Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Foliar Spray or Root Application: Which Method of Salicylic Acid Treatment is More Efficient in Alleviating the Adverse Effects of Salt Stress on the Growth of Alfalfa Plants, Medicago sativa L.?

  • Original Article / Originalbeitrag
  • Published:
Gesunde Pflanzen Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the effects of 0.5 mM Salicylic Acid (SA) applied through the rooting medium or foliar spray (denoted SA/R and SA/F, respectively) were evaluated on the growth characteristics, nutritional behavior and some key biochemical parameters (total chlorophyll, soluble proteins, total carbohydrates, proline and lipid peroxidation) of Medicago sativa cv. Gabes plants grown in the presence of 100 mM NaCl. The exposure of alfalfa plants to salt stress conditions resulted in a reduced growth rates, associated with significant decreases in water, total chlorophyll, soluble proteins, total carbohydrates and potassium contents. However, sodium and malondialdehyde concentrations were markedly increased in salt-stressed compared to control plants. Both methods of SA application improved plant growth and increased all parameters that were reduced by NaCl treatment. Nevertheless, the mitigating effects exerted by the exogenous SA were more prominent with the SA/F method. As compared to those of salt-stressed plants, shoot and root biomass production and water contents were significantly increased with the SA/F than the SA/R method. Contrarily to the SA/R method, application of SA/F to salt-stressed alfalfa plants restored their total leaf chlorophyll content to the level of control plants. In addition, SA/F application was accompanied by a noteworthy increase in leaf and root potassium contents as compared to the SA/R method; whereas sodium contents were significantly lower in the both plant organs. As compared to salt-stressed plants, total leaf carbohydrates and proline contents were increased by 26 and 120% as well as 54 and 300% due to application of SA/R and SA/F, respectively. Similarly, total root carbohydrates and proline contents were increased by 29 and 140% as well as 93 and 350% with the SA/R and SA/F method, respectively, reflecting a higher osmotic adjustment with this latter method of SA application. Leaf MDA content was not affected by the SA/R treatment and was decreased by 33% relative to salt-stressed plants by the SA/F treatment. Likewise, root MDA content was reduced by 27 and 42% with the SA/R and SA/F method, respectively, indicating a noticeable mitigation of the salt stress-induced cell membrane damage with the SA/F method. Taken together, the findings of the present work indicate that the method of SA application is a significant factor regarding the SA ameliorating effects on salinity stress, with the SA/F being much more efficient in improving the growth of alfalfa plants in saline areas than the SA/R method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author Contribution

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by F. Horchani, L. Mabrouk, M. A. Borgi and Z. Abbes. The first draft of the manuscript was written by F. Horchani and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faouzi Horchani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

F. Horchani, L. Mabrouk, M. A. Borgi and Z. Abbes declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature oder sein Lizenzgeber (z.B. eine Gesellschaft oder ein*e andere*r Vertragspartner*in) hält die ausschließlichen Nutzungsrechte an diesem Artikel kraft eines Verlagsvertrags mit dem/den Autor*in(nen) oder anderen Rechteinhaber*in(nen); die Selbstarchivierung der akzeptierten Manuskriptversion dieses Artikels durch Autor*in(nen) unterliegt ausschließlich den Bedingungen dieses Verlagsvertrags und dem geltenden Recht.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horchani, F., Mabrouk, L., Borgi, M.A. et al. Foliar Spray or Root Application: Which Method of Salicylic Acid Treatment is More Efficient in Alleviating the Adverse Effects of Salt Stress on the Growth of Alfalfa Plants, Medicago sativa L.?. Gesunde Pflanzen 75, 2697–2712 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-023-00867-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-023-00867-8

Keywords

Navigation