Abstract
In order to explore the influence of stored cereal volatiles on the behavior of Sitophilus oryzae, the olfactory responses of adult rice weevils to the volatiles of different rice cultivars [Red brown rice (RBR), Daohuaxiangmi (DHXM), Baishuigongmi (BSGM), Yashuixinmi (YSXM), and white glutinous rice (WGR)] were studied using electroantennography (EAG) and behavioural bioassays in different types of olfactometers. S. oryzae showed significantly different preferences for these rice cultivars, in the order RBR > DHXM = YSXM ≥ BSGM > WGR. Furthermore, 26 components were identified in the volatile profile of RBR. Nonanal (29.37%), hexanal (16.08%), and 1-octen-3-ol (8.83%) were the most abundant compounds. EAG recordings showed that the antennae of S. oryzae were able to perceive these three compounds in a dose-dependent manner. The compounds elicited significant EAG responses at various concentrations, with the strongest responses at 100 μg μL−1. S. oryzae had a significant positive behavioural response to nonanal, hexanal, and 1-octen-3-ol at various concentrations, with the most attractive being 50, 100, and 100 µg µL−1, respectively. The olfactory preferences of S. oryzae, based on a comparison of these compounds at their optimal concentrations, were nonanal > 1-octen-3-ol = hexanal. These results indicated that the volatiles of the preferred rice cultivar (RBR) were perceived by the peripheral olfactory system of S. oryzae adults and individually elicited positive chemotaxis. These findings offer new insights into the mechanism of host preferences of stored-grain pests. Nonanal showed the greatest potential for use as a novel monitoring and control tool against this storage-beetle pest.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Key message
-
Sitophilus oryzae damages stored cereals and is attracted to rice grain volatiles.
-
Nonanal, 1-octen-3-ol, and hexanal are the main volatiles of red brown rice.
-
These three compounds differed in terms of the optimal concentrations that were attractive to S. oryzae.
-
In bioassays, S. oryzae preferred nonanal to 1-octen-3-ol and hexanal
-
Nonanal has the greatest potential as a lure to monitor and/or control S. oryzae.
Introduction
Grain storage losses can account for up to 50% of the total harvest, resulting in the loss of several billion dollars globally (Tian et al. 2023). Damage and loss of stored products by insect pests is one of the most common challenges in grain storage. Postharvest losses of approximately 9% in developed countries and up to 50% in developing countries have been reported, with considerable economic losses. Serious qualitative degradation that may endanger human health is also of concern (Berhe et al. 2022).
The rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is among the most widespread and destructive primary pests of stored cereals such as rice, wheat, maize, barley, sorghum, buckwheat, pulses, dried beans, cashew nuts, and products derived from them (Nwaubani et al. 2014; Mehta and Kumar 2020). Control of this pest is difficult because the immature stages develop inside grain kernels, which hinders the accurate detection of infestations and the effectiveness of control measures, resulting in widespread damage to stored cereals (Trematerra et al. 1999; Nwaubani et al. 2014; Mehta et al. 2021).
Sitophilus oryzae shows host preferences for different stored products in terms of its feeding, development, oviposition, and degree of damage (Trematerra et al. 2013; Gvozdenac et al. 2020; Jalaeian et al. 2021; Mehta and Kumar 2021). In addition, the behavior and performance of insects differ depending on the host’s physicochemical characteristics, such as the occurrence of toxins, inhibitors, volatiles, macronutrients, and micronutrients, as well as kernel hardness and texture. Infestations of S. oryzae have been observed in different types of stored commodities, in terms of both damage and the progeny production capacity (Swamynarayana et al. 2014; Mehta et al. 2021; Mehta and Kumar 2021; Jalaeian et al. 2021). In places where storage facilities are inadequate, the resistance/susceptibility of the stored grain to S. oryzae might be influenced by one or a few factors, which together determine the “varietal resistance” (Badii et al. 2013; Mehta and Kumar 2020).
In the past two decades, managing the loss of stored food products to insect damage has relied heavily on the use of synthetic insecticides (Nayak et al. 2020; Brito et al. 2021). This strong reliance on a particular range of chemicals has led to complications such as toxic residues, resistance, pollution, and control failures (Isman 2006; Nayak et al. 2020). These challenges and the growing awareness of environmental issues have prompted researchers to explore suitable alternatives to chemical pesticides. One such alternative is the use of plant products because they are biodegradable, environmentally friendly, and safe for human health (Phillips and Throne 2010; Pavela and Benelli 2016; Hubert et al. 2018). The use of certain plant products as grain protectants has shown a good degree of success against S. oryzae (Bala 2015; Bhanderi et al. 2015; Mehta and Kumar 2020; Kundu et al. 2020).
Behavioral manipulation is an important and eco-friendly insect control method to manage pest populations. Previous studies have revealed that rice is the preferred host of S. oryzae in terms of oviposition, grain damage, and F1 progeny under free-choice conditions, followed by wheat, barley, and maize (Subedi et al. 2009 and references therein). In this study, the behavioral and electrophysiological responses of S. oryzae to the volatiles of different rice cultivars were investigated. We tested the following hypotheses: (1) S. oryzae is attracted to odors from rice cultivars; (2) S. oryzae shows a preference for certain rice cultivars; and (3) S. oryzae can perceive and behaviorally respond to individual volatile compounds. The results will provide new insights into the mechanism of host selection in S. oryzae, based on the chemical ecology of interactions between stored products and pests. Furthermore, our results will narrow the gap between theoretical research and the practical application of behavior regulation for pest control. In particular, the study will provide useful information for the development of new attractants for the sustainable control of S. oryzae in stored products, through natural resource-based substances.
Methods and materials
Insect rearing
Sitophilus oryzae have been reared in Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Rare Animal and Economic Insect of the Mountainous Region, Guiyang University, China, since 2019. S. oryzae are maintained on wheat kernels in 5 L glass jars at 28 ± 1 °C, 60 ± 5% relative humidity, and an 8:16 h light/dark photoperiod, as reported by Li et al. (2009) and Wang et al. (2022b). Secondary infestation by moisture-sensitive mites was prevented using the method of Steiner et al. (2007).
Behavioral responses of S. oryzae to rice-borne volatiles
Odor sources
Red brown rice (Guihong No.1), Daohuaxiangmi (Wuyoudao No.4), Baishuigongmi (Zhaoyou 5455), Yashuixinmi (Qianyou 64), and white glutinous rice (Tongnian No.1) (abbreviated as RBR, DHXM, BSGM, YSXM, and WGR, respectively) were purchased from the Guiyang Grain Commodity Market, Guiyang, Guizhou, China. No insecticides had been applied to these rice cultivar materials. Peeled rice grains were used for the behavioral responses and GC–MS bioassays.
Y-tube bioassays
Two types of two-way comparisons were made: 1) rice (25 g) versus clean air (CA); 2) pairings of all combinations of the five rice varieties (25 g each). The olfactory responses of S. oryzae were evaluated in a Y-tube olfactometer using the method described in our previous studies (Cao et al. 2018, 2019). Unmated S. oryzae adults (2–3 days old) were used in the Y-tube bioassays. The air flow was set to 250 mL min−1 arm−1. Each insect was observed for 5 min and if the insect had not made a choice within 5 min, it was discarded and reported as ‘no choice’. In total, 50–60 adults were used in each odor test. The olfactometer was cleaned after each tested insect (Carpita et al. 2012). All experiments were conducted between 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM. Choices made by male and female S. oryzae were tested separately. If there were no significant differences in the variance between males and females, the data were pooled and the choices were considered independent of sex (Collins et al. 2004, Cao et al. 2018).
Six-arm olfactometer bioassays
The behavioral responses of adult S. oryzae to the blends of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by different rice cultivars were evaluated in a six-arm olfactometer using the methods of Liu et al. (2016) and Cao et al. (2019). In brief, the six-arm olfactometer consisted of a central chamber (12 cm internal diameter) with six arms, each connected to a glass tube that projected outwards at an equal distance; angles between pairs of tubes were all 60°. Each arm was connected with Teflon tubing to a glass vessel, which was used to contain the control or rice materials of each of the five cultivars. The airflow was set at 250 L min−1 to drive the odor from the source toward the insects. Sitophilus oryzae adults (2–3 days old), starved for 6 h, were introduced in groups (150 individuals per group) into the six-arm olfactometer with a brush. The S. oryzae that entered an arm of the olfactometer within 20 min were considered to have chosen that odor source.
Collection and analysis of volatiles
Rice VOCs were collected as described previously (Cao et al. 2018, 2019). The collected VOCs were analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) (HP6890/5975C, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). An apolar chromatographic column (ZB-5MSI 5% phenyl-95% dimethylpolysiloxane 30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm) was used. Temperature was programmed to rise from 40 to 255 °C at 5 °C min−1, and was then maintained for 2 min. The temperatures of the vaporizing chamber, interface, and quadrupole rod were set at 250, 280, and 150 °C, respectively. The chemical identities of the main peaks in the chromatograms were determined by comparing the mass spectra of compounds with those in databases (NIST 2017 and WILEY 275). An additional criterion for peak assignment was consistency between the temperature-programmed retention indices (RIs) obtained and those recorded in the NIST database (2017).
Behavioral responses of S. oryzae to rice VOCs
Odor treatment
The VOC mixture from RBR was the most attractive to S. oryzae, as assessed by the Y-tube and six-arm olfactometer bioassays. The behavioral responses of S. oryzae to nonanal, 1-octen-3-ol, and hexanal, the most abundant VOCs of RBR, were then assessed in subsequent experiments.
Electroantennography
The antennal sensitivity of male and female S. oryzae to increasing concentrations of hexanal, 1-octen-3-ol, and nonanal was evaluated by electroantennography (EAG), as described elsewhere (Germinara et al. 2007; Paventi et al. 2021). Briefly, the head of an adult insect was excised using a scalpel and placed between two glass capillary electrodes (Micro-glass, Naples, Italy) filled with saline solution. The recording electrode (diameter ~ 100 μm) was put in contact with the abaxial surface of the antennal club, and the neutral electrode was introduced into the base of the head. AgCl coated silver wires were used to maintain electrical continuity between the antennal preparation and an AC/DC UN-6 amplifier in DC mode. The amplifier was connected to a computer equipped with the EAG 2.0 program (Syntech Laboratories, Hilversum, The Netherlands). The EAG response of S. oryzae to each test compound at different doses (0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100, and 1000 µg) was measured using the method detailed in Cao et al. (2022).
Y-tube bioassays
The Y-tube olfactometer described above was also used to test the olfactory responses of S. oryzae to hexanal, 1-octen-3-ol, and nonanal. Mineral oil was used as the control. The test compound (10 µL of a compound solution at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 100 μg μL−1) or control (10 μL mineral oil) stimulus was adsorbed onto a filter paper disk (1.0 cm diameter) (Cao et al. 2019), which was suspended in the center of the cross section of the odor chamber by a cotton thread. Sitophilus oryzae individuals were allowed to choose between the test compound at a specific dose (1, 10, 100, 500, or 1000 μg) and mineral oil. Bioassays were conducted using the method detailed above using 2- to 3-day-old unmated S. oryzae adults. In total, 50–60 adults were tested for each test stimulus.
Six-arm bioassays
The behavioral responses of adult S. oryzae to different doses of each of the three compounds (hexanal, 1-octen-3-ol, and nonanal) were also evaluated in a six-arm olfactometer as described above. Each test compound (10 µL of compound solution at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 100 μg μL−1) or control (10 μL of mineral oil) was placed in an odor chamber that was connected to one of the six olfactometer arms with Teflon tubing (Cao et al. 2019). The odor from each source was driven through the connector tube to the olfactometer compartment to allow adult S. oryzae to choose among the odors. Hexanal, 1-octen-3-ol, and nonanal at different doses were tested. Bioassays were replicated six times using 150 individuals per replication.
Four-arm bioassays
In the six-arm olfactometer bioassays, hexanal, 1-octen-3-ol, and nonanal were most attractive to S. oryzae at concentrations of 100, 100, and 50 μg μL−1, respectively. Therefore, the attractant power of the three compounds at their optimal concentrations was compared in further four-arm olfactometer bioassays, using the method reported by Liu et al. (2016). The details for the four-arm olfactometer have been described elsewhere (Cao et al. 2022). Hexanal, 1-octen-3-ol, and nonanal at the concentrations mentioned above were used as test stimuli, and mineral oil was used as the control. These four types of odor sources were placed in the odor chambers of the olfactometer system, and the airflow was set at 250 mL min−1 to drive the odor toward the insects. S. oryzae adults were tested in groups of 120 individuals, and bioassays were replicated six times.
Statistical analyses
The null hypothesis that S. oryzae adults showed no preference for either Y-tube arm (a response equal to 50:50) was tested using a chi-square goodness-of-fit test. The numbers of insects found in the different arms of the six-arm and four-arm olfactometer were subjected to Friedman two-way ANOVA by ranks. In the case of significance (p < 0.05), Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used for the separation of means. The corrected mean EAG response of males and females to the last dilution of each test compound was compared with the “0” value using one-sample Student’s t-test and regarded as “activated” if significant at p < 0.05. The saturation level was taken as the lowest dilution at which the mean response was equal to or less than the previous one (Germinara et al. 2016). The mean EAG responses of males and females to each stimulus were compared using Student’s t-test for independent samples at p = 0.05. However, because no significant differences were found between males and females, the data were pooled and analyzed together. For each dose of the three compounds, the mean EAG responses of S. oryzae adults were submitted to ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test (p = 0.05) for separation of means. Before ANOVA, data were submitted to Shapiro–Wilk’s test to verify the normal distribution of data and to Levene’s test to assess the homogeneity of variances. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 18.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Behavioral responses of S. oryzae to rice-borne volatiles
Y-tube bioassays
Sitophilus oryzae showed significant responses when offered a choice between the odor of rice materials in one chamber and clean air (CA) in the other (Fig. 1), responding positively to the volatiles of RBR, DHXM, BSGM, YSXM, and WGR (Fig. 1A).
Given a choice between pairs of these five rice cultivars, S. oryzae showed positive responses to the odors of RBR paired with DHXM, BSGM, YSXM, or WGR (Fig. 1B). However, S. oryzae showed no significant responses when DHXM, BSGM, YSXM, and WGR were paired with each other.
Six-arm bioassays
In the six-arm bioassays, odors emitted by grains of different rice cultivars attracted significantly more insects than did the control air (Friedman test: χ2 = 26.676, df = 5, p < 0.001, Wilcoxon tests: p = 0.026–0.027) (Fig. 2). Furthermore, RBR attracted significantly more S. oryzae adults than the other cultivars (Wilcoxon tests: p = 0.026–0.028).
Analysis of RBR volatiles
According to the GC–MS analysis, twenty-six components were identified in the volatiles from RBR (Table 1). The most abundant component was nonanal (29.37%), followed by hexanal (16.08%), and then 1-octen-3-ol (8.83%). No other component accounted for more than 5% of the volatiles of RBR, except for dodecane (5.05%).
EAG analyses
We evaluated the EAG responses of S. oryzae males and females to increasing doses of hexanal, 1-octen-3-ol, and nonanal (Fig. 3). Measurable EAG responses were elicited by the three compounds starting from the 0.1 µg dose. In both males and females, typical sigmoid-shaped dose responses were elicited by each compound for the dose range tested. For each compound, the mean EAG response to the highest dose (1000 μg) was higher than that to the previous dose, indicating that the olfactory receptors had not become saturated. For each compound at each dose, no significant differences were observed in the mean EAG responses between males and females (hexanal: t = 0.489–1.29, df = 8, p = 0.291–0.636; 1-octen-3-ol: t = 0.274–1.392; df = 8, p = 0.201–0.791; nonanal: t = 0.087–1.899; df = 8, p = 0.094–0.933).
When the mean EAG results of males and females were pooled, significant differences in the EAG responses of S. oryzae were observed among the three compounds at doses of 10 and 100 µg (Fig. 4). At 10 µg, the mean EAG responses elicited by hexanal and 1-octen-3-ol were statistically similar but significantly higher than that induced by nonanal (F = 8.246, df = 3, p < 0.01). At 100 µg, the mean EAG response to hexanal was significantly higher than those to 1-octen-3-ol and nonanal (F = 16.705, df = 3, p < 0.001).
Y-tube bioassays with individual volatile compounds
Next, we evaluated S. oryzae sensitivity to nonanal, hexanal, and 1-octen-3-ol in two choice behavior experiments (Fig. 5A–C). The results clearly show that adult S. oryzae were attracted to all three compounds at each dose for 1, 10, 100, 500, and 1000 μg, when they were paired with mineral oil as the control.
Six-arm behavioral bioassays with individual compounds
In the six-arm bioassays, all doses of hexanal (Friedman test: χ2 = 29.048, df = 5, p < 0.001, Wilcoxon tests: p = 0.026–0.027), 1-octen-3-ol (Friedman test: χ2 = 27.995, df = 5, p < 0.001, Wilcoxon tests: p = 0.026–0.028), and nonanal (Friedman test: χ2 = 29.524, df = 5, p < 0.001, Wilcoxon tests: p = 0.024–0.027) were significantly more attractive than the mineral oil control (Fig. 6). Furthermore, the most attractive doses of hexanal (Wilcoxon tests: p = 0.026–0.028), 1-octen-3-ol (Wilcoxon tests: p = 0.026–0.027) and nonanal (Wilcoxon tests: p = 0.026–0.027) were 1000, 1000, and 500 µg, respectively.
Four-arm behavioral bioassays with individual compounds
According to the results of the six-arm olfactometer bioassays, hexanal, 1-octen-3-ol, and nonanal were compared at their most attractive doses (1000, 1000, and 500 µg, respectively) in four-arm olfactometer bioassays. All three compounds at their respective doses were significantly more attractive than the mineral oil control (Friedman test: χ2 = 16.932, df = 3, p < 0.01, Wilcoxon tests: p = 0.027) (Fig. 7). In addition, S. oryzae adults significantly preferred nonanal to hexanal or 1-octen-3-ol (Wilcoxon tests: p = 0.027–0.028) but showed no significant preference between hexanal and 1-octen-3-ol (Wilcoxon test: p = 0.414).
Discussion
Plant volatiles are important cues for many insects when searching for suitable food, oviposition, and mating sites (Visser 1986; Knolhoff and Hecke 2014; Dyer et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2022a), and for non-host substrate avoidance (Angelopoulos et al. 1999). Identification of behaviourally active compounds, either attractants or repellents, can provide the means for monitoring and direct control of insect pests.
Behavioural responses to plant VOCs have been investigated for many stored-cereal insect pests (Trematerra et al. 2000; Germinara et al. 2008; Ukeh et al. 2010; Ndomo-Moualeu et al. 2015), including S. oryzae. In fact, adult rice weevils are known to be attracted by the fresh grain volatiles valeraldehyde, maltol, and vanillin (Phillips et al. 1993) but repelled by postharvest waste of cardamom plants (Elettaria cardamomum (L.) Maton) (Widiyaningrum et al. 2019) and some individual volatile compounds such as propionic acid, menthone, and α-pinene (Germinara et al. 2007; Fouad et al. 2021).
Rice is recognized as a preferred host plant for S. oryzae (Subedi et al. 2009). Despite behavioral evidence, little attention has been given to the olfactory response of rice weevils to individual rice VOCs. In this study, therefore, we assessed the sensitivity and behavioral responses of S. oryzae adults to the odor stimuli of different rice cultivars, illustrating notable results for the different substrates tested.
In the Y-tube olfactometer bioassays, S. oryzae adults were strongly attracted by the VOCs emitted by all rice cultivars. In the six-arm bioassays, S. oryzae adults exhibited significantly different preferences among the five rice cultivars. The rice cultivars were ranked, from most to least preferred by S. oryzae, as follows: RBR > DHXM ≥ BSGM = YSXM ≥ WGR. This clear ranking preference of S. oryzae adults confirmed that plant-borne VOCs provide important cues for the selection of a preferred host by this pest. These results might partially explain why S. oryzae showed faster and larger population growth on RBR than on other materials in tests carried out by Wang et al. (2022b).
The GC–MS analyses detected 26 compounds in the VOC profile of RBR, among which, nonanal, hexanal, and 1-octen-3-ol were the most abundant components. The results of the EAG analyses showed that these three main compounds were perceived by the peripheral olfactory systems of S. oryzae males and females in a wide range of concentrations and in a dose-dependent manner. Once the electrophysiological activity of the three compounds was ascertained, their biological activity was further investigated in Y-tube, six-, and four-arm olfactometer bioassays. In the bioassays, hexanal, 1-octen-3-ol, and nonanal were all attractive to S. oryzae at various concentrations, and their most attractive concentrations were 100, 100, and 50 μg μL−1, respectively. When the three compounds were compared at their most attractive concentrations, S. oryzae preferred nonanal over the other two, and showed equal preferences for 1-octen-3-ol and hexanal. These findings suggest that nonanal has the greatest potential for development as a kairomonal lure for S. oryzae. Nonanal has previously been identified in oat volatiles and, among stored-product insect pests, it was found to be attractive to the saw-toothed grain beetle, Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) (Coleoptera, Silvanidae) (White et al. 1989). Moreover, nonanal has been reported as an attractant for many other Coleoptera species, including the curculionids Listronotus maculicollis Kirby (McGraw et al. 2011) and Trypophloeus klimeschi Eggers (Gao et al. 2018). Hexanal is commonly used as an indicator of lipid oxidation in cereals (Piggot et al. 1991), and its production increases over time in stored native oats (Heiniö et al. 2002) and raw oat flour (Molteberg et al. 1996). It is the main VOC released by cereal-based macaroni pasta (Trematerra et al. 2021), which has been reported as an attractant for some important secondary pests of processed cereals, such as O. surinamensis and the merchant grain beetle Oryzaephilus mercator (Fauvel) (Coleoptera: Silvanidae) (Pierce et al. 1990). This compound was found to exert a strong repellent effect against the adults of the granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius (L.) (Germinara et al. 2008) and even to inhibit their olfactory orientation towards wheat grains, a highly attractive food source for this species (Germinara et al. 2015). 1-Octen-3-ol is formed when grain is contaminated by mold (Kaminski et al. 1973) and is an attractant for O. surinamensis (White et al. 1989).
All the currently known S. oryzae host-plant attractants are listed in the FDA’s official database on food additives (EAFUS, Everything Added to Food in the United States). These additives are readily available on the market, at relatively low cost, which would simplify the preparation of a valuable lure for practical applications. In contrast with other stored-product beetle species, where attractants have been successfully developed and thoroughly utilized at the commercial scale, there is still inadequate information on the development of a lure for S. oryzae, as well as for other species of this genus (Athanassiou et al. 2006; Trematerra et al. 2015). To this end, future field trapping experiments (Fields and White 2002; Cook et al. 2007) would provide new insights for the development of novel monitoring and control strategies for this pest (Wakefield et al. 2005; Phillips and Throne 2010; Guo et al. 2020). Because many studies have highlighted the importance of the ratio and concentrations of plant volatiles for host location by phytophagous insects (Najar-Rodriguez et al. 2010; Webster et al. 2010; Cha et al. 2011), it is important to evaluate different dosages and mixtures of kairomones. From a management perspective, it would also be useful to evaluate kairomone mixtures in combination with (4S,5R)-5-hydroxy-4-methyl-3-heptanone, the aggregation pheromone of S. oryzae (Walgenbach et al. 1987). In fact, additive or synergistic interactions between food odors and insect pheromones strongly suggest that more effective traps can be devised to manage this insect pest (Phillips et al. 1993; Wakefield et al. 2005; Athanassiou et al. 2006).
Volatile compounds emitted by the hosts’ food can elicit long-range attraction in parasitoids (Vinson 1985; Nordlund et al. 1988; Lewis et al. 1990). Therefore, future studies should also test the attractiveness of VOCs identified from the stored rice materials to the natural enemies of S. oryzae, for example, Anisopteromalus calandrae (Howard), Lariophagus distinguendus (Förster), and Theocolax elegans (Westwood) (Wen et al. 1994; Lucas and Jordi 2002; Germinara et al. 2009). Such information would be useful to develop and refine biocontrol management strategies based on the use of natural enemies to control S. oryzae in stored rice. At the same time, rice varieties that are less susceptible than others to infestations of S. oryzae should be further investigated under a varietal resistance-based strategy.
Our results confirm the three tested hypotheses: S. oryzae was attracted to odors from rice cultivars, showed a clear preference for the odor of RBR, and perceived and responded to three of the main components of the volatiles of RBR. Overall, the results of this study show that semiochemical volatiles of stored rice grains are involved in host-plant selection by S. oryzae. Individual compounds among the main volatile components of the preferred rice cultivar (RBR) were able to stimulate the peripheral olfactory systems of adult S. oryzae and elicit a positive chemotactic response. The most attractive compound identified in this study, nonanal, alone and in combination with other attractants, has potential application in the development of a kairomonal lure for trapping rice weevil adults at different stages of rice production, storage, and processing.
Author contributions
YC, GSG and CL conceived and designed the research. QQH, LJH, IDI, YYL, MP, and MZM conducted the experiments. YC, FM and GSG analyzed the data. YC, CGA and GSG wrote the manuscript. All of the authors read and approved the manuscript.
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Angelopoulos N, Birkett MA, Hick AJ, Hooper AM, Pickett JA, Pow EM et al (1999) Exploiting semiochemicals in insect control. Pestic Sci 55:225–235
Athanassiou CG, Kavallieratos NG, Trematerra P (2006) Responses of Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Tribolium confusum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) to traps baited with pheromones and food volatiles. Eur J Entomol 103:371–378
Badii KB, Asante SK, Adarkwa C (2013) Varietal differences in the susceptibility of new rice for Africa (NERICA) to Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Afr J Agr Res 8(16):1375–1380
Bala S (2015) Ecofriendly management of khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium and rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae through plant products in the stored wheat. J Entomol Res 39:249–252
Berhe M, Subramanyam B, Chichaybelu M, Demissie G, Abay F, Harvey J (2022) Post-harvest insect pests and their management practices for major food and export crops in East Africa: an ethiopian case study. InSects 13:1068
Bhanderi GR, Radadia GG, Patel DR (2015) Ecofriendly management of rice weevil sitophilus oryzae (linnaeus) in sorghum. Indian J Entomol 77(3):210–213
Brito VD, Achimón F, Pizzolitto RP, Sánchez AR, Torres EAG, Zygadlo JA, Zunino MP (2021) An alternative to reduce the use of the synthetic insecticide against the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais through the synergistic action of Pimenta racemosa and Citrus sinensis essential oils with chlorpyrifos. J Pest Sci 94:409–421
Cao Y, Li S, Benelli G, Germinara GS, Yang J, Yang WJ, Li C (2018) Olfactory responses of Stegobium paniceum to different Chinese medicinal plant materials and component analysis of volatiles. J Stored Prod Res 76:122–128
Cao Y, Benelli G, Germinara GS, Maggi F, Zhang YJ, Luo SL, Yang H, Li C (2019) Innate positive chemotaxis to paeonal from highly attractive Chinese medicinal herbs in the cigarette beetle. Lasioderma Serricorne Sci Rep 9(1):6995
Cao Y, Pistillo OM, Lou YB, D’isita I, Maggi F, Hu QQ, Germinara GS, Li C (2022) Electrophysiological and behavioural responses of Stegobium paniceum to volatile compounds from Chinese medicinal plant materials. Pest Manag Sci 78:3697–3703
Carpita A, Canale A, Raffaelli A, Saba A, Benelli G, Raspi A (2012) (Z)-9-Tri-cosene identified in rectal glands extracts of Bactrocera oleae males: first evidence of a male-produced female attractant in olive fruit fly. Naturwissenschaften 99:77–81
Cook SM, Khan ZR, Pickett JA (2007) The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management. Ann Rev Entomol 52(1):375–400
Dyer LA, Philbin CS, Ochsenrider KM, Richards LA, Massad TJ, Smilanich AM, Forister ML, Parchman TL, Galland LM, Hurtado PJ, Espeset AE, Glassmire AE, Harrison JG, Mo C, Yoon S, Pardikes NA, Muchoney ND, Jahner JP, Slinn HL, Shelef O, Dodson CD, Kato MJ, Yamaguchi LF, Jeffrey CS (2018) Modern approaches to study plant–insect interactions in chemical ecology. Nat Rev Chem 2:50–64
Fields PG, White N (2002) Alternatives to methyl bromide treatments for stored-product and quarantine insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47(1):331–359
Fouad HA, Tavares WDS, Zanuncio JC (2021) Toxicity and repellent activity of monoterpene enantiomers to rice weevils (Sitophilus oryzae). Pest Manag Sci 77(7):3500–3507
Gao G, Dai L, Gao J, Wang J, Chen H (2018) Volatile organic compound analysis of host and non-host poplars for Trypophloeus klimeschi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Ipinae). Russ J Plant Physiol 65:916–925
Germinara GS, Rotundo G, De Cristofaro A (2007) Repellence and fumigant toxicity of propionic acid against adults of Sitophilus granarius (L.) and S. oryzae (L.). J Stored Prod Res 43:229–233
Germinara GS, De Cristofaro A, Rotundo G (2008) Behavioral responses of adult Sitophilus granarius to individual cereal volatiles. J Chem Ecol 34(4):523–529
Germinara GS, De Cristofaro A, Rotundo G (2009) Antennal olfactory responses to individual cereal volatiles in Theocolax elegans (Westwood) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). J Stored Prod Res 45:195–200
Germinara GS, De Cristofaro A, Rotundo G (2015) Repellents effectively disrupt the olfactory orientation of Sitophilus granarius to wheat kernels. J Pest Sci 88(4):675–684
Germinara GS, De Cristofaro A, Rotundo G (2016) Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of Teocolax elegans (Westwood) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to cereal grain volatiles. Biomed Res Int 2016:1–8
Guo XJ, Yu QQ, Chen DF, Wei JL, Yang PC, Yu J, Wang XH, Kang L (2020) 4-Vinylanisole is an aggregation pheromone in locusts. Nature 584:584–588
Gvozdenac S, Tanaskovi S, Vukajlovi FN, Prvulovic D, Viacki V (2020) Host and ovipositional preference of rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) depending on feeding experience. Appl Ecol Env Res 18(5):6663–6673
Heiniö RL, Lehtinen P, Oksman-Caldentey KM, Poutanen K (2002) Differences between sensory profiles and development of rancidity during long-term storage of native and processed oat. Cereal Chem 79:367–375
Hubert J, Stejskal V, Athanassiou CG, Throne JE (2018) Health hazards associated with arthropod infestation of stored products. Annu Rev Entomol 63:553–573
Isman MB (2006) Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annu Rev Entomol 51:45–66
Jalaeian M, Mohammadzadeh M, Mohammadzadeh M, Borzoui E (2021) Rice cultivars affect fitness-related characteristics and digestive physiology of the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Stored Prod Res 93:101821
Kaminski E, Stawicki S, Wasowicz E, Przybylski R (1973) Detection of deterioration of grain by gas chromatography. Ann Technol Agric 22:401–408
Knolhoff LM, Heckel DG (2014) Behavioral assays for studies of host plant choice and adaptation in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 59:263–278
Kundu B, Hath TK, Chakraborty D (2020) Evaluation of different wheat germplasms against rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae (L.). J Entomol Res 44(2):291
Lewis WJ, Vet LEM, Tumilson JH, Van Lenteren JC, Papaj DR (1990) Variations in parasitoid foraging behaviour. essential element of a sound biological control theory. Environ Entomol 19:1183–1193
Li C, Li ZZ, Cao Y, Zheng XW, Zhou B (2009) Partial characterization of stress-induced carboxylesterase from adults of Stegobium paniceum and Lasioderma serricorne (Coleoptera: Anobiidae) subjected to CO2-enriched atmosphere. J Pest Sci 82:7–11
Liu XF, Chen HH, Li JK, Zhang R, Chen L (2016) Volatiles released by Chinese liquorice roots mediate host location behaviour by neonate Porphyrophora sophorae (Hemiptera: Margarodidae). Pest Manag Sci 72(10):1959–1964
Lucas É, Jordi R (2002) Biological and mechanical control of Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in rice. J Stored Prod Res 38(3):293–304
McGraw BA, Rodriguez-Saona C, Holdcraft R, SzendreiZ KAM (2011) Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of Listronotus maculicollis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to volatiles from intact and mechanically damaged annual bluegrass. Environ Entomol 40:412–419
Mehta V, Kumar S (2020) Influence of different plant powders as grain protectants on Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in stored wheat. J Food Protect 83(12):2167–2172
Mehta V, Kumar S (2021) Relative susceptibility and influence of different wheat cultivars on biological parameters of Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Int J Trop Insect Sci 41:653–661
Mehta V, Kumar S, Jayaram CS (2021) Damage potential, effect on germination, and development of Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on wheat grains in Northwestern Himalayas. J Insect Sci 21(3):1–7
Molteberg EL, Magnus EM, Bjɵrge JM, Nilsson A (1996) Sensory and chemical studies of lipid oxidation in raw and heat-treated oat flours. Cereal Chem 73:579–587
Nayak MK, Daglish GJ, Phillips TW, Ebert PR (2020) Resistance to the fumigant phosphine and its management in insect pests of stored products: a global perspective. Annu Rev Entomol 65:333–350
Ndomo-Moualeu AF, Ulrichs C, Adler C (2015) Behavioral responses of Callosobruchus maculatus to volatile organic compounds found in the headspace of dried green pea seeds. J Pest Sci 3:1–10
Nordlund DA, Lewis WJ, Altieri MA (1988) Influences of plant-produced allelochemicals on the host/prey selection behaviour of entomophagous insects. In: Barbosa P, Letourneau D (eds) Novel aspects of insect-plant interactions. Wiley, New York, pp 65–90
Nwaubani SI, Opit GP, Otitodun GO, Adesida MA (2014) Efficacy of two Nigeria- derived diatomaceous earths against Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Rhyzopertha Dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) on wheat. J Stored Prod Res 59:9–16
Pavela R, Benelli G (2016) Essential oils as ecofriendly biopesticides? Challenges and constraints. Trends Plant Sci 21:1000–1007
Paventi G, Rotundo G, Pistillo OM, Disita I, Germinara GS (2021) Bioactivity of wild hop extracts against the granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius (L.). InSects 12:564
Phillips TW, Throne JE (2010) Biorational approaches to managing stored-product insects. Annu Rev Entomol 55(1):375–397
Phillips TW, Jiang XL, Burkholder WE, Phillips JK, Tran HQ (1993) Behavioural responses to food volatiles by two species of stored-product Coleoptera, Sitophilus oryzae (Curculionidae) and Tribolium castaneum (Tenebrionidae). J Chem Ecol 19:723–734
Pierce AM, Pierce HD, Oehlschlager AC, Borden JH (1990) Attraction of Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) and Oryzaephilus mercator (Fauvel) (Coleoptera: Cucujidae) to some common volatiles of food. J Chem Ecol 16(2):465–475
Piggot JR, Morrison WR, Clyne J (1991) Changes in lipids and in sensory attributes on storage of rice milled to different degrees. Int J Food Sci Tech 26:615–628
Steiner S, Steidle JLM, Ruther J (2007) Host-associated kairomones used for habitat orientation in the parasitoid Lariophagus distinguendus (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). J Stored Prod Res 43:587-e593
Subedi S, GC YD, Thapa RB, Rija JP (2009) Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae L.) host preference of selected stored grains in Chitwan Nepal. J Inst Agr Ani Sci 30:151–158
Swamynarayana KC, Mutthuraja GP, Jagadeesh E (2014) Biology of Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on stored maize grains. Curr Biol 8(1):76–81
Tian XM, Wu FH, Zhou GX, Guo J, Liu XQ, Zhang T (2023) Potential volatile markers of brown rice infested by the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Food Chem X 17:100540
Trematerra P, Fontana F, Mancini M, Sciarretta A (1999) Influence of intact and damaged cereal kernels on the behaviour of rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Stored Prod Res 35:265–276
Trematerra P, Sciaretta A, Tamasi E (2000) Behavioural responses of Oryzaephilus surinamensis, Tribolium castaneum and Tribolium confusum to naturally and artificially damaged durum wheat kernels. Entomol Exp Appl 94:195–200
Trematerra P, Lupi C, Athanassiou C (2013) Does natal habitat preference modulate cereal kernel preferences in the rice weevil? Arthropod Plant Interact 7:287–297
Trematerra P, Ianiro R, Athanassiou CG, Kavallieratos NG (2015) Behavioral interactions between Sitophilus zeamais and Tribolium castaneum: the first colonizer matters. J Pest Sci 88:573–581
Trematerra P, Pistillo MO, Germinara GS, Colacci M (2021) Bioactivity of cereal- and legume-based macaroni pasta volatiles to adult Sitophilus granarius (L.). InSects 12:765
Ukeh DA, Birkett MA, Bruce TJA, Allan EJ, Luntz AJM (2010) Behavioural responses of the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais, to host (stored-grain) and non-host plant volatiles. Pest Manag Sci 1:44–50
Vinson SB (1985) The behavior of parasitoids. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 417–469
Visser JH (1986) Host odor perception in phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 37:141–172
Wakefield ME, Bryning GP, Chambers J (2005) Progress towards a lure to attract three stored product weevils, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky, S. oryzae (L.) and S. granarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Stored Prod Res 41:145–161
Walgenbach CA, Phillips JK, Burkholder WE, King GGS, Slessor KN, Mori K (1987) Determination of chirality in 5-hydroxy-4-methyl-3-heptanone, the aggregation pheromone of Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and S. zeamais (Motschulsky). J Chem Ecol 13:2159–2169
Wang B, Dong WY, Li HM, D’Onofriox C, Bai PH, Chen RP, Yang LL, Wu JA, Wang XQ, Wang B, Ai D, Knoll W, Pelosi P, Wang GR (2022a) Molecular basis of (E)-β-farnesene-mediated aphid location in the predator Eupeodes corollae. Curr Biol 32:1–12
Wang J, Germinara GS, Feng ZY, Luo SL, Yang SY, Xu S, Li C, Cao Y (2022b) Comparative effects of heat and cold stress on physiological enzymes in Sitophilus oryzae and Lasioderma serricorne. J Stored Prod Res 96:101949
Wen BR, Smith L, Brower JH (1994) Competition between Anisopteromalus calandrae and Choetospila elegans (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) at different parasitoid densities on immature maize weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in corn. Environ Entomol 23(2):367–373
White PR, Chambers J, Walter CM, Wilkins JPG, Mellar JG (1989) Saw-toothed grain beetle Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) (Coleptera, Silvanidae) collection, identification, and bioassay of attractive volatiles from beetles and oats. J Chem Ecol 15(3):999–1013
Widiyaningrum P, Candrawati D, Indriyanti DR, Priyono B (2019) Behavioral response of Sitophilus oryzae L. to repellent effect from postharvest waste of local cardamom. J Phys: Conf Ser 1321:032028
Acknowledgements
We thank the First-class Discipline Construction of Guizhou Province (XKTJ[2020]14), Special Project for Science and Technology Development of Local (Guizhou) under the Guidance of the Central Government (QKZYD[2022]4013), Guiyang Science and Technology Planning Project ([2022]5-20), and Special Funding of Guiyang University (GYU-KY-[2023]) for financial support.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università di Foggia within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This research did not involve any human participants and/or animals, only the stored products pest Sitophilus oryzae.
Informed consent Not applicable.
Additional information
Communicated by Orlando Campolo.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cao, Y., Hu, Q., Huang, L. et al. Attraction of Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to the semiochemical volatiles of stored rice materials. J Pest Sci 97, 73–85 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-023-01616-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-023-01616-6