Advertisement

Do translocal networks matter for agricultural innovation? A case study on advice sharing in small-scale farming communities in Northeast Thailand

  • Till RockenbauchEmail author
  • Patrick Sakdapolrak
  • Harald Sterly
Article

Abstract

Recent research on agricultural innovation has outlined social networks’ role in diffusing agricultural knowledge; however, so far, it has broadly neglected the socio-spatial dimensions of innovation processes. Against this backdrop, we apply a spatially explicit translocal network perspective in order to investigate the role of migration-related translocal networks for adaptive change in a small-scale farming community in Northeast Thailand. By means of formal social network analysis we map the socio-spatial patterns of advice sharing regarding changes in sugarcane and rice farming over a period of five years. We find that, in translocally connected and mobile rural communities, a substantial share of advice originates from translocal levels. Translocal advice is dominantly provided through weak and formal ties with extension agencies and shared by few highly central larger-scale farmers within sparse local networks. This draws the picture of top-down translocal innovation flows driven by extension agencies and brokered through elite farmers. A closer look on institutional context and key actors of particular changes, however, suggests the potential of migration-related translocal networks and migration experience in fostering bottom-up innovations. Migration-related innovations transfers can promote adaptive capacity also among less favorably connected actors, especially if changes are geared towards limited household resources and are compatible with social practices of small-scale farming. We conclude that a translocal network perspective is instructive for research and extension interested in leveraging more inclusive agricultural innovation.

Keywords

Agricultural innovation Farmer advice sharing Migration Northeast Thailand Social network analysis (SNA) Translocal knowledge transfers 

Abbreviations

BAAC

Bank of agriculture and agricultural cooperatives

DOAE

Department of agricultural extension

SNA

Social network analysis

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is based on research funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Grant Number 01LN1309A. The responsibility for the contents of this publication lies with the authors. We thank the numerous interviewees for providing insights in their agricultural activities and their sources of advice. In particular we thank our excellent research assistants, Pichapon Robru and Nootchanok Jitpakdee, for facilitating and translating interviews, and Raks Thai Foundation for organizational support.

Supplementary material

10460_2019_9935_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (663 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 662 kb)
10460_2019_9935_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (827 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 826 kb)
10460_2019_9935_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (524 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 523 kb)

References

  1. Arora, S. 2012. Farmers’ participation in knowledge circulation and the promotion of agroecological methods in South India. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 36 (2): 207–235.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2011.620231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandiera, O., and I. Rasul. 2006. Social networks and technology adoption in Northern Mozambique. The Economic Journal 116 (514): 869–902.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01115.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berdegué, J.A., T. Rosada, and A.J. Bebbington. 2014. The rural transformation. In International development: Ideas, experience, and prospects, ed. B. Currie-Alder, R. Kanbur, D.M. Malone, and R. Medhora, 463–478. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671656.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Binz, C., B. Truffer, and L. Coenen. 2014. Why space matters in technological innovation systems—Mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology. Research Policy 43 (1): 138–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bodin, Ö., B. Crona, and H. Ernstson. 2006. Social networks in natural resource management: What is there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecology and Society 11 (2): r2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bodin, Ö., and B. Crona. 2009. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change 19 (3): 366–374.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolíbar, M. 2015. Macro, meso, micro: Broadening the ‘social’ of social network analysis with a mixed methods approach. Quality & Quantity 50 (5): 2217–2236.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0259-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourne, M., A. Gassner, P. Makui, A. Muller, and J. Muriuki. 2017. A network perspective filling a gap in assessment of agricultural advisory system performance. Journal of Rural Studies 50: 30–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brickell, K., and A. Datta. 2011. Translocal geographies. Spaces, places, connections. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Calvet-Mir, L., M. Calvet-Mir, J.L. Molina, and V. Reyes-García. 2012. Seed exchange as an agrobiodiversity conservation mechanism. A case study in Vall Fosca, Catalan Pyrenees, Iberian Peninsula. Ecology and Society 17 (1): 29.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04682-170129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Choenkwan, S., and M. Fisher. 2018. Introduction to the special section: Agrarian transformation in Thailand—Commodities, landscapes, and livelihoods. Forest and Society 2 (2): 112–120.  https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v2i2.5356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conley, T., and C. Udry. 2001. Social learning through networks: The adoption of new agricultural technologies in Ghana. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 (3): 668–673.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darr, D., and J. Pretzsch. 2008. Mechanisms of innovation diffusion under information abundance and information scarcity—On the contribution of social networks in group vs. individual extension approaches in semi-arid Kenya. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 14 (3): 231–248.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13892240802207676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Das, R.J. 2001. The spatiality of social relations: An Indian case-study. Journal of Rural Studies 17 (3): 347–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00034-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellis, F. 2003. A livelihoods approach to migration and poverty reduction. Paper commissioned by the Department for International Development (DFID). CiteSeerX. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.553.5678&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2019.
  16. Granovetter, M.S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greiner, C., and P. Sakdapolrak. 2013. Translocality: Concepts, applications and emerging research perspectives. Geography Compass 7 (5): 373–384.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hennig, M., U. Brandes, J. Pfeffer, and I. Mergel. 2012. Studying social networks: A guide to empirical research. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Hoang, L.A., J.-C. Castella, and P. Novosad. 2006. Social networks and information access: Implications for agricultural extension in a rice farming community in northern Vietnam. Agriculture and Human Values 23 (4): 513–527.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-006-9013-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hollstein, B., and F. Straus. 2006. Qualitative Netzwerkanalyse. Konzepte, Methoden, Anwendungen. Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Isaac, M.E. 2012. Agricultural information exchange and organizational ties: The effect of network topology on managing agrodiversity. Agricultural Systems 109: 9–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.01.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Isaac, M.E., L.C.N. Anglaaere, D.S. Akoto, and E. Dawoe. 2014. Migrant farmers as information brokers: Agroecosystem management in the transition zone of Ghana. Ecology and Society 19 (2): 56.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06589-190256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Isaac, M.E., and P. Matous. 2017. Social network ties predict land use diversity and land use change: A case study in Ghana. Regional Environmental Change 17 (6): 1823–1833.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1151-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jessop, B., N. Brenner, and M. Jones. 2008. Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D 26: 389–401.  https://doi.org/10.1068/d9107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klerkx, L., N. Aarts, and C. Leeuwis. 2010. Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems 103 (6): 390–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kossinets, G. 2006. Effects of missing data in social networks. Social Networks 28 (3): 247–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marsden, P.V. 2005. Recent developments in network measurement. In Models and methods in social network analysis, ed. P.J. Carrington, J. Scott, and S. Wasserman, 8–30. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Matous, P., Y. Todo, and D. Mojo. 2013. Roles of extension and ethno-religious networks in acceptance of resource-conserving agriculture among Ethiopian farmers. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 11 (4): 301–316.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2012.751701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matous, P. 2015. Social networks and environmental management at multiple levels: Soil conservation in Sumatra. Ecology and Society 20 (3): 37.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07816-200337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matous, P., and Y. Todo. 2018. An experiment in strengthening the networks of remote communities in the face of environmental change: Leveraging spatially distributed environmental memory. Regional Environmental Change 18 (6): 1741–1752.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1307-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mekonnen, D.A., N. Gerber, and J.A. Matz. 2018. Gendered social networks, agricultural innovations, and farm productivity in Ethiopia. World Development 105: 321–355.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mikhail, M., A. Fencl, S. Naruchaikusol, and E. Kemp-Benedict. 2010. Innovation and diffusion of sustainable agricultural water resource management in a changing climate: A case study in Northeast Thailand. Stockholm Environment Institute, Project report—2010. CAKE. https://www.cakex.org/sites/default/files/documents/sei-2010-innovation-diffusion-agriculture-thailand.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2019.
  33. Naruchaikusol, S. 2016. Climate change in Thailand. TransRe Factsheet, Issue 2. transre. http://transre.org/files/9014/6859/1818/Climate_Change_in_Thailand_TransRe_Fact_Sheet_No._2.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2019.
  34. Newman, L., and A. Dale. 2005. Network structure, diversity, and proactive resilience building: A response to Tompkins and Adger. Ecology and Society 10 (1): r2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peth, S.A., H. Sterly, and P. Sakdapolrak. 2018. Between the village and the global city: The production and decay of translocal spaces of Thai migrant workers in Singapore. Mobilities 13 (4): 455–472.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2018.1449785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Porst, L., and P. Sakdapolrak. 2018. Advancing adaptation or producing precarity? The role of rural-urban migration and translocal embeddedness in navigating household resilience in Thailand. Geoforum 97: 35–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.10.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Promburom, P., and P. Sakdapolrak. 2012. Where the rain falls project. Case study: Thailand. Results from Thung Hua Chang District, Northern Thailand. UNU EHS. https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:1845/pdf10818.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2019.
  38. Rambo, A.T. 2017. The agrarian transformation in Northeast Thailand: A review of recent research. Southeast Asian Studies 6 (2): 211–245.  https://doi.org/10.20495/seas.6.2_211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ricciardi, V. 2015. Social seed networks: Identifying central farmers for equitable seed access. Agricultural Systems 139: 110–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rigg, J. 2006. Land, farming, livelihoods, and poverty: Rethinking the links in the Rural South. World Development 34 (1): 180–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rigg, J., and A. Salamanca. 2011. Connecting lives, living, and location. Mobility and spatial signatures in Northeast Thailand, 1982-2009. Critical Asian Studies 43 (4): 551–575.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2011.623522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rigg, J., A. Salamanca, and M. Parnwell. 2012. Joining the dots of agrarian change in Asia: A 25 year view from Thailand. World Development 40 (7): 1469–1481.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rigg, J., and K. Oven. 2015. Building liberal resilience? A critical review from developing rural Asia. Global Environmental Change 32: 175–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rockenbauch, T., and P. Sakdapolrak. 2017. Social networks and the resilience of rural communities in the Global South: A critical review and conceptual reflections. Ecology and Society 22 (1): 10.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09009-220110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rodima-Taylor, D., M.F. Olwig, and N. Chhetri. 2012. Adaptation as innovation, innovation as adaptation: An institutional approach to climate change. Applied Geography 33: 107–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.10.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sakdapolrak, P., S. Naruchaikusol, K. Ober, S.A. Peth, L. Porst, T. Rockenbauch, and V. Tolo. 2016. Migration in a changing climate. Towards a translocal social resilience approach. Die Erde 147 (2): 81–94.  https://doi.org/10.12854/erde-147-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Salpeteur, M., H.H.R. Patel, J.L. Molina, A.L. Balbo, X. Rubio-Campillo, V. Reyes-García, and M. Madella. 2016. Comigrants and friends: Informal networks and the transmission of traditional ecological knowledge among seminomadic pastoralists of Gujarat, India. Ecology and Society 21 (2): 20.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08332-210220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Salpeteur, M., L. Calvet-Mir, I. Diaz-Reviriego, and V. Reyes-García. 2017. Networking the environment: Social network analysis in environmental management and local ecological knowledge studies. Ecology and Society 22 (1): 41.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08790-220141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scheffran, J., E. Marmer, and P. Sow. 2012. Migration as a contribution to resilience and innovation in climate adaptation: Social networks and co-development in northwest Africa. Applied Geography 33: 119–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schut, M., L. Klerkx, J. Rodenburg, J. Kayeke, L.C. Hinnou, C.M. Raboanarielina, P.Y. Adegbola, A. van Ast, and L. Bastiaans. 2015. RAAIS: Rapid appraisal of agricultural innovation systems (Part I). A diagnostic tool for integrated analysis of complex problems and innovation capacity. Agricultural Systems 132: 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.08.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scott, J. 2013. Social network analysis, 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  52. Spielman, D.J., K. Davis, M. Negash, and G. Ayele. 2011. Rural innovation systems and networks: Findings from a study of Ethiopian smallholders. Agriculture and Human Values 28 (2): 195–212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-010-9273-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Steinbrink, M. 2009. Leben zwischen Land und Stadt. Migration, Translokalität und Verwundbarkeit in Südafrika. Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tatlonghari, G., T. Paris, V. Pede, I. Siliphouthone, and R. Suhaeti. 2012. Seed and information exchange through social networks: The case of rice farmers of Indonesia and Lao PDR. Sociology Mind 2 (2): 169–176.  https://doi.org/10.4236/sm.2012.22022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thuo, M., A.A. Bell, B.E. Bravo-Ureta, M.A. Lachaud, D.K. Okello, E. Nasambu Okoko, N.L. Kidula, C.M. Deom, and N. Puppala. 2014. Effects of social network factors on information acquisition and adoption of improved groundnut varieties: The case of Uganda and Kenya. Agriculture and Human Values 31 (3): 339–353.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9486-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van den Broeck, K., and S. Dercon. 2011. Information flows and social externalities in a Tanzanian banana growing village. Journal of Development Studies 47 (2): 231–252.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220381003599360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Violon, C., M. Thomas, and E. Garine. 2016. Good year, bad year: changing strategies, changing networks? A two-year study on seed acquisition in Northern Cameroon. Ecology and Society 21 (2): 34.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08376-210234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis. Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wossen, T., T. Berger, T. Mequaninte, and B. Alamirew. 2013. Social network effects on the adoption of sustainable natural resource management practices in Ethiopia. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 20 (6): 477–483.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2013.856048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.Department of Geography and Regional ResearchUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations