Abstract
Background
A variety of approaches are available for division of major vascular structures during laparoscopic colorectal resection. Ultrasonic coagulating shears (UCS), vascular staplers, plastic or titanium clips and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS) are currently available. We report our experience with an EBVS device, LigaSure™ (Covidien AG), used in division of the ileocolic, middle colic and inferior mesenteric arteries during laparoscopic colorectal resection.
Methods
We report the immediate outcome of 802 consecutive unselected patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection performed with use of the LigaSure™ (5 and 10 mm) at our institution over a 5-year period. Operative procedures included right hemicolectomy (n = 180), left hemicolectomy (n = 96), sigmoid colectomy (n = 347) and anterior resection (n = 179). Data were collected from a prospectively maintained cancer database and operative records. The procedures were performed primarily by three consultant surgeons with an interest in laparoscopic colorectal resection.
Results
Of 802 cases in which the LigaSure™ device was employed to divide major vascular structures, immediate effective vessel sealing was achieved in 99.8% (n = 800). Two patients experienced related adverse events both following division of the inferior mesenteric artery with a 5 mm LigaSure™. Both patients had immediate uncontrolled haemorrhage that required laparotomy.
Conclusions
Use of the LigaSure™ device to seal and divide the major mesenteric vessels during laparoscopic colorectal resection is very effective, with a high success rate of 99.8%. Caution should be exercised in elderly atherosclerotic patients, particularly when using the 5-mm LigaSure™ device.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nelson H, Sargent D, Wieand HS, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059
Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al. (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662; discussion 662–654
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726
Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229
Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192
Amato A, Pescatori M (2006) Perioperative blood transfusions for the recurrence of colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD005033
Campagnacci R, de Sanctis A, Baldarelli M, Rimini M, Lezoche G, Guerrieri M (2007) Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomies: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 21:1526–1531
Rimonda R, Arezzo A, Garrone C, Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Morino M (2009) Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system vs. harmonic scalpel in colorectal laparoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 52:657–661
Targarona EM, Balague C, Marin J et al (2005) Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis. Surg Innov 12:339–344
Bansal N, Roberts WS, Apte SM, Lancaster JM, Wenham RM (2009) Electrothermal bipolar coagulation decreases the rate of red blood cell transfusions for pelvic exenterations. J Surg Oncol 100:511–514
Cakabay B, Sevinc MM, Gomceli I, Yenidogan E, Ulku A, Koc S (2009) LigaSure versus clamp-and-tie in thyroidectomy: a single-center experience. Adv Ther 26:1035–1041
Constant DL, Florman SS, Mendez F, Thomas R, Slakey DP (2004) Use of the LigaSure vessel sealing device in laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 78:1661–1664
Ikeda M, Hasegawa K, Sano K et al (2009) The vessel sealing system (LigaSure) in hepatic resection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 250:199–203
Kyo S, Mizumoto Y, Takakura M et al (2009) Experience and efficacy of a bipolar vessel sealing system for radical abdominal hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19:1658–1661
Leonardo C, Guaglianone S, De Carli P, Pompeo V, Forastiere E, Gallucci M (2005) Laparoscopic nephrectomy using LigaSure system: preliminary experience. J Endourol 19:976–978
Surgit O (2010) Clipless and sutureless laparoscopic adrenalectomy carried out with the LigaSure device in 32 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:109–113
Yekeler E, Ulutas H, Becerik C, Peker K (2010) The use of the LigaSureTM in esophagectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 11:10–14
Kennedy JS, Stranahan PL, Taylor KD, Chandler JG (1998) High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing. Surg Endosc 12:876–878
Macario A, Dexter F, Sypal J, Cosgriff N, Heniford BT (2008) Operative time and other outcomes of the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (LigaSure) versus other methods for surgical hemostasis: a meta-analysis. Surg Innov 15:284–291
Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Rusin LC, Holubkov R, Schoetz DJ (2006) Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy. A prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 20:263–269
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, S.T., Heeney, A., Pierce, C. et al. Use of an electrothermal bipolar sealing device in ligation of major mesenteric vessels during laparoscopic colorectal resection. Tech Coloproctol 15, 285–289 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0707-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0707-3