Skip to main content
Log in

Microchip Electrophoretic Analysis of Phaseolin Patterns and Its Comparison with Currently Used SDS-PAGE Techniques

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this work was to compare reproducibility of phaseolin patterns of common bean obtained by two electrophoretic protein separation techniques including the conventional SDS-PAGE and an automated chip electrophoresis system. Five standard cultivars of common bean provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (Beltsville, Maryland) that represented five phaseolin types, T (Tendergreen), C (Contender) and S (Sanilac), B (Boyaca) and P (Pampa), were used in this study. Comparison of the phaseolin patterns revealed that the chip-on-a-lab electrophoresis provided a good reproducibility. The phaseolin polymorphism included four to seven polypeptides typical for the pattern composition of the T, C and S types. The polymorphism of the B and P patterns was also established. Phaseolin polypeptides separated by the microchip electrophoresis exhibited differences with respect to the molecular weights and electrophoretic mobility as compared to the SDS-PAGE technique. This phenomenon could be attributed to the absence of a solid separation phase in the microchip electrophoresis. Moreover, this technique has potential to substantially accelerate screening of large bean germplasm collections since it allows for the accurate analysis of the higher number of individual plants within accessions than the conventional, tedious and time consuming SDS-PAGE method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ying H, Zhiqiang C, Larry IH, Stuart BK, Raymond PG, Ross MW (2006) J Agric Food Chem 54:9254–9261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Broughton WJ, Hernandez G, Blair M, Beebe S, Gepts P, Vanderleyden J (2003) Plant Soil 252:55–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gentry HS (1969) Econ Bot 23:55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koenig R, Gepts P (1989) Theor Appl Genet 78:809–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh SP (2001) Crop Sci 41:1659–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bliss FA, Brown JWS (1982) Qual Plant Plant Foods Itum Nutr 31:269–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodiño AP, Monteagudo AB, Santalla M (2001a) Methodology for electrophoretic analysis of phaseolin. In: Jacobsen H-J, Múzquiz M, Hassa A (eds) Handbook on common bean related laboratory methods. Pontevedra, Spain

  8. Gepts P, Bliss FA (1986) Econ Bot 40(4):469–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodiño AP, Santalla M, Montero I, Casquero PA, De Ron AM (2001) Genet Resour Crop Evol 48:409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gepts P, Osborn TC, Rashka K, Bliss FA (1986) Econ Bot 40(4):451–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gepts P, Bliss FA (1988) Econ Bot 42:86–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Logozzo G, Donnoli R, Macaluso L, Papa R, Knupffer H, Zeuli PS (2007) Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:1763–1779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Igrejas G, Carnide V, Pereira P, Mesquita F, Guedes-Pinto H (2009) Plant Genet Resour: Charact Util 7(3):230–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelly JD, Miklas PN (1999) Marker assisted selection. In: Singh SP (ed) Common bean improvement in the twenty first century. Kluwer Academic publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  15. Romero J, Sun SM, McLeester RC, Bliss FA, Hall TC (1975) Plant Physiol 56:776–779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sturm A, Van Kuik JA, Vliegenthart JFG, Chrispeels MJ (1987) J Biol Chem 262(28):13392–13403

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bliss FA, Brown JWS (1983) Plant Breed Rev 1:59–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown JWS, Bliss FA, Hall TC (1981) Theor Appl Genet 60:251–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown JWS, Ma Y, Bliss FA, Hall TC (1981) Theor Appl Genet 59:83–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Osborn TC (1988) Crit Rev Plant Sci 7:93–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown JWS, Bliss FA, Hall TC (1980) Plant Physiol 66:838–840

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ma Y, Bliss FA, Hall TC (1980) Plant Physiol 66:897–902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Suzuki E, Van Donkelaar A, Varghese JN, Lilley GG, Blagrove RJ, Colman PM (1983) J Biol Chem 258(4):2634–2636

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Paaren HE, Slightom JL, Hall TC, Inglis AS, Blagrove RJ (1987) Phytochemistry 26:335–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hall TC, McLeester RC, Bliss FA (1977) Plant Physiol 56:776–777

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bradová J, Matějová E (2008) Chromatographia 67:S83–S88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun S, Hall T (1975) J Agric Food Chem 23(2):184–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bradford M (1976) Anal Biochem 72:248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Laemmli UK (1970) Nature 22:680–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ma Y, Bliss FA (1978) Crop Sci 18:432–437

    Google Scholar 

  31. Garfin DE (2003) Gel electrophoresis of proteins. In: Davey J, Lord M (eds) Essential cell biology. Vol. 1. Cell structure, a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  32. Uthayakumaran S, Listiohadi Y, Baratta M, Batey IL, Wrigley CW (2006) J Cereal Sci 44:34–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bousse L, Mouradian S, Minalla A, Yee H, Williams K, Dubrow R (2001) Anal Chem 73:1207–1212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhu K, Nguyen M, Strong W, Whitman-Guliaev C (2010) Technical notes Bio-RAD Bulletin. 5299 Rev B

  35. Siriamornpun S, Suttajit M, Uthayakumaran S, Wrigley CW (2004) Identification of Thai rice varieties using capillary electrophoresis. In: Black CK, Panozzo JF, Rebetzke GJ (eds) Cereals 2004 proceedings of the 54th Australia Cereal Chemistry Conference and the 11th Wheat breeders` Assembly. Royal Australian Chemical institute, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  36. Uthayakumaran S, Batey IL, Wrigley CW (2005) J Cereal Sci 41:371–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

At the USDA-United States Department of Agriculture for ceding species Phaseolus vulgaris L. standards used in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emanuel Marques da Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

da Silva, E.M., dos Santos, T.M.M., Ganança, J.F.T. et al. Microchip Electrophoretic Analysis of Phaseolin Patterns and Its Comparison with Currently Used SDS-PAGE Techniques. Chromatographia 76, 1163–1169 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-013-2511-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-013-2511-x

Keywords

Navigation