Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rectal stump management in inflammatory bowel disease: a cohort study, systematic review and proportional analysis of perioperative complications

  • Review
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to analyse local single-institution data and perform a systematic review of the literature to calculate precise risk estimates of rectal stump-related morbidity and mortality following subtotal colectomy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s colitis, ulcerative colitis and indeterminate colitis.

Methods

Institutional information systems were interrogated to obtain local patient data. A systematic review of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed to identify relevant articles. Fixed-effects or random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was performed to calculate pooled incidence estimates, including local data.

Results

Sixty-one patients were included locally and all had their rectal stump closed intra-abdominally. Four patients (8.3%) had a rectal stump perforation and 30-day mortality was 0. Fourteen papers were included in our review alongside local data, with a total of 1330 patients included. Pooled mortality was 1.7% (95% confidence interval, CI 1.0–2.8), pooled incidence of pelvic abscess/sepsis, stump leak and wound infection was 5.7% (95% CI 4.4–7.3), 4.9% (95% CI 3.7–6.6) and 11.3% (95% CI 7.8–16), respectively. Subcutaneous placement of the stump was associated with the highest incidence of stump leak (12.6%, 95% CI 8.3–18.6), and closure of the stump with both staples and suture was associated with the highest incidence of pelvic abscess (11.1%, 95% CI 5.8–20.3). Mortality and the incidence of wound infection were similar across stump closure techniques. There was evidence suggesting considerable heterogeneity and publication bias among studies.

Conclusions

This study provides estimates of morbidity associated with the rectal stump after subtotal colectomy for IBD. A closed intra-abdominal stump seems to be associated with the highest rate of pelvic abscess/sepsis. Further work in form of an international collaborative project would allow individual patient data analysis and identification of risk factors for complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bryan S, Andronis L, Hyde C, Connock M, Fry-Smith A, Wang D (2010) Infliximab for the treatment of acute exacerbations of ulcerative colitis. Health Technol Assess 14(Suppl 1):9–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Farmer RG, Easley KA, Rankin GB (1993) Clinical patterns, natural history, and progression of ulcerative colitis. A long-term follow-up of 1116 patients. Dig Dis Sci 38(6):1137–1146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Frid NL, Bulut O, Pachler J (2013) Acceptable short-term outcome of laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease. Dan Med J 60(6):A4645

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Messenger DE, Mihailovic D, MacRae HM, O'Connor BI, Victor JC, McLeod RS (2014) Subtotal colectomy in severe ulcerative and Crohn’s colitis: what benefit does the laparoscopic approach confer? Dis Colon Rectum 57(12):1349–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ross H, Steele SR, Varma M, Dykes S, Cima R, Buie WD et al (2014) Practice parameters for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 57(1):5–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Strong S, Steele SR, Boutrous M, Bordineau L, Chun J, Stewart DB et al (2015) Clinical practice guideline for the surgical management of Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 58(11):1021–1036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown SR, Fearnhead NS, Faiz OD, Abercrombie JF, Acheson AG, Arnott RG et al (2018) The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. Colorectal Dis 20(S8):3–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brady RR, Collie MH, Ho GT, Bartolo DC, Wilson RG, Dunlop MG (2008) Outcomes of the rectal remnant following colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Colorectal Dis 10(2):144–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carter FM, McLeod RS, Cohen Z (1991) Subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis: complications related to the rectal remnant. Dis Colon Rectum 34(11):1005–1009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Karch LA, Bauer JJ, Gorfine SR, Gelernt IM (1995) Subtotal colectomy with Hartmann’s pouch for inflammatory bowel disease. Dis Colon Rectum 38(6):635–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kyle SM, Steyn RS, Keenan RA (1992) Management of the rectum following colectomy for acute colitis. Aust N Z J Surg 62(3):196–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i491

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Albrechtsen D, Bergan A, Nygaard K, Gjone E, Flatmark A (1981) Urgent surgery for ulcerative colitis: early colectomy in 132 patients. World J Surg 5(4):607–615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bohm G, O'Dwyer ST (2007) The fate of the rectal stump after subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 22(3):277–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fleshner PR, Michelassi F, Rubin M, Hanauer SB, Plevy SE, Targan SR (1995) Morbidity of subtotal colectomy in patients with severe ulcerative colitis unresponsive to cyclosporin. Dis Colon Rectum 38(12):1241–1245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gu J, Stocchi L, Remzi F, Kiran RP (2013) Factors associated with postoperative morbidity, reoperation and readmission rates after laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Colorectal Dis 15(9):1123–1129

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koudahl G, Aagaard P (1971) The management of the rectal stump after subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 9:127–129

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ng RL, Davies AH, Grace RH, Mortensen NJ (1992) Subcutaneous rectal stump closure after emergency subtotal colectomy. Br J Surg 79(7):701–703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Candilio G, Canonico S, Selvaggi F (2012) Rectosigmoid stump washout as an alternative to permanent mucous fistula in patients undergoing subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis in emergency settings. BMC Surg 12(Suppl 1):S31

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Trickett JP, Tilney HS, Gudgeon AM, Mellor SG, Edwards DP (2005) Management of the rectal stump after emergency sub-total colectomy: which surgical option is associated with the lowest morbidity? Colorectal Dis 7(5):519–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wojdemann M, Wettergren A, Hartvigsen A, Myrhoj T, Svendsen LB, Bulow S (1995) Closure of rectal stump after colectomy for acute colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 10(4):197–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamamoto T, Keighley MR (1999) Long-term outcome of total colectomy and ileostomy for Crohn disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 34(3):280–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bedrikovetski S, Dudi-Venkata N, Kroon HM, Liu J, Andrews JM, Lewis M, Lawrence M, Sammour T (2019) Systematic review of rectal stump management during and after emergency total colectomy for acute severe ulcerative colitis. ANZ J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Lawday.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Retrospective audit of local data was registered with the local hospital audit and governance department. No ethical approval was necessary for the systematic review.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Fig. 

Fig. 2
figure 2

Search strategy

2.

Appendix 2

See Table 4.

Table 4 The risks of bias tool (iROBINS) results of all included papers from the review are presented

Appendix 3

See Figs. 

Fig. 3
figure 3

Mortality forest plot and funnel plot

3,

Fig. 4
figure 4

Pelvic sepsis forest plot and funnel plot

4,

Fig. 5
figure 5

Rectal stump leak forest plot and funnel plot

5 and

Fig. 6
figure 6

Wound infection forest plot and funnel plot

6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lawday, S., Leaning, M., Flannery, O. et al. Rectal stump management in inflammatory bowel disease: a cohort study, systematic review and proportional analysis of perioperative complications. Tech Coloproctol 24, 671–684 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02188-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02188-8

Keywords

Navigation