Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparotomy for Acute Colorectal Conditions in Moribund Patients: Is it Worthwhile?

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal surgeons are sometimes asked to operate on moribund patients, classified by the American Society of Anesthesiology as Class 5—patients who are likely to die with or without surgery. There is a concern that surgery may precipitate the patient’s demise; however, there are few data concerning outcomes in this group. It is, therefore, difficult to counsel patients and their families about the advisability of surgery. This study was performed to show what sort of results can be expected from operating on American Society of Anesthesiology Class 5 patients and to see whether there are any factors that can be used to predict outcome within this American Society of Anesthesiology class.

METHODS

Since March 1989, a prospective database of all surgeries has been maintained. Included in the data is the American Society of Anesthesiology Classification. All patients classified as 5 were identified and their history reviewed. The 30-day postoperative survival was the primary end point of the study. Also abstracted were data on comorbidity, indication for colorectal surgery, surgery performed, length of postoperative hospital stay, estimated intraoperative blood loss, and duration of anesthesia.

RESULTS

There were 4,163 surgeries recorded, including 2,040 (49 percent) laparotomies. There were 21 laparotomies in American Society of Anesthesiology Class 5 patients (1 percent of all laparotomies). Eighteen surgeries were performed as emergencies, and three were urgent. Nine patients survived 30 days or longer (41 percent), whereas 12 did not. Seven patients lived to be discharged from the hospital.

CONCLUSION

Expeditious, safe surgery may save moribund patients with an acute colorectal problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. SR Haynes PG Lawler (1995) ArticleTitleAn assessment of the consistency of ASA physical status classification allocation Anaesthesia 50 195–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqB3szlt1A%3D Occurrence Handle7717481

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. PP Tekkis JD Poloniecki MR Thompson JD Stamatakis (2003) ArticleTitleOperative mortality in colorectal cancer: prospective national study BMJ 327 1196–9 Occurrence Handle10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1196 Occurrence Handle14630754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. H Spivak DV Maele I Friedman M Nussbaum (1996) ArticleTitleColorectal surgery in octogenarians J Am Coll Surg 183 46–50 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB28bktlU%3D Occurrence Handle8673306

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. WE Wise SuffixJr A Padmanabhan DM Meesig MW Arnold PS Aguilar WR Stewart (1991) ArticleTitleAbdominal colon and rectal operations in the elderly Dis Colon Rectum 34 959–63 Occurrence Handle1935473

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. AJ Pikarsky Y Saida T Yamaguchi et al. (2002) ArticleTitleIs obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 16 855–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383lvVagsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11997837

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. S Ascanelli G Navarra G Tonini et al. (2003) ArticleTitleEarly and late outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer: elective versus emergency surgery Tumori 89 36–41 Occurrence Handle12729359

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. RD Kingston S Walsh C Robinson J Jeacock F Keeling (1995) ArticleTitleSignificant risk factors in elective colorectal surgery Ann R Coll Surg Engl 77 369–71 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD1cvnslE%3D Occurrence Handle7486765

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. L Zorcolo L Covotta N Carlomagno DC Bartolo (2003) ArticleTitleToward lowering morbidity, mortality, and stoma formation in emergency colorectal surgery: the role of specialization Dis Colon Rectum 46 1461–7 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6793-9 Occurrence Handle14605562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. MA Callahan PJ Christos HT Gold AI Mushlin JM Daly (2003) ArticleTitleInfluence of surgical subspecialty training on in-hospital mortality for gastrectomy and colectomy patients Ann Surg 238 629–36 Occurrence Handle14530734

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. L Rosen JJ Stasik SuffixJr JF Reed SuffixIII JA Olenwine JS Aronoff D Sherman (1996) ArticleTitleVariations in colon and rectal surgical mortality. Comparison of specialties with a state-legislated database Dis Colon Rectum 39 129–35 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB38znt1c%3D Occurrence Handle8620777

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. VG Hadjianastassiou PP Tekkis JD Poloniecki MC Gavalas DR Goldhill (2004) ArticleTitleSurgical mortality score: risk management tool for auditing surgical performance World J Surg 28 193–200 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-003-7174-6 Occurrence Handle14708049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. PP Tekkis N Kessaris HM Kocher JD Poloniecki J Lyttle AC Windsor (2003) ArticleTitleEvaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in patients undergoing colorectal surgery Br J Surg 90 340–5 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4037 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2Fot1Oitw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12594670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

A debt of gratitude is owed to the medical, nursing, and ancillary staff in the departments of critical care and anesthesiology for their contribution to the management of these critically ill patients.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Church, J. Laparotomy for Acute Colorectal Conditions in Moribund Patients: Is it Worthwhile?. Dis Colon Rectum 48, 1147–1152 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0945-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0945-9

Key words

Navigation