Abstract
Purpose
This systematic review aims to assess the impact of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) on various frequency-following response (FFR) parameters.
Methods
Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to January 2023. Studies evaluating FFRs in patients with SNHL and normal hearing controls were included.
Results
Sixteen case–control studies were included, revealing variability in acquisition parameters. In the time domain, patients with SNHL exhibited prolonged latencies. The specific waves that were prolonged differed across studies. There was no consensus regarding wave amplitude in the time domain. In the frequency domain, focusing on studies that elicited FFRs with stimuli of 170 ms or longer, participants with SNHL displayed a significantly smaller fundamental frequency (F0). Results regarding changes in the temporal fine structure (TFS) were inconsistent.
Conclusion
Patients with SNHL may require more time for processing (speech) stimuli, reflected in prolonged latencies. However, the exact timing of this delay remains unclear. Additionally, when presenting longer stimuli (≥ 170 ms), patients with SNHL show difficulties tracking the F0 of (speech) stimuli. No definite conclusions could be drawn on changes in wave amplitude in the time domain and the TFS in the frequency domain. Patient characteristics, acquisition parameters, and FFR outcome parameters differed greatly across studies. Future studies should be performed in larger and carefully matched subject groups, using longer stimuli presented at the same intensity in dB HL for both groups, or at a carefully determined maximum comfortable loudness level.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data sharing does not apply to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study. The list of studies included in this scoping review that support the findings of this review are openly available in the supplementary files and reference list.
References
Krizman J, Kraus N (2019) Analyzing the FFR: a tutorial for decoding the richness of auditory function. Hear Res 382:107779
Coffey EBJ, Nicol T, White-Schwoch T, Chandrasekaran B, Krizman J, Skoe E et al (2019) Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response. Nat Commun 10(1):5036
Weiss MW, Bidelman GM (2015) Listening to the brainstem: musicianship enhances intelligibility of subcortical representations for speech. J Neurosci 35(4):1687–1691
Galbraith GC, Arbagey PW, Branski R, Comerci N, Rector PM (1995) Intelligible speech encoded in the human brain stem frequency-following response. NeuroReport 6(17):2363–2367
Bidelman GM (2015) Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR. Hear Res 323:68–80
Chandrasekaran B, Kraus N (2010) The scalp-recorded brainstem response to speech: neural origins and plasticity. Psychophysiology 47(2):236–246
Sohmer H, Pratt H, Kinarti R (1977) Sources of frequency following responses (FFR) in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 42(5):656–664
White-Schwoch T, Nicol T, Warrier CM, Abrams DA, Kraus N (2017) Individual differences in human auditory processing: insights from single-trial auditory midbrain activity in an animal model. Cereb Cortex 27(11):5095–5115
White-Schwoch T, Anderson S, Krizman J, Nicol T, Kraus N (2019) Case studies in neuroscience: subcortical origins of the frequency-following response. J Neurophysiol 122(2):844–848
Gorina-Careta N, Kurkela JLO, Hämäläinen J, Astikainen P, Escera C (2021) Neural generators of the frequency-following response elicited to stimuli of low and high frequency: a magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study. Neuroimage 231:117866
Ribas-Prats T, Arenillas-Alcón S, Lip-Sosa DL, Costa-Faidella J, Mazarico E, Gómez-Roig MD et al (2022) Deficient neural encoding of speech sounds in term neonates born after fetal growth restriction. Dev Sci 25(3):e13189
Kraus N, Nicol T (2017) The power of sound for brain health. Nat Hum Behav 1(10):700–702
Nozaradan S, Schönwiesner M, Caron-Desrochers L, Lehmann A (2016) Enhanced brainstem and cortical encoding of sound during synchronized movement. Neuroimage 142:231–240
Musacchia G, Sams M, Skoe E, Kraus N (2007) Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(40):15894–15898
Skoe E, Kraus N (2010) Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial. Ear Hear 31(3):302–324
Aiken SJ, Picton TW (2008) Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds. Hear Res 245(1–2):35–47
Banai K, Hornickel J, Skoe E, Nicol T, Zecker S, Kraus N (2009) Reading and subcortical auditory function. Cereb Cortex 19(11):2699–2707
Krishnan A (2002) Human frequency-following responses: representation of steady-state synthetic vowels. Hear Res 166(1–2):192–201
López-Caballero F, Martin-Trias P, Ribas-Prats T, Gorina-Careta N, Bartrés-Faz D, Escera C (2020) Effects of cTBS on the frequency-following response and other auditory evoked potentials. Front Hum Neurosci 14:250
Carcagno S, Plack CJ (2011) Subcortical plasticity following perceptual learning in a pitch discrimination task. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12(1):89–100
Krishnan A, Xu Y, Gandour J, Cariani P (2005) Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 25(1):161–168
Anderson S, Parbery-Clark A, White-Schwoch T, Drehobl S, Kraus N (2013) Effects of hearing loss on the subcortical representation of speech cues. J Acoust Soc Am 133(5):3030–3038
Krizman J, Marian V, Shook A, Skoe E, Kraus N (2012) Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(20):7877–7881
Parbery-Clark A, Strait DL, Anderson S, Hittner E, Kraus N (2011) Musical experience and the aging auditory system: implications for cognitive abilities and hearing speech in noise. PLoS ONE 6(5):e18082
Skoe E, Kraus N (2012) A little goes a long way: how the adult brain is shaped by musical training in childhood. J Neurosci 32(34):11507–11510
Bidelman GM (2013) The role of the auditory brainstem in processing musically relevant pitch. Front Psychol 4:264
Bidelman GM, Alain C (2015) Musical training orchestrates coordinated neuroplasticity in auditory brainstem and cortex to counteract age-related declines in categorical vowel perception. J Neurosci 35(3):1240–1249
Chandrasekaran B, Hornickel J, Skoe E, Nicol T, Kraus N (2009) Context-dependent encoding in the human auditory brainstem relates to hearing speech in noise: implications for developmental dyslexia. Neuron 64(3):311–319
Billiet CR, Bellis TJ (2011) The relationship between brainstem temporal processing and performance on tests of central auditory function in children with reading disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res 54(1):228–242
Bidelman GM, Lowther JE, Tak SH, Alain C (2017) Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Characterized by Deficient Brainstem and Cortical Representations of Speech. J Neurosci 37(13):3610–3620
Font-Alaminos M, Cornella M, Costa-Faidella J, Hervás A, Leung S, Rueda I et al (2020) Increased subcortical neural responses to repeating auditory stimulation in children with autism spectrum disorder. Biol Psychol 149:107807
Otto-Meyer S, Krizman J, White-Schwoch T, Kraus N (2018) Children with autism spectrum disorder have unstable neural responses to sound. Exp Brain Res 236(3):733–743
Vasilkov V, Garrett M, Mauermann M, Verhulst S (2021) Enhancing the sensitivity of the envelope-following response for cochlear synaptopathy screening in humans: The role of stimulus envelope. Hear Res 400:108132
Verhulst S, Ernst F, Garrett M, Vasilkov V (2018) Suprathreshold psychoacoustics and envelope-following response relations: normal-hearing, synaptopathy and cochlear gain loss. Acta Acust Acust 104(5):800–803
White-Schwoch T, Anderson S, Krizman J, Bonacina S, Nicol T, Bradlow AR et al (2022) Multiple cases of auditory neuropathy illuminate the importance of subcortical neural synchrony for speech-in-noise recognition and the frequency-following response. Ear Hear 43(2):605–619
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4(1):1
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med 18(3):e1003583
Universiteit Utrecht (2022) Clinical questions: get going [updated 09/09/2022]. Available from: https://libguides.library.uu.nl/clinical_questions
Kraus N, Anderson S, White-Schwoch T (2017) The frequency-following response: a window into human communication. In: Kraus N, Anderson S, White-Schwoch T, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) The Frequency-Following Response: A Window into Human Communication. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–15
Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell D et al (2021) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Available from: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
McPheeters ML, Kripalani S, Peterson NB, Idowu RT, Jerome RN, Potter SA et al (2012) Closing the quality gap: revisiting the state of the science (vol. 3: quality improvement interventions to address health disparities). Evid Rep Technol Assess (208.3):1–475
Koravand A, Al Osman R, Rivest V, Poulin C (2017) Speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 99:24–29
Nada NM, Kolkaila EA, Gabr TA, El-Mahallawi TH (2016) Speech auditory brainstem response audiometry in adults with sensorineural hearing loss. Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences 17(2):87–94
Jalaeia B, Zakariab MN (2019) Speech-evoked auditory brainstem response in children with sensorineural hearing loss. Glob J Otolaryngol 20(4):556042. https://doi.org/10.19080/GJO.2019.20.556042
Ji H, Yu X, Xiao Z, Zhu H, Liu P, Lin H et al (2023) Features of cognitive ability and central auditory processing of preschool children with minimal and mild hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 66(5):1867–1888
Leite RA, Magliaro FCL, Raimundo JC, Gandara M, Garbi S, Bento RF et al (2018) Effect of hearing aids use on speech stimulus decoding through speech-evoked ABR. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 84(1):66–73
Ananthakrishnan S, Krishnan A, Bartlett E (2016) Human frequency following response: neural representation of envelope and temporal fine structure in listeners with normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 37(2):e91–e103
Hao W, Wang Q, Li L, Qiao Y, Gao Z, Ni D et al (2018) Effects of phase-locking deficits on speech recognition in older adults with presbycusis. Front Aging Neurosci 10:397
Roque L, Gaskins C, Gordon-Salant S, Goupell MJ, Anderson S (2019) Age effects on neural representation and perception of silence duration cues in speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 62(4s):1099–1116
Seol HY, Park S, Ji YS, Hong SH, Moon IJ (2020) Impact of hearing aid noise reduction algorithms on the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response. Sci Rep 10(1):10773
Akhoun I, Moulin A, Jeanvoine A, Menard M, Buret F, Vollaire C et al (2008) Speech auditory brainstem response (speech ABR) characteristics depending on recording conditions, and hearing status an experimental parametric study. J Neurosci Methods 175(2):196–205
Molis MR, Bologna WJ, Madsen BM, Muralimanohar RK, Billings CJ (2023) Frequency following responses to tone glides: effects of age and hearing loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 24(4):429–439
Presacco A, Simon JZ, Anderson S (2019) Speech-in-noise representation in the aging midbrain and cortex: Effects of hearing loss. PLoS ONE 14(3):e0213899
Fu Z, Yang H, Chen F, Wu X, Chen J (2019) Brainstem encoding of frequency-modulated sweeps is relevant to Mandarin concurrent-vowels identification for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Hear Res 380:123–136
Abd El-Ghaffar NM, El-Gharib AM, Kolkaila EA, Elmahallawy TH (2018) Speech-evoked auditory brainstem response with ipsilateral noise in adults with unilateral hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol 138(2):145–152
Plyler PN, Ananthanarayan AK (2001) Human frequency-following responses: representation of second formant transitions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Am Acad Audiol 12(10):523–533
Parthasarathy A, Datta J, Torres JA, Hopkins C, Bartlett EL (2014) Age-related changes in the relationship between auditory brainstem responses and envelope-following responses. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 15(4):649–661
Clinard CG, Tremblay KL, Krishnan AR (2010) Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: evidence from human frequency-following response recordings. Hear Res 264(1–2):48–55
Russo N, Nicol T, Musacchia G, Kraus N (2004) Brainstem responses to speech syllables. Clin Neurophysiol 115(9):2021–2030
BinKhamis G, Elia Forte A, Reichenbach T, O’Driscoll M, Kluk K (2019) Speech auditory brainstem responses in adult hearing aid users: effects of aiding and background noise, and prediction of behavioral measures. Trends Hear 23
Easwar V, Purcell D, Wright T (2023) Predicting hearing aid benefit using speech-evoked envelope following responses in children with hearing loss. Trends Hear 27:23312165231151468
Easwar V, Purcell DW, Aiken SJ, Parsa V, Scollie SD (2015) Evaluation of speech-evoked envelope following responses as an objective aided outcome measure: effect of stimulus level, bandwidth, and amplification in adults with hearing loss. Ear Hear 36(6):635–652
Karawani H, Jenkins KA, Anderson S (2018) Neural and behavioral changes after the use of hearing aids. Clin Neurophysiol 129(6):1254–1267
Kessler DM, Ananthakrishnan S, Smith SB, D’Onofrio K, Gifford RH (2020) Frequency following response and speech recognition benefit for combining a cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid. Trends Hear 24:2331216520902001
Easwar V, Birstler J, Harrison A, Scollie S, Purcell D (2022) The influence of sensation level on speech-evoked envelope following responses. Ear Hear 43(1):250–254
Goossens T, Vercammen C, Wouters J, van Wieringen A (2019) The association between hearing impairment and neural envelope encoding at different ages. Neurobiol Aging 74:202–212
Farahani ED, Wouters J, van Wieringen A (2022) Age-related hearing loss is associated with alterations in temporal envelope processing in different neural generators along the auditory pathway. Front Neurol 13:905017
Funding
We would like to acknowledge that this research was partially conducted and made possible through a research stay at the University of Barcelona, supported by a grant for a short research stay provided by the FWO (Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek—Research Foundation Flanders), grant number K208323N. Carles Escera was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation the project PID2021-122255NB-100 supported by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER, UE; the María de Maeztu Center of Excellence CEX2021-001159-M (supported by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033); the 2021SGR-00356 Consolidated Research Group of the Catalan Government, and the ICREA Acadèmia Distinguished Professorship award.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Laura Jacxsens: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization. Lana Biot: data curation, formal analysis, writing—review and editing. Carles Escera: conceptualization, supervision, writing—review and editing. Annick Gilles: supervision, writing—review and editing. Emilie Cardon: conceptualization, writing—review and editing. Vincent Van Rompaey: conceptualization, supervision, writing—review and editing. Willem De Hertogh: conceptualization, supervision, writing—review and editing. Marc Lammers: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing—review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jacxsens, L., Biot, L., Escera, C. et al. Frequency-Following Responses in Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review. JARO 25, 131–147 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-024-00932-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-024-00932-7