Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating the susceptibility of landslide landforms in Japan using slope stability analysis: a case study of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake

  • Recent Landslides
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study analyzed 267 landslide landforms (LLs) in the Kumamoto area of Japan from the database of about 0.4 million LLs for the whole of Japan identified from aerial photos by the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience of Japan (NIED). Each LL in the inventory is composed of a scarp and a moving mass. Since landslides are prone to reactivation, it is important to evaluate the sliding-recurrence susceptibility of LLs. One possible approach to evaluate the susceptibility of LLs is slope stability analysis. A previous study found a good correlation (R 2 = 0.99) between the safety factor (F s ) and slope angle (α) of F s  = 17.3α −0.843. We applied the equation to the analysis of F s for 267 LLs in the area affected by the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake (M j  = 7.3). The F s was calculated for the following three cases of failure: scarps only, moving mass only, and scarps and moving mass together. Verification with the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake event shows that the most appropriate method for the evaluation of LLs is to consider the failure of scarps and moving mass together. In addition, by analyzing the relationship between the factors of slope of entire landslide and slope of scarp for LLs and comparing the results with the Aso-ohashi landslide, the largest landslide caused by the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake, we also found that morphometric analysis of LLs is useful for forecasting the travel distance of future landslides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. B Eng Geol Environ 58:21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda–Yahiko Mountains, central Japan. Geomorphology 65:15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop AW (1955) The use of the slip circle in the stability analysis of slopes. Geotechnique 5:7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Tuan TA, Klempe H, Pradhan B, Revhaug I (2016) Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides 13:361–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capparelli G, Tiranti D (2010) Application of the MoniFLaIR early warning system for rainfall-induced landslides in Piedmont region (Italy). Landslides 7:401–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CW, Saito H, Oguchi T (2015) Rainfall intensity–duration conditions for mass movements in Taiwan. Progr Earth Planet Sci 2:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CW, Chen H, Oguchi T (2016) Distributions of landslides, vegetation, and related sediment yields during typhoon events in northwestern Taiwan. Geomorphology 273:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CW, Oguchi T, Hayakawa YS, Saito H, Chen H (2017) Relationship between landslide size and rainfall conditions in Taiwan. Landslides 14:1235–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chigira M, Yagi H (2006) Geological and geomorphological characteristics of landslides triggered by the 2004 Mid Niigata Prefecture earthquake in Japan. Eng Geol 82:202–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corominas J (1996) The angle of reach as a mobility index for small and large landslides. Can Geotech J 33:260–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY (2002) Landslide risk assessment and management and management—an overview. Eng Geol 64:65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dang K, Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Sakai N, Sato Y, Takara K, Quang LH, Loi DH, Tien PV, Ha ND (2016) Mechanism of two rapid and long-runout landslides in the 16 April 2016 Kumamoto earthquake using a ring-shear apparatus and computer simulation (LS-RAPID). Landslides 13:1525–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich WE, Reiss R, Hsu ML, Montgomery DR (1995) A process-based model for colluvial soil depth and shallow landsliding using digital elevation data. Hydrol Process 9:383–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay PJ, Mostyn GR, Fell R (1999) Landslide risk assessment: prediction of travel distance. Can Geotech J 36:556–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, central Italy. Geomorphology 31:181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattanji T, Moriwaki H (2009) Morphometric analysis of relic landslides using detailed landslide distribution maps: implications for forecasting travel distance of future landslides. Geomorphology 103:447–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsü KJ (1975) Catastrophic debris streams (Sturzstroms) generated by rockfalls. Geol Soc Am Bull 86:129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter G, Fell R (2003) Travel distance angle for qrapidq landslides in constructed and natural soil slopes. Can Geotech J 40:1123–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, George DL, Allstadt K, Reid ME, Collins BD, Vallance JW, Schilling SP, Godt JW, Cannon CM, Magirl CS, Baum RL, Coe JA, Schulz WH, Bower JB (2015) Landslide mobility and hazards: implications of the 2014 Oso disaster. Earth Planet Sc Lett 412:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang X, Qiao J, Wang C, Zhao Y (2006) Computer simulation of landslides by the contact element method. Comput Geosci UK 32:434–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JMA (2016) About the earthquake in the Kumamoto area of Kumamoto Prefecture, around 21:26 April 14, 2016. Japan Meteorological Agency (in Japanese). http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/menu/h28_kumamoto_jishin_menu.html

  • Kubota T, Jitousono T, Shimizu O et al (2012) Debris disasters induced by heavy rainfall in northern Kyushu District in July 2012. J Jpn Soc Erosion Contrl Eng 65:50–61 (In Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin GW, Chen H, Chen YH, Horng MJ (2008) Influence of typhoons and earthquakes on rainfall-induced landslides and suspended sediments discharge. Eng Geol 97:32–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsushi Y, Saito H, Fukuoka H, Furuya G (2013) Landslides of tephra deposits on hillslopes of the Aso caldera wall and volcanic central cones by the north-Kyushu heavy rainfall at July 2012. Ann Disas Prev Res Inst Kyoto Univ 56B:237–241 (In Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyabuchi Y (2012) Landslides triggered by the July 2012 torrential rain in Aso caldera, southwestern Japan. J Geogr 121:1073–1080 (In Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyabuchi Y, Daimaru H (2004) The June 2001 rainfall-induced landslides and associated lahars at Aso volcano, southwestern Japan: implications for hazard assessment. Acta Vulcanol 16:21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstem NR, Price VE (1965) The analysis of the stability of general slip surface. Geotechnique 15:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriwaki H (1987) A prediction of the runout distance of a debris. J Jpn Landslide Soc 24:10–16 (In Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriwaki H, Hattanji T (2002) Morphometric analysis of landslides based on landslide maps. J Jpn Landslide Soc 39:244–252 (In Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriwaki H, Sasaki Y (2007) Relative risk evaluation of old landslides with slope stability analysis. J Jpn Landslide Soc 44:25–32 (In Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okura Y, Kitahara H, Kawanami A, Kurokawa U (2003) Topography and volume effects on travel distance of surface failure. Eng Geol 67:243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ost L, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Poesen J, Vanmaercke-Gottigny MC (2003) Characteristics and spatial distribution of large landslides in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium). Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie N.F 47:329–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Paudel U, Oguchi T, Hayakawa Y (2016) Multi-resolution landslide susceptibility analysis using a DEM and random forest. Int J Geosci 7:726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roering JJ, Kirchner JW, Dietrich WE (2005) Characterizing structural and lithologic controls on deep-seated landsliding: implications for topographic relief and landscape evolution in the Oregon Coast Range, USA. Geol Soc Am Bull 117:654–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samia J, Temme A, Bregt A, Wallinga J, Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Rossi M (2017) Do landslides follow landslides? Insights in path dependency from a multi-temporal landslide inventory. Landslides 14:547–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidegger AE (1973) On the prediction of reach and velocity of catastrophic landslides. Rock Mech 5:231–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster R, Highland L (2003) Impact of landslides and innovative landslide-mitigation measures on the natural environment. Paper presented at the International Conference on Slope Engineering, Hong Kong, China

  • Segoni S, Lagomarsino D, Fanti R, Moretti S, Casagli N (2015) Integration of rainfall thresholds and susceptibility maps in the Emilia Romagna (Italy) regional-scale landslide warning system. Landslides 12:773–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu O, Ono M (2016) Relationship of tephra stratigraphy and hydraulic conductivity with slide depth in rainfall-induced shallow landslides in Aso volcano, Japan. Landslides 13:577–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu A, Takeshita M, Mizutani K (1992) Research on the shallow landslide of the 7.2 Aso disaster. Trans Kyushu Branch Jpn Forest Soc 45:177–178 (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidle CR (1992) A theoretical model of the effects of timber harvesting on slope stability. Water Resour Res 28:1897–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer E (1967) A method of analysis of the stability of embankments assuming parallel inter-slice forces. Geotechnique 12:11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USGS Earthquake Hazards Program (2016) M7.0–1 km WSW of Kumamoto-shi, Japan

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Storm, Flood, and Landslide Research Department, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience of Japan (NIED), for providing the landslide data of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi-Wen Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, CW., Chen, H., Wei, LW. et al. Evaluating the susceptibility of landslide landforms in Japan using slope stability analysis: a case study of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake. Landslides 14, 1793–1801 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0872-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0872-1

Keywords

Navigation