anthropocene. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Tuhiwai Smith, L. 2012. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples, 2nd ed. London: Zed Books.
Google Scholar
UNFSS (UN Food Systems Summit). 2021. Session 4: Why the fight: getting to grips with missed opportunities and contentious issues in science and innovation for food systems July 8, Science Days. https://sc-fss2021.org/events/sciencedays/program/. Accessed 31 Oct 2021.
USFSA (US Food Sovereignty Alliance). n.d. “Food Sovereignty” | USFSA. http://usfoodsovereigntyalliance.org/what-is-food-sovereignty/. Accessed 7 June 2021.
Vandermeer, J., and I. Perfecto. 2013. Complex traditions: Intersecting theoretical frameworks in agroecological research. Journal of Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37 (1): 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2012.717904.
Article
Google Scholar
Vanloqueren, G., and P.V. Baret. 2009. How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations. Research Policy 38 (6): 971–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.008.
Article
Google Scholar
Vivero Pol, J.L., T. Ferrando, O. de Schutter, and U. Mattei, eds. 2019. Routledge handbook of food as a commons. Abingdon: Routledge.
Google Scholar
von Braun, J., K. Afsana, L.O. Fresco, and M. Hassan. 2021. Food systems: Seven priorities to end hunger and protect the planet. Nature 597 (7874): 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02331-x.
Article
Google Scholar
Wang, X., J. Li, F. Li, Y. Pan, D. Cai, D. Mao, L. Chen, and S. Luan. 2021. Rice potassium transporter OsHAK8 mediates K+ uptake and translocation in response to low K+ stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 12 (August): 730002. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.730002.
Article
Google Scholar
Warner, K.D., K.M. Daane, C.M. Getz, S.P. Maurano, S. Calderon, and K.A. Powers. 2011. The decline of public interest agricultural science and the dubious future of crop biological control in California. Agriculture and Human Values 28 (4): 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-010-9288-4.
Article
Google Scholar
Wattnem, T. 2016. Seed laws, certification and standardization: Outlawing informal seed systems in the Global South. The Journal of Peasant Studies 43 (4): 850–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2015.1130702.
Article
Google Scholar
WEF (World Economic Forum). 2018. Innovation with a purpose: the role of technology innovation in accelerating food systems transformation. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Innovation_with_a_Purpose_VF-reduced.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
WEF (World Economic Forum). 2020. Nature risk rising: why the crisis engulfing nature matters for business and the economy. New Nature Economy Series. Geneve, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_New_Nature_Economy_Report_2020.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Werner, M., A. Shattuck, and R. Galt. 2021. While debate rages over glyphosate-based herbicides, farmers are spraying them all over the world. The Conversation. July 3. http://theconversation.com/while-debate-rages-over-glyphosate-based-herbicides-farmers-are-spraying-them-all-over-the-world-161156. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Willett, W., J. Rockström, B. Loken, M. Springmann, T. Lang, S. Vermeulen, T. Garnett, et al. 2019. Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet 393 (10170): 447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4.
Article
Google Scholar
Wright, A.L. 2005. The death of Ramón González: The modern agricultural dilemma. Rev. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Yapa, L. 1993. What are improved seeds? An epistemology of the green revolution. Economic Geography 69 (3): 254–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/143450.
Article
Google Scholar
Yazzie, M. 2021. To Palestine, with love. Red Power Hour. Co-hosts Elena Ortiz and Justine Teba. https://directory.libsyn.com/episode/index/show/therednation/id/19210127. Accessed 14 June 2021.
Zaitchik, A. 2021. The great American science heist. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2021/08/29/bayh-dole-act-public-science-patents/. Accessed 5 Sept 2021.
Zsögön, A., T. Čermák, E. Rezende Naves, M.M. Notini, K.H. Edel, S. Weinl, L. Freschi, D.F. Voytas, J. Kudla, and L.E. Pereira Peres. 2018. De novo domestication of wild tomato using genome editing. Nature Biotechnology 36 (12): 1211–1216. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4272.
Article
Google Scholar
Zuluaga Sánchez, G.P., G. Catacora-Vargas, and E. Siliprandi. 2018. Agroecología en femenino: reflexiones a partir de nuestras experiencias. La Paz, Bolivia: SOCLA / CLACSO.