Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Promoting Cultural Relativism in Counselors through the Cultural De-Centering Model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Counselors who are culturally encapsulated are likely to create client mistrust and to misinterpret clients’ cultural norms. This article presents the Cultural De-Centering Model (CDCM) as a constructive-developmental method for helping future counselors to be less ethnocentric in their work. The goal of the CDCM is to increase counselors’ cultural relativism. Through the CDCM counselors are asked to name and challenge their assumptions about race/ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual orientation, and social class. They are then asked to re-examine the foundations of those assumptions and begin constructing culturally de-centered perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: Social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, L. (2002). I’m not a racist, but...: The moral quandary of race. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, Sage House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, F. (1940). Race, language and culture. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brendel, J. M., Kolbert, J. B., & Foster, V. A. (2002). The relationship between counseling professional education and moral development, conceptual development, and self actualization. Journal of Adult Development, 9(2), 217–227. doi:10.1023/A:1016056227344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1951). Social anthropology. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, B. A., & Frieden, G. (2000). Facilitating reflective thinking in counselor education. Counselor Education and Supervision, 40(2), 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self. Cambridge: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegan, R. (1998). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knefelkamp, L. L., & Slepitza, R. (1976). A epistemological-developmental model of career development: An adaptation of the Perry scheme. The Counseling Psychologist, 6, 53–58. doi:10.1177/001100007600600310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., & Mayer, R. (1972). Development as the aim of education. Harvard Educational Review, 42, 449–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, C. W., & McAuliffe, G. J. (1997). Principles of constructivist training and education. In T. Sexton, & B. Griffin (Eds.), Constructivist thinking in counseling practice, research, and training (pp. 134–156). New York: Teacher’s College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2004). Culture and Psychology (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe, G. J. (1993). Constructive development and career transition: Implications for counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe, G. J. (2004). The constructive-developmental internship seminar: A hothouse for powerful student learning. Human Services Education, 24, 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe, G. J. (2008). Cultural de-centering and adult moral development: Instigating post-conventional thinking. New York: Annual Symposium of the Society for Research in Adult Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe, G. J., & Lovell, C. W. (2006). The influence of counselor epistemology on the helping interview: A qualitative study. Journal of Counseling and Development, 8, 308–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe, G. J., Grothaus, T., Pare, D., & Wininger, A. (2008). The practice of culturally alert counseling. In G. J. McAuliffe, et al. (Ed.), Cultrually alert counseling: A comprehensive introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustakova-Possard, E. (2003). Critical consciousness: A study of morality in global, historical context. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry Jr., W. G. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In A. W. Chickering, et al. (Ed.), The modern American college (pp. 76–116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprinthall, N. A. (1994). Counseling work and social role/perspective-taking: Promoting moral and ego development. In J. Rest, & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 85–100). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprinthall, N., Peace, S., & Kennington, P. (2001). Developmental counseling work. In D. Locke, J. Myers, & E. Herr (Eds.), The handbook of counseling work. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrenn, G. (1962). The culturally encapsulated counselor. Harvard Educational Review, 32, 444–449.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Garrett J. McAuliffe.

Appendices

Appendix

Cultural De-Centering Inventory - 1

Walt Whitman, the nineteenth-century American writer, wrote, in his poem ‘Leaves of Grass’:

Re-examine all you have been told at school or church [or at home] or in any book, dismiss what insults your own soul, and your very flesh shall be a great poem.

Whitman encourages us, in a sense, to have a self-authorized (Kegan 1982) vision of what we believe and value, a vision based on careful consideration of what matters to us, and a consideration of the broader implications of those beliefs.

In regard to culture, that “poem” might be translated as your ability to both question what you received about culture and construct a culturally inclusive perspective. In this vision of the self-authorizing person, all cultural conventions are treated as social constructions; that is, creations of a community at a particular time and place. They can then be examined for their origins in a particular historical, political, or cultural context. Then we can ask the questions of our assumptions, values, beliefs, and behaviors: Do they still work? Do they help? Whom do they serve? What shall I discard and/or reclaim? What new, more multicultural perspectives might I take?

In order to claim, or reclaim, your cultures, and perhaps move closer to “self-authorizing” them, try this activity. It may take several months or more of searching, questioning, and re-examining for you to self-authorize your cultures. Once you have begun the work on achieving “critical consciousness” and your own capacity to self-authorize, you, as a counselor, will be better able to consistently act in a socially critical fashion with both individuals and organizations.

  • Directions for Column 1: Received Views

In the boxes below, name some strong, deeply held beliefs, values, or customs that you were taught through home, school, or religion in each of the categories. These beliefs, values, or customs may or may not be ones that you currently hold. Write one for each category. Put them in Column 1 in your own words.

  • Directions for Column 2: Alternate Perspectives from Received Ones

In the second column, “Alternate Perspectives,” write an alternative belief, value, or custom for each box; one that differs from the one that you were taught. (For example, boys might have been taught that men should be the primary income provider for the family. An alternative perspective is that men can be stay-at-home dads.)

  • Directions for Column 3: Current Views

In the third column, describe your current perspectives. What do you think now in each area? It can be the same, slightly different, or very different from the perspectives in columns 1 and 2.

  • Directions for Column 4: Basis for Views

In the fourth column, write your reasons for each of your current perspectives. What has contributed to your current beliefs? How strongly do you adhere to these beliefs?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McAuliffe, G.J., Milliken, T.F. Promoting Cultural Relativism in Counselors through the Cultural De-Centering Model. Int J Adv Counselling 31, 118–129 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-009-9072-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-009-9072-6

Keywords

Navigation