Abstract
The goal of this work was to compare reproducibility of phaseolin patterns of common bean obtained by two electrophoretic protein separation techniques including the conventional SDS-PAGE and an automated chip electrophoresis system. Five standard cultivars of common bean provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (Beltsville, Maryland) that represented five phaseolin types, T (Tendergreen), C (Contender) and S (Sanilac), B (Boyaca) and P (Pampa), were used in this study. Comparison of the phaseolin patterns revealed that the chip-on-a-lab electrophoresis provided a good reproducibility. The phaseolin polymorphism included four to seven polypeptides typical for the pattern composition of the T, C and S types. The polymorphism of the B and P patterns was also established. Phaseolin polypeptides separated by the microchip electrophoresis exhibited differences with respect to the molecular weights and electrophoretic mobility as compared to the SDS-PAGE technique. This phenomenon could be attributed to the absence of a solid separation phase in the microchip electrophoresis. Moreover, this technique has potential to substantially accelerate screening of large bean germplasm collections since it allows for the accurate analysis of the higher number of individual plants within accessions than the conventional, tedious and time consuming SDS-PAGE method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ying H, Zhiqiang C, Larry IH, Stuart BK, Raymond PG, Ross MW (2006) J Agric Food Chem 54:9254–9261
Broughton WJ, Hernandez G, Blair M, Beebe S, Gepts P, Vanderleyden J (2003) Plant Soil 252:55–128
Gentry HS (1969) Econ Bot 23:55–69
Koenig R, Gepts P (1989) Theor Appl Genet 78:809–817
Singh SP (2001) Crop Sci 41:1659–1675
Bliss FA, Brown JWS (1982) Qual Plant Plant Foods Itum Nutr 31:269–279
Rodiño AP, Monteagudo AB, Santalla M (2001a) Methodology for electrophoretic analysis of phaseolin. In: Jacobsen H-J, Múzquiz M, Hassa A (eds) Handbook on common bean related laboratory methods. Pontevedra, Spain
Gepts P, Bliss FA (1986) Econ Bot 40(4):469–478
Rodiño AP, Santalla M, Montero I, Casquero PA, De Ron AM (2001) Genet Resour Crop Evol 48:409–417
Gepts P, Osborn TC, Rashka K, Bliss FA (1986) Econ Bot 40(4):451–468
Gepts P, Bliss FA (1988) Econ Bot 42:86–104
Logozzo G, Donnoli R, Macaluso L, Papa R, Knupffer H, Zeuli PS (2007) Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:1763–1779
Igrejas G, Carnide V, Pereira P, Mesquita F, Guedes-Pinto H (2009) Plant Genet Resour: Charact Util 7(3):230–236
Kelly JD, Miklas PN (1999) Marker assisted selection. In: Singh SP (ed) Common bean improvement in the twenty first century. Kluwer Academic publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Romero J, Sun SM, McLeester RC, Bliss FA, Hall TC (1975) Plant Physiol 56:776–779
Sturm A, Van Kuik JA, Vliegenthart JFG, Chrispeels MJ (1987) J Biol Chem 262(28):13392–13403
Bliss FA, Brown JWS (1983) Plant Breed Rev 1:59–102
Brown JWS, Bliss FA, Hall TC (1981) Theor Appl Genet 60:251–259
Brown JWS, Ma Y, Bliss FA, Hall TC (1981) Theor Appl Genet 59:83–88
Osborn TC (1988) Crit Rev Plant Sci 7:93–116
Brown JWS, Bliss FA, Hall TC (1980) Plant Physiol 66:838–840
Ma Y, Bliss FA, Hall TC (1980) Plant Physiol 66:897–902
Suzuki E, Van Donkelaar A, Varghese JN, Lilley GG, Blagrove RJ, Colman PM (1983) J Biol Chem 258(4):2634–2636
Paaren HE, Slightom JL, Hall TC, Inglis AS, Blagrove RJ (1987) Phytochemistry 26:335–343
Hall TC, McLeester RC, Bliss FA (1977) Plant Physiol 56:776–777
Bradová J, Matějová E (2008) Chromatographia 67:S83–S88
Sun S, Hall T (1975) J Agric Food Chem 23(2):184–189
Bradford M (1976) Anal Biochem 72:248
Laemmli UK (1970) Nature 22:680–685
Ma Y, Bliss FA (1978) Crop Sci 18:432–437
Garfin DE (2003) Gel electrophoresis of proteins. In: Davey J, Lord M (eds) Essential cell biology. Vol. 1. Cell structure, a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Uthayakumaran S, Listiohadi Y, Baratta M, Batey IL, Wrigley CW (2006) J Cereal Sci 44:34–39
Bousse L, Mouradian S, Minalla A, Yee H, Williams K, Dubrow R (2001) Anal Chem 73:1207–1212
Zhu K, Nguyen M, Strong W, Whitman-Guliaev C (2010) Technical notes Bio-RAD Bulletin. 5299 Rev B
Siriamornpun S, Suttajit M, Uthayakumaran S, Wrigley CW (2004) Identification of Thai rice varieties using capillary electrophoresis. In: Black CK, Panozzo JF, Rebetzke GJ (eds) Cereals 2004 proceedings of the 54th Australia Cereal Chemistry Conference and the 11th Wheat breeders` Assembly. Royal Australian Chemical institute, Melbourne
Uthayakumaran S, Batey IL, Wrigley CW (2005) J Cereal Sci 41:371–374
Acknowledgments
At the USDA-United States Department of Agriculture for ceding species Phaseolus vulgaris L. standards used in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
da Silva, E.M., dos Santos, T.M.M., Ganança, J.F.T. et al. Microchip Electrophoretic Analysis of Phaseolin Patterns and Its Comparison with Currently Used SDS-PAGE Techniques. Chromatographia 76, 1163–1169 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-013-2511-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-013-2511-x