References
L Brusciano SM Ayabaca M Pescatori et al. (2004) ArticleTitleReintervention after complicated and failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy Dis Colon Rectum 47 1846–1851 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0721-x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cnktlKgtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle15622576
YK Ho WK Cheong C Tsang et al. (2000) ArticleTitleStapled hemorrhoidectomy—cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months Dis Colon Rectum 12 1666–1675 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02236847
Thaha MA, Kazmi SA, Irvine LA, et al. New onset fecal urgency and its impact on recovery following circular stapled anopexy: preliminary results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial [abstract]. Br J Surg 2003;90(Suppl 1)
M Pescatori U Favetta S Dedola S Orsini (1997) ArticleTitleTransanal stapled excision of rectal mucosal prolapse Tech Coloproctol 1 96–98
G Dodi R Pietroletti G Milito GA Binda M Pescatori (2003) ArticleTitleBleeding, incontinence, pain and constipation after STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation Tech Coloproctol 7 148–159 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10151-003-0026-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3srkvV2rsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle14628157
M Pescatori G Dodi G Salafia AP Zbar (2005) ArticleTitleRecto-vaginal fistulae after double stapled transanal rectotomy for obstructed defecation Int J Colorectal Dis 20 83–85 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00384-004-0658-5 Occurrence Handle15349740
U Guller ER Long ParticleDel (2004) ArticleTitleInterpreting statistics in medical literature J Am Coll Surg 198 441–458 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.09.017 Occurrence Handle14992748
RG Molloy D Kingsmore (2000) ArticleTitleLife threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 355 810 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02208-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7nsFSqug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10711934
PJ Nisar AG Acheson KR Neal JH Scholefield (2004) ArticleTitleStapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials Dis Colon Rectum 47 1837–45 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0679-8 Occurrence Handle15622575
About this article
Cite this article
The Authors Reply. Dis Colon Rectum 49, 691–693 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0320-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0320-5