Skip to main content
Log in

Does health and medical research consider geographic factors affecting study participants: a retrospective snapshot analysis of 11 leading journals

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Research has identified that rurally located persons face health inequities when compared to their urban peers. While health policies and practice frameworks to address the needs of rural people are largely developed on the principles of evidence-based medicine, it is not clear whether this evidence base appropriately considers geographic factors that may impact participant outcomes. The purpose of this project was to examine whether research within leading health and medical journals identified the geographic classification (location) of their participants, thus enabling the original authors and subsequent readers to appropriately consider this factor in the making of policy and practice recommendations.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of study participants’ geographic identifiers within articles from medical and health journals was carried out in this project. Eleven journals were chosen for evaluation, with 300 consecutive eligible papers from each journal retrospectively reviewed. All 3300 papers were analyzed to determine whether the research participants’ geographic location was identified. This classification was then stratified into varying categories of rural or urban, as appropriate.

Results

It was not possible to identify participants’ geographic location in 2193 (66%) of the 3300 reviewed articles. A total of 121 papers (4%) had sole focus on rural residents, with another 95 articles (3%) comparing outcomes between rural and urban locations. Slightly more than a quarter (27%) of the articles either just featured urban participants or made no distinction between rural and urban locations.

Conclusions

These findings indicate that insufficient attention is given to the geographic location of participants. This failure means that the outcomes and recommendations of the research base may be invalid for a large section of the world’s population and result in inequities in healthcare services. There is an emerging concern about using this evidence base for developing health guidelines and policy frameworks, as the needs of a substantial proportion of the population may not have been appropriately captured.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Data were obtained through the retrospective analysis of journal articles published in 11 leading medical and health journals. All obtained data are reported within the main text.

References

Download references

Funding

There was no funding to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, S.W.; methodology, S.W.; data collection, S.W., N.H., M.W., B.L., J.A., G.W., D.P., H.T., J.Z., A.S., A.L.; validation, S.W., N.H., M.W., B.L., J.A., G.W., D.P., H.T., J.Z., A.S., A.L.; formal analysis, S.W., N.H., M.W., B.L., J.A., G.W., D.P., H.T., J.Z., A.S., A.L.; investigation, S.W., N.H., M.W., B.L., J.A., G.W., D.P., H.T., J.Z., A.S., A.L.; writing – original draft preparation, S.W..; writing – review and editing, S.W., N.H., M.W., B.L., J.A., G.W., D.P., H.T., J.Z., A.S., A.L.; project administration, S.W.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart Wark.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study did not require ethical approval as it was a retrospective analysis of journal articles published in 11 leading medical and health journals.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3 Geographic classification of articles within the 11 journals

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wark, S., Hardikar, N., Wensing, M. et al. Does health and medical research consider geographic factors affecting study participants: a retrospective snapshot analysis of 11 leading journals. J Public Health (Berl.) 29, 205–214 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-019-01117-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-019-01117-w

Keywords

Navigation