Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of an electrothermal bipolar sealing device in ligation of major mesenteric vessels during laparoscopic colorectal resection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A variety of approaches are available for division of major vascular structures during laparoscopic colorectal resection. Ultrasonic coagulating shears (UCS), vascular staplers, plastic or titanium clips and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS) are currently available. We report our experience with an EBVS device, LigaSure™ (Covidien AG), used in division of the ileocolic, middle colic and inferior mesenteric arteries during laparoscopic colorectal resection.

Methods

We report the immediate outcome of 802 consecutive unselected patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection performed with use of the LigaSure™ (5 and 10 mm) at our institution over a 5-year period. Operative procedures included right hemicolectomy (n = 180), left hemicolectomy (n = 96), sigmoid colectomy (n = 347) and anterior resection (n = 179). Data were collected from a prospectively maintained cancer database and operative records. The procedures were performed primarily by three consultant surgeons with an interest in laparoscopic colorectal resection.

Results

Of 802 cases in which the LigaSure™ device was employed to divide major vascular structures, immediate effective vessel sealing was achieved in 99.8% (n = 800). Two patients experienced related adverse events both following division of the inferior mesenteric artery with a 5 mm LigaSure™. Both patients had immediate uncontrolled haemorrhage that required laparotomy.

Conclusions

Use of the LigaSure™ device to seal and divide the major mesenteric vessels during laparoscopic colorectal resection is very effective, with a high success rate of 99.8%. Caution should be exercised in elderly atherosclerotic patients, particularly when using the 5-mm LigaSure™ device.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nelson H, Sargent D, Wieand HS, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al. (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662; discussion 662–654

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Amato A, Pescatori M (2006) Perioperative blood transfusions for the recurrence of colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD005033

  7. Campagnacci R, de Sanctis A, Baldarelli M, Rimini M, Lezoche G, Guerrieri M (2007) Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomies: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 21:1526–1531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rimonda R, Arezzo A, Garrone C, Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Morino M (2009) Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system vs. harmonic scalpel in colorectal laparoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 52:657–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Targarona EM, Balague C, Marin J et al (2005) Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis. Surg Innov 12:339–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bansal N, Roberts WS, Apte SM, Lancaster JM, Wenham RM (2009) Electrothermal bipolar coagulation decreases the rate of red blood cell transfusions for pelvic exenterations. J Surg Oncol 100:511–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cakabay B, Sevinc MM, Gomceli I, Yenidogan E, Ulku A, Koc S (2009) LigaSure versus clamp-and-tie in thyroidectomy: a single-center experience. Adv Ther 26:1035–1041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Constant DL, Florman SS, Mendez F, Thomas R, Slakey DP (2004) Use of the LigaSure vessel sealing device in laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 78:1661–1664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ikeda M, Hasegawa K, Sano K et al (2009) The vessel sealing system (LigaSure) in hepatic resection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 250:199–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kyo S, Mizumoto Y, Takakura M et al (2009) Experience and efficacy of a bipolar vessel sealing system for radical abdominal hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19:1658–1661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leonardo C, Guaglianone S, De Carli P, Pompeo V, Forastiere E, Gallucci M (2005) Laparoscopic nephrectomy using LigaSure system: preliminary experience. J Endourol 19:976–978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Surgit O (2010) Clipless and sutureless laparoscopic adrenalectomy carried out with the LigaSure device in 32 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:109–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yekeler E, Ulutas H, Becerik C, Peker K (2010) The use of the LigaSureTM in esophagectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 11:10–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kennedy JS, Stranahan PL, Taylor KD, Chandler JG (1998) High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing. Surg Endosc 12:876–878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Macario A, Dexter F, Sypal J, Cosgriff N, Heniford BT (2008) Operative time and other outcomes of the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (LigaSure) versus other methods for surgical hemostasis: a meta-analysis. Surg Innov 15:284–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Rusin LC, Holubkov R, Schoetz DJ (2006) Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy. A prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 20:263–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Desmond C. Winter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, S.T., Heeney, A., Pierce, C. et al. Use of an electrothermal bipolar sealing device in ligation of major mesenteric vessels during laparoscopic colorectal resection. Tech Coloproctol 15, 285–289 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0707-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0707-3

Keywords

Navigation