Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

‘Pesticides are our children now’: cultural change and the technological treadmill in the Burkina Faso cotton sector

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Amidst broad debates about the “New Green Revolution” in Africa, input-intensive agriculture is on the rise in some parts of Africa. This paper examines the underlying drivers of the recent and rapid adoption of herbicides and genetically modified seeds in the Burkina Faso cotton sector. Drawing on 8 months of ethnographic fieldwork in the Houndé region, this article contends that economic and cultural dynamics—often considered separately in analyses of technology adoption—have co-produced a self-reinforcing technological treadmill. On the one hand, male farmers seek to increase cotton production in response to an economic squeeze. At the same time, broader cultural shifts toward individualism have created labor shortages as a result of families splitting apart, parents putting their children in school, and some women and young men refusing to provide free labor. Male cotton farmers thus increase production by turning to labor-saving inputs like herbicides, but these inputs create more debt, further locking farmers into intensive production. This article thus expands on the classic concept of the technological treadmill, demonstrating how economic and cultural processes intersect within a process of agrarian change to drive labor-saving agricultural technology adoption in the Burkinabè cotton sector. This expanded treadmill concept illuminates the complex dynamics compelling farmers’ choices to opt into input-intensive agriculture, and also helps explain rising farmer differentiation, as poorer farmers struggle to stay afloat and wealthier farmers expand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This includes costs for: backpack sprayers, motorcycles, gas, carts, corruption (paying the cotton conditioner), UNPCB (union) fees, cows, cow vaccines, cow food during the dry season, and a cow plow. Per-hectare costs include seed, fertilizer, insecticide, herbicides, meals for harvest laborers, and GPC fees. Costs can vary significantly. These cost calculations are based on group discussions with male farmers.

  2. Until recently, access to land was not a major constraint for most farmers in this area, although “older” families controlling the land have more land than more recently arrived or migrant families. However, with increasing farm size, forest conservation enclosures, rising numbers of migrant farmers, population growth, and families splitting, land is becoming limited. Thus, the strategy of increasing farm size to increase production may shift. However, pressures on land may be offset by rising social differentiation, as in U.S. farming communities, where some farmers fall out of the system and other farmers then incorporate their land (see Bell 2004).

  3. I found (CFA) wage/service rates per hectare of: 25,000 (tilling, tractor), 10,000 (delivering inputs to farm), 13,750 (seed planting/re-planting), 5500 (thinning), 10,000 (weeding, oxen), 12,500 (hilling, oxen), 6000 (spraying), 25,000 (harvest), 5000 (transportation of harvested cotton). This adds up to CFA117,750 per hectare. At CFA215,000 net income per hectare, and additional per-hectare input costs of CFA109,500, it is not profitable to hire all labor. (This calculation excludes the aforementioned fixed costs, assuming the farmer hires out all these services).

  4. The theme of Western school as a cultural threat is echoed in other historical and literary works in West Africa (Kane 1961).

Abbreviations

Bt:

Bacillus thuringiensis, refers to genetically modified Bt cotton

CFA:

The West African Franc (currency denomination); roughly 500 CFA to 1 US dollar

GM:

Genetically modified

GPC:

Groupement des Producteurs du Coton, or Cotton Producer Group

SOFITEX:

Société Burkinabè des Fibres Textiles, the parastatal cotton company in Burkina Faso

References

  • Addison, L., and M. Schnurr. 2016. Introduction to symposium on labor, gender and new sources of agrarian change. Agriculture and Human Values 33 (4): 961–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, T.J. 2014. Capturing the margins: World market prices and cotton farmer incomes in West Africa. World Development 59: 408–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bationo, H. 2017. Usage incontrôlé des pesticides et impact sur l’environnement et la santé des populations. Le Faso, Jan 15.

  • Becker, L.C. 1990. The collapse of the family farm in West Africa? Evidence from Mali. The Geographical Journal 156 (3): 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. 2004. Farming for us all: Practical agriculture and the cultivation of sustainability. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, H. 2004. Considering Africa’s agrarian questions. Historical Materialism 12 (4): 115–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, H. 2010. Class dynamics of agrarian change: Agrarian change and peasant studies. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S. 1984. The food crisis and agrarian change in Africa: A review essay. African Studies Review 27 (2): 59–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S. 1985. Fathers work for their sons: Accumulation, mobility, and class formation in an extended Yorùbá community. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S. 1993. No condition is permanent: The social dynamics of agrarian change in sub-Saharan Africa. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezner Kerr, R., C. Hickey, E. Lupafya, and L. Dakishoni. 2019. Repairing rifts or reproducing inequalities? Agroecology, food sovereignty, and gender justice in Malawi. Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (7): 1499–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. 1965. The conditions of agricultural growth: The economics of agrarian change under population pressure. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryceson, D.F. 2002. The scramble in Africa: Reorienting rural livelihoods. World Development 30: 725–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryceson, D.F. 2019. Gender and generational patterns of African deagrarianization: Evolving labour and land allocation in smallholder peasant household farming, 1980–2015. World Development 113: 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R. 2004. Seeing through the ‘good farmer’s’ eyes: Towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of ‘productivist’ behaviour. Sociologia Ruralis 44 (2): 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R., C. Kuczera, and G. Schwarz. 2008. Exploring farmers’ cultural resistance to voluntary agri-environmental schemes. Sociologia Ruralis 48 (1): 16–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F.H. 2004. The treadmill of production: An appreciation, assessment, and agenda for research. Organization & Environment 17 (3): 323–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F.H., O.F. Larson, and G.W. Gillespie Jr. 1990. The sociology of agriculture. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvès, A.E., J. Kobiané, and A. N’Bouké. 2013. Privatization of education and labor force inequality in urban francophone Africa: The transition from school to work in Ouagadougou. World Development 47: 136–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H., M.M. Bell, and M. Finney. 2006. Country boys: Masculinity and rural life. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, W.W. 1958. Farm prices: Myth and reality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, W.W. 1979. The development of American agriculture: A historical analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordell, D.D., J.W. Gregory, and V. Piché. 1996. Hoe and wage: A social history of a circular migration system in West Africa. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R., and P. Gunby. 1996. Sprayed to death: Path dependence, lock-in and pest control strategies. The Economic Journal 106 (436): 521–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd-Uribe, B. 2014a. Liberalisation failed: understanding persistent state power in the Burkinabè cotton sector from 1990 to 2004. Development Policy Review 32 (5): 545–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd-Uribe, B. 2014b. Engineering yields and inequality? How institutions and agro-ecology shape Bt cotton outcomes in Burkina Faso. Geoforum 53: 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd-Uribe, B., and M. Schnurr. 2016. Briefing: Burkina Faso’s reversal on genetically modified crops and the implications for Africa. African Affairs 115 (458): 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faure, G., and G. Vognan. 2012. Les effets du système d’innovation sectoriel de la filière coton au Burkina Faso sur les dynamiques d’évolution des exploitations familiales et du milieu rural. In Ecole d’été 2012: reseau de recherche sur l’innovation. Montpellier: CIRAD.

  • Feder, G., R.E. Just, and D. Zilberman. 1985. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change 33 (2): 255–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feder, G., and S. Savastano. 2017. Modern agricultural technology adoption in sub-Saharan Africa. In Agriculture and rural development in a globalizing world: Challenges and opportunities, ed. P. Pingali and G. Feder. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galt, R.E. 2013. From homo economicus to complex subjectivities: Reconceptualizing farmers as pesticide users. Antipode 45 (2): 336–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gengenbach, H., R.A. Schurman, T.J. Bassett, W.A. Munro, and W.G. Moseley. 2018. Limits of the new green revolution for Africa: Reconceptualising gendered agricultural value chains. The Geographical Journal 184 (2): 208–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gidwani, V.K. 2008. Capital, interrupted: Agrarian development and the politics of work in India. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenna, L.L., R.A. Jussaume Jr., and J.C. Dawson. 2011. How farmers matter in shaping agricultural technologies: Social and structural characteristics of wheat growers and wheat varieties. Agriculture and Human Values 28 (2): 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, L.C. 2005. What kind of intensification? Agricultural practice, soil fertility and socioeconomic differentiation in rural Burkina Faso. Geographical Journal 171 (1): 70–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, L.C., and B. Dowd-Uribe. 2013. A political ecology of socio-economic differentiation: Debt, inputs and liberalization reforms in southwestern Burkina Faso. Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (4): 683–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, L.C., B. Dowd-Uribe, and J. Kaminski. 2018. Weaving cotton-led development? Liberalization, cotton producer organizations, and uneven development in Burkina Faso. Journal of Agrarian Change 18 (4): 831–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, L.C., and M. Kevane. 2001. Evolving tenure rights and agricultural intensification in southwestern Burkina Faso. World Development 29: 573–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, L.C., and W.G. Moseley (eds.). 2008. Hanging by a thread: Cotton, globalization, and poverty in Africa. Athens: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, J.I. 1997. An African niche economy: Farming to feed Ibadan, 1968-88. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, H., M. Smale, and V. Theriault. 2017. Intensification and intrahousehold decisions: Fertilizer adoption in Burkina Faso. World Development 105: 310–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J.L., and S.E. Lloyd. 2013. New jobs, new workers, and new inequalities: Explaining employers’ roles in occupational segregation by nativity and race. Social Problems 60 (3): 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, G. 2004. Geography and development: Critical ethnographies. Progress in Human Geography 28 (1): 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y., and V.W. Ruttan. 1970. Factor prices and technical change in agricultural development: The United States and Japan, 1880-1960. Journal of Political Economy 78 (5): 1115–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. 1997. The migrant cocoa-farmers of southern Ghana: A study in rural capitalism. Münster: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt-Giménez, E., and M.A. Altieri. 2013. Agroecology, food sovereignty, and the new green revolution. Agroecology and Sustainable Food systems 37 (1): 90–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houssou, N., M. Johnson, S. Kolavalli, and C. Asante-Addo. 2018. Changes in Ghanaian farming systems: Stagnation or a quiet transformation? Agriculture and Human Values 35 (1): 41–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, E. 2014. The social dynamics of labor shortage in South African small-scale agriculture. World Development 59: 451–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, C.H. 1961. L’Aventure Ambiguë. Paris: Librairie Générale Française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansanga, M., P. Andersen, D. Kpienbaareh, S. Mason-Renton, K. Atuoye, and Y. Sano. 2019. Traditional agriculture in transition: Examining the impacts of agricultural modernization on smallholder farming in Ghana under the new green revolution. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 26 (1): 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kevane, M., and L.C. Gray. 1999. A woman’s field is made at night: Gendered land rights and norms in Burkina Faso. Feminist Economics 5 (3): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacoste, M.Y. 1966. Problèmes de développement agricole dans la région de Ouagadougou (Haute-Volta). Bulletin de l’Association de Géographes Français: 4–18.

  • Li, T.M. 2014. Land’s end: Capitalist relations on an indigenous frontier. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J., D. Snow, L. Anderson, and L.H. Lofland. 2006. Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna, J.K. 2018. Getting out of the dirt: Racialized modernity and environmental inequality in the cotton sector of Burkina Faso. Environmental Sociology 4 (2): 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luna, J.K. 2019. The chain of exploitation: Intersectional inequalities, capital accumulation, and resistance in Burkina Faso’s cotton sector. Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (7): 1413–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchal, J. 1987. En Afrique des savanes, le fractionnement des unités d’exploitation rurales ou le chacun pour soi. Cahiers des Sciences Humaines 23 (3–4): 445–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J., L.W. Morton, and A.D. Cast. 2013. Reconstructing the good farmer identity: Shifts in farmer identities and farm management practices to improve water quality. Agriculture and Human Values 30 (1): 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, W.G., M.A. Schnurr, and R. Bezner Kerr. 2017. Africa’s green revolution: Critical perspectives on new agricultural technologies and systems. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S. 2012. The modernity bluff: Crime, consumption, and citizenship in Côte d’Ivoire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, K.B. 1994. French devaluation of African currency brings wide unrest. New York Times, Feb 23.

  • Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H., and R. Bezner Kerr. 2015. A political ecology of high-input agriculture in northern Ghana. African Geographical Review 34 (1): 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouédraogo, M., A.M. Toé, T.Z. Ouédraogo, and P.I. Guissou. 2011. Pesticides in Burkina Faso: Overview of the situation in a Sahelian African Country. In Pesticides in the modern world: Pesticides use and management. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.

  • Oya, C. 2007. Stories of rural accumulation in Africa: Trajectories and transitions among rural capitalists in Senegal. Journal of Agrarian Change 7 (4): 453–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paarlberg, R. 2008. Starved for science: How biotechnology is being kept out of Africa. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, R. 2013. The long green revolution. Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (1): 1–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piché, V., and D. Cordell. 2015. Entre le mil et le franc: un siècle de migrations circulaires en Afrique de l’Ouest: le cas du Burkina Faso. Montreal: Presses de l’Université du Québec.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piot, C. 1999. Remotely global: Village modernity in West Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, S. 2000. From social negotiation to contract: Shifting strategies of farm labor recruitment in Tanzania under market liberalization. World Development 28 (6): 1017–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rock, J. 2019. “We are not starving:” challenging genetically modified seeds and development in Ghana. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment 41 (1): 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. 2010. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan, V.W. 1996. What happened to technology adoption-diffusion research? Sociologia Ruralis 36 (1): 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanou, E.I.R., G. Gheysen, B. Koulibaly, C. Roelofs, and S. Speelman. 2018. Farmers’ knowledge and opinions towards Bollgard II® implementation in cotton production in western Burkina Faso. New Biotechnology 42: 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saugeres, L. 2002. Of tractors and men: Masculinity, technology and power in a French farming community. Sociologia Ruralis 42 (2): 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I., and J. Thompson. 2011. The politics of seed in Africa’s green revolution: Alternative narratives and competing pathways. IDS Bulletin 42: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheahan, M., and C.B. Barrett. 2017. Ten striking facts about agricultural input use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy 67: 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shilomboleni, H. 2018. African green revolution, food sovereignty and constrained livelihood choice in Mozambique. Canadian Journal of African Studies 52 (2): 115–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G.D. 2007. Agricultural deskilling and the spread of genetically modified cotton in Warangal. Current Anthropology 48 (1): 67–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G.D. 2011. Field versus farm in Warangal: Bt cotton, higher yields, and larger questions. World Development 39 (3): 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G.D. 2016. Towards a general theory of agricultural knowledge production: Environmental, social, and didactic learning. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment 38 (1): 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G.D., and A. Flachs. 2018. The ox fall down: Path-breaking and technology treadmills in Indian cotton agriculture. Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (7): 1272–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorsen, D. 2009. From shackles to links in the chain: Theorising adolescent boys’ relocation in Burkina Faso. Forum for Development Studies 36: 301–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toe, A.M., M. Ouedraogo, R. Ouedraogo, S. Ilboudo, and P.I. Guissou. 2013. Pilot study on agricultural pesticide poisoning in Burkina Faso. Interdisciplinary Toxicology 6: 185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, C., and B. Guèye. 2003. Transformations de l’agriculture ouest-africaine et rôle des exploitations familiales. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, N. 1993. The agricultural treadmill and the rural environment in the post-productivist era. Sociologia Ruralis 33: 348–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werthmann, K. 2009. Working in a boom-town: Female perspectives on gold-mining in Burkina Faso. Resources Policy 34: 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, S., A. Ball, and J. Pretty. 2008. Trends in pesticide use and drivers for safer pest management in four African countries. Crop Protection 27: 1327–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C., and C. Tisdell. 2001. Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costs. Ecological Economics 39: 449–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2018. Rural population (% of total population)—Burkina Faso. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS?locations=BF. Accessed 10 July 2019.

  • Yeh, E.T. 2013. Taming Tibet: Landscape transformation and the gift of Chinese development. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank my funding agencies: the Fulbright Foundation, the National Science Foundation, the American Association of University Women, and the University of Colorado Boulder Dean’s Office. Also thanks to insightful comments from Jill Harrison, Daniel Ahlquist, and anonymous reviewers. I extend deep appreciation to my research assistants and to all of my research participants. Also thanks to Mike Simsik, Gabin Korbeogo, folks at the American Association of Geographers annual meeting, and exchanges at the Pesticide Politics in Africa conference in Arusha, Tanzania in 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessie K. Luna.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luna, J.K. ‘Pesticides are our children now’: cultural change and the technological treadmill in the Burkina Faso cotton sector. Agric Hum Values 37, 449–462 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09999-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09999-y

Keywords

Navigation