Abstract
The regions of Central and South America most susceptible to the occurrence of landslides will become even more vulnerable in the context of climate change. The Josefina disaster, in 1993, demonstrated both the vulnerability of local infrastructures and communities in the Paute River basin (Ecuador). Since this natural phenomena, several landslide inventories and susceptibility studies were developed, revealing the vulnerability of the Paute River basin to unstable terrain and the need for further studies throughout the basin. Despite this, no studies have been done since then to update the information generated. This paper describes a Mobile Application for Regional Landslide Inventories (MARLI), a simple but efficient open-access platform to report landslide events using the Open Data Kit system. Its design makes reporting fast, simple and cost-effective with an added benefit, and a specialized knowledge is not required for its use. MARLI was tested for the collection of landslides in Cuenca (Ecuador). From the data taken in the field, it was possible to analyze the performance and suitability of collected data and compare the results with regional inventories in the same area. Additionally, these results can be used for the elaboration and update of large-scale inventories or the training of automatic identification systems of landslides and later evaluation of their precision in a small-medium scale. Likewise, this product constitutes a fundamental input for the formulation of mitigation strategies, to formulate the appropriate response and in time, also the elaboration of reconstruction plans before the increase in the occurrence of such phenomena.
Notes
Lithology legend Fig. 4: 1. Sandy clays, often reddish and with presence of gypsum, and thick tuffaceous sandstones; 2. Clear laminated shales, with gypsum; locally, sandstones and basal conglomerates with levels of clays and siltstones; 3. Silts, clays, sands, gravels and blocks; 4. Heterogeneous mixture of fine materials and rocky angular fragments of very different sizes; 5. Tobaceous sandstones of medium to thick grain, levels of conglomerates and weak layers of clays, silts and shales; 6. Heterogeneous mixture of fine materials and rocky angular fragments, with absence of stratification and internal ordering structures; 7. Limonites, shales and fine-grained conglomerates; 8. Limonites, shales and fine-grained interstratified sandstones, shales with coal seams, coarse-grained and conglomerate sandstones; 9. Coarse and brecciated andesitic conglomerates, with intercalations of sandstones and tuffaceous siltstones, scarcely lithified and consolidated; 10. Silt and clay (predominant in the distal zone) and sand, gravel and blocks (predominant in the apical zone), in variable proportions and with marked changes of lateral and vertical facies; 12. Volcanic agglomerate with white glass matrix (Llacao) and well stratified volcanic-sedimentary sequence with predominance of tuff (Gualaceo); 13. Sands, silts, clays and conglomerates; 14. Silts, clays, sands, gravels and blocks in variable proportions; 15. Tuffs and agglomerates (dacite, rhyolithic and andesitic) kaolinized, with low percentage of lava; 16. Dark gray massive siltstones and quartz-feldspathic sandstones; limestone, gravel and tuffaceous sandstones; 18. Green andesitic tuffs very meteorized and andesitic to andesite-basaltic lavas; 22. Metavolcanites with weak metamorphism, massive lavas and green phyllites, green schist, quartzite and marbles.
References
Alexander D (2012) Vulnerability to landslides, chapter 5. In: Glade T, Anderson MG, Crozier MJ (eds) Landslide hazard and risk. Wiley, pp 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470012659.ch5
Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M, Guzzetti F, Reichenbachv P (2007) Identification and mapping of recent rainfall-induced landslides using elevation data collected by airborne lidar. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7:637–650. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-7-637-2007
Basabe P, Almeida E, Ramón P, Zeas R, Alvarez L (1996) Avance en la prevención de desastres naturales en la cuenca del rıo paute, ecuador. Bulletin de lInstitut français détudes andines 25(3):443–458
Baum R, Highland L, Lyttle P, Fee J, Martinez E, Wald L (2014) “Report a landslide” a website to engage the public in identifying geologic hazards. In: Sassa K, Canuti P, Yin Y (eds) Landslide science for a safer geoenvironment, vol 1. Springer, pp 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04999-1_8
Botts M, Percivall G, Reed C, Davidson J (2008) OGC sensor web enablement: overview and high level architecture, vol 4540. Springer, Berlin, pp 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79996-2_10
Bragagnolo L, da Silva R, Grzybowski J (2020) Landslide susceptibility mapping with r.landslide: a free open-source GIS-integrated tool based on artificial neural networks. Environ Model Softw 123:104565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104565
Cardinali M, Ardizzone F, Galli M, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (2000) Landslides triggered by rapid snow melting, the December 1996–January 1997 event in central Italy. In: Claps P, Siccardi F (eds) Mediterranean storms, proceedings Plinius conference 99, 2012, pp 439–448
Carrara A (1993) Uncertainty in evaluating landslide hazard and risk. In: Nemec J, Nigg JM, Siccardi F (eds) Prediction and perception of natural hazards. Advances in natural and technological hazards research, vol 2. Springer, pp 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8190-5_12
Coe J, Godt J (2012) Review of approaches for assessing the impact of climate change on landslide hazards. In: Eberhardt E, Froese C, Turner A, Leroueil S (eds) Landslides and engineered slopes, protecting society through improved understanding, vol 1. Taylor & Francis Group, pp 371–377
Cruden D, Varnes J (1996) Special report: landslide types and processes, chapter 3. In: Varnes DJ (ed) Landslides: investigation and mitigation, transportation research board. National Research Council, vol 247. National Academy Press, pp 36–75
De Brito MM, Weber EJ, Krigger VS, Leitzke FP (2016) Análise dos factores condicionantes de movimientos de massa no municıpio de Porto Alegre a partir de registros históricos. Rev Bras Cartogr 68(9):1853–1872
Di Martire D, De Rosa M, Pesce V, Santangelo MA, Calcaterra D (2012) Landslide hazard and land management in high-density urban areas of Campania Region, Italy. Nat Hazard 12:905–926. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-905-2012
Ferster CJ, Coops NC, Harshaw HW, Kozak RA, Meitner MJ (2013) An exploratory assessment of a smartphone application for public participation in forest fuels measurement in the wildland-urban interface. Forests 4:1199–1219
Fiorucci F, Cardinali M, Carlà R, Rossi M, Mondini A, Santurri L, Ardizzone F, Guzzetti F (2011) Seasonal landslide mapping and estimation of landslide mobilization rates using aerial and satellite images. Geomorphology 129:59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.01.013
Galli M, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (2008) Comparing landslide inventory maps. Geomorphology 94(3):268–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.09.023 (gIS technology and models for assessing landslide hazard and risk)
Gariano SL, Guzzetti F (2016) Landslides in a changing climate. Earth Sci Rev 162:227–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.011
Glade T, Crozier M (1996) Towards a national landslide information base for New Zealand. NZ Geogr 52(1):29–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7939.1996.tb00461.x
Goodchild MF (2007) Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69(4):211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y
Guzzetti F, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P, Cipolla F, Sebastiani C, Galli M, Salvati P (2004) Landslides triggered by the 23 November 2000 rainfall event in the Imperia Province, Western Liguria, Italy. Eng Geol 73:229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.01.006
Guzzetti F, Mondini AC, Cardinali M, Fiorucci F, Santangelo M, Chang KT (2012) Landslide inventory maps: new tools for an old problem. Earth Sci Rev 112(1):42–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.02.001
Hearn GJ, Hart AB (2019) Landslide susceptibility mapping: a practitioners view. Bull Eng Geol Env 78:5811–5826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01506-1
Hungerbühler D, Steinmann M, Winkler W, Seward D, Egüez A, Peterson DE, Helg U, Hammer C (2002) Neogene stratigraphy and Andean geodynamics of southern Ecuador. Earth Sci Rev 57(1–2):75–124
Jäger D, Kreuzer T, Wilde M, Bemm S, Terhorst B (2018) A spatial database for landslides in northern Bavaria: a methodological approach. Geomorphology 306:283–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.10.008
Joy J, Kanga S, Singh SK (2019) Kerala flood 2018: flood mapping by participatory GIS approach, Meloor Panchayat. Int J Emerg Technol 10(1):197–205
Karsli F, Atasoy M, Yalcin A, Reis S, Demir O, Gokceoglu C (2009) Effects of land-use changes on landslides in a landslide-prone area (Ardesen, Rize, NE Turkey). Environ Monit Assess 156(1):241–255
Kirschbaum D, Stanley T (2018) Satellite-based assessment of rainfall-triggered landslide hazard for situational awareness. Earths Future 6(3):505–523. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000715
Kirschbaum D, Stanley T, Zhou Y (2015) Spatial and temporal analysis of a global landslide catalog. Geomorphology 249:4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.016
Kirschbaum DB, Adler R, Hong Y, Hill S, Lerner-Lam A (2010) A global landslide catalog for hazard applications: method, results, and limitations. Nat Hazards 52(3):561–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9401-4
Kocaman S, Gokceoglu C (2019) A CitSci app for landslide data collection. Landslides 16(3):611–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1101-2
Liang WT, Lee JC, Chen KH, Hsiao NC (2017) Citizen earthquake science in Taiwan: from science to hazard mitigation. J Disaster Res 12(6):1174–1181. https://doi.org/10.20965/JDR.2017.P1174
Liu W, Wang S, Zhou Y, Wang L (2014) An android intelligent mobile terminal application: field data survey system for forest fires. Nat Hazards 73:1483–1497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1147-y
Lupiano V, Rago V, Terranova OG, Iovine G (2019) Landslide inventory and main geomorphological features affecting slope stability in the Picentino river basin (Campania, Southern Italy). J Maps 15(2):131–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2018.1563836
Malamud BD, Turcotte DL, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (2004) Landslide inventories and their statistical properties. Earth Surf Proc Land 29:687–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1064
Mantovani F, Gracia FJ, de Cosmo PD, Suma A (2010) A new approach to landslide geomorphological mapping using the open source software in the Olvera area (Cadiz, Spain). Landslides 7:69–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-009-0181-4
Mondini A, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Rossi M, Cardinali M, Ardizzone F (2011) Semi-automatic recognition and mapping of rainfall induced shallow landslides using optical satellite images. Remote Sens Environ 115:1743–1757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.03.006
Muñoz Sotomayor V, Tubıo-Sánchez JM, Morales-Ramos V (2018) Ragioni ed esiti di una ricerca sul territorio e sul progetto rurale contemporaneo, Prisma, chap Mercados de suelo informal en las fronteras urbano-rurales. El caso de Loja, pp 199–212
Olyazadeh R, Sudmeier-Rieux K, Jaboyedoff M, Derron MH, Devkota S (2016) An offline–online web-GIS android application for fast data acquisition of landslide hazard and risk. Nat Hazard 17(4):549–561. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-549-2017
Petley D (2010) On the impact of climate change and population growth on the occurrence of fatal landslides in South, East and SE Asia. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 43:487–496. https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/09-001
Petley D (2012) Landslides and engineered slopes: protecting society through improved understanding. In: Eberhardt E, Froese C, Turner AK, Leroueil S (eds) Landslides and engineered slopes: protecting society through improved understanding. Taylor and Francis Group
R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Development Core Team
Raja A, Tridane A, Gaffar A, Lindquist T, Pribadi K (2014) Android and ODK base d data collection framework to aid in epidemiological analysis. J Public Health Inf 5(3):228. https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v5i3.4996
Reichenbach P, Rossi M, Malamud BD, Mihir M, Guzzetti F (2018) A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models. Earth Sci Rev 180:60–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001
Rivera Torres G, Serrano Fernández de Córdova ER (2019) Asentamientos informales en Cuenca: el otro lado de la moneda. Revista Planeo (40)
Rosser B, Dellow S, Haubrock S, Glassey P (2017) New Zealands national landslide database. Landslides 14:1949–1959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0843-6
Saleem N, Huq ME, Twumasi NYD, Javed A, Sajjad A (2019) Parameters derived from and/or used with digital elevation models (DEMs) for landslide susceptibility mapping and landslide risk assessment: a review. Int J Geo-Inf 8:545. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8120545
Sassa K (2015) ISDR-ICL Sendai Partnerships 2015–2025 for global promotion of understanding and reducing landslide disaster risk. Landslides 12(4):631–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0586-1
Sassa K (2019) Journal landslides, the international consortium on landslides, and the Kyoto landslide commitment 2020. Landslides 16(9):1623–1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01242-3
Scaioni M, Longoni L, Melillo V, Papini M (2014) Remote sensing for landslide investigations: an overview of recent achievements and perspectives. Remote Sens 6(10):9600–9652. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6109600
Sepúlveda SA, Petley DN (2015) Regional trends and controlling factors of fatal landslides in Latin America and the Caribbean. Nat Hazard 15:1821–1833. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1821-2015
Tanyaş H, Lombardo L (2020) Completeness index for earthquake-induced landslide inventories. Eng Geol 264:105331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105331
Tanyaş H, van Westen CJ, Allstadt KE, Jessee MAN, Görüm T, Jibson RW, Godt JW, Sato HP, Schmitt RG, Marc O, Hovius N (2017) Presentation and analysis of a worldwide database of earthquake-induced landslide inventories. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 122:1991–2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JF004236
Tao Z, Zhang H, Zhu C, Hao Z, Zhang X, Hu X (2019) Design and operation of app-based intelligent landslide monitoring system: the case of three gorges reservoir region. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 10:1209–1226. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2019.1568312
Van-Den-Eeckhaut M, Hervás J (2012) State of the art of national landslide databases in Europe and their potential for assessing landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk. Geomorphology 139–140:545–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.12.006
Varnes D (1978) Transportation Research Board Special Report. Slope movements: types and processes. In: Landslide analysis and control, vol 176. National Academy of Sciences, pp 11–33
Venkatasrinivasa Murthy M (2017) Field GIS: towards mobile computing to support pre-disaster spatial analysis in the fiels. Marter thesis, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University os Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Vulović N, Kitanović O, Stanković R, Vorkapić D, Vulović A (2017) BEWARE multi-device web GIS application for landslides. In: Mikoš M, Arbanas Ž, Yin Y, Sassa K (eds) Advancing culture of living with landslides. Springer, pp 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53487-9_49
van Westen CJ, Castellanos E, Kuriakose SL (2008) Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment: an overview. Eng Geol 102(3):112–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.010 (landslide Susceptibility, Hazard and Risk Zoning for Land Use Planning)
Funding
This study was supported by the Land Laboratory Research Group (G.I.-1934-TB) (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain) and the University of Azuay (Cuenca, Ecuador) (Project No: 2016-53).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CS and SB conceived the presented the idea. CS and SB developed the theory and designed the forms for MARLI. CS developed the application. CS and SB performed all computations. CS, SB, DM verified de analytics and resulting data. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1.
The online version contains supplementary material available, concretely: (i) description of citizen and technical forms; (ii) disadvantages and advantages of the mobile tools; (iii) web map of landslides recorded with MARLI.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sellers, C.A., Buján, S. & Miranda, D. MARLI: a mobile application for regional landslide inventories in Ecuador. Landslides 18, 3963–3977 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01764-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01764-9