Ajena, F. 2019. Agriculture 3.0 or (smart) agroecology? P2P foundation. https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/agriculture-3-0-or-smart-agroecology/2019/07/11. Accessed 21 July 2020.
Akom, A., S. Aekta, A. Nakai, and T. Cruz. 2016. Youth participatory action research (YPAR) 2.0: How technological innovation and digital organizing sparked a food revolution in East Oakland. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 29: 1287–1307.
Article
Google Scholar
Barrett, H., and D.C. Rose. 2020. Perceptions of the fourth agricultural revolution: What’s in, what’s out, and what consequences are anticipated? Sociologia Ruralis. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12324.
Article
Google Scholar
Becker, H.S. 1998. Tricks of the trade: How to think about your research while you’re doing it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Baker, D., A Jayadev, and J.E. Stiglitz. 2017. Innovation, intellectual property, and development: A better set of approaches for the 21st century. AccessIBSA: Innovation & Access to Medicines in India, Brazil & South Africa.
Benjaminson, M.A., J.A. Gilchriest, and M. Lorenz. 2002. In vitro edible muscle protein production system (MPPS): Stage 1, fish. Acta Astronautica 51: 879–889.
Article
Google Scholar
Bowen, R., and W. Morris. 2019. The digital divide: Implications for agribusiness and entrepreneurship. Lessons from Wales. Journal of Rural Studies 72: 75–84.
Article
Google Scholar
Brandl, B., and L.L. Glenna. 2017. Intellectual property and agricultural science and innovation in Germany and the United States. Science, Technology, & Human Values 42: 622–656.
Article
Google Scholar
Braveman, P., and S. Gruskin. 2003. Defining equity in health. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 57 (4): 254–258.
Article
Google Scholar
Broad, G.M. 2019. Plant-based and cell-based animal product alternatives: An assessment and agenda for food tech justice. Geoforum 107: 223–226.
Article
Google Scholar
Broad, G.M. 2020a. Making meat, better: The metaphors of plant-based and cell-based meat innovation. Environmental Communication 14 (7): 919–932.
Article
Google Scholar
Broad, G.M. 2020b. Know your indoor farmer: Square roots, techno-local food, and transparency as publicity. American Behavioral Scientist 64: 1588–1606.
Article
Google Scholar
Burawoy, M. 2000. Global ethnography: Forces, connections, and imaginations in a postmodern world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
Burton, R.J. 2019. The potential impact of synthetic animal protein on livestock production: The new “war against agriculture”? Journal of Rural Studies 68: 33–45.
Article
Google Scholar
Cameron, B., and S. O’Neill. 2019. State of the industry: Cell-based meat. Washington, D.C.: The Good Food Institute.
Google Scholar
Carlson, C. 2018. Rethinking the agrarian question: Agriculture and underdevelopment in the Global South. Journal of Agrarian Change 18: 703–721.
Article
Google Scholar
Carolan, M. 2015. Affective sustainable landscapes and care ecologies: Getting a real feel for alternative food communities. Sustainability Science 10: 317–329.
Article
Google Scholar
Carolan, M. 2017a. Agro-digital governance and life itself: Food politics at the intersection of code and affect. Sociologia Ruralis 57: 816–835.
Article
Google Scholar
Carolan, M. 2017b. Publicising food: Big data, precision agriculture, and co-experimental techniques of addition. Sociologia Ruralis 57: 135–154.
Article
Google Scholar
Carolan, M. 2018. ‘Smart’ farming techniques as political ontology: Access, sovereignty and the performance of neoliberal and not-so-neoliberal worlds. Sociologia Ruralis 58: 745–764.
Article
Google Scholar
Carolan, M. 2020a. Acting like an algorithm: Digital farming platforms and the trajectories they (need not) lock-in. Agriculture and Human Values 37: 1041–1053.
Article
Google Scholar
Carolan, M. 2020b. Automated agrifood futures: Robotics, labor and the distributive politics of digital agriculture. The Journal of Peasant Studies 47: 184–207.
Article
Google Scholar
Catts, O., and I. Zurr. 2008. The ethics of experiential engagement with the manipulation of life. In Tactical biopolitics: Art, activism, and technoscience, ed. B. da Costa and K. Philip, 125–142. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Chiles, R.M. 2013. Intertwined ambiguities: Meat, in vitro meat, and the ideological construction of the marketplace. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 12: 472–482.
Article
Google Scholar
Chiles, R.M. 2020. Global food systems in the post-coronavirus era. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4mn8u.
Article
Google Scholar
Chiles, R.M., L. Glenna, A. Sharma, J. Catchmark, C.D. Azzara, and A. Maretzki. 2020. Agri-food firms, universities, and corporate social responsibility: What’s in the public interest? Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 35 (2): 158–168.
Article
Google Scholar
Choudary, S. 2018. The architecture of digital labour platforms: policy recommendations on platform design for worker well-being, ILO Future of Work research paper series, no. 3, ILO, Geneva.
Church, G.M., and E. Regis. 2014. Regenesis: How synthetic biology will reinvent nature and ourselves. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
Clancy, M.S., and G. Moschini. 2017. Intellectual property rights and the ascent of proprietary innovation in agriculture. Annual Review of Resource Economics 9: 53–74.
Article
Google Scholar
Clapp, J., and S.L. Ruder. 2020. Precision technologies for agriculture: Digital farming, gene-edited crops, and the politics of sustainability. Global Environmental Politics 20: 49–69.
Article
Google Scholar
Comi, M. 2020. The distributed farmer: Rethinking US Midwestern precision agriculture techniques. Environmental Sociology 6: 403–415.
Article
Google Scholar
Comino, S., and F.M. Manenti. 2011. Dual licensing in open source software markets. Information Economics and Policy 23: 234–242.
Article
Google Scholar
Corkery, M., and N. Popper. 2018. From farm to blockchain: Walmart tracks its lettuce. The New York Times. September 24. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/business/walmart-blockchain-lettuce.html. Accessed 14 July 2021.
Cosgrove, E. 2017. What do farmers think about cultured meat? Ag Funder News. October 12. https://agfundernews.com/what-do-farmers-think-about-cultured-meat.html. Accessed 21 July 2020.
CMMC (Cultivated Meat Modeling Consortium). 2019. Using computational modeling to advance cultivated meat. September 19. https://thecmmc.org/. Accessed 21 July 2020.
CMMC (Cultivated Meat Modeling Consortium). 2021. Member subscription term sheet. January 26. Unpublished.
Cumbers, J., and K. Costa. 2020. China’s plan to beat the U.S. in the trillion-dollar global bioeconomy. Synbiobeta. February 8. https://synbiobeta.com/chinas-plan-to-beat-the-u-s-in-the-trillion-dollar-global-bioeconomy. Accessed 21 July 2020.
Cumbers, J., and K. Schmieder. 2017. What’s your bio strategy? New York: Pulp Bio Books.
Google Scholar
Cusumano, M., A. Gawer, and D.B. Yoffie. 2019. The business of platforms: Strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation, and power. New York: HarperCollins.
Google Scholar
Datar, I., E. Kim, and G. d’Origny. 2016. New harvest: Building the cellular agriculture economy. In The future of meat without animals, ed. B. Donaldson and C. Carter, 121–131. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1991. Democracy and educational administration. Planning and Changing 22: 134–140.
Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P.J., and W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.
Article
Google Scholar
Djelic, M.L., and S. Quack. 2007. Overcoming path dependency: Path generation in open systems. Theory and Society 36: 161–186.
Article
Google Scholar
Dolgin, E. 2020. Cell-based meat with a side of science. Nature 588: S64–S67.
Article
Google Scholar
Domingos, P. 2015. The master algorithm: How the quest for the ultimate learning machine will remake our world. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
Douglas, L. 2018. How rural America got milked. Washington monthly. https://washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/january-february-march-2018/how-rural-america-got-milked/. Accessed 21 July 2020.
Dryzek, J. S. (2005). Deliberative democracy in divided societies: Alternatives to agonism and analgesia. Political Theory 33 (2): 218–242.
Article
Google Scholar
Eddens, A. 2019. White science and indigenous maize: The racial logics of the green revolution. The Journal of Peasant Studies 46: 653–673.
Article
Google Scholar
Emerson, R.M., R.I. Fretz, and L. Shaw. 2011. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Fraser, A. 2020. The digital revolution, data curation, and the new dynamics of food sovereignty construction. The Journal of Peasant Studies 47: 208–226.
Article
Google Scholar
Fuglie, K.O., and A. Toole. 2014. The evolving institutional structure of public and private agricultural research. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96: 862–883.
Article
Google Scholar
Galloway, S. 2017. The four: The hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google. New York: Random House.
Google Scholar
Garsten, C., and A. Sörbom. 2018. Discreet power: How the world economic forum shapes market agendas. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar
Gershlak, J.R., S. Hernandez, G. Fontana, L.R. Perreault, K.J. Hansen, S.A. Larson, B.Y. Binder, D.M. Dolivo, T. Yang, T. Dominko, M.W. Rolle, P.J. Weathers, F. Medina-Bolivae, C.L. Cramer, W.L. Murphy, and G.R. Gaudette. 2017. Crossing kingdoms: Using decellularized plants as perfusable tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 125: 13–22.
Article
Google Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J.K. 2006. A postcapitalist politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar
Gille, Z., and S.O. Riain. 2002. Global ethnography. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 271–295.
Article
Google Scholar
Glenna, L., and G. Mitev. 2009. Global neo-liberalism, global ecological modernization, and a swine CAFO in rural Bulgaria. Journal of Rural Studies 25 (3): 289–298.
Article
Google Scholar
Glenna, L., J. Tooker, R. Welsh, and D. Ervin. 2015. Intellectual property, scientific independence, and the efficacy and environmental impacts of genetically engineered crops. Rural Sociology 80: 147–172.
Article
Google Scholar
Goodman, D., B. Sorj, and J. Wilkinson. 1987. From farming to biotechnology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Guthman, J., and C. Biltekoff. 2020. Magical disruption?Alternative protein and the promise of de-materialization. Environment and Planning e: Nature and Space. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848620963125.
Article
Google Scholar
Hagedoorn, J., and A. Zobel. 2015. The role of contracts and intellectual property rights in open innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 27: 1050–1067.
Article
Google Scholar
Haigh, N., J. Walker, S. Bacq, and J. Kickul. 2015. Hybrid organizations: Origins, strategies, impacts, and implications. California Management Review 57: 5–12.
Article
Google Scholar
Hansen, B.G., C.T. Bugge, and P.K. Skibrek. 2020. Automatic milking systems and farmer wellbeing–exploring the effects of automation and digitalization in dairy farming. Journal of Rural Studies 80: 469–480.
Article
Google Scholar
Hebinck, P. 2018. De-/re-agrarianisation: Global perspectives. Journal of Rural Studies 61: 227–235.
Article
Google Scholar
Heimans, J., and H. Timms. 2018. New power: How power works in our hyperconnected world–and how to make it work for you. London: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Hines, E., J.A. Campbell, T. Felix, and R.M. Chiles. 2018. Cell-culture technology and potential impacts on livestock production. Penn State Extension. https://extension.psu.edu/cell-culture-technology-and-potential-impacts-on-livestock-production. Accessed 21 July 2020.
Hocquette, A., C. Lambert, C. Sinquin, L. Peterolff, Z. Wagner, S.F. Bonny, A. Lebert, and J.F. Hocquette. 2015. Educated consumers don’t believe artificial meat is the solution to the problems with the meat industry. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 14 (2): 273–284.
Article
Google Scholar
Howard, P.H. 2016. Concentration and power in the food system: Who controls what we eat? New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Book
Google Scholar
Ilea, R.C. 2009. Intensive livestock farming: Global trends, increased environmental concerns, and ethical solutions. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22: 153–167.
Article
Google Scholar
Jacobides, M.G. 2019. Designing digital ecosystems. In Platforms and ecosystems: Enabling the digital economy, ed. M.G. Jacobides, A. Sundararajan, and M. Van Alstyne, 13–18. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Google Scholar
Jackson, S.J., M. Bailey, and B.F. Welles. 2020. # HashtagActivism: Networks of race and gender justice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Jaffe, J., and M. Gertler. 2006. Victual vicissitudes: Consumer deskilling and the (gendered) transformation of food systems. Agriculture and Human Values 23: 143–162.
Article
Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. 2004. States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. New York: Routledge.
Book
Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. 2016. The ethics of invention: Technology and the human future. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Google Scholar
Jönsson, E. 2016. Benevolent technotopias and hitherto unimaginable meats: Tracing the promises of in vitro meat. Social Studies of Science 46: 725–748.
Article
Google Scholar
Juma, C. 2016. Innovation and its enemies: Why people resist new technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Kahan, S., J. Camphuijsen, C. Cannistra, G. Potter, Z. Cosenza, and I. Shmulevich. 2020. Cultivated meat modeling consortium: Inaugural meeting whitepaper. Authorea. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.158057683.31004563.
Article
Google Scholar
Katz, E., and A. Light. 1996. Environmental pragmatism. 1st edn. Milton Park: Routledge.
Google Scholar
King, D., and P. Le Galès. 2017. The three constituencies of the state: Why the state has lost unifying energy. The British Journal of Sociology 68: S11–S33.
Google Scholar
Klerkx, L., E. Jakku, and P. Labarthe. 2019. A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 90: 100315.
Article
Google Scholar
Kloppenburg, J. 2005. First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Google Scholar
Kloppenburg, J. 2010. Impeding dispossession, enabling repossession: Biological open source and the recovery of seed sovereignty. Journal of Agrarian Change 10: 367–388.
Article
Google Scholar
Kloppenburg, J. 2014. Re-purposing the master’s tools: The open source seed initiative and the struggle for seed sovereignty. Journal of Peasant Studies 41: 1225–1246.
Article
Google Scholar
Kozinets, R.V. 2015. Netnography. In The international encyclopedia of digital communication and society, ed. R. Mansell and P.H. Ang, 653–660. Malden: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Laestadius, L. 2015. Public perceptions of the ethics of in-vitro meat: Determining an appropriate course of action. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28: 991–1009.
Article
Google Scholar
Lawrence, G. 2017. Re-evaluating food systems and food security: A global perspective. Journal of Sociology 53: 774–796.
Article
Google Scholar
Lee, K. 2018. AI superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the new world order. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Google Scholar
Lei, Z., R. Juneja, and B.D. Wright. 2009. Patents versus patenting: Implications of intellectual property protection for biological research. Nature Biotechnology 27: 36–40.
Article
Google Scholar
Lele, U., and S. Goswami. 2017. The fourth industrial revolution, agricultural and rural innovation, and implications for public policy and investments: A case of India. Agricultural Economics 48: 87–100.
Article
Google Scholar
Lewis, K. 2017. How to ensure the fourth industrial revolution is ‘Made in the USA’. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/how-to-ensure-the-fourth-industrial-revolution-is-made-in-the-usa-81385. Accessed 21 July 2020.
Linux Foundation. 2020. About the Linux Foundation. https://www.linuxfoundation.org/about. Accessed 21 July 2020.
Lusk, J. 2016. Unnaturally delicious: How science and technology are serving up super foods to save the world. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Google Scholar
Lynch, J., and R. Pierrehumbert. 2019. Climate impacts of cultured meat and beef cattle. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 3: 5.
Article
Google Scholar
Marcus, G.E. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117.
Article
Google Scholar
Marsden, T., A.M. Faus, and R. Sonnino. 2019. Reproducing vulnerabilities in agri-food systems: Tracing the links between governance, financialization, and vulnerability in Europe post 2007–2008. Journal of Agrarian Change 19: 82–100.
Article
Google Scholar
Marshall, A., M. Dezuanni, J. Burgess, J. Thomas, and C.K. Wilson. 2020. Australian farmers left behind in the digital economy–insights from the Australian Digital Inclusion Index. Journal of Rural Studies 80: 195–210.
Article
Google Scholar
Mascarenhas, M., and L. Busch. 2006. Seeds of change: Intellectual property rights, genetically modified soybeans and seed saving in the United States. Sociologia Ruralis 46: 122–138.
Article
Google Scholar
McAfee, A., and E. Brynjolfsson. 2017. Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Google Scholar
McCarthy, J.D., and M.N. Zald. 1977. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology 82: 1212–1241.
Article
Google Scholar
McGrath, J.E., J.M. Martin, and R.A. Kulka. 1982. Judgment calls in research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
McMichael, P. 2020. Does China’s ‘going out’ strategy prefigure a new food regime? The Journal of Peasant Studies 47: 116–154.
Article
Google Scholar
Mehrabi, Z., D. Jimenez, and A. Jarvis. 2018. Smallholders need access to big-data agronomy too. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-02566-1.
Article
Google Scholar
Merrett, C.D., and N. Walzer. 2004. Cooperatives and local development: Theory and applications for the 21st century. New York: ME Sharpe.
Google Scholar
Miles, M.B., M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Google Scholar
Mooney, P.H. 2004. Democratizing rural economy: Institutional friction, sustainable struggle and the cooperative movement. Rural Sociology 69 (1): 76–98.
Article
Google Scholar
Nachal, N., J.A. Moses, P. Karthik, and C. Anandharamakrishnan. 2019. Applications of 3D printing in food processing. Food Engineering Reviews 11: 123–141.
Article
Google Scholar
Novkovic, S. 2018. Are cooperatives transformative, or just businesses? Cooperative Business Journal Fall 2018: 30–40.
Noyes, A. 2020. Eat Just makes history (again) with restaurant debut of cultured meat. Business wire. December 21. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20201220005063/en/Eat-Just-Makes-History-Again-with-Restaurant-Debut-of-Cultured-Meat. Accessed 14 July 2021.
Okoli, C. and J. Nguyen. 2015. Business models for free and open source software: Insights from a Delphi study. In Proceedings of the 21st Americas Conference on Information Systems, Puerto Rico. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2769875. Accessed 21 July 2020.
Oncini, F., E. Bozzini, F. Forno, and N. Magnani. 2020. Towards food platforms? An analysis of online food provisioning services in Italy. Geoforum 114: 172–180.
Article
Google Scholar
Patel, R., and J.W. Moore. 2017. A history of the world in seven cheap things: A guide to capitalism, nature, and the future of the planet. Oakland: University of California Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Perls, D. 2018. From lab to fork. Friends of the Earth. https://foe.org/resources/from-lab-to-fork/. Accessed 21 July 2020.
Pimbert, M., J. Thompson, W.T. Vorley, T. Fox, N. Kanji, and C. Tacoli. 2001. Global restructuring, agri-food systems and livelihoods. International Institute for Environment and Development. Gatekeeper Series: SA100.
Pixley, K.V., J.B. Falck-Zepeda, K.E. Giller, L. Glenna, F. Gould, C.A. Mallory-Smith, D.M. Stelly, and C.N. Stewart Jr. 2019. Genome editing, gene drives, and synthetic biology: Will they contribute to disease-resistant crops, and who will benefit? Annual Review of Phytopathology 57: 165–188.
Article
Google Scholar
Ransom, E., L. Busch, and G. Middendorf. 1998. Can cooperatives survive the privatization of biotechnology in U.S. agriculture? In Privatization of information and agricultural industrialization, ed. S.A. Wolf, 75–93. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Google Scholar
Rifkin, J. 2014. The zero marginal cost society: The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Rose, D.C., R. Wheeler, M. Winter, M. Lobley, and C.A. Chivers. 2021. Agriculture 4.0: Making it work for people, production, and the planet. Land Use Policy 100: 104933.
Article
Google Scholar
Rotz, S., E. Duncan, M. Small, J. Botschner, R. Dara, I. Mosby, M. Reed, and E. Fraser. 2019a. The politics of digital agricultural technologies: A preliminary review. Sociologia Ruralis 59: 203–229.
Article
Google Scholar
Rotz, S., E. Gravely, I. Mosby, E. Duncan, E. Finnis, M. Horgan, J. LeBlanc, R. Martin, H.T. Neufeld, and A. Nixon. 2019b. Automated pastures and the digital divide: How agricultural technologies are shaping labour and rural communities. Journal of Rural Studies 68: 112–122.
Article
Google Scholar
Schneiberg, M., M. King, and T. Smith. 2008. Social movements and organizational form: Cooperative alternatives to corporations in the American insurance, dairy, and grain industries. American Sociological Review 73: 635–667.
Article
Google Scholar
Schwab, K. 2016. The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: Crown Business.
Google Scholar
Schwab, K., and N. Davis. 2018. Shaping the future of the fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: Currency.
Google Scholar
Scott, D. 2011. The technological fix criticisms and the agricultural biotechnology debate. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24: 207–226.
Article
Google Scholar
Schneider, T., K. Eli, C. Dolan, and S. Ulijaszek. 2017. Digital food activism. New York: Routledge.
Book
Google Scholar
Shieber, J. 2018. Tyson Foods investment arm backs another lab-grown meat manufacturer. Tech Crunch. https://techcrunch.com/2018/05/02/tyson-foods-investment-arm-backs-another-lab-grown-meat-manufacturer. Accessed 21 July 2020.
Slade, P. 2018. If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers. Appetite 125: 428–437.
Article
Google Scholar
Specht, E., D. Welch, E.M.R. Clayton, and C. Lagally. 2018. Opportunities for applying biomedical production and manufacturing methods to the development of the clean meat industry. Biochemical Engineering Journal 132: 161–168.
Article
Google Scholar
Stephens, N., A.E. Sexton, and C. Driessen. 2019. Making sense of making meat: Key moments in the first 20 years of tissue engineering muscle to make food. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 3: 45.
Article
Google Scholar
Staeritz, F., S. Torrance, and M. Larkin. 2020. Fightback: How to win in the digital economy with platforms, ventures and entrepreneurs. London: LID Publishing Ltd.
Google Scholar
Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy 42: 1568–1580.
Article
Google Scholar
Starostinetskaya, A. 2018. Meat brand invests $8.8 million in cultured-meat pioneer. VegNews. https://vegnews.com/2018/7/meat-brand-invests-88-million-in-cultured-meat-pioneer. Accessed 21 July 2020.
Tapscott, D., and A. Tapscott. 2016. Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. New York: Penguin.
Google Scholar
Tuomisto, H.L. 2019. Vertical farming and cultured meat: Immature technologies for urgent problems. One Earth 1: 275–277.
Article
Google Scholar
USDA NASS. (2019). 2017 Census of Agriculture, Census Data Query Tool (CDQT). https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2017/Online_Resources/Census_Data_Query_Tool/. Accessed 21 July 2020.
Van Alstyne, M., G.G. Parker, and S.G. Choudary. 2016. Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review 94: 54–62.
Google Scholar
Van Alstyne, M. 2019. The opportunity and challenge of platforms. Designing digital ecosystems. In Platforms and ecosystems: Enabling the digital economy, ed. M.G. Jacobides, A. Sundararajan, and M. Van Alstyne, 8–12. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Google Scholar
Vertesi, J., D. Ribes, L. Forlano, Y. Loukissas, and M.L. Cohn. 2016. Engaging, designing, and making digital systems. In The handbook of science and technology studies, ed. U. Felt, R. Fouché, C.A. Miller, and L. Smith-Doerr, 169–194. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
von Schomberg, R. 2011. Towards responsible research and innovation in the information and communication technologies and security technologies fields. Brussels: European Commission. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2436399.
Walter, M. and M. Lohse. 2017. Platform innovation kit: User guide. Platform & Blockchain Innovation Lab. https://platforminnovationkit.com/. Accessed 21 July 2020.
Webb, A. 2019. The big nine: How the tech titans and their thinking machines could warp humanity. New York: Public Affairs.
Google Scholar
Welsh, R., L. Glenna, W. Lacy, and D. Biscotti. 2008. Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism. Research Policy 37: 1854–1864.
Article
Google Scholar
Wolf, S.A., and S.D. Wood. 1997. Precision farming: Environmental legitimation, commodification of information, and industrial coordination 1. Rural Sociology 62: 180–206.
Article
Google Scholar