Skip to main content
Log in

A generalization of the Lucas–Washburn–Rideal law to composite microchannels of arbitrary cross section

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Capillary microfluidics or capillarics has been lately gaining importance in the biotechnological and biological domains. In these domains where biological and chemical targets are transported by fluids, it has been shown that capillary actuation of fluids does not require bulky pumps or syringes and produces microsystems with a low cost of fabrication, which are user-friendly, portable and compatible with telemedicine. Capillary systems for biotechnology can be confined or open; i.e., the fluid moves inside a closed channel or in a channel with a boundary with air. In this work, we propose a general expression for the determination of the velocities of spontaneous capillary flows in composite, confined microchannels of arbitrary shapes. This expression generalizes the conventional Lucas–Washburn model which is valid for cylindrical channels. It is shown that the use of an equivalent hydraulic diameter in the Lucas–Washburn–Rideal model introduces a bias when the shape of the channel cross section differs notably from a circle. The approach also shows that relatively large velocities—at the scale of microsystems—can be reached by capillary microflows, depending on the shape of the channel, and that transport distances can be important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bahrami M, Yovanovich MM, Culham JR (2007) A novel solution for pressure drop in singly connected microchannels of arbitrary cross-section. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50:2492–2502

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bejan A (2013) Convection heat transfer, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell JM, Cameron FK (1906) The flow of liquids through capillary spaces. J Phys Chem 10:658–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthier J, Brakke K (2012) The physics of microdroplets. Scrivener-Wiley Publishing, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Berthier J, Silberzan P (2012) Microfluidics for biotechnology, 2nd edn. Artech House Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthier J, Renaudot R, Dalle P, Blanco-Gomez G, Rivera F, Agache V, Caillat P (2010) COMSOL assistance for the determination of pressure drops in complex microfluidic channels. In: Proceedings of the 2010 COMSOL conference, Nov. 17–19, Paris, France

  • Berthier J, Brakke K, Berthier E (2014a) A general condition for spontaneous capillary flow in uniform cross-section microchannels. Microfluid Nanofluid J 16:779–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthier J, Brakke K, Furlani EP, Karampelas IH, Delapierre G (2014b) Open-surface microfluidics. In: Proceedings of the 2014 nanotech conference, 15–19 June 2014, Washington DC

  • Bruus H (2007) Theoretical microfluidics. Oxford Master Series in Physics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Concus P, Finn R (1969) On the behavior of a capillary surface in a wedge. PNAS 63(2):292–299

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopedia Britannica. http://www.global.britannica.com

  • Gervais L, Delamarche E (2009) Toward one-step point-of-care immunodiagnostics using capillary-driven microfluidics and PDMS substrates. Lab Chip 9:3330–3337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamraoui A, Thuresson K, Nylander T, Yaminsky V (2000) Can a dynamic contact angle be understood in terms of a friction coefficient? J Colloid Interface Sci 226:199–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han A, Mondin G, Hegelbach NG, de Rooij NF, Staufer U (2006) Filling kinetics of liquids in nanochannels as narrow as 27 nm by capillary force. J Colloid Interface Sci 293:151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joos P, Van Remoortere P, Bracke M (1990) The kinetics of wetting in a capillary. J Colloid Interface Sci 136(1):189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kost GJ (2002) Principles and practice of point-of-care testing. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotwal N, Pandit A (2012) Variability of capillary blood glucose monitoring measured on home glucose monitoring devices. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 16(Suppl 2):S248–S251

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas R (1918) Ueber das Zeitgesetz des Kapillaren Aufstiegs von Flussigkeiten. Kolloid Z 23:15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHale JP, Garimella SV (2010) Heat transfer in trapezoidal microchannels of various aspect ratios. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53:365–375

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ouali FF, McHale G, Javed H, Trabi C, Shirtcliffe NJ, Newton MI (2013) Wetting considerations in capillary rise and imbibition in closed square tubes and open rectangular cross-section channels. Microfluid Nanofluid 15:309–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rideal EK (1922) On the flow of liquids under capillary pressure. Philos Mag Ser 6(44):1152–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rye RR, Yost FG (1996) Wetting kinetics in surface capillary grooves. Langmuir 12:4625–4627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safavieh R, Juncker D (2013) Capillarics: pre-programmed, self-powered microfluidic circuits built from capillary elements. Lab-Chip 13:4180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah RK, London AL (1978) Laminar flow forced convection in ducts. Advances in Heat Transfer Series, Supp. 1. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp KV, Adrian RJ, Santiago JG, Molho JI (2005) Liquid flows in microchannels. In: Gad-El-Hak M (ed) MEMS: introduction and fundamentals. CRC Press, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobolev VD, Churaev NV, Velarde MG, Zorin ZM (2000) Surface tension and dynamic contact angle of water in thin quartz capillaries. J Colloid Interface Sci 222:51–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washburn EW (1921) The dynamics of capillary flow. Phys Rev 17:273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weislogel MM (2012) Compound capillary rise. J Fluid Mech 709:622–664

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Weislogel MM, Lichter S (1998) Capillary flow in interior corners. J Fluid Mech 373:349–378

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Weislogel MM, Chen Y, Bolleddula D (2008) A better nondimensionalization scheme for slender laminar flows: the Laplacian operator scaling method. Phys Fluids 20:093602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann M, Schmid H, Hunziker P, Delamarche E (2007) Capillary pumps for autonomous capillary systems. Lab Chip 7:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann M, Hunziker P, Delamarche E (2008) Valves for autonomous capillary systems. Microfluid Nanofluid 5:395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Berthier.

Appendix: Numerical determination of the Poiseuille number

Appendix: Numerical determination of the Poiseuille number

The numerical determination of the Poiseuille number—or equivalently of the hydraulic resistance—is made by considering a straight channel with the characteristic trapezoidal cross section. The liquid considered in the calculation is water; in fact, the choice of the liquid has no influence on the Poiseuille number since the quantity (1/μ) ∂P/∂z is independent of the nature of the fluid.

At inlet, a given velocity is imposed—for example, 1 mm/s. The Stokes model of the COMSOL numerical software is used to calculate the pressure at the nodes of the meshing in the channel. Let us recall that the Stokes equation results from a linearization of the Navier–Stokes equation valid in the case of a negligible inertia (Re < 1). More precisely, in this particular case, the flow velocity has only a z-component, denoted u, and the Stokes equation is

$$ \begin{aligned} {\nabla }P & = \frac{\partial P}{\partial z} = \mu \quad\Delta V = \mu \frac{{\partial^{2} u}}{{\partial z^{2} }} \\ \frac{\partial u}{\partial z} & = 0 \\ \end{aligned} $$
(31)

A linear pressure gradient ∂P/∂z is then derived from the contour plot of the pressure in the channel (Fig. 11). Finally, formula (23) is used to calculate the Poiseuille number after substitution of the value of the pressure gradient. A value of Po = 14.25—i.e., a value of fRe = 57—is found.

Fig. 11
figure 11

a View of the channel and its meshing, b contour plot of the pressure for an imposed inlet velocity of 1 mm/s

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berthier, J., Gosselin, D. & Berthier, E. A generalization of the Lucas–Washburn–Rideal law to composite microchannels of arbitrary cross section. Microfluid Nanofluid 19, 497–507 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-014-1519-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-014-1519-3

Keywords

Navigation