Skip to main content
Log in

Improving employee well-being through worksite health promotion? The employees’ perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential of worksite health promotion to improve individual well-being from the employees’ perspective, analyze benefit categories and develop suggestions for future worksite health promotion program designs.

Subjects and methods

A questionnaire based on a qualitative study was distributed in four Austrian organizations to cover state-owned, private, and non-profit organizations. A total of 237 white-collar employees participated in the survey.

Results

Workplace health promotion does improve individual well-being from the employees’ perspective. A factor analysis of the changes in well-being reported yields a three-factor solution with a physical/cognitive element, a social component, and an emotional factor. In the sample tested, the physical-cognitive and emotional elements of perceived benefits were felt the most.

Conclusion

The current theoretical grouping of potential WHP effects requires further testing and might profit from being differentiated into more categories. Research on WHP could gain from a consideration of the employee’s perspective by showing which program elements to focus on. Strengthening the emotional components of WHP information and program elements is proposed for increasing participation rates and the subsequent individual benefits derived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson DR, Serxner SA, Gold DB (2001) Conceptual framework, critical questions, and practical challenges in conducting research on the financial impact of worksite health promotion. Am J Health Promot 15:281–288

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Badura B, Hehlmann T (2003) Betriebliche Gesundheitspolitik: der Weg zur gesunden Organisation. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Birgmann R (2006) Detailbericht Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung in Oberösterreich. Institut für Gesundheitsplanung, Linz, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Bödeker W, Hüsing T (2008) IGA-Barometer 2. Welle. Einschätzungen der Erwerbsbevölkerung zum Stellenwert der Arbeit, zur Verbreitung und Akzeptanz von betrieblicher Prävention und zur krankheitsbedingten Beeinträchtigung der Arbeit – 2007. http://www.iga-info.de/fileadmin/texte/iga_report_12.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2010

  • Breucker G, Schröer A (2000) Settings 1: effective health promotion in the workplace. In: International Union for Health Promotion and Education (ed) The evidence of health promotion effectiveness: shaping public health in a new Europe, part 2. http://www.healthpromotion.act.gov.au/files/Theevidenceofhealthpromotionpart2.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2010

  • Breucker G (2000) Gesundheitsförderung: zum Wohle von Unternehmen und Mitarbeitern. Arbeit Arbeitsrecht 6:240–246

    Google Scholar 

  • De Greef M, Van den Broek K (2004) Making the case for workplace health promotion: analysis of the effects of WHP. http://www.enwhp.org/fileadmin/downloads/report_business_case.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2010

  • Elkeles T (2001) Arbeitslosigkeit und Gesundheitszustand. In: Mielck A, Bloomfield K (eds) Sozialepidemiologie: eine Einführung in die Grundlagen, Ergebnisse und Umsetzungsmöglichkeiten. Juventa, Weinheim, Germany, pp 71–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Engbers LH, van Poppel MNM, Chin A, Paw MJM, van Mechelen W (2005) Worksite health promotion programs with environmental changes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 29:61–70. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2005.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • European Network for Workplace Health Promotion ENWHP (2007) Luxembourg declaration on workplace health promotion in the European Union. http://www.enwhp.org/fileadmin/rs-dokumente/dateien/Luxembourg_Declaration.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2010

  • Ganster DC, Murphy L (2000) Workplace interventions to prevent stress-related illness: lessons from research and practice. In: Cooper CL, Locke EA (eds) Industrial and occupational psychology: linking theory with practice. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 34–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetzel RZ, Pronk NP (2010) Worksite health promotion. How much do we really know about what works? Am J Prev Med 38:223–225. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldgruber J, Ahrens D (2010) Effectiveness of workplace health promotion and primary prevention interventions: a review. J Public Health 18:75–88. doi:10.1007/s10389-009-0282-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossmeier J, Terry PE, Ciprotti A, Burtaine JE (2010) Best practices in evaluating worksite health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot 24:TAHP1–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haunschild A (2003) Humanziation through discipline? Focault and the goodness of employee health programmes. TAMARA: J Critical Postmodern Org Sci 2:46–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen H (2003) Motivation und Handeln, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmenstein C, Hofmarcher M, Kleissner A, Riedel M, Röhrling G, Schnabl A (2004) Ökonomischer Nutzen Betrieblicher Gesundheitsförderung. http://www.sportministerium.at/files/doc/Studien/FitforBusiness_Endbericht1.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2010

  • Huppert FA, Marks N, Clark A, Siegrist J, Sutzer A, Vitterso J, WahrendorfM (2009) Measuring well-being across Europe: description of the ESS well-being module and preliminary findings. Social Indicators Res 91:301–315

  • Jahoda M, Lazarsfeld PF, Zeisel H (1933) Die Arbeitslosen von Marienthal. Hirzel, Leipzig, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreis J, Bödeker W (2003) IGA Report 3. Gesundheitlicher und ökonomischer Nutzen betrieblicher Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention. Zusammenstellung der wissenschaftlichen Evidenz. http://www.bb-balance.de/Dateien/IGA-Report3-neuVers2.6.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2010

  • Lange C, Lampert T (2005) Die Gesundheit arbeitsloser Frauen und Männer: erste Auswertungen des telefonischen Gesundheitssurveys 2003. Bundesblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 48:1256–1264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nöhammer E (2008) Nutzenpotenziale von betrieblicher Gesundheitsförderung für die MitarbeiterInnen: Gestaltungsansätze für das zielgruppenoptimierte Angebot betrieblicher Gesundheitsförderung. Johannes Kepler Universität, Linz, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöhammer E, Schusterschitz C, Stummer H (2009) Nutzenpotenziale und Effekte betrieblicher Gesundheitsförderung. Gruppendyn Organisationsberat 40:425–439. doi:10.1007/s11612-009-0091-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nöhammer E, Schusterschitz C, Stummer H (2010) Determinants of employee participation in workplace health promotion. Int J Workplace Health Manage 3:97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodogno R (2008) On the importance of well-being. Ethic Theory Moral Practice 11:197–212. doi:10.1007/s10677-007-9090-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sockoll I, Kramer I, Bödeker W (2008) IGA Report 13. Wirksamkeit und Nutzen betrieblicher Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention. Zusammenstellung der wissenschaftlichen Evidenz 2000 bis 2006. http://www.iga-info.de/fileadmin/texte/iga_report_13.pdf. Accessed 21 April 2010

  • Stummer H, Nöhammer E, Schaffenrath-Resi M, Eitzinger C (2008) Interne Kommunikation und betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung: Informationshemmnisse bei der Umsetzung von betrieblicher Gesundheitsförderung. Prävention Gesundheitsförderung 3:235–240. doi:10.1007/s11553-008-0136-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westermayer G, Wellendorf J (2001) Evaluation betrieblicher Stressprävention. In: Pfaff H, Slesina W (eds) Effektive betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung: Konzepte und methodische Ansätze zur Evaluierung und Qualitätssicherung. Juventa, Weinheim, Germany, pp 97–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams S, Bruno A (2007) Worksite wellness programs: what is working. Am J Men’s Health 1:154–156. doi:10.1177/1557988306295022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2004) Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. World Health Organisation, Geneva. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/strategy/eb11344/strategy_english_web.pdf. Accessed 9 September 2010

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Nöhammer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nöhammer, E., Stummer, H. & Schusterschitz, C. Improving employee well-being through worksite health promotion? The employees’ perspective. J Public Health 19, 121–129 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-010-0364-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-010-0364-4

Keywords

Navigation