Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Rectal sleeve advancement for the treatment of persistent rectovaginal fistulas

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Different surgical procedures are available for rectovaginal fistula repair. Most of these procedures fail in a substantial number of women, especially in those with a persistent fistula after prior attempts at repair. In addition, these procedures have a potential risk of dyspareunia and impairment of continence. The question is whether rectal sleeve advancement could be a valuable option for women with such a persistent rectovaginal fistula. The present study was aimed to examine the feasibility of this new procedure.

Patients and methods

Eight consecutive women (median age 41 years; range 28–53) with a persistent, low rectovaginal fistula underwent rectal sleeve advancement, six patients by a posterior “Kraske” approach and two patients by an abdominal approach. The aetiologies were obstetric trauma (n = 4), prior anal surgery (n = 2) and cryptoglandular fistulous disease (n = 2).

Results

Five patients had an uneventful postoperative course. Three patients encountered recurrent symptoms shortly after the procedure. In these three patients an additional transanal approach was performed to close the anal opening of the fistulous tract. This additional approach was successful in one patient. The median duration of follow-up was 12 months (range 3–17). The overall healing rate was 75%. None of the patients encountered de novo dyspareunia. One patient encountered involuntary loss of stool during the night postoperatively.

Conclusion

Based on these early results, rectal sleeve advancement, either by a posterior “Kraske” approach, or by an abdominal approach, seems to be a valuable alternative for the treatment of persistent rectovaginal fistulas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daniels BT (1949) Rectovaginal fistula: a clinical and pathological study. University of Minnesota Graduate School, Minneapolis, p 84

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belt RL Jr (1969) Repair of anorectal vaginal fistula utilizing segmental advancement of the internal sphincter muscle. Dis Colon Rectum 12:99–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hibbard LT (1978) Surgical management of rectovaginal fistulas and complete perineal tears. Am J Obstet Gynecol 130:139–141

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HC (2001) Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG 108:383–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Venkatesh KS, Ramanujam PS, Larson DM, Haywood MA (1989) Anorectal complications of vaginal delivery. Dis Colon Rectum 32:1039–1041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowry AC, Thorson AG, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM (1982) Repair of simple rectovaginal fistulas. Influence of previous repairs. Dis Colon Rectum 31:676–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rothenberger DA, Christenson CE, Balcos EG et al (1982) Endorectal advancement flap for treatment of simple rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 25:297–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wise WE Jr, Aguilar PS, Padmanabhan A, Meesig DM, Arnold MW, Stewart WR (1991) Surgical treatment of low rectovaginal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 34:271–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones IT, Fazio VW, Jagelman D (1987) The use of transanal rectal advancement flaps in the management of fistulas involving the anorectum. Dis Colon Rectum 30:919–923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. MacRae HM, McLeod RS, Cohen Z, Stern H, Reznick R (1995) Treatment of rectovaginal fistulas that has failed previous repair attempts. Dis Colon Rectum 38:921–925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Watson SJ, Phillips RK (1995) Non-inflammatory rectovaginal fistula. Br J Surg 82:1641–1643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsang CB, Madoff RD, Wong WD et al (1998) Anal sphincter integrity and function influences outcome in rectovaginal fistula repair. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1141–1146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zimmerman DD, Gosselink MP, Briel JW, Schouten WR (2002) The outcome of transanal advancement flap repair of rectovaginal fistulas is not improved by an additional labial fat flap transposition. Tech Coloproctol 6:37–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oom DM, Gosselink MP, Van Dijl VR, Zimmerman DD, Schouten WR (2006) Puborectal sling interposition for the treatment of rectovaginal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 10:125–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Berman IR (1991) Sleeve advancement anorectoplasty for complicated anorectal/vaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 34:1032–1037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hull TL, Fazio VW (1997) Surgical approaches to low anovaginal fistula in Crohn’s disease. Am J Surg 173:95–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marchesa P, Hull TL, Fazio VW (1998) Advancement sleeve flaps for treatment of severe perianal Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 85:1695–1698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Halverson AL, Hull TL, Fazio VW, Church J, Hammel J, Floruta C (2001) Repair of recurrent rectovaginal fistulas. Surgery 130:753–758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Simmang CL, Lacey SW, Huber PJ Jr (1998) Rectal sleeve advancement: repair of rectovaginal fistula associated with anorectal stricture in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 41:787–789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alexander SM, Mitalas LE, Gosselink MP, Oom DM, Zimmerman DD, Schouten WR (2008) Obliteration of the fistulous tract with Bioglue® adversely affects the outcome of transanal advancement flap repair. Tech Coloproctol 12:225–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwandner O, Fuerst A, Kunstreich K, Scherer R (2009) Innovative technique for the closure of rectovaginal fistula using Surgisis™ mesh. Tech Coloproctol 13:135–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Group, Erasmus Medical Center, Room Ba 181’s, Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    W. R. Schouten & D. M. J. Oom

Authors
  1. W. R. Schouten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. M. J. Oom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. M. J. Oom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schouten, W.R., Oom, D.M.J. Rectal sleeve advancement for the treatment of persistent rectovaginal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 13, 289–294 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0535-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0535-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation