Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Network Influences Decision Making During Collective Movements in Brown Lemurs (Eulemur fulvus fulvus)

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many animal species live as a group and must therefore move as such. Several authors have suggested that the mechanisms underlying collective movements in primate species appear to rely on complex cognitive skills, given their high level of cognitive abilities. However, recent studies have highlighted the fact that complex patterns do not necessarily imply complex mechanisms. We used a modeling approach to investigate the patterns of collective movement in a semi-free-ranging group of brown lemurs. We recorded via digital video cameras the order and joining latencies of the 11 individuals of the group during the departure time of spontaneous group movements. We then assessed whether mimetic mechanisms or the existence of a leader were underlying conditions for the joining process by testing 5 computer models relying respectively on 5 hypotheses: the independence of individuals, an anonymous mimetism, a mimetism according to kinship, a mimetism according to affiliation, and eventually the existence of a leader. We found that departure latencies, associations, and the order of individuals at departure time could all be explained by the mimetism according to affiliation model. Thus, an individual’s decision to join the collective movement or not depended on the decision taken by its preferred social partners. These results show the importance of social parameters in primate decision making and that the high cohesion displayed by the group members might not be constrained merely by ecological factors such as predation or foraging consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour, 49(3/4), 227–267.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amé, J., Halloy, J., Rivault, C., Detrain, C., & Deneubourg, J. L. (2006). Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 103(15), 5835–5840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biro, D., Sumpter, D. J. T., Meade, J., & Guilford, T. (2006). From compromise to leadership in pigeon homing. Current Biology, 16(21), 2123–2128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S., & Garber, P. A. (2000). On the move. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S., Treves, A., & Chapman, C. A. (2000). A critical evaluation of the influence of predators on primates: Effects on group travel. In S. Boinski & P. A. Garber (Eds.), On the move (pp. 43–72). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M., & Freeman, L. (2002). UCINET 6 for Windows. Harvard, Cambridge, MA: Analytic Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. J., Ando, Y., & Lehmann, H. (2007). Agent-based modelling as scientific method: a case study analysing primate social behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1485), 1685–1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhl, J., Sumpter, D. J. T., Couzin, I. D., Hale, J. J., Despland, E., Miller, E. R., et al. (2006). From disorder to order in marching locusts. Science, 312(5778), 1402–1406.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R. W., & Whiten, A. (1988). Machiavellian intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camazine, S., Deneubourg, J. L., Franks, N. R., Sneyd, J., Theraulaz, G., & Bonabeau, E. (2001). Self-organization in biological systems. Woodstock, UK: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B., & Berman, C. M. (2004). Kinship and behavior in primates. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B., & St-Pierre, C. E. G. (1997). Kinship bonds are not necessary for maintaining matrilineal rank in captive Japanese macaques. International Journal of Primatology, 18(3), 375–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. A. & Chapman, L. J. (2000). Determinants of group size in primates: the importance of travel costs. In S. Boinski & P. A. Garber, (eds). On the move. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Conradt, L., & Roper, T. J. (2005). Consensus decision making in animals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(8), 449–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couzin, I. D., & Krause, J. (2003). Self-organization and collective behavior in vertebrates. In J. B. Slater, C. T. Rosenblatt, C. T. Snowdon, & T. J. Roper (Eds). Advances in the Study of Behavior, 1–75.

  • Deneubourg, J. L., & Goss, S. (1989). Collective patterns and decision-making. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 1(4), 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detrain, C., & Deneubourg, J. L. (2006). Self-organized structures in a superorganism: do ants “behave” like molecules? Physics of Life Reviews, 3(3), 162–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detrain, C., Deneubourg, J. L., & Pasteels, J. M. (1999). Information processing in social insects. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Waal, F. B. M., & Luttrell, L. M. (1989). Toward a comparative socioecology of the genus Macaca: different dominance styles in rhesus and stumptail monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 19(2), 83–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dussutour, A., Nicolis, S. C., Despland, E., & Simpson, S. J. (2008). Individual differences influence collective behaviour in social caterpillars. Animal Behaviour, 76(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erhart, E., & Overdorff, D. J. (1999). Female coordination of group travel in wild Propithecus and Eulemur. International Journal of Primatology, 20(6), 927–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautrais, J., Michelena, P., Sibbald, A., Bon, R., & Deneubourg, J. L. (2007). Allelomimetic synchronization in Merino sheep. Animal Behaviour, 74(5), 1443–1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouzoules, S., & Gouzoules, H. (1987). Kinship. In B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, & T. T. Struhsaker (Eds.), Primate societies (pp. 229–305). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). Genetical evolution of social behavior I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 1–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemelrijk, C. K. (1990). Models of, and tests for, reciprocity, unidirectionality and other social interaction patterns at a group level. Animal Behaviour, 39(6), 1013–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemelrijk, C. K. (2002). Understanding social behaviour with the help of complexity science. Ethology, 108(8), 655–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A. (2010). Group cohesiveness during collective movements: travelling apart together. Behavioural Processes, 84(3), 678–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A., Maumy, M., & Petit, O. (2008). The influence of social organisation on leadership in brown lemurs (Eulemur fulvus fulvus) in a controlled environment. Behavioural Processes, 79(2), 111–113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson, R., Rivault, C., Deneubourg, J. L., Blanco, S., Fournier, R., Jost, C., et al. (2005). Self-organized aggregation in cockroaches. Animal Behaviour, 69(1), 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, A. (1995). The evolution of primate behavior. In M. Slatkin (Ed.), Exploring evolutionary biology: Readings from American Scientist (pp. 288–297). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovani, R., & Grimm, V. (2008). Breeding synchrony in colonial birds: from local stress to global harmony. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 275(1642), 1557–1564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, P. M. (1993). Variation in social structure: the effects of sex and kinship on social interactions in three lemur species. Ethology, 93(2), 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, P. M. (2000). Grouping and movement patterns in Malagasy primates. In S. Boinski & P. A. Garber (Eds.), On the move (pp. 470–490). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. J., Douglas, C. M. S., Huchard, E., Isaac, N. J. B., & Cowlishaw, G. (2008). Dominance and affiliation mediate despotism in a social primate. Current Biology, 18(23), 1833–1838.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, J., & Ruxton, G. D. (2002). Living in groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamprecht, J. (1992). Variable leadership in bar-headed geese (Anser indicus): an analysis of pair and family departures. Behaviour, 122(1/2), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leca, J.-B., Gunst, N., Thierry, B., & Petit, O. (2003). Distributed leadership in semifree-ranging white-faced capuchin monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 66(6), 1045–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mateo, J. M. (2003). Kin recognition in ground squirrels and other rodents. Journal of Mammalogy, 84(4), 1163–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meunier, H., Leca, J.-B., Deneubourg, J. L., & Petit, O. (2006). Group movement decisions in capuchin monkeys: the utility of an experimental study and a mathematical model to explore the relationship between individual and collective behaviours. Behaviour, 143(12), 1511–1527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overdorff, D. J. (1993). Similarities, differences, and seasonal patterns in the diets of Eulemur rubriventer and Eulemur fulvus rufus in the Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology, 14(5), 721–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overdorff, D. J. (1998). Are Eulemur species pair-bonded? Social organization and mating strategies in Eulemur fulvus rufus from 1988–1995 in southeast Madagascar. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 105(2), 153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Overdorff, D. J., Erhart, E. M., & Mutschler, T. (2005). Does female dominance facilitate feeding priority in black-and-white ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata) in southeastern Madagascar? American Journal of Primatology, 66(1), 7–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. O., Jacobs, A. K., Drummer, T. D., Mech, L. D., & Smith, D. W. (2002). Leadership behavior in relation to dominance and reproductive status in gray wolves, Canis lupus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80(8), 1405–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit, O., & Bon, R. (2010). Decision-making processes: the case of collective movements. Special section. Behavioural Processes, 84, 635–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petit, O., Gautrais, J., Leca, J.-B., Theraulaz, G., & Deneubourg, J. L. (2009). Collective decision-making in white-faced capuchin monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 276(1672), 3495–3503.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A. N. (2004). Vocal coordination of group movement by green woodhoopoes (Phoeniculus purpureus). Ethology, 110(1), 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramseyer, A., Boissy, A., Thierry, B., & Dumont, B. (2009). Individual and social determinants of spontaneous group movements in cattle and sheep. Animal, 3(9), 1319–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. W. (1987). Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. In Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM, pp. 25–34.

  • Rhine, R. J., & Westlund, B. J. (1981). Adult male positioning in baboon progressions—order and chaos revisited. Folia Primatologica, 35(2–3), 77–116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stueckle, S., & Zinner, D. (2008). To follow or not to follow: decision making and leadership during the morning departure in chacma baboons. Animal Behaviour, 75(6), 1995–2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueur, C., & Petit, O. (2008a). Shared or unshared consensus decision in macaques? Behavioural Processes, 78(1), 84–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sueur, C., & Petit, O. (2008b). Organization of group members at departure is driven by social structure in Macaca. International Journal of Primatology, 29(4), 1085–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueur, C., Petit, O., & Deneubourg, J. L. (2009). Selective mimetism at departure in collective movements of Macaca tonkeana: an experimental and theoretical approach. Animal Behaviour, 78(5), 1087–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueur, C., Petit, O., & Deneubourg, J. L. (2010). Short-term group fission processes in macaques: a social networking approach. Journal of Experimental Biology, 213(8), 1338–1346.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sumpter, D. J. T. (2006). The principles of collective animal behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 361(1465), 5–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, R. W. (1974). Ecological distinctions in sympatric species of Lemur. In R. D. Martin, G. A. Doyle, & A. C. Walker (Eds.), Prosimian biology (pp. 75–108). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierry, B. (2007). The macaques: A double-layered social organization. In C. J. Campbell, A. Fuentes, K. C. MacKinnon, M. Panger, & S. K. Bearder (Eds.), Primates in perspective (pp. 224–239). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., & Call, J. (1997). Primate cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tóth, Z., Bókony, V., Lendvai, Á. Z., Szabó, K., Pénzes, Z., & Liker, A. (2009). Whom do the sparrows follow? The effect of kinship on social preference in house sparrow flocks. Behavioural Processes, 82(2), 173–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, S. J. (1972). The behaviour and social organisation of the New Forest ponies. Animal Behaviour Monographs, 5, 87–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, K., & Brotoisworo, E. (1982). Field observation of Sulawesi macaques. Kyoto University Overseas Research Reports of Studies of Asian Non-Human Primates, 2, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. P. (2000). Mountain gorilla habitat use strategies and group movements. In S. Boinski & P. A. Garber (Eds.), On the move (pp. 351–374). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wey, T., Blumstein, D. T., Shen, W., & Jordan, F. (2008). Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Animal Behaviour, 75(2), 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, H. (1997). Analysing animal social structure. Animal Behaviour, 53(5), 1053–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, H. (2009). SOCPROG programs: analysing animal social structures. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63(5), 765–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo: center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Pierre Ulrich, Marion Gaurivaud, and Laetitia Marechal for their help during this study, as well as the trainees: Mathieu Laparie, Antoine Wystrach, and Capucine Gallet. We also thank 2 anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Armand Jacobs was funded by a grant from French Ministry for Higher Education and Research. Cédric Sueur was funded by the Wallonia Brussels International, the Franco-American Commission, and the Fyssen Foundation. Jean Louis Deneubourg is a research associate from the Belgian National Funds for Scientific Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université de Strasbourg, IPHC, Strasbourg, 67087, France

    Armand Jacobs, Cédric Sueur & Odile Petit

  2. CNRS, UMR7178, Strasbourg, 67037, France

    Armand Jacobs, Cédric Sueur & Odile Petit

  3. Service d’Ecologie Sociale, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

    Cédric Sueur, Jean Louis Deneubourg & Odile Petit

  4. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

    Cédric Sueur

Authors
  1. Armand Jacobs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cédric Sueur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jean Louis Deneubourg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Odile Petit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Odile Petit.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Esm 1

Social Network Influences Decision Making During Collective Movements in Brown Lemurs (Eulemur fulvus fulvus) (DOC 646 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobs, A., Sueur, C., Deneubourg, J.L. et al. Social Network Influences Decision Making During Collective Movements in Brown Lemurs (Eulemur fulvus fulvus). Int J Primatol 32, 721–736 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-011-9497-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-011-9497-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation