Skip to main content
Log in

Fluid lubrication model over sinusoidal roughness with streamline-based approach

  • Research
  • Published:
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method is proposed to deterministically obtain steady lubrication pressure for the Stokes flow in a channel bounded by a flat wall and a surface with roughness represented by sinusoidal waves. A streamline sufficiently far away from the rough surface is used to formulate a streamline-based lubrication equation with the velocity on the streamline, and the velocities on the streamline is imposed as a boundary condition. In the solution of the lubrication equation, by virtually moving the streamline towards the flat wall, the pressure on the flat wall is obtained, and then the wall-normal variation of the pressure is recovered from the wall pressure by a lubrication model that considers higher order terms. The proposed method is applied to lubrication flows in channels with roughness represented by a single sinusoidal wave and a superposition of several sinusoidal waves. Through comparison with analytical solutions, the validity of the proposed method is established, and the applicable range of superposition of waves is explained that lowest-wavenumber component in surface profile is sufficiently isolated from higher-wavenumber components. Although the problem setting intrinsically prohibits the application of the conventional Reynolds lubrication equation, this study provides new understandings for the pressure obeying the Reynolds lubrication equation and the role of the higher-order terms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almqvist A, Fabricius J, Spencer A, Wall P (2011) Similarities and differences between the flow factor method by Patir and Cheng and homogenization. ASME J Tribol 133:031702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asghar Z, Elmoasry A, Shatanawi W, Gondal MA (2023) An exact solution for directional cell movement over Jeffrey slime layer with surface roughness effects. Phys Fluids 35:041901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayada G, Chambat M (1988) New models in the theory of hydrodynamic lubrication of rough surfaces. ASME J Tribol 110:402–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabal A, Szumbarski J, Floryan JM (2001) Numerical simulation of flows over corrugated walls. Comput Fluids 30:753–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen H (1969) Stochastic models for hydrodynamic lubrication of rough surface. Proc Inst Mech Eng 184(1):1013–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elrod HG (1977) A review of theories for the fluid dynamic effects of roghness on laminar lubricating films, Technical Report No. 27, Columbia University, New York

  • Greenwood JA, Williamson JBP (1977) Developments in the theory of surface roughness. In: 4th Leeds-Lyon Symp. Tribology, Roughness Effects in Lubrication, iv(i), p 167

  • Gu J, Sakaue M, Takeuchi S, Kajishima T (2018) An immersed lubrication model for the fluid flow in a narrow gap region. Powder Technol 329:445p–4454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Happel J, Brenner H (1965) Low reynolds number hydrodynamics. Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Hori N, Rosti ME, Takagi S (2022) An Eulerian-based immersed boundary method for particle suspensions with implicit lubrication modelf. Comput Fluids 236:105278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong J-T, Son J (2017) Stokes flow through a microchannel with periodical protuberances on the wall. Eur J Mech B/Fluids 61(Part 1):9–15

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kovalchenko A, Ajayi O, Erdemir A, Fenske G, Etsion I (2005) The effect of laser surface texturing on transitions in lubrication regimes during unidirectional sliding contact. Tribol Int 38(3):21925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsuya Y (1984) A simulation method for hydrodynamic lubrication of surfaces with two-dimensional isotropic or anisotropic roughness using mixed average film thickness. Bull JSME 27(231):2036–2044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patir N, Cheng HS (1979a) An average flow model for determining effects of three dimensional roughness on partial hydrodynamic lubrication. J Lubr Technol 100:12–17 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patir N, Cheng HS (1979b) Application of average flow model to lubrication between rough sliding surfaces. J Lubr Technol 101:220–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozrikidis C (1987) Creeping flow in two-dimensional channels. J Fluid Mech 180:495–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds O (1886) On the theory of lubrication and its application to Mr. Beuchamp towers experiments, including an experimental determination of the viscosity of olive oil. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 177:157–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin F, Almqvist A, Larsson R, Glavatskih S (2007) Rough surface flow factors in full film lubrication based on a homogenization technique. Tribol Int 40:1025–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi S, Gu J (2019) Extended Reynolds lubrication model for incompressible Newtonian fluid. Phys Rev Fluid 4(11):114101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi S, Miyauchi S, Yamada S, Tazaki A, Zhang LT, Onishi R, Kajishima T (2021a) Effect of lubrication in the non-Reynolds regime due to the non-negligible gap on the fluid permeation through a membrane. Fluid Dyn Res 53:035501

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi S, Fukada T, Yamada S, Miyauchi S, Kajishima T (2021b) Lubrication pressure model in a non-negligible gap for fluid permeation through a membrane with finite permeability. Phys Rev Fluids 6(11):114101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi S, Omori T, Fujii T, Kajishima T (2023) Higher order lubrication model between slip walls. Microfluid Nanofluid 27:46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripp JH (1983) Surface roughness effects in hydrodynamic lubrication: the flow factor method. J Lubr 105:458–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada S, Takeuchi S, Miyauchi S, Kajishima T (2021) Transport of solute and solvent driven by lubrication pressure through non-deformable permeable membranes. Microfluid Nanofluid 25:83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C-Y (1978) Drag due to a striated boundary in slow Couette flow. Phys Fluids 21(4):697–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partly supported by Grants-in-Aid for Challenging Research (Exploratory) No. JP20K20972 and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) No. JP23K01344 of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.O. developed the mathematical model and conducted data mining. S.T. contributed to conceptualization, modelling and validation. Both authors wrote the manuscript, prepared the figures and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shintaro Takeuchi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix

Adding roughness to an arbitrary base shape \(h_{\textrm{b}}(x)\)

In Sects. 4 and 5, sinusoidal roughness is superposed on a flat wall of a parallel channel. In this section, sinusoidal roughness is superposed on a non-flat wall of weekly-undulating profile \(h_{\textrm{b}}(x)\) that satisfies \(|{\textrm{d}^{} h_{\textrm{b}}}/{\textrm{d} x^{}} |\ll \min (\varepsilon \beta _i) \min (h_0 k_i)/2\pi\), and the rough surface profile is given as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} h_{\textrm{w}}(x)=\sum _{i=1}^n \varepsilon h_0 \beta _i\cos (k_i x+\phi _i)+h_{\textrm{b}}(x). \end{aligned}$$

The stream function of form \(\psi =\psi _0(x, y)+\varepsilon \psi _1\) is assumed, where \(\psi _0\) is determined by the nominal geometry of the wall \(h_{\textrm{b}}\). Following the same procedure as in Sect. 4, we find \(\psi _1\) of the following form:

$$\begin{aligned} \psi _1&\simeq \sum _{i=1}^n \left[ \left( C_{1i}+C_{2i} \frac{y}{h_0}\right) \sinh (k_iy) \right. \nonumber \\&\quad \left. + \left( C_{3i}+C_{4i} \frac{y}{h_0}\right) \cosh (k_iy)\right] \cos (k_i x+\phi _i). \end{aligned}$$
(50)

From the boundary conditions in Sect. 4, the coefficient are identified as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} C_{1i}&=\beta _i \frac{h_{\textrm{b}}}{h_0}\frac{ \sinh ( k_ih_{\textrm{b}})}{\sinh ^2 (k_ih_{\textrm{b}}) - k_i^2h_{\textrm{b}}^2}C_0 \ , \end{aligned}$$
(51a)
$$\begin{aligned} C_{2i}&=\beta _i \frac{ k_ih_{\textrm{b}}\cosh ( k_ih_{\textrm{b}})-\sinh ( k_ih_{\textrm{b}}) }{\sinh ^2( k_ih_{\textrm{b}})- k_i^2h_{\textrm{b}}^2} C_0 \ ,\end{aligned}$$
(51b)
$$\begin{aligned} C_{3i}&=0 \ ,\end{aligned}$$
(51c)
$$\begin{aligned} C_{4i}&=-\beta _i \frac{ k_ih_{\textrm{b}}\sinh ( k_ih_{\textrm{b}})}{\sinh ^2( k_ih_{\textrm{b}})-k_i^2h_{\textrm{b}}^2}C_0 \ , \end{aligned}$$
(51d)

where

$$\begin{aligned} C_0= h_0^2\left( \left. \frac{\partial ^{2} \psi _0}{\partial y^{2}} \right| _{y=h_{\textrm{b}}}-\frac{\textrm{d}^{} h_{\textrm{b}}}{\textrm{d} x^{}} \left. \frac{\partial ^2 \psi _0}{\partial x \partial y} \right| _{y=h_{\textrm{b}}} \right) \simeq h_0^2 \left. \frac{\partial ^{2} \psi _0}{\partial y^{2}} \right| _{y=h_{\textrm{b}}}. \end{aligned}$$
(52)

A streamline away from the roughness wall and the velocities on the streamline are used to impose boundary conditions for the lubrication pressure. Finding the streamline in a form of \(h_{\text {s}}=h_0 \sum a_i \cos (k_i x+\phi _i)+b h_{\textrm{b}}\) and the velocity on the streamline as \(u_{\text {s}}=U_0 \sum c_i \cos (k_i x+\phi _i)+U_0 d\), the coefficients \(a_i, b, c_i\), and d are obtained as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} h_0 a_i&=- \varepsilon \frac{ G_i^{1,2}\sinh (b k_i h_{\textrm{b}}) + G_i^{3,4}\cosh (b k_i h_{\textrm{b}}) }{\left. {\partial ^{} \psi _0}/{\partial y^{}} \right| _{y=b h_{\textrm{b}}}} \ ,\\ U_0c_i&=a_ih_0\left. \frac{\partial ^2 \psi _0}{\partial y^2}\right| _{y=bh_{\textrm{b}}} +\frac{\varepsilon }{h_0} \left( k_ih_0G_i^{1,2}+{C_{4i}}\right) \cosh (b k_i h_{\textrm{b}}) \\&\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad +\frac{\varepsilon }{h_0} \left( k_ih_0G_i^{3,4}+{C_{2i}}\right) \sinh (b k_i h_{\textrm{b}}) \ ,\\ U_0d&=\left. \frac{\partial \psi _0}{\partial y}\right| _{y=b h_{\textrm{b}}} \ , \end{aligned}$$

where

$$\begin{aligned} G_i^{1,2}=C_{1i}+\frac{b h_{\textrm{b}}C_{2i}}{h_0} ,\quad G_i^{3,4}=C_{3i}+\frac{b h_{\textrm{b}}C_{4i}}{h_0}. \end{aligned}$$

Assuming that the geometry of \(h_{\textrm{b}}\) is smooth and the Reynolds lubrication equation can be applied, the solution of the Reynolds lubrication equation with the boundary condition at \(y=h_{\textrm{b}}\) is denoted as \(p_{\textrm{s}}\). With the corresponding higher order pressure \(p_{\text {adj}}\), the pressure is given as \(p=p_{\textrm{s}}+p_{\text {adj}}\). By taking the limit of \(b\rightarrow 0\), \(p_{\text {adj}}\) under the roughness takes the following form:

$$\begin{aligned} p_{\text {adj}}=-\mu \frac{\partial ^{} }{\partial x^{}} \left[ \frac{y^2}{2\mu }\frac{\textrm{d}^{} p_{\textrm{s}}}{\textrm{d} x^{}} +\varGamma y \right] \ , \end{aligned}$$
(53)

where

$$\begin{aligned} \varGamma (x)=2 \varepsilon \sum _{i=1}^n k_i h_0 C_{2i} \cos (k_i x+\phi _i) +\left. \frac{\partial ^2 \psi _0}{\partial y^2}\right| _{y=0}. \end{aligned}$$
(54)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okazaki, H., Takeuchi, S. Fluid lubrication model over sinusoidal roughness with streamline-based approach. Microfluid Nanofluid 28, 30 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-024-02721-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-024-02721-3

Keywords

Navigation