Abstract
Owing to the superelevation in the bend, debris flow rushed out of the channel and destroyed the engineering facilities near the bend, which brings challenges to the design of disaster prevention and mitigation projects. Under the assumption of a continuous homogeneous medium and rectangular channel section, the debris flow velocity in the bend is decomposed into a tangential velocity that causes superelevation and a normal velocity that generates runup. The calculation equations of superelevation, runup, and total superelevation of debris flow in the bend are derived based on the gravity center offset of the flow section in the debris flow movement. The proposed equation can determine and depict the evolution of total superelevation value along the bend, which is useful for engineers to carry out the targeted design in debris flow prevention and control engineering. Meanwhile, using the equation in this paper and two other representative equations, the total superelevation, superelevation, and runup height of debris flow in 37 groups of test data and bends in the case study are computed to compare with the test and measured results. The test findings showed that the runup height accounts for about 40% of the total superelevation, and the runup height of the five bend points in the case accounts for 43–48%, indicating that the runup is an essential part of the total superelevation and needs to be calculated in the design of the bend of the debris flow prevention and control project.
Data availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
References
Aronne A, Giulia R, Michele L (2020) Dynamic impact of a water and sediments surge against a rigid wall. J Hydraul Res 58:314–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2019.1579113
Bambrey RR, Reinaud JN, Dritschel DG (2007) Strong interactions between two corotating quasi-geostrophic vortices. J Fluid Mech 592:117–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112007008373
Chen HY, Cui P, Zhou GGD, Zhu XH, Tang JB (2014) Experimental study of debris flow caused by domino failures of landslide dams. Int J Sedim Res 29:414–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(14)60055-X
Chen M, Tang C, Zhang XZ, Xiong J, Chang M, Shi QY, Wang FL, Li MW (2021) Quantitative assessment of physical fragility of buildings to the debris flow on 20 August 2019 in the Cutou gully, Wenchuan, southwestern China. Eng Geol 3:106319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106319
Chen NS, Yang CL, Li ZL, He J (2009) Research on the Relationship between the calculation of debris flow velocity and its super elevation in bend. Advanced Engineering Sciences 41:165–171 (in Chinese). http://ir.imde.ac.cn/handle/131551/1692
Choi CE, Au-Yeung SCH, Ng CWW, Song D (2015) Flume investigation of landslide granular debris and water runup mechanisms. Géotechnique Letters 5:28–32. https://doi.org/10.1680/geolett.14.00080
Faug T (2015a) Depth-averaged analytic solutions for free-surface granular flows impacting rigid walls down inclines. Physical Review E 92:062310. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.062310
Faug T, Childs P, Wyburn E, Einav I (2015b) Standing jumps in shallow granular flows down smooth inclines. Physics of Fluids 27:073304. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4927447
Fei XJ (2002) Velocity and transport concentration of solid in water-stone debris flow. Journal of Sediment Research (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.16239/j.cnki.0468-155x.2002.04.002
Fei XJ (2003) Velocity and solid transportation concentration of viscous debris flow. J Hydraul Eng 2:15–18 (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13243/j.cnki.slxb.2003.02.004
Han Z, Chen GQ, Li YG, Xu LR, Zheng L, Zhang YB (2014) A new approach for analyzing the velocity distribution of debris flows at typical cross-sections. Nat Hazards 74:2053–2070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1276-3
Han Z, Chen GQ, Li YG, Wang W, Zhang H (2015) Exploring the velocity distribution of debris flows: an iteration algorithm based approach for complex cross-sections. Geomorphology 241:72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.043
Huang T, Ding MT, Gao ZM, Téllez RD (2021) Check dam storage capacity calculation based on high-resolution topogrammetry: case study of the Cutou Gully, Wenchuan County, China. Sci Total Environ 790:148083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148083
Huang YH, Zhao JH, Hu KH, Li P (2017) Investigation of influence of debris-flow properties and channel’s turning angle on its superelevation by flume experiments. Journal of Natural Disasters 26:110–118 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13577/j.jnd.2017.0513
Hungr O, Morgan GC, Kellerhals R (1984) Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazards for design of remedial measures. Can Geotech J 21:663–677. https://doi.org/10.1139/t84-073
Hungr O, Mcdougall S (2009) Two numerical models for landslide dynamic analysis. Comput Geosci-UK 35:978–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.12.003
Iverson RM (1997) The physics of debris flows. Rev Geophys 35:245–296. https://doi.org/10.1029/97RG00426
Iverson RM, George DL, Logan M (2016) Debris flow runup on vertical barriers and adverse slopes. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 121:2333–2357. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JF003933
Jiang ZX (2007) Current velocity calculation of debris flow based on excess-height in bend. Geotechnical Engineering Technique 21:288–291 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2007.06.005
Johnson AM, Rodine JR (1984) Debris flow. In: Brunsden D, Prior DB (eds) Slope instability. https://trid.trb.org/view/267068
Kattel P, Kafle J, Fischer JT, Mergili M, Tuladhar BM, Pudasaini SP (2018) Interaction of two-phase debris flow with obstacles. Eng Geol 242:197–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.05.023
Khadem B, Najafabadi SHG, Sarkardeh H (2018) Numerical simulation of anti-vortex devices at water intakes. Proc Inst Civil Eng-Water Manag 171:18–29. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwama.16.00051
Kim MI, Kwak JH, Kim BS (2018) Assessment of dynamic impact force of debris flow in mountain torrent based on characteristics of debris flow. Environ Earth Sci 77:538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7707-9
Kopnin NB (2004) Vortex instability and the onset of superfluid turbulence. Phys Rev Lett 92:135301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.135301
Li L (2017) Experimental study about superelevation of the debris flow in bend. Chengdu University of Technology (in Chinese). https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201801&filename=1017218325.nh
Li YG, Tang C, Han Z, Huang JL, Xu LR, He Y, Chen GQ (2016) Estimating the mud depth of debris flow in a natural river channel: a theoretical approach and its engineering application. Environmental Earth Sciences 75:722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5480-1
Lo DOK (2000) Review of natural terrain landslide debris-resisting barrier design. GEO Report 104:92. https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/e3d232e6-5cd1-33b2-8c87-abf31e98de65/
Mao J, Zhao LH, Liu XN, Cheng J, Avital E (2017) A three-phases model for the simulation of landslide-generated waves using the improved conservative level set method. Comput Fluids 159:243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.10.007
McClung DM (2001) Superelevation of flowing avalanches around curved channel bends. J Geophys Res-Sol Ea 106:16489–16498. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000266
Mergili M, Fischer JT, Krenn J, Pudasaini SP (2016) r.avaflow v1, an advanced open source computational framework for the propagation and interaction of two-phase mass flows. Geosci Model Dev Discuss. http://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2016-218
Mergili M, Emmer A, JuIcová A, Cochachin A, Fischer JT, Huggel C, Pudasaini SP (2018) How well can we simulate complex hydro-geomorphic process chains? The 2012 mult-lake outburst flood in the Santa Cruz Valley (Cordillera Blanca, Perú). Earth Surf Proc Land 43:1373–1389. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4318
Narbona-Reina G, Fernández-Nieto ED, Bouchut F, Mangeney A (2015) A two-phase shallow debris flow model with energy balance. ESAIM Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 49:101–140. https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2014026
Ng CWW, Choi CE, Liu LHD, Wang Y, Song D, Yang N (2017) Influence of particle size on the mechanism of dry granular run-up on a rigid barrier. Géotechnique Letters 7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.16.00159
Ng CWW, Choi CE, Koo RCH, Goodwin SR, Song D, Kwan JS (2018) Dry granular flow interaction with dual-barrier systems. Géotechnique 68:386–399. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.273
Ng CWW, Choi CE, Liu HM, Poudyal S, Kwan JSH (2021) Design recommendations for single and dual debris flow barriers with and without basal clearance. Workshop on World Landslide Forum 1:33–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60196-6_2
Ouyang CJ, He SM, Tang C (2015) Numerical analysis of dynamics of debris flow over erodible beds in Wenchuan earthquake-induced area. Eng Geol 194:62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.07.012
Peterson AW, Peterson AE (1988) Mobile boundary flow: an assessment of velocity and sediment discharge relationships. Can J Civ Eng 15:539–546. https://doi.org/10.1139/l88-074
Prochaska AB, Santi PM, Higgins JD, Cannon SH (2008) A study of methods to estimate debris flow velocity. Landslides 5:431–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-008-0137-0
Procter CM (2012) Debris flow dynamics: a flume study of velocity and superelevation. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3587/
Pudasaini SP, Wang Y, Hutter K (2005) Modelling debris flows down general channels. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5:799–819. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-799-2005
Pudasaini SP, Wang Y, Sheng LT, Hsiau SS, Hutter K, Katzenbach R (2008) Avalanching granular flows down curved and twisted channels: theoretical and experimental results. Phys Fluids 20:073302. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2945304
Pudasaini SP (2012) A general two-phase debris flow model. J Geophys Res-Earth 117. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002186
Pudasaini SP, Jaboyedoff M (2020) A general analytical model for superelevation in landslide. Landslides 17:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01333-1
Rahman MA, Konagai K (2017) Substantiation of debris flow velocity from superelevation: a numerical approach. Landslides 14:633–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0725-3
Rickenmann D, Koch T (1997) Comparison of debris flow modelling approaches. ASCE. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279588684_Comparison_of_debris_flow_modelling_approaches
Rickenmann D (1999) Empirical relationships for debris flows. Nat Hazards 19:47–77. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008064220727
Roberti G, Friele P, Vries BVWD, Ward B, Clague JJ, Perotti L, Giardino M (2017) Rheological evolution of the Mount Meager 2010 debris avalanche, southwestern British Columbia. Geosphere 13:369–390. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01389.1
Scheidl C, Brian WM, Rickenmann D (2015) Debris-flow velocities and superelevation in a curved laboratory channel. Can Geotech J 52:305–317. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0081
Stock JD, Dietrich WE (2006) Erosion of steepland valleys by debris flows. Geol Soc Am Bull 118:1125–1148. https://doi.org/10.1130/B25902.1
Takahashi T (2009) A review of Japanese debris flow research. Int J Eng Sci 2:1–14. https://doi.org/10.13101/ijece.2.1
Tian SJ, Zhang J, Shi BB, Zhang SS (2021) Evaluation of the benefits of facility for disaster mitigation based on the risk of debris flow. Landslides 19:85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01776-5
Torabizadeh A, Tahershamsi A, Tabatabai MRM (2018) Measurement of dimensionless Chezy coefficient in step-pool reach (case study of Dizin River in Iran). Flow Meas Instrum 61:15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.03.012
Torbic DJ, O'Laughlin MK, Harwood DW, Bauer KM, Bokenkroger CD, Lucas LM, Ronchetto JR, Brennan S, Donnell E, Brown A (2014) Superelevation criteria for sharp horizontal curves on steep grades. http://trid.trb.org/view/2014/M/1322919
Vandine DF (1985) Debris flows and debris torrents in the Southern Canadian Cordillera. Can Geothch J 22:44–68. https://doi.org/10.1139/t85-006
Wang Z, You Y, Zhang GZ, Feng T, Liu JF, Lv XB, Wang DW (2020) Superelevation analysis of the debris flow curve in Xiedi gully, China. B Eng Geol Environ 80:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01999-1
Warszawski L, Melatos A, Berloff NG (2012) Unpinning triggers for superfluid vortex avalanches. Phys Rev B 85:104503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.104503
Xiong J, Tang C, Chen M, Zhang XZ, Shi QY, Gong LF (2020) Activity characteristics and enlightenment of the debris flow triggered by the rainstorm on 20 August 2019 in Wenchuan County, China. B Eng Geol Environ 80:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01981-x
Zhao HX, You Y, Liu JF, Yao LK (2017) Superelevation calculation of debris flow climbing ascending slopes. Math Probl Eng 2017:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9578928
Zhao JH, Hu KH, Tang JB, Li P (2015) Movement analysis of loess mud flow based on orthogonal experiment. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 46:190–196 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13243/j.cnki.slxb.2015.02.008
Zhou BF, Hu PH, You Y, Cheng ZL (1991) Empirical relation of surface velocity of debris flow in Jiangjia Ravine. Mountain Research 03:171–178 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.1991.03.006
Zhu XH, Liu BX, Liu Y (2020) New method for estimating roughness coefficient for debris flows. Water 12:2341. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092341
Funding
This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 41971214 and 41877524).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Shujun Tian: Conceptualization, methodology, funding acquisition, supervision, writing — original draft. Benben Shi: Software, formal analysis. Xiaosong Chen: Visualization, investigation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Appendix: Derivation of correction coefficient for superelevation and runup
Appendix: Derivation of correction coefficient for superelevation and runup
As shown in Fig. 4, from the flow section AB to HI, the range is 0 < θ < arccosR2/R1. Let RF be arbitrary flow section from AB to HI. SAEJ (representing the mass involved in superelevation and runup in this process)/SAEFB (representing the total mass of all flow sections from AB to HI) is the correction coefficient when reaching the flow section EiFi.
where S represents the area of subscript surface, R1 and R2 are the outer radius and inner radius of the bend, and θ is the included angle between arbitrary flow section and OA.
From the flow section HI to MN, the range is arccosR2/R1 < θ < π/2. Let E’F’ be arbitrary flow section from HI to MN. The velocity direction of debris flow in AB section of the initial flow section all changes. Under the constraint of the channel wall, the general flow trend changes to the circular movement trend. It is assumed that the uniform rate of change of the angle between the velocity direction and the tangent direction is:
where Δθ is the included angle between arbitrary flow section Ei’Fi’ and HI.
At the flow section HI, the included angle between the movement direction of debris flow and the tangent direction is α (indicated by point P), and the included angle between the debris flow movement direction of arbitrary flow section Ei’Fi’ and the tangent direction is α-αdα (indicated by point Q). Multiply (α-αdα)/α by the correction coefficient at the time of the flow section HI to be the correction coefficient at arbitrary position of the flow section Ei’Fi’. The correction coefficient of the flow section HI to MN is:
Substituting Eq. (25) into Eq. (26):
where angle is in radian. The final correction coefficient is expressed as a piecewise function:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tian, S., Shi, B. & Chen, X. Superelevation and runup height of debris flows in bends based on typical rectangular cross-sections and gravity center offset. Landslides 20, 1303–1319 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-023-02036-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-023-02036-4