Abstract
The concern about protecting water quantity and quality is one of the most severe challenges of the twenty-first century since the demand for water resources grows as the population and its needs grow. Additionally, and as expected, most human activities produce wastewater containing undesirable contaminants. On the other hand, the generation of agricultural waste and its inappropriate disposal causes further problems. Current wastewater treatment methods involve a combination of physical and chemical processes, technologies, and operations to remove pollutants from effluents; adsorption is an excellent example of an effective method for wastewater treatment, and biochar is currently one of the most valuable adsorbents. This review focuses on new research about applying biochar produced from agricultural waste as a low-cost and environmentally friendly method for removing ammonium and phosphates from aqueous solutions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Biochar is a carbonaceous material recognized as an important environmental management tool [1]. Today, caring for the environment and natural resources is an imperative mission because humanity is facing increasingly complex environmental challenges. On one hand, one of the challenges is maintaining water of sufficient quantity and quality to supply the population’s necessities; on the other hand, agricultural activity has been intensively developed due to the need to produce food for the population. However, agricultural activity generates vast amounts of waste, which must be appropriately disposed of, and it is also necessary to search for new ways to add value [2]. Accordingly, in recent years research has focused on developing novel water treatment methods in which agricultural waste intervenes as an adsorbent material for water-pollutant compounds [3].
Water quality is crucial for public health, as used for drinking, domestic use, food production, or recreational purposes. With population growth, increased amounts of nitrogen (N; ammonium and nitrate) and phosphorus (P; phosphate) are discharged in domestic sewage, and these are components that cause water eutrophication; additionally, agricultural activity and applying fertilizers and pesticides intensify the release of N and P [4]. Achieving economic growth and reducing poverty can be facilitated by ensuring a consistent and high-quality supply of water and sanitation, along with effective management of water resources [5]. The primary objective of the current research is to develop materials, processes, and technologies that enable the decontamination, management, and reuse of water. A prime illustration of this is the utilization of nitrogen and/or phosphorus that is obtained during the water decontamination process to produce fertilizers. This application exemplifies the global concept of circular economy, which the European Union defines as a ‘system that maximizes the value of products by minimizing waste and keeping materials in use for as long as possible’ [6].
Biochar is ‘the porous carbonaceous solid produced by the thermochemical conversion of organic materials in an oxygen depleted atmosphere that has physicochemical properties suitable for safe and long-term storage of carbon in the environment’ [7]. By the definition, biochar is considered to be a precursor to activated carbon. Although the feedstock material and production processes used to make biochar and activated carbon are similar, biochar is produced at a lower temperature, resulting in more functional groups [8]. This situation also means that the price of biochar is lower than that of commercial activated carbon. Biochar can be produced from a wide range of raw materials and is currently used in environmental management practices such as soil improvement, waste management, energy production, climate change mitigation, and waste water treatment [1].
Several studies have demonstrated that the primary process involved in N and P adsorption on biochar is a practical, low-cost, and environmentally friendly option for recovery of nutrients from wastewater. The present review focuses on recent studies about the application of biochar produced from agricultural waste to remove ammonium and phosphates from aqueous solutions.
The study of biochar has gained great interest in the scientific community in the last decade; proof of this is the growing number of publications referring to biochar as an adsorbent in general and biochar as an ammonium and phosphate adsorbent specifically.
In the last decade, the number of publications referring to the use of biochar as an adsorbent material for compounds such as ammonium and phosphorus in SCOPUS has grown (Fig. 1).
Materials and methods
Biochar feedstock types, production technologies characteristics, and nutrient adsorption mechanism.
Feedstock types for making biochar
A wide variety of organic materials or biomass with a high carbon content can be used to yield biochar [9], including woody [10], herbaceous, and agricultural biomass [11,12,13]. To achieve the goal of circular economy and minimize environmental emissions, it is crucial to take into account various factors when selecting feedstock, including abundance, storage capacity, transportation costs, and the need for chemical treatment in cases where pre-treatment is required [14].
Biochar production technologies
The feedstock type has a significant impact on the textural features of biochar in terms of surface area, pore size, and pore volume distribution [15]. However, depending on the biochar fabrication technique, the new scorched organic matter can have different chemical and physical characteristics [16]. Biochar can be produced by slow/fast pyrolysis, gasification, flash carbonization, torrefaction, and hydrothermal carbonization [17].
Pyrolysis is carried out under oxygen-free conditions during the conversion process; nevertheless, pyrolysis ability may be distinguished by the pyrolyzed material’s response time and the heating method [16]: using slow pyrolysis it is possible to achieve a 35% biochar yield [17], while a 26% biochar yield is achieved through fast pyrolysis [16].
Gasification is a thermochemical process through which organic matter is decomposed to hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide principally; with this technology, a syngas yield of 85% is reached [17]. The gasification process is intended to produce gaseous energy products. The product of biomass gasification is known as syngas; in this process, small amounts of char, ash, and tar are also produced [18].
During flash carbonization, biomass is placed in a vessel with an initial pressure in the range of 1–2 MPa and a flash fire is periodically lit at the bottom of the biomass. The carbonization time decreases with increasing pressure; in consequence, the volatile matter in the feedstock is converted into gaseous fuel, and the remaining fixed carbon is derived into biochar [19]. Using flash carbonization, it is possible to reach a biochar yield of 50% [20].
Hydrothermal carbonization is a wet pyrolysis that is carried out in a reactor with automatic electric heating [21]. With this technology, a hydrochar yield of 72% can be achieved [20]. Last but not least, pyrolysis-like torrefaction is a thermochemical process carried out at low temperatures and heating rates [22]; a biochar yield of 77% can be achieved through this process [20].
Types of biochar production technologies are summarized in Table 1. Besides the different types of technology used to produce biochar, it points out the characteristics, advantages, and challenges that must be taken into account when applying the technologies.
Modified biochar for water treatment
The modification of biochar is being sought to improve its characteristics for removal of impurities. Metal oxide and metal salt modification, acid–base modification, composite production, and ball milling modification are all typical ways of improving biochar’s adsorption capability [33].
Metal oxide and metal salt modification The modified biochar has strong anion exchange capacity, precipitation, and electrostatic attraction, which increases its adsorption capacity: Inorganic phosphorus adsorption capacity is 1.46 times higher than that of unmodified biochar [34]. The metals used for this modification include magnesium, iron, aluminium, and manganese [35].
Acid–base modification The aims of acid modification are to eliminate impurities on one hand, and on the other hand to introduce acid functional groups on the surface of the biochar. Hydrochloric acid, sulphuric acid, nitric acid, phosphoric acid, oxalic acid, and citric acid are the acids used in this type of modification. With respect to alkaline modification, this has the objective of increasing the functional groups that contain oxygen. The most commonly used alkaline agents include potassium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide [35]. Moreover, the specific surface area of acid- and alkali-modified biochar can be raised by 10 and 14 times, respectively [33].
Composite production Biochar is impregnated with clay minerals such as kaolinite, montmorillonite, or bentonite, which alter the composition and physical characteristics of the biochar, resulting in increased oxyanion sorption capacity [36]. Modifying biochar with clay minerals enhances its interfacial compatibility with pollutants, thereby boosting its adsorption capacity. For instance, the incorporation of montmorillonite in biochar increases the adsorption of ammonia approximately five fold [33]. Clay mineral–biochar composite has been demonstrated to have an efficient ability to co-adsorb ammonium and phosphate by electrostatic interaction and ionic bonding [37].
Ball milling modification Ball milling mechanically reduces the particle size to ultrafine or nanoscale sizes [38]. Compared to their non-ground counterparts, carbon-based materials treated by ball milling have a higher adsorption capacity, more oxygenated functional groups, and enhanced efficiency in environmental applications. The powder charge is subjected to the kinetic energy produced by the motion of moving balls, which causes the chemical bonds between the molecules involved to break and the particle size to decrease. The breaking of the materials’ lattice structure results from a number of progressions including the transfer of mass and energy and the development of mechanical stress as a result of milling [38, 39]. With ball milling modification, the specific surface area increases in a range from 3 to 25–194 m2/g, depending upon the milling method used [40], considering the comparison between the pristine biochar and ball milling biochar [41].
Characteristics of biochar
The main characteristics of biochar are: the surface area, carbon content, stable structure, porosity, and cation exchange capacity. Thanks to the high surface charge density, biochar retains cations through the ion exchange process; moreover, a large surface area, internal porosity, and polar and non-polar surface sites allow biochar to adsorb nutrients [42]. It is worth noting that physical adsorption is determined by the structure and surface area of biochar, whereas chemical adsorption is determined by the biochar composition and type and quantity of functional groups [4].
Biochar generally has an alkaline pH; under different pyrolysis temperatures, the pH normally increases as the temperature rises due to the decomposition of acidic functional groups and the volatilization of organic acids [43]. Ammonium retention by biochar is due to electrostatic adsorption to surface functional groups containing negatively charged oxygen [42, 44]. However, the magnesium and calcium content of biochar gives it a high capacity to adsorb phosphate [8].
Biochar surface area and porosity (principally micro-mesopores and part of macropores) are regularly measured using gas adsorption in water treatment and soil remediation. The European Biochar Certificate (EBC) and International Biochar Initiative (IBI) recommend the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) process to analyse the nitrogen adsorption isotherm to determine the surface area [45].
Biochar’s porous structure is advantageous for sorption because it can accommodate different pore sizes required for variable accessibility induced by distinct kinetic diameters of the adsorbate. This allows for effective pore filling in the sorption process. In conclusion, the surface area and porosity of biochar are critical in controlling the rate and kinetics of chemical reactions, as well as the pH [45].
Dehydroxylation, dehydrogenation, and aromatization of feedstock during pyrolysis produce surface functional groups that can be basic or acidic and play an important role in P or N adsorption. Acidic functional groups with a negative charge attract cationic ammonium species and exchange H+ on the surface of biochar, while basic surface functional groups with a positive charge contain OH ions and exchange phosphate ions in an aqueous solution [46]. An important research affirmation suggested that biochar produced in low temperature pyrolysis contains more functional groups [47].
Table 2 presents the principal characteristics of biochar obtained from waste, showing some examples of the principal characteristics of biochar from different feedstocks, conditions of temperature, residence time, and the technology chosen for elaboration of the biochar, as well as characteristics of the biochar such as the BET surface area, micropore volume, and the type of functional groups.
Generally, a higher carbonization temperature results in a higher specific surface area, e.g., hydrothermal carbonization of rice husk at 180 °C produced a variety of functional groups and BET area of 5.02 m2/g [48], but carbonization of sugarcane bagasse at 700 °C created biochar with more functional groups and a greater BET surface area (131 m2/g) [49]. The pyrolysis process has a critical temperature, beyond which subjecting the biomass to higher temperatures accelerates the release of volatile compounds, resulting in the development of a porous structure and an increased specific surface area [53]. Generally, feedstocks producing aromatic functional groups during pyrolysis, e.g., sugar cane bagasse, soybean stover, and oak sawdust, are advantageous for ammonium removal [49, 51, 52], while feedstocks producing mainly oxygen-containing functional groups e.g., rice husk and wheat straw, have demonstrated good results in terms of phosphate elimination. Overall, it is evident that the preparatory conditions and type of feedstock used to produce biochar determine its characteristics and applicability.
Methods for characterizing biochar
The characterization of biochar is conducted with three main objectives in mind: (1) to get a better understanding of biochar’s physical and chemical characteristics, as well as changes in biochar features as a result of manufacture, circumstances, and feedstocks; (2) to assess the potential applications of biochar in various fields; and (3) to study biochar contaminants and ecotoxicological parameters [54].
Figure 2 shows a summary of methods for analysing the chemical and physical characteristics of biochar. Biochar can be characterized by its chemical properties, physical properties, surface morphology, and thermal stability. Chemical characterization involves pH measurements, electrical conductivity, and cation exchange capacity. Physical properties, such as surface area and pore size, can be determined by means of adsorption methods (BET isotherm measurements), while particle size distribution can be determined by particle size analysers. Porosity, bulk density, and solid density can be measured by means of mercury porosimetry. Surface morphology can be followed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), while distribution of surface elements can be determined by scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDX). Surface functional groups are measured by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR); surface chemical compounds can be determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Thermal stability can be followed by thermal gravimetric analysis, while determination of chemical composition can be fulfilled by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Raman spectroscopy can be used for determination of aromaticity [54].
Adsorption kinetics and isotherm models
Regarding kinetic models, Table 3 summarizes the equations and parameters of kinetic models and their respective units and parameter description.
Equations and parameters of isotherm models are summarized in Table 4; these models were used for decades to describe the interactions between adsorbates and adsorbents at equilibrium. Several research studies estimated the value of the maximum adsorption capacity using the Langmuir model [48].
The Langmuir isotherm assumes that the adsorbate forms a monolayer on a homogeneous adsorbent surface, whereas the Langmuir kinetic model is used to describe adsorption equilibrium data [56].
Results and discussion
Results for removal of ammonium and phosphates from aqueous solution using modified biochar originated from agricultural waste in recent research
The primary objective of utilizing biochar in the adsorption process is to eliminate nitrogen and phosphate from water to improve the water quality. On the other hand, once the biochar has removed the ammonium and phosphate nutrients from the water by adsorption, the nutrient-rich biochar can be utilized in fertilizer production [56].
In general, to gain a better understanding of the performance and mass transfer mechanisms of adsorbing substances from an aqueous solution, it is necessary to consider both thermodynamic and kinetic factors. The solute consumption rate, which defines the residence time necessary for the adsorption process to occur, may be determined by analysing the kinetic model [57].
According to the literature reviewed, most research papers dealing with the adsorption of ammonium and phosphates from aqueous solutions use pseudo-first order, pseudo-second order, and intraparticle diffusion kinetic models. The application of these models is problematic since they are empirical and lack specific physical significance, thus using these empirical kinetic models makes it impossible to investigate mass transfer mechanisms. On the other hand, there are differential kinetic models with precise physical meanings, but their solution methods are rather complex [58]. Regarding isotherm models, the constants have particular physical implications that characterize the adsorbent’s maximum capacity and surface characteristics [59].
The results for ammonium and phosphate removal, a summary of the feedstock material from which the biochar was made, the conditions of pyrolysis (temperature and residence time), the recovery capacity, the modification of biochar, and authors of mentioned research are summarized in Table 5.
Comparing Tables 2 and 5 reveals that the modification of the biochar improves its adsorption capacity due to the increase in the specific surface area. Moreover, biochars prepared in different conditions and further modified with various techniques like metal oxide and metal salt modifications are also compared. It can be seen that all kinds of biochar modification (metal oxide, acid–base, ball milling, and HCl modification) result in higher pollutant removal than achieved by biochar in the pristine form. It can be concluded that biochar modification technologies help to increase the recovery capacity by up to 24 times [62].
Based on previous research regarding the mechanisms involved in the different methods of modifying biochar to improve its adsorption capacity, it can be summarized that: In the case of metal oxide and metal salt modification, the modified biochar has a larger specific surface area than pristine or unmodified biochar. According to the results shown in the work of Yin et al., modification not only increases the average pore diameter but also enhances the number of functional groups [60]. Acid–base modification resulted in increased average pore volume, while the specific surface area decreased. This can be explained through the study of pore size: micropores were observed in the pristine biochar, which were not present in modified biochar. This implies that the modification merges the micropores into larger ones. Additionally, the number of O=H functional groups increased in modified biochar compared to the unmodified one [61]. The specific surface area can also be increased by reduction of particle size, as shown in the work of Qin et al.; they also proved that changes in the functional groups improve adsorption [63].
Biochar-based fertilizers
In general, the biochar produced from agricultural waste contains small amounts of nutrients, so these concentrations can be increased if the biochar is used for the ammonium and phosphate adsorption process. In general, several investigations have been carried out in the field of biochar-based slow-release fertilizers, which have presented excellent environmental performance because they increase both crop yield and nutrient (P and N) use efficiency; some examples of the results are shown below (Table 6).
Conclusion
It has been demonstrated that biochar is a promising material for water treatment. Previous studies have proved the high efficiency of ammonium and phosphate removal from water by biochar adsorption. This review emphasizes the necessity of utilizing engineered biochar for ammonium and phosphate removal. The modification of biochar’s surface properties using various techniques and methods is expected to alter its surface area, surface charge, functional groups, and pore volume.
Biochar production from biomass waste materials would not compete for land with any other land use choice, including food production or maintaining the land’s natural state, thereby addressing at least two of the most pressing environmental concerns.
The literature highlights the relevance of research focusing on biochar’s sorption mechanism, desorption, and sorption kinetics for removing organic compounds and heavy metals from aqueous solutions, making biochar a promising technology for wastewater treatment. A further promising opportunity for use is the degradation of organic pollutants by catalytic reactions.
Further research is required to establish a highly efficient and cost-effective technology for modifying biochar, increasing its practical application in wastewater treatment and enhancing its adsorption capacity for nitrogen and phosphorus, heavy metals, and organic pollutants.
References
Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071
Souza AB, Ferreira HS, Vilela AP, Viana QS, Mendes JF, Mendes RF (2021) Study on the feasibility of using agricultural waste in the production of concrete blocks. J Build Eng 42:102491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102491
Wang J, Chen C (2009) Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future. Biotechnol Adv 27:195–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.11.002
Yin Q, Zhang B, Wang R, Zhao Z (2017) Biochar as an adsorbent for inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus removal from water: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:26297–26309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0338-y
World Health Organization (2019) Drinking water. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/drinking-water
Smol M, Adam C, Preisner M (2020) Circular economy model framework in the European water and wastewater sector. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22:682–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00960-z
Shackley S, Carter S, Knowles T, Middelink E, Haefele S, Sohi S, Cross A, Haszeldine S (2012) Sustainable gasification-biochar systems? A case-study of rice-husk gasification in Cambodia, Part I: context, chemical properties, environmental and health and safety issues. Energy Policy 42:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.026
Almanassra IW, Mckay G, Kochkodan V, Ali Atieh M, Al-Ansari T (2021) A state of the art review on phosphate removal from water by biochars. Chem Eng J 409:128211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.128211
Hopkins D, Hawboldt K (2020) Biochar for the removal of metals from solution: a review of lignocellulosic and novel marine feedstocks. J Environ Chem Eng 8:103975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.103975
Liu Z, Han G (2015) Production of solid fuel biochar from waste biomass by low temperature pyrolysis. Fuel 158:159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.05.032
Wang Y, Hu Y, Zhao X, Wang S, Xing G (2013) Comparisons of biochar properties from wood material and crop residues at different temperatures and residence times. Energy Fuels 27:5890–5899. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef400972z
Wang B, Lehmann J, Hanley K, Hestrin R, Enders A (2015) Adsorption and desorption of ammonium by maple wood biochar as a function of oxidation and pH. Chemosphere 138:120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.062
Oginni O, Singh K (2020) Influence of high carbonization temperatures on microstructural and physicochemical characteristics of herbaceous biomass derived biochars. J Environ Chem Eng 8:104169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104169
Ghodake GS, Shinde SK, Kadam AA, Saratale RG, Saratale GD, Kumar M, Palem RR, AL-Shwaiman HA, Elgorban AM, Syed A, Kim DY (2021) Review on biomass feedstocks, pyrolysis mechanism and physicochemical properties of biochar: state-of-the-art framework to speed up vision of circular bioeconomy. J Clean Prod 297:126645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126645
Alburquerque JA, Sánchez ME, Mora M, Barrón V (2016) Slow pyrolysis of relevant biomasses in the Mediterranean basin. Part 2. Char characterisation for carbon sequestration and agricultural uses. J Clean Prod 120:191–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.080
Meyer S, Glaser B, Quicker P (2011) Technical, economical, and climate-related aspects of biochar production technologies: a literature review. Environ Sci Technol 45:9473–9483. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201792c
Qambrani NA, Rahman MM, Won S, Shim S, Ra C (2017) Biochar properties and eco-friendly applications for climate change mitigation, waste management, and wastewater treatment: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 79:255–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.057
Nunes LJR (2022) Biomass gasification as an industrial process with effective proof-of-concept: a comprehensive review on technologies, processes and future developments. Results Eng 14:100408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100408
Qin F, Zhang C, Zeng G, Huang D, Tan X, Duan A (2022) Lignocellulosic biomass carbonization for biochar production and characterization of biochar reactivity. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 157:112056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.112056
Ahmed MB, Zhou JL, Ngo HH, Guo W (2016) Insight into biochar properties and its cost analysis. Biomass Bioenergy 84:76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.11.002
Wang R, Liu S, Xue Q, Lin K, Yin Q, Zhao Z (2022) Analysis and prediction of characteristics for solid product obtained by hydrothermal carbonization of biomass components. Renew Energy 183:575–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.001
Thengane SK, Kung KS, Gomez-Barea A, Ghoniem AF (2022) Advances in biomass torrefaction: parameters, models, reactors, applications, deployment, and market. Prog Energy Combust Sci 93:101040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2022.101040
Xiang W, Zhang X, Chen J, Zou W, He F, Hu X, Tsang DCW, Ok YS, Gao B (2020) Biochar technology in wastewater treatment: a critical review. Chemosphere 252:126539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126539
Yaashikaa PR, Kumar PS, Varjani S, Saravanan A (2020) A critical review on the biochar production techniques, characterization, stability and applications for circular bioeconomy. Biotechnol Rep 28:e00570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00570
Masoumi S, Borugadda VB, Nanda S, Dalai AK (2021) Hydrochar: a review on its production technologies. Catalysts 11:939. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11080939
Patra BR, Mukherjee A, Nanda S, Dalai AK (2021) Biochar production, activation and adsorptive applications: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19:2237–2259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01165-9
do Nascimento BF, de Araujo CMB, do Nascimento AC, da Costa GRB, Gomes BFML, da Silva MP, da Silva Santos RK, da Motta Sobrinho MA (2021) Adsorption of Reactive Black 5 and Basic Blue 12 using biochar from gasification residues: batch tests and fixed-bed breakthrough predictions for wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol Rep 15:100767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100767
Nunoura T, Wade SR, Bourke JP, Antal MJ (2006) Studies of the flash carbonization process. 1. Propagation of the flaming pyrolysis reaction and performance of a catalytic afterburner. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:585–599. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050854y
Cha JS, Park SH, Jung SC, Ryu C, Jeon JK, Shin MC, Park YK (2016) Production and utilization of biochar: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 40:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.06.002
Zhang C, Ho SH, Chen WH, Fu Y, Chang JS, Bi X (2019) Oxidative torrefaction of biomass nutshells: evaluations of energy efficiency as well as biochar transportation and storage. Appl Energy 235:428–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.090
Chen D, Zheng Z, Fu K, Zeng Z, Wang J, Lu M (2015) Torrefaction of biomass stalk and its effect on the yield and quality of pyrolysis products. Fuel 159:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.078
Chen WH, Lin BJ, Lin YY, Chu YS, Ubando AT, Show PL, Ong HC, Chang JS, Ho SH, Culaba AB, Pétrissans A, Pétrissans M (2021) Progress in biomass torrefaction: principles, applications and challenges. Prog Energy Combust Sci 82:100887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100887
Cheng N, Wang B, Wu P, Lee X, Xing Y, Chen M, Gao B (2021) Adsorption of emerging contaminants from water and wastewater by modified biochar: a review. Environ Pollut 273:116448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116448
Wu L, Wei C, Zhang S, Wang Y, Kuzyakov Y, Ding X (2019) MgO-modified biochar increases phosphate retention and rice yields in saline-alkaline soil. J Clean Prod 235:901–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.043
Wang J, Wang S (2019) Preparation, modification and environmental application of biochar: a review. J Clean Prod 227:1002–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.282
Sizmur T, Fresno T, Akgül G, Frost H, Moreno-Jiménez E (2017) Biochar modification to enhance sorption of inorganics from water. Bioresour Technol 246:34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.082
Xi H, Zhang X, Hua Zhang A, Guo F, Yang Y, Lu Z, Ying G, Zhang J (2022) Concurrent removal of phosphate and ammonium from wastewater for utilization using Mg-doped biochar/bentonite composite beads. Sep Purif Technol 285:120399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.120399
Kumar M, Xiong X, Wan Z, Sun Y, Tsang DCW, Gupta J, Gao B, Cao X, Tang J, Ok YS (2020) Ball milling as a mechanochemical technology for fabrication of novel biochar nanomaterials. Bioresour Technol 312:123613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123613
Lyu H, Gao B, He F, Ding C, Tang J, Crittenden JC (2017) Ball-milled carbon nanomaterials for energy and environmental applications. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:9568–9585. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02170
Lyu H, Gao B, He F, Zimmerman AR, Ding C, Tang J, Crittenden JC (2018) Experimental and modeling investigations of ball-milled biochar for the removal of aqueous methylene blue. Chem Eng J 335:110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.130
Zhang X, Miao X, Xiang W, Zhang J, Cao C, Wang H, Hu X, Gao B (2021) Ball milling biochar with ammonia hydroxide or hydrogen peroxide enhances its adsorption of phenyl volatile organic compounds (VOCs). J Hazard Mater 403:123540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123540
Hale SE, Alling V, Martinsen V, Mulder J, Breedveld GD, Cornelissen G (2013) The sorption and desorption of phosphate-P, ammonium-N and nitrate-N in cacao shell and corn cob biochars. Chemosphere 91:1612–1619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.12.057
Chen W, Meng J, Han X, Lan Y, Zhang W (2019) Past, present, and future of biochar. Biochar 1:75–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-019-00008-3
Wang S, Gao B, Zimmerman AR, Li Y, Ma L, Harris WG, Migliaccio KW (2015) Physicochemical and sorptive properties of biochars derived from woody and herbaceous biomass. Chemosphere 134:257–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.04.062
Leng L, Xiong Q, Yang L, Li H, Zhou Y, Zhang W, Jiang S, Li H, Huang H (2021) An overview on engineering the surface area and porosity of biochar. Sci Total Environ 763:144204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144204
Shakoor MB, Ye ZL, Chen S (2021) Engineered biochars for recovering phosphate and ammonium from wastewater: a review. Sci Total Environ 779:146240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146240
Fu MM, Mo CH, Li H, Zhang YN, Huang WX, Wong MH (2019) Comparison of physicochemical properties of biochars and hydrochars produced from food wastes. J Clean Prod 236:117637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117637
Hossain N, Nizamuddin S, Griffin G, Selvakannan P, Mubarak NM, Mahlia TMI (2020) Synthesis and characterization of rice husk biochar via hydrothermal carbonization for wastewater treatment and biofuel production. Sci Rep 10:18851. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75936-3
Trazzi PA, Leahy JJ, Hayes MHB, Kwapinski W (2016) Adsorption and desorption of phosphate on biochars. J Environ Chem Eng 4:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.11.005
Yang HI, Lou K, Rajapaksha AU, Ok YS, Anyia AO, Chang SX (2018) Adsorption of ammonium in aqueous solutions by pine sawdust and wheat straw biochars. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:25638–25647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8551-2
Karunanithi R, Ok YS, Dharmarajan R, Ahmad M, Seshadri B, Bolan N, Naidu R (2017) Sorption, kinetics and thermodynamics of phosphate sorption onto soybean stover derived biochar. Environ Technol Innov 8:113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2017.06.002
Wang Z, Guo H, Shen F, Yang G, Zhang Y, Zeng Y, Wang L, Xiao H, Deng S (2015) Biochar produced from oak sawdust by lanthanum (La)-involved pyrolysis for adsorption of ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3−), and phosphate (PO43−). Chemosphere 119:646–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.084
Fan X, Wang X, Zhao B, Wan J, Tang J, Guo X (2022) Sorption mechanisms of diethyl phthalate by nutshell biochar derived at different pyrolysis temperature. J Environ Chem Eng 10:107328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107328
Igalavithana AD, Mandal S, Niazi NK, Vithanage M, Parikh SJ, Mukome FND, Rizwan M, Oleszczuk P, Al-Wabel M, Bolan N, Tsang DCW, Kim KH, Ok YS (2017) Advances and future directions of biochar characterization methods and applications. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 47:2275–2330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2017.1421844
Carneiro JS da S, Ribeiro ICA, Nardis BO, Barbosa CF, Lustosa Filho JF, Melo LCA (2021) Long-term effect of biochar-based fertilizers application in tropical soil: agronomic efficiency and phosphorus availability. Sci Total Environ 760:143955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143955
Xu K, Lin F, Dou X, Zheng M, Tan W, Wang C (2018) Recovery of ammonium and phosphate from urine as value-added fertilizer using wood waste biochar loaded with magnesium oxides. J Clean Prod 187:205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.206
Qiu H, Lv L, Pan BC, Zhang QJ, Zhang WM, Zhang QX (2009) Critical review in adsorption kinetic models. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 10:716–724. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A0820524
Wang J, Guo X (2020) Adsorption kinetic models: physical meanings, applications, and solving methods. J Hazard Mater 390:122156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122156
Guo X, Wang J (2019) Comparison of linearization methods for modeling the Langmuir adsorption isotherm. J Mol Liq 296:111850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111850
Yin Q, Wang R, Zhao Z (2018) Application of Mg–Al-modified biochar for simultaneous removal of ammonium, nitrate, and phosphate from eutrophic water. J Clean Prod 176:230–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.117
Vu TM, Trinh VT, Doan DP, Van HT, Nguyen TV, Vigneswaran S, Ngo HH (2017) Removing ammonium from water using modified corncob-biochar. Sci Total Environ 579:612–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.050
Li R, Wang JJ, Zhou B, Zhang Z, Liu S, Lei S, Xiao R (2017) Simultaneous capture removal of phosphate, ammonium and organic substances by MgO impregnated biochar and its potential use in swine wastewater treatment. J Clean Prod 147:96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.069
Qin Y, Zhu X, Su Q, Anumah A, Gao B, Lyu W, Zhou X, Xing Y, Wang B (2020) Enhanced removal of ammonium from water by ball-milled biochar. Environ Geochem Health 42:1579–1587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-019-00474-5
Li JH, Lv GH, Bai WB, Liu Q, Zhang YC, Song JQ (2016) Modification and use of biochar from wheat straw (Triticum aestivum L.) for nitrate and phosphate removal from water. Desalination Water Treat 57:4681–4693. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.994104
Yin Q, Liu M, Ren H (2019) Removal of ammonium and phosphate from water by Mg-modified biochar: influence of Mg pretreatment and pyrolysis temperature. BioResources 14:6203–6218. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.14.3.6203-6218
Zhao Z, Wang B, Feng Q, Chen M, Zhang X, Zhao R (2023) Recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus in wastewater by red mud-modified biochar and its potential application. Sci Total Environ 860:160289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160289
Sepúlveda-Cadavid C, Romero JH, Torres M, Becerra-Agudelo E, López JE (2021) Evaluation of a biochar-based slow-release P fertilizer to improve Spinacia oleracea P use, yield, and nutritional quality. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 21:2980–2992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00583-0
An X, Wu Z, Liu X, Shi W, Tian F, Yu B (2021) A new class of biochar-based slow-release phosphorus fertilizers with high water retention based on integrated co-pyrolysis and co-polymerization. Chemosphere 285:131481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131481
Cen Z, Wei L, Muthukumarappan K, Sobhan A, McDaniel R (2021) Assessment of a biochar-based controlled release nitrogen fertilizer coated with polylactic acid. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 21:2007–2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00497-x
Hu P, Zhang Y, Liu L, Wang X, Luan X, Ma X, Chu PK, Zhou J, Zhao P (2019) Biochar/struvite composite as a novel potential material for slow release of N and P. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:17152–17162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04458-x
Acknowledgements
Fernanda Pantoja Álvarez is grateful for the financial support of the Stipendium Hungaricum scholarship. Additionally, the text of the present manuscript was corrected by a professional proofreading service, provided by https://Proof-Reading-Service.com.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Szeged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pantoja, F., Sukmana, H., Beszédes, S. et al. Removal of ammonium and phosphates from aqueous solutions by biochar produced from agricultural waste. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 25, 1921–1934 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01687-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01687-8