Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management tools for optimal allocation of wood fibre to conventional log and bio-energy markets in Ireland: a case study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A set of tools are described for optimal allocation of wood fibre at an operational planning level. These were applied to a case study in Ireland. Allocation was based on optimising net value recovery (delivered price minus harvesting and transportation costs) while meeting market demands and operational constraints (mainly crew capability and productivity limits). Two new models were developed to predict harvesting costs and transportation costs for Irish forest conditions. A new model was developed to link Sitka spruce biomass expansion factors to optimal log-making algorithms so that log and bio-energy product yields could be estimated for individual harvest areas. An existing operational allocation model based on a tabu search heuristic procedure was used. The case study included 16 forest harvest areas and 12 processing plants (saw logs, pallet logs, stakes, pulp, bio-energy slash bundles, etc.). New terrestrial lidar scanning procedures were used to obtain representative stem profiles from over 4,000 trees for the 16 forests. We demonstrated that optimal allocation of bio-energy and log products, while complex, can be achieved through the use of appropriate management tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berwick M, Farooq M (2003) Truck costing model for transportation managers. Mountain Plains Consortium, North Dakota State University, Fargo. MPC Report 03-152, p 61

  • Cossens GP (1996) Optimisation of log allocation. Master of Applied Science Thesis, Lincoln University, New Zealand, pp 124

  • Devlin GJ, McDonnell K, Ward S (2008) Development of a spatial decision support system (SDSS) for route costing calculations within the Irish timber haulage sector. Trans ASABE 51(2):763–773

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOWOOD (2002) Factors affecting the productivity of CTL wood harvesting under Irish conditions. ECOWOOD Project. (Draft Report), pp 28

  • Epstein R, Nieto E, Weintraub A, Gabarro J, Chevalier P (1999) A system for the design of a short term harvesting strategy. Eur J Oper Res 119:427–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrow G, McKewen BJ (1980) The determination of the profit sacrificed in felling, extraction and log allocation processes. Report of an investigation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Bachelor of Management Studies of the University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, pp 91 (Unpublished)

  • Fight R, Zhang X, Hartsough BR (2003) Users Guide for STHARVEST: Software to Estimate the Cost of Harvesting Small Timber. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, PNW-GTR-582, pp 18

  • Firth JG, Brownlie RK, Carson WW (2000) Accurate stem measurements key to new image-based system. N Z J For 45:25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher G, Hendrick E, Byrne KA (2004) Preliminary estimates of biomass carbon stocks in managed forests in the Republic of Ireland over the period 1990–2000. Irish For 61:35–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon AD, Lawrence ME, Pont D (1995) Assessing the potential log yield of stands prior to harvesting. In: Proceedings of the Institute of Foresters of Australia 16th biennial conference. “Applications of New Technologies in Forestry”, 18–21 April, Ballarat, Victoria

  • Gordon AD, Wakelin SJ, Threadgill JA (2006) Using measured and modelled wood quality information to optimise harvest scheduling and log allocation decisions. N Z J For Sci 36(2/3):198–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Green C, Tobin B, O’Shea M, Farell EP, Byrne KA (2007) Above and below-ground biomass measurements in an unthinned stand of Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.). Eur J For Res 126:179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivinen V-P (2004) A genetic algorithm approach to tree bucking optimization. For Sci 50(5):696–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofman PD, Kent T (2007) Harvesting and processing forest biomass for energy production in Ireland. The Forest Energy 2006 programme. COFORD, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Laroze A (1999) A linear programming, tabu search method for solving forest-level bucking optimisation problems. For Sci 45(1):108–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy PE, Hale SE, Nicoll BC (2004) Biomass expansion factors and root: shoot ratios for coniferous tree species in Great Britain. Forestry 77(5):421–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone L (1998) Value maximisation of forest stands through optimal inventory and cross-cutting methodologies. Dissertation. University College Dublin, Ireland

  • Marshall HD, Murphy GE, Boston K (2006) Three mathematical models for bucking-to-order. Silva Fennica 40(1):127–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell SA (2004) Operational forest harvest scheduling optimisation—a mathematical model and solution strategy. PhD thesis, University of Auckland, New Zealand, pp 278

  • Murphy GE (1998) Allocation of stands and cutting patterns to logging crews using a tabu search heuristic. Int J For Eng 9(1):31–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy GE (2008) Determining stand value and log product yields using terrestrial lidar and optimal bucking: a case study. J For 106(6):317–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy GE, Wimer J (2007) Controlling truck productivity and costs. In: Proceedings of the international mountain logging and 13th Pacific Northwest Skyline Symposium, Corvallis, Oregon, April 2007, 43–48

  • Murphy GE, Wilson I, Barr B (2006) Developing methods for pre-harvest inventories which use the harvester as the sampling tool. Aust J For 69(1):9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasberg M (1985) Mathematical programming models for optimal log bucking. Linkoping University, Dissertation No. 132, pp 200

  • Pnevmaticos SM, Mann SH (1972) Dynamic programming in tree bucking. For Products J 22(2):26–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Sessions J, Layton R, Guangda L (1988) Improving tree bucking decisions: a network approach. Compiler 6(1):5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarleton M, Phillips H (2004) Considerable savings possible by planning harvesting systems. COFORD Connects Harvesting/Transportation 2, pp 8

  • Tobin B, Nieuwenhuis M (2007) Biomass expansion factors for Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) in Ireland. Eur J For Res 126:189–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson G, Nieuwenhuis M (1993) Integrated timber allocation and transportation planning in Ireland. Int J For Eng 5(1):7–15

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was undertaken while the first author was a Charles Parsons Visiting Professor at University College Dublin. We acknowledge the assistance of Treemetrics Ltd., which provided a large database of laser scan tree stem profiles, and Coillte Teoranta, which provided access to internal technical reports on conventional and energywood harvesting production studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glen Murphy.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Seifert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, G., Lyons, J., O’Shea, M. et al. Management tools for optimal allocation of wood fibre to conventional log and bio-energy markets in Ireland: a case study. Eur J Forest Res 129, 1057–1067 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0390-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0390-3

Keywords

Navigation