References
L Brusciano SM Ayabaca M Pescatori et al. (2004) ArticleTitleReinterventions after complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy Dis Colon Rectum 47 1846–1851 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0721-x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cnktlKgtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle15622576
M Rowsell M Bello DM Hemingway (2000) ArticleTitleCircumferential mucosectomy (stapled hemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial Lancet 355 768–769 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06122-X
BJ Mehigan JR Monson JE Hartley (2000) ArticleTitleStapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial Lancet 355 782–785 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(99)08362-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7nsFSruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10711925
P Boccasanta PG Capretti M Venturi et al. (2001) ArticleTitleRandomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular haemorrhoidectomy in advanced haemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse Am J Surg 182 64–68 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00654-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvovFOnuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11532418
YH Ho WK Cheong C Tsang et al. (2000) ArticleTitleStapled haemorrhoidectomy-cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months Dis Colon Rectum 43 1666–1675 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02236847 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FpvFGrtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11156449
MJ Cheetham CR Cohen MA Kamm RK Phillips (2003) ArticleTitleA randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up Dis Colon Rectum 46 491–497 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6588-z Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7msVeisg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12682543
FH Hetzer N Demartines AE Handschin PA Clavien (2002) ArticleTitleStapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of prospective randomized trial Arch Surg 137 337–340 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.137.3.337 Occurrence Handle11888463
B Ravo A Amato V Bianco et al. (2002) ArticleTitleComplications after stapler hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 6 83–88 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s101510200018 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nktlWrtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12402051
P Boccasanta M Venturi A Stuto et al. (2004) ArticleTitleStapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction: a prospective, multicenter trial Dis Colon Rectum 47 1285–1297 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0582-3 Occurrence Handle15484341
O Zmora P Colquhoun S Abramson et al. (2004) ArticleTitleCan the procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) be done twice? Results of a porcine model Surg Endosc 18 757–761 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-003-8141-x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3ntFWhtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle14735346
M Lehnardt L Steinstraesser D Druecke T Muehlberger HU Steinau HH Homann (2004) ArticleTitleFournier's gangrene after Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy requiring subsequent abdominoperineal resection of the rectum: report of a case Dis Colon Rectum 47 1729–1733 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0616-x
About this article
Cite this article
Opinions and Facts on Reinterventions After Complicated or Failed Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 49, 690–691 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0313-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0313-4