Advertisement

How can leadership processes in European bison be used to improve the management of free-roaming herds

  • Amandine Ramos
  • Lola Manizan
  • Esther Rodriguez
  • Yvonne J. M. Kemp
  • Cédric Sueur
Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

For several years, several wild species are experiencing a comeback in Europe, especially large herbivores. Despite the good news, the increased number of wild herbivores also potentially increases human-wildlife conflicts due to crop damages and road traffic accidents where such species have been involved in previously. In this context, studying the movements of animal groups is particularly relevant for managing their use of space and ensure sufficient cohabitation with human populations. We thus studied the European bison (Bison bonasus), a species concerned in several rewilding programs, to understand to what extent individual characteristics and social relationships are involved in the leadership process and how these factors influence the success of group movements. We observed a herd of 14 individuals in Zuid-Kennemerland National Park (the Netherlands) and analysed the initiation phase of spontaneous group movements. We showed that leadership was distributed throughout the group but the two oldest females showed higher propensity to initiate and to be followed. They seemed to have a high social power and a strong capacity to federate probably due to their dominance rank and their knowledge of the areas. The joining process was faster when animals were grouped before departure and when the initiator moved in the direction towards which the majority of individuals was oriented. Individuals joined the movement according to a selective mimetic process, based on kinship. These results, combined with virtual fence device, could be used to manage herd movements in a given territory and thus, might be an innovative tool to decrease human-wildlife conflicts.

Keywords

Bison bonasus Ungulates Leadership Rewilding Social relationships Virtual fences 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to warmly thank all the teams of Zuid-Kennemerland National Park, PWN, ARK Nature and all partners of the Kraansvlak Bison Project for their valuable help during data collection and their presence during the various stages of our study. We are grateful to Emilio R. Rojas (Wildstats) and Palmyre H. Boucherie for their help for statistical analyses and their scientific contributions, always enriching. We also thank Alexandre Naud, M-A Forin-Wiart and Joffrey Jouma’a for their fruitful advices regarding GLMM analysis.

References

  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–266.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156853974X00534 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson DM (2007) Virtual fencing—past, present and future. Rangel J 29:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartoń K (2016) MuMIn: multi-model inferenceGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry PSM, Bercovitch FB (2015) Leadership of herd progressions in the Thornicroft’s giraffe of Zambia. Afr J Ecol 53:175–182.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.12173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blowers TE, Waterman JM, Kuhar CW, Bettinger TL (2009) Social behaviors within a group of captive female Hippopotamus amphibius. J Ethol 28:287–294.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-009-0184-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bode NWF, Wood AJ, Franks DW (2011) The impact of social networks on animal collective motion. Anim Behav 82:29–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.04.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bon R, Campan R (1996) Unexplained sexual segregation in polygamous ungulates: a defense of an ontogenetic approach. Behav Process 38:131–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00029-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourjade M, Sueur C (2010) Shared or unshared consensus for collective movement? Towards methodological concerns. Behav Process 84:648–652.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.02.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourjade M, Thierry B, Maumy M, Petit O (2009) Decision-making in przewalski horses (Equus ferus przewalskii) is driven by the ecological contexts of collective movements. Ethology 115:321–330.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01614.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Briard L, Dorn C, Petit O (2015) Personality and affinities play a key role in the organisation of collective movements in a group of domestic horses. Ethology 121:888–902.  https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bumann D, Krause J, Rubenstein D (1997) Mortality risk of spatial positions in animal groups: the danger of being in the front. Behaviour 134:1063–1076.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156853997X00403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (eds) (2004) Model selection and multimodel inference. Springer New York, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  13. Butler Z, Corke P, Peterson R, Rus D (2006) From robots to animals: virtual fences for controlling cattle. Int J Robot Res 25:485–508.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364906065375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caboń-Raczyńska K, Krasińska M, Krasiński ZA, Wójcik JM (1987) Bisoniana XCVII. Rhythm of daily activity and behavior of European bison in the Białowieża Forest in the period without snow cover. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 32:335–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conradt L, Roper TJ (2005) Consensus decision making in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 20:449–456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Craney TA, Surles JG (2002) Model-dependent variance inflation factor cutoff values. Qual Eng 14:391–403.  https://doi.org/10.1081/QEN-120001878 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Decker SE, Bath AJ, Simms A, Lindner U, Reisinger E (2010) The return of the king or bringing snails to the garden? The human dimensions of a proposed restoration of European bison (Bison bonasus) in Germany. Restor Ecol 18:41–51.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00467.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Della-Rossa L, Chadœuf J, Boissy A, Dumont B (2013) Leaders of spontaneous group movements influence whole-group social organization: an experimental study on grazing heifers. Behaviour 150:153–173.  https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Distefano E (2005) Human-wildlife conflict worldwide: collection of case studies, analysis of management strategies and good practices. SARD Initiat Rep FAO Rome 18:41–51.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00467.x Google Scholar
  20. Rewilding Europe (2015) Rewilding Europe—making Europe a wilder place. https://www.rewildingeurope.com/. Accessed 3 Jan 2017
  21. Farine DR, Whitehead H (2015) Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis. J Anim Ecol 84:1144–1163.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12418 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Feist JD, McCullough DR (1976) Behavior patterns and communication in feral horses. Z Für Tierpsychol 41:337–371.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1976.tb00947.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fischhoff IR, Sundaresan SR, Cordingley J, Larkin HM, Sellier MJ, Rubenstein DI (2007) Social relationships and reproductive state influence leadership roles in movements of plains zebra, Equus burchellii. Anim Behav 73:825–831.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fry JC (1993) Biological data analysis: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Gammell MP, de VH, Jennings DJ et al (2003) David’s score: a more appropriate dominance ranking method than Clutton-Brock et al.’s index. Anim Behav 66:601–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Green WCH (1992) The development of independence in bison: pre-weaning spatial relations between mothers and calves. Anim Behav 43:759–773.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80199-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Green WCH, Griswold JG, Rothstein A (1989) Post-weaning associations among bison mothers and daughters. Anim Behav 38:847–858.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80116-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haddadi H, King AJ, Wills AP, Fay D, Lowe J, Morton AJ, Hailes S, Wilson AM (2011) Determining association networks in social animals: choosing spatial–temporal criteria and sampling rates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1659–1668.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1193-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harcourt JL, Ang TZ, Sweetman G, Johnstone RA, Manica A (2009) Social feedback and the emergence of leaders and followers. Curr Biol 19:248–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.051 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hofman-Kamińska E, Kowalczyk R (2012) Farm crops depredation by European bison (Bison Bonasus) in the vicinity of forest habitats in northeastern Poland. Environ Manag 50:530–541.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9913-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ihl C, Bowyer RT (2011) Leadership in mixed-sex groups of muskoxen during the snow-free season. J Mammal 92:819–827.  https://doi.org/10.1644/10-MAMM-A-109.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jachowski DS, Slotow R, Millspaugh JJ (2014) Good virtual fences make good neighbors: opportunities for conservation. Anim Conserv 17:187–196.  https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacobs A, Sueur C, Deneubourg JL, Petit O (2011) Social network influences decision making during collective movements in brown lemurs (Eulemur fulvus fulvus). Int J Primatol 32:721–736.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-011-9497-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jędrzejewski W, Jędrzejewska B, Okarma H, Ruprecht AL (1992) Wolf predation and snow cover as mortality factors in the ungulate community of the Białowieża National Park, Poland. Oecologia 90:27–36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317805 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jouven M, Ickowiczi A, Leroy H, Lapeyronie P (2010) Les clôtures virtuelles: un outil pour gérer le pâturage en élevage ovin allaitant? Rencontres Autour Rech Sur Rumin:53–56Google Scholar
  36. Kamler J, Homolka M, Barančeková M, Krojerová-Prokešová J (2010) Reduction of herbivore density as a tool for reduction of herbivore browsing on palatable tree species. Eur J For Res 129:155–162.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-009-0309-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kerley GIH, Kowalczyk R, Cromsigt J (2012) Conservation implications of the refugee species concept and the European bison: king of the forest or refugee in a marginal habitat? Ecography 35:519–529.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07146.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klich D, Perzanowski K (2012) A chance for the restoration of wisents to northern Caucasus. Eur Bison Conserv Newsl 5:57–66Google Scholar
  39. Klingel H (1968) Soziale Organisation und Verhaltensweisen von Hartmann-und Bergzebras (Equus zebra hartmannae und E. z. zebra). Z Für Tierpsychol 25:76–88.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1968.tb00004.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kluever BM, Breck SW, Howery LD, Krausman PR, Bergman DL (2008) Vigilance in cattle: the influence of predation, social interactions, and environmental factors. Rangel Ecol Manag 61:321–328.  https://doi.org/10.2111/07-087.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kondo S, Terashima H, Nishino S (1980) Leader-follower relationship in steer calves and lactating dairy cows. J Coll DairyGoogle Scholar
  42. Krasińska M, Krasiński ZA (2013) European bison: the nature monograph. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  43. Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  44. Krueger K, Flauger B, Farmer K, Hemelrijk C (2014) Movement initiation in groups of feral horses. Behav Process 103:91–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2013.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Krysiak K (1963) News of the European bison in Poland. Oryx 7:94–96.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605300002453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kurvers RHJM, Eijkelenkamp B, van Oers K, van Lith B, van Wieren SE, Ydenberg RC, Prins HHT (2009) Personality differences explain leadership in barnacle geese. Anim Behav 78:447–453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lawton JH (1994) What do species do in ecosystems? Oikos 71:367–374.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3545824 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Le Pendu Y, Briedermann L, Gerard JF, Maublanc ML (1995) Inter-individual associations and social structure of a mouflon population (Ovis orientalis musimon). Behav Process 34:67–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(94)00055-L CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lusseau D, Conradt L (2009) The emergence of unshared consensus decisions in bottlenose dolphins. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1067–1077.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0740-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McComb K, Moss C, Durant SM, Baker L, Sayialel S (2001) Matriarchs as repositories of social knowledge in African elephants. Science 292:491–494.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1057895 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. McComb K, Shannon G, Durant SM et al (2011) Leadership in elephants: the adaptive value of age. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci rspb20110168.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.0168
  52. McDonnell S (2003) Practical field guide to horse behavior: the equid ethogram. LexingtonGoogle Scholar
  53. McHugh T (1958) Social behavior of the American buffalo (Bison bison bison). Zoologica 43:1–40Google Scholar
  54. Merkle JA, Sigaud M, Fortin D (2015) To follow or not? How animals in fusion–fission societies handle conflicting information during group decision-making. Ecol Lett 18:799–806.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12457 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Michelena P, Jeanson R, Deneubourg J-L, Sibbald AM (2010) Personality and collective decision-making in foraging herbivores. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 277:1093–1099.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Navarro LM, Pereira HM (2012) Rewilding abandoned landscapes in Europe. Ecosystems 15:900–912.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-012-9558-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Olech W (2008) Bison bonasus. In: IUCN Red List Threat. Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/2814/0. Accessed 3 Jan 2017
  58. Pays O, Fortin D, Gassani J, Duchesne J (2012) Group dynamics and landscape features constrain the exploration of herds in fusion-fission societies: the case of European roe deer. PLoS One 7:e34678.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034678 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Petit O, Bon R (2010) Decision-making processes: the case of collective movements. Behav Process 84:635–647.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Prins H (1996) Ecology and behaviour of the African buffalo: social inequality and decision making. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  61. Pucek Z, Belousova I, Krasinska M, et al (2004) Status survey and conservation action plan: European bison. IUCNSSC Bison Spec Group–Gland IUCNGoogle Scholar
  62. Putman R, Apollonio M, Andersen R (2011) Ungulate management in Europe: problems and practices. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  63. Quigley TM, Sanderson HR, Tiedemann AR, McInnis ML (1990) Livestock control with electrical and audio stimulation. Rangelands 12:152–155Google Scholar
  64. Ramos A, Petit O, Longour P, Pasquaretta C, Sueur C (2015) Collective decision making during group movements in European bison, Bison bonasus. Anim Behav 109:149–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ramos A, Petit O, Longour P, Pasquaretta C, Sueur C (2016) Space use and movement patterns in a semi-free-ranging herd of European bison (Bison Bonasus). PLoS One 11:e0147404.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147404 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Ramseyer A, Boissy A, Dumont B, Thierry B (2009a) Decision making in group departures of sheep is a continuous process. Anim Behav 78:71–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.03.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ramseyer A, Boissy A, Thierry B, Dumont B (2009b) Individual and social determinants of spontaneous group movements in cattle and sheep. Anim Int J Anim Biosci 3:1319–1326.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109004790 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ramseyer A, Thierry B, Boissy A, Dumont B (2009c) Decision-making processes in group departures of cattle. Ethology 115:948–957.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01686.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Raveling DG (1969) Preflight and flight behavior of Canada geese. Auk 86:671–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Reinhardt V (1983) Movement orders and leadership in a semi-wild cattle herd. Behaviour 83:251–264.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156853983X00183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ritchie ME, Tilman D, Knops JM (1998) Herbivore effects on plant and nitrogen dynamics in oak savanna. Ecology 79:165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. RStudio Team (2016) RStudio: integrated development environment for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  73. Ruckstuhl KE, Neuhaus P (2000) Sexual segregation in ungulates: a new approach. Behaviour 137:361–377.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156853900502123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rutberg AT (1986) Dominance and its fitness consequences in American bison cows. Behaviour 96:62–91.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156853986X00225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sandom CJ, Hughes J, Macdonald DW (2013) Rewilding the Scottish highlands: do wild boar, Sus Scrofa, use a suitable foraging strategy to be effective ecosystem engineers? Restor Ecol 21:336–343.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2012.00903.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sibbald AM, Erhard HW, McLeod JE, Hooper RJ (2009) Individual personality and the spatial distribution of groups of grazing animals: an example with sheep. Behav Process 82:319–326.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2009.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Smit C, Ruifrok JL, van Klink R, Olff H (2015) Rewilding with large herbivores: the importance of grazing refuges for sapling establishment and wood-pasture formation. Biol Conserv 182:134–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Steventon J (2013) CyberTracker. CyberTracker conservation, Bellville, SAGoogle Scholar
  79. Stewart KJ, Harcourt AH (1994) Gorillas’ vocalizations during rest periods: signals of impending departure? Behaviour 130:29–40.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156853994X00127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sueur C (2011) Group decision-making in chacma baboons: leadership, order and communication during movement. BMC Ecol 11:26.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-11-26 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Sueur C, Deneubourg J-L (2011) Self-organization in primates: understanding the rules underlying collective movements. Int J Primatol 32:1413–1432.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-011-9520-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sueur C, Petit O (2008a) Shared or unshared consensus decision in macaques? Behav Process 78:84–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2008.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sueur C, Petit O (2008b) Organization of group members at departure is driven by social structure in Macaca. Int J Primatol 29:1085–1098.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-008-9262-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sueur C, Petit O, Deneubourg J-L (2009) Selective mimetism at departure in collective movements of Macaca tonkeana: an experimental and theoretical approach. Anim Behav 78:1087–1095.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sueur C, Deneubourg J-L, Petit O (2010) Sequence of quorums during collective decision making in macaques. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:1875–1885.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0999-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sueur C, King AJ, Conradt L, Kerth G, Lusseau D, Mettke-Hofmann C, Schaffner CM, Williams L, Zinner D, Aureli F (2011) Collective decision-making and fission–fusion dynamics: a conceptual framework. Oikos 120:1608–1617.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19685.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sueur C, MacIntosh AJJ, Jacobs AT et al (2012) Predicting leadership using nutrient requirements and dominance rank of group members. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:457–470.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1466-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tulloch DG (1978) The water buffalo, Bubalus bubalis, in Australia: grouping and home range. Aust Wildl Res 5:327–354Google Scholar
  89. Tyler SJ (1972) The behaviour and social organization of the new forest ponies. Anim Behav Monogr 5:87–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(72)90003-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vander Wal E, Gagné-Delorme A, Festa-Bianchet M, Pelletier F (2016) Dyadic associations and individual sociality in bighorn ewes. Behav Ecol 27:560–566.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Villaret J-C, Bon R (1998) Sociality and relationships in alpine ibex (Capra Ibex). Rev Ecol 53:153–170Google Scholar
  92. de Vries H (1993) The rowwise correlation between two proximity matrices and the partial rowwise correlation. Psychometrika 58:53–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. de Vries H (1995) An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships. Anim Behav 50:1375–1389.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)80053-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. de Vries H (2006) Measuring and testing the steepness of dominance hierarchies. Anim Behav 71:585–592.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.05.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  96. Wells SM, von Goldschmidt-Rothschild B (1979) Social behaviour and relationships in a herd of Camargue horses. Z Für Tierpsychol 49:363–380.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb00299.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Whitehead H (2009) SOCPROG programs: analysing animal social structures. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:765–778.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0697-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wittemyer G, Douglas-Hamilton I, Getz WM (2005) The socioecology of elephants: analysis of the processes creating multitiered social structures. Anim Behav 69:1357–1371.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.08.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zou KH, Tuncali K, Silverman SG (2003) Correlation and simple linear regression. Radiology 227:617–628.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2273011499 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNRS, IPHC UMR 717Université de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance
  2. 2.PWN Waterleidingbedrijf Noord-HollandVelserbroekThe Netherlands
  3. 3.ARK NatureNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options