Advertisement

Aquatic Ecology

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 59–74 | Cite as

Fish density increases from the upper to lower parts of the Pearl River Delta, China, and is influenced by tide, chlorophyll-a, water transparency, and water depth

  • Lei Zhou
  • Lei Zeng
  • Donghua Fu
  • Peng Xu
  • Shuang Zeng
  • Qindong Tang
  • Qiaofei Chen
  • Luoan Chen
  • Guifeng LiEmail author
Article

Abstract

In order to assess the spatial distribution pattern and tidal difference of fish density estimated acoustically as well as identify influences of physiochemical variables on fish density, 12 acoustic surveys were carried out in the Pearl River Delta during November 2014 using the Simrad EY60 split-beam echo sounder. Results of these surveys did not reveal a consistent tidal pattern over the longitudinal extent of the Pearl River Delta. The sites near river mouth, Shenwan (28.6 km), Nansha (19.9 km), Yamen (9.7 km), and Nanshui (0 km), provided strong evidence for tidal differences in densities and acoustic size distributions with higher density and smaller fish being acoustically detected at flood tide. However, the flood tide and the ebb tide samplings gave a similar result in terms of mean density and size distributions in upstream sites Sanshui (139.0 km) and Jiujiang (93.1 km). Fishes were unevenly distributed in the Pearl River Delta. Average fish density in the investigated areas during November 2014 was 136.15 fish/1000 m3, with a minimum density of 5.89 fish/1000 m3 in Jiujiang at ebb tide and with a maximum density of 344.08 fish/1000 m3 in Yamen at flood tide. Overall fish density tended to increase from upstream to river mouth. Spatial distribution of fish was positively associated with chlorophyll-a and negatively associated with transparency, water depth, and distance to river mouth. This study contributes to the knowledge of the current state of fish resources and can be useful for proper resources conservation and effective ecosystem management in the Pearl River Delta.

Keywords

Spatial distribution Tidal differences Hydroacoustics Fish density Environmental variables Pearl River Delta 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (Grant No. 201303048). We would like to thank local fishermen for their help in acoustic survey and fish sampling, particularly Guiyou Chen, Weixiong Li, and Nianer Wu.

References

  1. Aglen A (1983) Random errors of acoustic fish abundance estimates in relation to the survey grid density applied. FAO Fish Rep 300:293–298Google Scholar
  2. Akin S, Buhan E, Winemiller KO, Yilmaz H (2005) Fish assemblage structure of Koycegiz Lagoon-Estuary, Turkey: spatial and temporal distribution patterns in relation to environmental variation. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 64:671–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balk H, Lindem T (2014) Sonar4, Sonar5 and Sonar6 post processing systems, operator manual version (6.0.3). University of Oslo, Norway, pp 59–327Google Scholar
  4. Blaber SJM, Blaber TG (1980) Factors affecting the distribution of juvenile estuarine and inshore fish. J Fish Biol 17:143–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaber SJM, Cyrus DP, Albaret JJ, Ching CV, Day JW, Elliott M, Fonseca MS, Hoss DE, Orensanz J, Potter IC, Silvert W (2000) Effects of fishing on the structure and functioning of estuarine and nearshore ecosystems. ICES J Mar Sci 57:590–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boesch DF, Turner RE (1984) Dependence of fishery species on salt marshes: the role of food and refuge. Estuaries 7:460–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boswell KM, Wilson MP, Wilson CA (2007) Hydroacoustics as a tool for assessing fish biomass and size distribution associated with discrete shallow water estuarine habitats in Louisiana. Estuar Coast 30:607–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boswell KM, Kaller MD, JrJH Cowan, Wilson CA (2008) Evaluation of target strength—fish length equation choices for estimating estuarine fish biomass. Hydrobiologia 610:113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boswell KM, Wilson MP, MacRae PS, Wilson CA, JrJH Cowan (2010) Seasonal estimates of fish biomass and length distributions using acoustics and traditional nets to identify estuarine habitat preferences in Barataria Bay, Louisiana. Mar Coast Fish 2:83–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen XH, Chen YQ (2002) Hydrological change and its causes in the river network of the Pearl River Delta. J Geogr Sci 57:430–436Google Scholar
  11. Claridge PN, Potter IC, Hardisty MW (1986) Seasonal changes in movements, abundance, size composition and diversity of the fish fauna of the Severn Estuary. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 66:229–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connolly RM (1994) A comparison of fish assemblages from seagrass and unvegetated areas of a southern Australian estuary. Mar Freshw Res 45:1033–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dauwalter DC, Splinter DK, Fisher WL, Marston RA (2008) Biogeography, ecoregions, and geomorphology affect fish species composition in streams of eastern Oklahoma, USA. Environ Biol Fish 82:237–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Djemali I, Toujani R, Guillard J (2009) Hydroacoustic fish biomass assessment in man-made lakes in Tunisia: horizontal beaming importance and diel effect. Aquat Ecol 43:1121–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Draštík V, Kubečka J (2005) Fish avoidance of acoustic survey boat in shallow waters. Fish Res 72:219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fan X, Cui B, Zhang K, Zhang Z, Zhao H (2012) Construction of river channel-wetland networks for controlling water pollution in the Pearl River Delta, China. Clean Soil Air Water 40:1027–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foote KG (1987) Fish target strengths for use in echo integrator surveys. J Acoust Soc Am 82:981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foote KG, Knudsen H, Vestnes G (1987) Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish density estimation: a practical guide. ICES Coop Res Rep 144:57Google Scholar
  19. Forward RB, Tankersley RA (2001) Selective tidal-stream transport of marine animals. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 39:305–353Google Scholar
  20. Froese R, Pauly D (eds) (2015) FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org, version (04/2015)
  21. Fu J, Mai B, Sheng G, Zhang G, Wang X, Peng PA, Xiao X, Ran R, Cheng F, Peng X, Wang Z, Tang UW (2003) Persistent organic pollutants in environment of the Pearl River Delta, China: an overview. Chemosphere 52:1411–1422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Godlewska M (2002) The effect of fish migration pattern on the acoustical estimates of fish stocks. Acta Acust United Acust 88:748–751Google Scholar
  23. Godlewska M, Świerzowski A (2003) Hydroacoustical parameters of fish in reservoirs with contrasting levels of eutrophication. Aquat Living Resour 16:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Godlewska M, Długoszewski B, Doroszczyk L, Jóźwik A (2009) The relationship between sampling intensity and sampling error—empirical results from acoustic surveys in polish vendace lakes. Fish Res 96:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grossman GD, Ratajczak REMC, Freeman MC (1998) Assemblage organization in stream fishes: effects of environmental variation and interspecific interactions. Ecol Monogr 68:395–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guillard J, Albaret JJ, Simier M, Sow I, Raffray J, de Morais LT (2004) Spatio-temporal variability of fish assemblages in the Gambia Estuary (West Africa) observed by two vertical hydroacoustic methods: moored and mobile sampling. Aquat Living Resour 17:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayes JW, Leathwick JR, Hanchet SM (1989) Fish distribution patterns and their association with environmental factors in the Mokau River catchment, New Zealand. N Z J Mar Freshw 23:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hubert WA (1996) Passive capture techniques. In: Murphy BR, Willis DW (eds) Fisheries techniques, 2nd edn. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 157–192Google Scholar
  29. Ikejima K, Tongnunui P, Medej T, Taniuchi T (2003) Juvenile and small fishes in a mangrove estuary in Trang province, Thailand: seasonal and habitat differences. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 56:447–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jaureguizar AJ, Menni R, Guerrero R, Lasta C (2004) Environmental factors structuring fish communities of the Rıo de la Plata estuary. Fish Res 66:195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jiang CJ (2007) The tidal spatial character of the Pearl River Delta. J Grad 28:78–90Google Scholar
  32. Krumme U (2009) Diel and tidal movements by fish and decapods linking tropical coastal ecosystems. In: Nagelkerken I (ed) Ecological connectivity among tropical coastal ecosystems. Springer, Netherlands, pp 271–324Google Scholar
  33. Li KZ, Yin JQ, Huang LM, Tan YH (2006) Spatial and temporal variations of mesozooplankton in the Pearl River estuary, China. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 67:543–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lin PC, Gao X, Zhu QG, Wang T, Liu HZ (2013) Hydroacoustic survey on the spatial distribution pattern and day–night rhythmic behaviour of fishes in the Xiaonanhai reach of the upper Yangtze River. J Appl Ichthyol 29:402–1407Google Scholar
  35. Linehan JE, Gregory RS, Schneider DC (2001) Predation risk of age-0 cod (Gadus) relative to depth and substrate in coastal waters. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 263:25–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lu KX (1990) Fishes and fishery resources of Pearl River system. Guangdong Science of Technology Press, GuangzhouGoogle Scholar
  37. Mansor MI, Mohammad-Zafrizal MZ, Nur-Fadhilah MA, Khairun Y, Wan-Maznah WO (2012) Temporal and spatial variations in fish assemblage structures in relation to the physicochemical parameters of the Merbok estuary, Kedah. J Nat Sci Res 2:110–127Google Scholar
  38. Martino EJ, Able KW (2003) Fish assemblages across the marine to low salinity transition zone of a temperate estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 56:969–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Matveev VF, Steven ADL (2014) The effects of salinity, turbidity and flow on fish biomass estimated acoustically in two tidal rivers. Mar Freshw Res 65:267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pan JH (1991) The freshwater fishes of Guangdong province. Guangdong Science of Technology Press, GuangzhouGoogle Scholar
  41. Pollom RA, Rose GA (2015) Size-based hydroacoustic measures of within-season fish abundance in a boreal freshwater ecosystem. PLoS ONE 10:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prchalová M, Kubečka J, Vašek M, Peterka J, Sed’a J, Jůza T, Říha M, Jarolím O, Tušer M, Kratochvíl M, Čech M, Draštík V, Frouzová J, Hohausová E (2008) Distribution patterns of fishes in a canyon-shaped reservoir. J Fish Biol 73:54–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Remmert H (1983) Studies and thoughts about the zonation along the rocky shores of the Baltic. Zoologica 22:121–125Google Scholar
  44. Robinson CJ, Gomez-Aguirre S (2004) Tidal stream use by the red crab Pleuroncodes planipes in Bahía Magdalena, Mexico. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 308:237–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Simmonds EJ, MacLennan DN (2005) Fisheries acoustics. Theory and practice, 2nd edn. Blackwell, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Świerzowski A, Godlewska M, Półtorak T (2000) The relationship between the spatial distribution of fish, zooplankton and other environmental parameters in the Solina reservoir, Poland. Aquat Living Resour 13:373–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tao JP, Chen YB, Qiao Y, Tan XC, Chang JB (2008) Hydroacoustic surveys on spatial distribution of fishes in the Three Gorges Reservoir during the first impoundment. J Hydroecol 9:25–33Google Scholar
  48. Tušer M, Prchalová M, Mrkvička T, Frouzová J, Čech M, Peterka J, Jůza T, Vašek M, Kratochvíl M, Draštík V, Kubečka J (2013) A simple method to correct the results of acoustic surveys for fish hidden in the dead zone. J Appl Ichthyol 29:358–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Viehman HA, Zydlewski GB, McCleave JD, Staines GJ (2014) Using hydroacoustics to understand fish presence and vertical distribution in a tidally dynamic region targeted for energy extraction. Estuar Coast 38:215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang K, Duan XB, Liu SP, Chen DQ, Liu MD (2013) Acoustic assessment of the fish spatio-temporal distribution during the initial filling of the Three Gorges Reservoir, Yangtze River (China), from 2006 to 2010. J Appl Ichthyol 29:1395–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Whitfield AK (1999) Ichthyofaunal assemblages in estuaries: a South African case study. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 9:151–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yan Y, Xiang X, Chu L, Zhan Y, Fu C (2011) Influences of local habitat and stream spatial position on fish assemblages in a dammed watershed, the Qingyi Stream, China. Ecol Freshw Fish 20:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang W, Ruan X, Zheng J, Zhu Y, Wu H (2010) Long-term change in tidal dynamics and its cause in the Pearl River Delta, China. Geomorphology 120:209–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lei Zhou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lei Zeng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Donghua Fu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peng Xu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shuang Zeng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qindong Tang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qiaofei Chen
    • 3
  • Luoan Chen
    • 1
  • Guifeng Li
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Aquatic Economic Animals, School of Life SciencesSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.South China Sea Bio-Resource Exploitation and Utilization Collaborative Innovation CenterSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.College of Life ScienceSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations