Abstract
Traditional agroforestry on agricultural land was common in the past in Central Europe. However, much less is known about agroforestry on forested land, especially because it was often banned by forestry authorities during the 20th century. We used data from the so-called stable cadastre to map the occurrence of agroforestry uses (litter raking, hay cutting and forest grazing) on forested land in the mid-19th century in Moravia (eastern part of the Czech Republic, ca. 27,000 km2) in high spatial resolution. We combined machine learning algorithms and logistic models to reveal which environmental, land use and forest management factors could be linked to the occurrence of individual agroforestry uses. Results showed that agroforestry on forested land was very common in the 19th century: only 9.2% of townships with forests had no agroforestry uses. The distribution of agroforestry uses was clearly connected to environmental factors and to the availability of agricultural products that agroforestry uses were meant to supplement (e.g. hay cutting in forests was the most common in townships with large forests and few grasslands). However, the ubiquity of some uses (especially litter raking) made it more difficult to arrive at straightforward conclusions. In addition, we discussed the limitations inherent in the stable cadastre and how these might influence the interpretation of the results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As contained in laws no. 215/1995 Sb. and 282/1996 Sb. of the Ministry of Agriculture.
The shelfmark for this archival source is Národní archiv Praha, PT, inv.č. 1498–5.4.1754.
References
Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New York
Ahmad F, Goparaju L, Qayum A (2019) FAO guidelines and geospatial application for agroforestry suitability mapping: case study of Ranchi, Jharkhand state of India. Agrofor Syst 93:531–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0145-y
Bavaghar MP (2016) Deforestation modelling using logistic regression and GIS. J For Sci 61:193–199. https://doi.org/10.17221/78/2014-JFS
Bičík I, Kupková L, Jeleček L, Kabrda J, Štych P, Janoušek Z, Winklerová J (2015) Land use changes in the Czech Republic 1845–2010. Springer, Dordrecht
Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (2017) Classification and regression trees. Routledge, New York
Bürgi M, Stuber M (2003) Agrarische Waldnutzungen in der Schweiz 1800–1950. Waldfeldbau, Waldfrüchte und Harz. Schweiz Z Forstwes 154:360–375. https://doi.org/10.3188/szf.2003.0360
Cheng X, Doosthosseini A, Kunkel J (2022) Improve the deep learning models in forestry based on explanations and expertise. Front Plant Sci 13:902105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.902105
Dagar JC, Tewari VP (2017) Evolution of agroforestry as a modern science. In: Dagar JC, Tewari VP (eds) Agroforestry. Springer, Singapore, pp 13–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7650-3_2
Dhyani S, Maikhuri RK, Dhyani D (2013) Utility of fodder banks for reducing women drudgery and anthropogenic pressure from forests of western Himalaya. Natl Acad Sci Lett 36:453–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-013-0143-1
Diniz ÉS, Lorenzon AS, de Castro NLM, Marcatti GE, dos Santos OP, de Deus Júnior JC, Lopes Cavalcante RB, Fernandes-Filho EI, Amaral CH (2021) Forecasting frost risk in forest plantations by the combination of spatial data and machine learning algorithms. Agric For Meteorol 306:108450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108450
Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S et al (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
Douda J, Boublík K, Doudová J, Kyncl M (2017) Traditional forest management practices stop forest succession and bring back rare plant species. J Appl Ecol 54:761–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12801
Dupraz C, Lawson GJ, Lamersdorf N, Papanastasis VP, Rosati A, Ruiz-Mirazo J (2018) Temperate agroforestry: the European way. In: Gordon AM, Newman SM, Coleman BRW (eds) Temperate agroforestry systems. CABI, Wallingford, pp 98–152. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780644851.009
Forejt M, Skalos J, Pereponova A, Plieninger T, Vojta J, Šantrůčková M (2017) Changes and continuity of wood-pastures in the lowland landscape in Czechia. Appl Geogr 79:235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.12.016
Forejt M, Dolejš M, Raška P (2018) How reliable is my historical land-use reconstruction? Assessing uncertainties in old cadastral maps. Ecol Indic 94:237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.053
Gareth J, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2017) An introduction to statistical learning, 8th edn. Springer, New York
Gimmi U, Bürgi M, Stuber M (2008) Reconstructing anthropogenic disturbance regimes in forest ecosystems: a case study from the swiss Rhone valley. Ecosystems 11:113–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-007-9111-2
Gimmi U, Poulter B, Wolf A, Portner H, Weber P, Bürgi M (2013) Soil carbon pools in swiss forests show legacy effects from historic forest litter raking. Landsc Ecol 28:835–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9778-4
Grömping U (2009) Variable importance assessment in regression: linear regression versus random forest. Am Stat 63:308–319. https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2009.08199
Hartel T, Plieninger T (eds) (2014) European wood-pastures in transition: a social-ecological approach. Routledge, Abingdon
Hegelich S (2016) Decision trees and random forests: machine learning techniques to classify rare events. Eur Policy Anal 2:98–120. https://doi.org/10.18278/epa.2.1.7
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow L (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Jamrichová E, Szabó P, Hédl R, Kuneš P, Bobek P, Pelánková B (2013) Continuity and change in the vegetation of a central European oakwood. Holocene 23:46–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683612450200
Khadka D, Aryal A, Bhatta KP, Dhakal BP, Baral H (2021) Agroforestry systems and their contribution to supplying forest products to communities in the chure range, central Nepal. Forests 12:358. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12030358
Khaledian Y, Miller BA (2020) Selecting appropriate machine learning methods for digital soil mapping. Appl Math Model 81:401–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.12.016
Krčmářová J, Jeleček L (2017) Czech traditional agroforestry: historic accounts and current status. Agrofor Syst 91:1087–1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9985-0
Kuhn M (2008) Building predictive models in R using the caret package. J Stat Softw 28:1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v028.i05
Kusters R, Misevic D, Berry H, Cully A, Le Cunff Y, Dandoy L, Díaz-Rodríguez N, Ficher M, Grizou J, Othmani A, Palpanas T, Komorowski M, Loiseau P, Moulin Frier C, Nanini S, Quercia D, Sebag M, Soulié Fogelman F, Taleb S, Tupikina L, Sahu V, Vie JJ, Wehbi F (2020) Interdisciplinary research in artificial intelligence: challenges and opportunities. Front Big Data 3:577974. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2020.577974
Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by random forest. R News 2:18–22
Lin Y, Chu H, Wu C, Verburg PH (2011) Predictive ability of logistic regression, auto-logistic regression and neural network models in empirical land-use change modeling—a case study. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 25:65–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658811003752332
Lojka B, Teutscherová N, Chládová A, Kala L, Szabó P, Martiník A, Weger J, Houška J, Červenka J, Kotrba R, Jobbiková J, Doležalová H, Snášelová M, Krčmářová J, Vávrová K, Králík T, Zavadil T, Lawson G (2022) Agroforestry in the Czech Republic: what hampers the comeback of a once traditional land use system? Agronomy 12:69. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010069
Lovrić M, Da Re R, Vidale E, Prokofieva I, Wong J, Pettenella D, Verkerk J, Mavsar R (2020) Non-wood forest products in Europe—a quantitative overview. For Policy Econ 116:102175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102175
Manel S, Williams HC, Ormerod SJ (2001) Evaluating presence–absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. J Appl Ecol 38:921–931. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00647.x
McAdam JH, Burgess PJ, Graves AR, Rigueiro-Rodrígez A, Mosquera-Losada MR (2010) Classifications and functions of agroforestry systems in Europe. In: Rigueiro-Rodrígez A, McAdam JH, Mosquera-Losada MR (eds) Agroforestry in Europe: current status and future prospects. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8272-6_2
McGrath MJ, Luyssaert S, Meyfroidt P, Kaplan JO, Bürgi M, Chen Y, Erb K, Gimmi U, McInerney D, Naudts K, Otto J, Pasztor F, Ryder J, Schelhaas MJ, Valade A (2015) Reconstructing European forest management from 1600 to 2010. Biogeosciences 12:4291–4316. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-4291-2015
Menard SW (2002) Applied logistic regression analysis, 2nd edn. Sage, London
Meshram VA, Patil K, Meshram VV, Hanchate DB, Ramkteke SD (2021) Machine learning in agriculture domain: a state-of-art survey. Artif Int Life Sci 1:100010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ailsci.2021.100010
Miklín J, Čížek L (2014) Erasing a European biodiversity hot-spot: open woodlands, veteran trees and mature forests succumb to forestry intensification, succession, and logging in a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. J Nat Conserv 22:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2013.08.002
Molnár Z, Szabados K, Kiš A, Marinkov J, Demeter L, Biró M, Öllerer K, Katona K, Đapić M, Perić R, Ulichni V, Babai D (2021) Preserving for the future the—once widespread but now vanishing—knowledge on traditional pig grazing in forests and marshes (Sava-Bosut floodplain, Serbia). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 17:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-021-00482-9
Müllerová J, Szabó P, Hédl R (2014) The rise and fall of traditional forest management in southern Moravia: a history of the past 700 years. For Ecol Manag 331:104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.032
Nožička J (1957) Přehled vývoje našich lesů. Státní zemědělské nakladatelství, Praha
Rana P, Varshney LR (2021) Trustworthy predictive algorithms for complex forest system decision-making. Front For Glob Change 3:587178. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.587178
Schöllmann H (1999) Ausgewählte Waldnutzungsformen im Fichtelgebirge und ihr Beitrag zur heutigen Ausstattung der Waldökosysteme. PhD thesis, Georg-August- Universität, Göttingen
Shabani S, Pourghasemi HR, Blaschke T (2020) Forest stand susceptibility mapping during harvesting using logistic regression and boosted regression tree machine learning models. Glob Ecol Conserv 22:e00974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00974
Singh R, Behera MD, Das P, Rizvi J, Dhyani SK, Biradar ÇM (2022) Agroforestry suitability for planning site-specific interventions using machine learning approaches. Sustainability 14:5189. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095189
Strobl C, Boulesteix AL, Kneib T, Augustin T, Zeileis A (2008) Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinform 9:307. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-307
Svoboda J, Štych P, Laštovička J, Paluba D, Kobliuk N (2022) Random forest classification of land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) using Sentinel-2 data—a case study of Czechia. Remote Sens 4:1189. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14051189
Szabó P (2009) Open woodland in Europe in the mesolithic and in the middle ages: can there be a connection? For Ecol Manag 257:2327–2330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.03.035
Szabó P (2023) The Horka litter raking incident: on foresters and peasants in nineteenth-century Moravia. Environ Hist 29:323–343. https://doi.org/10.3197/096734021X16245313029958
Szabó P (2021) Život je změna: dlouhodobý pohled na současné lesnictví. In: Fanta J, Petřík P (eds) Jiné klima - jiný les. Academia, Praha, pp 14–18
Szabó P, Müllerová J, Suchánková S, Kotačka M (2015) Intensive woodland management in the middle ages: spatial modelling based on archival data. J Hist Geogr 48:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2015.01.005
Szabó P, Šipoš J, Müllerová J (2017) Township boundaries and the colonization of the Moravian landscape. J Hist Geogr 57:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2017.06.007
Szabó P, Suchánková S, Křížová L, Kotačka M, Kvardová M, Macek M, Müllerová J, Brázdil R (2018) More than trees: the challenges of creating a geodatabase to capture the complexity of forest history. Hist Methods J Quant Interdiscip Hist 51:175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01615440.2018.1444523
Vera FWM (2000) Grazing ecology and forest history. CABI, Wallingford
Vild O, Kalwij JM, Hédl R (2015) Effects of simulated historical tree litter raking on the understorey vegetation in a central European forest. Appl Veg Sci 18:569–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12180
Vild O, Šipoš J, Szabó P, Macek M, Chudomelová M, Kopecký M, Suchánková S, Houška J, Kotačka M, Hédl R (2018) Legacy of historical litter raking in temperate forest plant communities. J Veg Sci 29:596–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12642
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:3–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00001.x
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by long-term research development Project No. RVO 67985939 and by Project No. SS02030018 financed by the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PS and ÉSD wrote the main manuscript text with contributions from JH. PS prepared the archival data. ÉSD designed and carried out the statistical analyses. JH provided land-use data and prepared Fig. 1. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Szabó, P., Diniz, É.S. & Houška, J. Traditional agroforestry on forested land: a comprehensive analysis of its distribution pattern in the 19th century. Agroforest Syst 98, 115–127 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00894-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00894-4