Abstract
We have developed a finite element model to simulate the penetration of nanoneedles into the cellular nucleus. It is found that the nuclear lamina, the primary supporting structure of the nuclear membrane, plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of the nuclear envelope and enhancing stress concentration in the nuclear membrane. Notably, nuclear lamina A exhibits a more pronounced effect compared to nuclear lamina B. Subsequently, we further conducted experiments by controlling the time of osteopontin (OPN) treatment to modify the nuclear lamina density, and the results showed that an increase in nuclear lamina density enhances the probability of nanoneedle penetration into the nuclear membrane. Through employing both simulation and experimental techniques, we have gathered compelling evidence indicating that an augmented density of nuclear lamina A can enhance the penetration of nanoneedles into the nuclear membrane.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmar S et al (2020) A revolution toward gene-editing technology and its application to crop improvement. Int J Mol Sci 21:5665
Arfsten J, Leupold S, Bradtmöller C, Kampen I, Kwade A (2010) Atomic force microscopy studies on the nanomechanical properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Colloids Surf B 79:284–290
Bathe KJ (2007) Finite element method. Wiley Encycl Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470050118.ecse159
Cao X et al (2016) A chemomechanical model for nuclear morphology and stresses during cell transendothelial migration. Biophys J 111:1541–1552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2016.08.011
Cotter CJ, Ham DA, Pain CC (2009) A mixed discontinuous/continuous finite element pair for shallow-water ocean modelling. Ocean Model 26:86–90
Dahl KN, Kahn SM, Wilson KL, Discher DE (2004) The nuclear envelope lamina network has elasticity and a compressibility limit suggestive of a molecular shock absorber. J Cell Sci 117:4779–4786
Dahl KN, Ribeiro AJ, Lammerding J (2008) Nuclear shape, mechanics, and mechanotransduction. Circ Res 102:1307–1318
Deveraux S, Allena R, Aubry D (2017) A numerical model suggests the interplay between nuclear plasticity and stiffness during a perfusion assay. J Theor Biol 435:62–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.09.007
Enyedi B, Niethammer P (2017) Nuclear membrane stretch and its role in mechanotransduction. Nucleus 8:156–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491034.2016.1263411
Fan N et al (2018) The insertion mechanism of a living cell determined by the stress segmentation effect of the cell membrane during the tip–cell interaction. Small 14:1703868
Gaj T, Sirk SJ, Shui S-l, Liu J (2016) Genome-editing technologies: principles and applications. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol 8:a023754
Gao W, Yu X (2020) Osteopontin on the exercise ability and biomechanical properties of mesenchymal stem cells. Rev Cient Fac Cienc Vet 30:2366–2375
Hansel CS et al (2019) Nanoneedle-mediated stimulation of cell mechanotransduction machinery. ACS Nano 13:2913–2926
Heo S-J et al (2020) Nuclear softening expedites interstitial cell migration in fibrous networks and dense connective tissues. Sci Adv 6:5083
Ho CY, Jaalouk DE, Vartiainen MK, Lammerding J (2013) Lamin A/C and emerin regulate MKL1–SRF activity by modulating actin dynamics. Nature 497:507–511
Hobson CM, Stephens AD (2020) Modeling of cell nuclear mechanics: classes components, and applications. Cells 9:1. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9071623
Hobson CM, Kern M, O’Brien Iii ET, Stephens AD, Falvo MR, Superfine R (2020) Correlating nuclear morphology and external force with combined atomic force microscopy and light sheet imaging separates roles of chromatin and lamin A/C in nuclear mechanics. Mol Biol Cell 31:1788–1801
Ingber DE (2008) Tensegrity-based mechanosensing from macro to micro. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 97:163–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2008.02.005
Jagota V, Sethi APS, Kumar K (2013) Finite element method: an overview. Walailak J Sci Technol 10:1–8
Kagiwada H, Nakamura C, Kihara T, Kamiishi H, Kawano K, Nakamura N, Miyake J (2010) The mechanical properties of a cell, as determined by its actin cytoskeleton, are important for nanoneedle insertion into a living cell. Cytoskeleton 67:496–503
Kamikawa Y et al (2021) OASIS/CREB3L1 is a factor that responds to nuclear envelope stress. Cell Death Discov 7:152. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-021-00540-x
Khan SH (2019) Genome-editing technologies: concept, pros, and cons of various genome-editing techniques and bioethical concerns for clinical application. Mol Ther Nucl Acids 16:326–334
Khunsaraki GM, Oscuii HN, Voloshin A (2020) Study of the mechanical behavior of subcellular organelles using a 3D finite element model of the tensegrity structure. Appl Sci 11:249. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010249
Khunsaraki GM, Oscuii HN, Voloshin A (2020) Study of the mechanical behavior of subcellular organelles using a 3D finite element model of the tensegrity structure. Appl Sci 11:249
Kim K-H, Lee K, Hong H, Yang D, Ryu W, Nam O, Kim Y-C (2018) Functionalized inclined-GaN based nanoneedles. J Ind Eng Chem 59:184–191
Kittisopikul M et al (2021) Computational analyses reveal spatial relationships between nuclear pore complexes and specific lamins. J Cell Biol 220:e202007082
Krzemien L, Giergiel M, Kurek A, Barbasz J (2023) The role of the cortex in indentation experiments of animal cells. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 22:177–187
Lammerding J, Fong LG, Ji JY, Reue K, Stewart CL, Young SG, Lee RT (2006) Lamins A and C but not Lamin B1 regulate nuclear mechanics. J Biol Chem 281:25768–25780. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M513511200
Li H, Yang Y, Hong W, Huang M, Wu M, Zhao X (2020) Applications of genome editing technology in the targeted therapy of human diseases: mechanisms, advances and prospects. Signal Transduct Target Ther 5:1
Liu H et al (2014) In situ mechanical characterization of the cell nucleus by atomic force microscopy. ACS Nano 8:3821–3828. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn500553z
Liu L et al (2017) Decreased nuclear stiffness via FAK-ERK1/2 signaling is necessary for osteopontin-promoted migration of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Exp Cell Res 355:172–181
Liu Y, Mollaeian K, Ren J (2019) Finite element modeling of living cells for AFM indentation-based biomechanical characterization. Micron 116:108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2018.10.004
McCreery KP, Xu X, Scott AK, Fajrial AK, Calve S, Ding X, Neu CP (2021) Nuclear stiffness decreases with disruption of the extracellular matrix in living tissues. Small 17:2006699
Mukherjee A, Barai A, Singh RK, Yan W, Sen S (2020) Nuclear plasticity increases susceptibility to damage during confined migration. PLoS Comput Biol 16:e1008300. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008300
Munjiza AA (2004) The combined finite-discrete element method. Wiley, New York
Obataya I, Nakamura C, Han, Nakamura N, Miyake J (2005) Nanoscale operation of a living cell using an atomic force microscope with a nanoneedle. Nano Lett 5:27–30
Shimi T et al (2008) The A- and B-type nuclear Lamin networks: microdomains involved in chromatin organization and transcription. Genes Dev 22:3409–3421. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1735208
Shimi T et al (2015) Structural organization of nuclear Lamins A, C, B1, and B2 revealed by superresolution microscopy. Mol Biol Cell 26:4075–4086
Stephens AD, Banigan EJ, Adam SA, Goldman RD, Marko JF (2017) Chromatin and Lamin A determine two different mechanical response regimes of the cell nucleus. Mol Biol Cell 28:1984–1996
Swift J et al (2013) Nuclear Lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation. Science 341:1240104
Turgay Y et al (2017) The molecular architecture of lamins in somatic cells. Nature 543:261–264
Wang K, Qin Y, Chen Y (2021) In situ AFM detection of the stiffness of the in situ exposed cell nucleus. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 1868:118985
Wei F, Lan F, Liu B, Liu L, Li G (2016) Poroelasticity of cell nuclei revealed through atomic force microscopy characterization. Appl Phys Lett 109:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4968191
Yao Y, Lacroix D, Mak AF (2016) Effects of oxidative stress-induced changes in the actin cytoskeletal structure on myoblast damage under compressive stress: confocal-based cell-specific finite element analysis. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 15:1495–1508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-016-0779-0
Zanta MA, Belguise-Valladier P, Behr J-P (1999) Gene delivery: a single nuclear localization signal peptide is sufficient to carry DNA to the cell nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:91–96
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from the Natural Science Foundation of China (52005084, 5230130299), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. ZYGX2021YGLH225, ZYGX2019J037), and Sichuan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (23NSFSC3423).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JZ and NF wrote the main manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zou, J., Peng, B., Fan, N. et al. Simulation and experimental study on the influence of lamina on nanoneedle penetration into the cell nucleus. Biomech Model Mechanobiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-024-01836-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-024-01836-4